Determination of Teachers' Awareness of Environmental Ethics

Abstract

Environmental ethics defines the moral principles governing the relationship between humans and their environment, emphasizing the need for harmony with nature. Raising awareness about environmental issues is believed to be achievable through education, with teachers playing a critical role in this process. This study aims to assess the level of environmental ethics awareness among teachers from various disciplines(classroom,science and social studies teachers) and examine whether variables such as gender, age, field, seniority, educational background, and academic status influence their opinions. The research employed a quantitative survey method, involving 346 teachers from public schools in Elazığ. Participants completed a personal data form and the Environmental Ethics Awareness Scale. The data were analyzed using the MANOVA test. Results indicated no significant differences across all sub-dimensions for teachers graduating from faculties outside the Faculty of Education. However, a significant difference was observed regarding the field variable, while other variables like gender, age, and seniority showed no significant differences. Arithmetic means of teachers’ responses revealed that most opinions were at the "Agree" level across the sub-dimensions, except for specific items. These findings suggest that while teachers generally exhibit awareness of environmental ethics, their views vary depending on their field of expertise. This study highlights the importance of integrating environmental ethics into educational practices to further enhance teachers’ awareness and their ability to address environmental issues effectively. Future research could expand on these findings by exploring other variables and methodologies to provide deeper insights into teachers' environmental ethics awareness.

Keywords

• Environment
• Environmental Ethics
• Teacher

References

1. Altın, M., & Akcanca, N. (2023). Students' self-efficacy regarding environmental education and the relationship between their perceptions of environmental ethics awareness and their ecological citizenship. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 179-197. https://dx.doi.org/10.30855/gjes.2023.09.02.003.
2. Anokye, K., Mohammed, A.S., Agyemang, P., Agya, B.A., Amuah, E.E.Y., & Sodoke, S. (2024). Understanding the perception and awareness of senior high school teachers on the environmental impacts of plastic waste: Implications for sustainable waste education and management. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 100999.
3. Balcı, S., & Ahi, B. (2017).[SPSS user guide Step-by-step data analysis with SPSS]. Anı Yayıncılık.
4. Buzlukçu, C. (2023). The relationship between environmental ethics awareness, environmentally friendly behavior and person-organization fit in eco-friendly hotels, Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, 20(2), 208-226. https://doi.org/10.24010/soid.1281224.
5. Cavaliere, A., Pigliafreddo, S., De Marchi, E., & Banterle, A. (2020). Do consumers really want to reduce plastic usage? Exploring the determinants of plastic avoidance in food-related consumption decisions. Sustainability, 12(22), 9627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229627
6. Ceyhan, B., & Sahin, N. (2018). Teachers’ sensitivity towards technology and environmental ethics. Education Sciences, 8(3), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030121
7. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Oxon: Routledge.
8. Çiller, N. (2023). Determining the environmental ethics cognitive structures and alternative concepts of teacher candidates (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Matematik ve Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı, Konya.

9. Deniz, S. (2019). Investigation of the relationship between environmental ethics awareness and science and technology literacy of pre-service teachers (Yüksek lisans tezi). Siirt Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Siirt.
10. Duru, B., & Bakanay, Ç.D. (2021). Investigation of environmental ethical attitudes of preschool teachers. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 9, 47-63.
11. Ergün, T., & Çobanoğlu, N. (2012). Sustainable development and environmental ethics. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 97-123. https://doi.org/10.1501/sbeder_0000000041.
12. Ertan, B. (2004). 2000’li Yıllarda çevre etiği yaklaşımları ve Türkiye. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 93-108.
13. Göz, K. (2011). Çevre ahlakı ve insan, Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 92-100.
14. Hunter, L.M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004) Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors’. Social Science Quarterly, 85(3), 677-694.
15. Karakaya, F., & Yılmaz, M. (2017). Environmental ethics awareness of teachers. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 7(2), 105-115.
16. Karasar, N. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
17. Kayaer, M. (2013). Çevre ve etik yaklaşımlar. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 63-76.
18. Kırkpınar Özsoy, N., & Çini, P. (2020). An evaluation of anthropocentric global environmental politics in the framework of ecocentric environmental ethics view. Alternatif Politika, 12 (1), 20-49.
19. Laal, M. (2009). Brief history of enviroethics and its challenges. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 2(10).
20. MacDonald, W. L., & Hara, N. (1994). Gender differences in environmental concern among college students. Sex Roles, 31(5-6), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544595.
21. Öğüt Ebil, A. Ö., & İdemen, B. (2010). Planlama ve çevre etiği: Uygulamalı disiplinlerde çevre etiği. Planlama, 20(2), 3-13.
22. Özer, N., & Keleş, Ö. (2016). Çevre etiği farkındalık ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 4(1), 47-64.
23. Palmer, C., McShane, K., & Sandler, R. (2014). Environmental ethics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39(1), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-121112-094434.
24. Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
25. Saka, M., Sürmeli, H., & Öztuna, A. (2009). Which attitudes preservice teachers’ have towards environmental ethics. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2475–2479.
26. Saka, M. (2016). A study of pre service teacher’ critical thinking dispositions as predictors of environmental ethics approaches. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 6(3), 100-115. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.220185 Sandler, R. L. (2013). Environmental virtue ethics. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics (pp. 1665–1674). Blackwell.
27. Somashekara, M., & Praveena, K. B. (2023). A study on environmental behavior in relation to environmental ethics of elementary school teachers of Mysore district. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT, 11(7), b460–b466.
28. Sönmez, D. (2017). Investigation of thesis on environmental ethics in field education and training. Gaziantep University Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 55-66.
29. Sönmez, D. (2019). Investigation of environmental ethics awawreness of science and classroom teacher candidates by different variables. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(4), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.545715.
30. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistic. Pearson Education, Inc.
31. Taşçı, N. (2023). Regarding teachers' environmental ethics determining the sensitivity (Yüksek lisans tezi). Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı, Kastamonu Üniversitesi.
32. Tekiroğlu, A., & Hayır-Kanat, M. (2021). Çevre etiği farkındalığı ve sürdürülebilir çevre tutumu arasındaki ilişki. Ulakbilge Sosyal Bilimleri Dergisi, 59, 630–645. https://doi.org/10.7816/ulakbilge-09-59-11.
33. Tozdan, N. (2022). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin çevre etiği duyuşsal düzeylerinin belirlenmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Aksaray Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İlköğretim Ana Bilim Dalı Fen Bilgisi Eğitimi Bilim Dalı, Aksaray.
34. Uşak, M. (2006). Çevre bilimi. In M. Aydoğdu & K. Gezer (Eds.), Çevre bilimi (pp. 1–9). Anı Yayıncılık. ISBN: 975-6376-81-3.
35. Uysal, İ., & Kılıç, A. (2022). Normal Distribution Dilemma. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 12(1), 220-248. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.962653
36. Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism – statistical data included. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443-457.