Abstract
It has been a period of radical right movements; xenophobia, racism and religious separatism have increased in Europe. Austria, as a country, has allowed the radical right party to come to political power. As the arrival of refugees in Europe continues apace, xenophobia and anti-Muslim sentiment has become more pronounced with the problem showing no signs of abating. In recent years, the populist Austrian Freedom party in Austria has sought to capitalize on such sentiments through the use of xenophobic, anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric, an approach that has raised its profile and garnered attention among the electorate. In following a populist discursive strategy that embraces anti-immigration, anti-Muslim and anti-foreign elements, its advocacy of homogeneity and support for anti-European Union discourses and strategies continue to build political momentum.
The aim of this study is to examine Austria Freedom Party in the context of populism. Austria has chosen to examine as far as possible the rise of the populist far-right in Europe. The reason for choosing Austria; the far right has a very special place in the history of this country, and Austria has a very special place in the history of the far right.
In this study, the nationalist and populist elements of the Austria Freedom Party’s discourse within the context of Austrian politics will be analyzed through Critical Discourse Analysis. Through Critical Discourse Analysis, the period of 2001-2019 will be analyzed and compared. In addition to the methodological originality of the study, its current contribution is to reveal how this populist far-right party in Austria legitimizes their discourse. Newspaper contents, official websites, articles, party programs, public speeches, and social media discourses of the Freedom Party are examined empirically. In the study, a leading and influential politician is selected for this political party. In order to avoid the impression that the focus was the discourse of individual politicians, some pieces of discourse of other members of this party were analyzed, as well as the more general discursive material of the parties, such as party programs.