Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

RECONSIDERING THE PARAMETERS OF CONSTANT ELASTICITY OF SUBSTITUTION PRODUCTION FUNCTION

Yıl 2022, , 1074 - 1090, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.1134380

Öz

This study investigates the properties of constant elasticity of substitution production function. Solving the differential equation which defines elasticity of substitution, this study exactly defines the model parameters of production function. In the literature, in previous variant models, those parameters have been widely accepted as free variables. However, this paper demonstrates that the distribution of production factors and technology (efficiency) parameters are not arbitrarily free constants, but are indeed functions of elasticity of substitution and moreover they determine the limiting behavior of factor productivities. This finding contributes to the literature by reconsidering and revising the relationship between model parameters, factor productivities and rate of growth for output of the economy. The results of this study suggest that the economic implications of limiting behavior of factor productivities are deeper than previously considered. This gives more room to designing alternative growth-enhancing policies across the world.

Kaynakça

  • Acemoglu, D. Introduction To Modern Economic Growth, (Princeton University Press, 2009)
  • Arrow, K.J., Chenery, H.B., Minhas, B.S., Solow, R.M. (1961). Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 43, No. 3, 225-250
  • Azariadis, C. (1996). The economics of poverty traps - Part One: Complete markets. Journal of Economic Growth 1: 449–486.
  • Blanchard, O. J. (1997) The medium run. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2: 89–158.
  • Chirinko, R. S., Fazzari, S. M., Meyer, A. P. (1999). How responsive is business capital formation to its user cost? Journal of Public Economics 74(1): 53–80.
  • Chirinko, R. S. (2002) Corporate taxation, capital formation, and the substitution elasticity between laborand capital. National Tax Journal, 60: 339–355.
  • Chirinko, R. S. (2008). σ: The long and short of it. Journal of Macroeconomics, 30(2): 671–686.
  • Duffy, J., Papageorgiou, C. (2000). A cross-country empirical investigation of the aggregate production function specification. Journal of Economic Growth 5, 87–120.
  • Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J.E., Polya, G. Inequalities (Cambridge University Press, England, 1934)
  • De La Grandville, Olivier. In Quest of the Slutsky Diamond. The American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No. 3, (1989), 468-481
  • De La Grandville, O (1997). Curvature and the elasticity of substitution: Straightening it out. Journal of Economics 66 (1): 23-34
  • De La Grandville, O. Economic growth: a unified approach. 1th Edition. (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
  • Guo, J. T., Lansing, K. J. (2009). Capital-labour substitution and equilibrium indeterminacy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33(12): 1991–2000.
  • Jones, C. I. (2005). The shape of production functions and the direction of technical change. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2): 517–549.
  • Klump, R. (2001) Trade, money and employment in intertemporal optimizing models of growth. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development1 0(4): 411–428.
  • Klump, R., De La Grandville, O. (2000). Economic Growth and Elasticity of Substitution: Two Theorems and Some Suggestions. The American Economic Review, 90, 282-291.
  • Klump, R., McAdam, P., Willman, A. (2007). Factor substitution and factor-augmenting technical progress in the US. Review of Economics and Statistics 89(1): 183–92.
  • Klump, R., McAdam, P., Willman, A. (2012). The normalized CES production function: Theory and empirics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26: 769-799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00730.x
  • Le ́on-Ledesma, M. A., McAdam, P. and Willman, A. (2010a) Identifying the elasticity of substitution with biased technical change. American Economic Review 100(4): 1330–1357.
  • Mallick, D. (2012). The role of the elasticity of substitution in economic growth: A cross-country investigation. Labour Economics, 19, 682-694.
  • McAdam, P., Willman, A. (2013). Medium run redux. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 17(4), 695-727. doi:10.1017/S1365100511000459
  • Ozkaya, A. (2021). Inada conditions asymptotically transform production function into the Cobb–Douglas, Economics Letters, 109786.
  • Palivos, T., Karagiannis, G. (2010). The elasticity of substitution as an engine of growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 14, 617 - 628.
  • Rowthorn, R. (1999). Unemployment, wage bargaining and capital-labour substitution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23(4): 413–425.
  • Saam, M. (2008). Openness to trade as a determinant of the macroeconomic elasticity of substitution. Journal of Macroeconomics, 30: 691–702
  • Solow, Robert M. A. (1956). Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, no. 1: 65-94.
  • Ventura, J. (1997) Growth and interdependence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62: 57–84.
  • Yuhn, K. (1991). Economic Growth, Technical Change Biases, and the Elasticity of Substitution: A Test of the De La Grandville Hypothesis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 340-346.

SABİT İKAME ESNEKLİĞİ ÜRETİM FONKSİYONUNUN PARAMETRELERİNİN YENİDEN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2022, , 1074 - 1090, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.1134380

Öz

Bu çalışmamız sabit ikame esnekliği üretim fonksiyonunun özelliklerini incelemektedir. Sabit ikame esnekliğini tanımlayan diferansiyel denklemin çözülmesiyle, bu çalışmada üretim fonksiyonuna ait yapısal değişkenler tam olarak elde edilmektedir. Literatürde ve daha önce modellenmiş sabit ikame esnekliği üretim fonksiyonlarında bu parametrelerin serbest olduğu varsayılmaktaydı. Hâlbuki bu çalışma üretim faktörlerinin dağılımı ve verimlilik parametrelerinin gelişigüzel sabitler olmadığını, ikame esnekliğinin birer fonksiyonu olduklarını ispat etmektedir. Ayrıca, bu iki değişken böylelikle, faktör üretkenliğinin sınır değer davranışlarını da açıklamaktadır. Bu bulgu, model parametreleri, faktör üretkenliği ve ekonomik büyüme hızı arasındaki ilişkinin tekrar ele alınması açısından literatüre katkı sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları ek olarak faktör üretkenliklerinin sınır koşullardaki davranışını bilmenin daha zengin ekonomi-politik uygulamalara imkân tanıdığını göstermektedir. Böylelikle politika yapıcılar açısından, ekonomik büyüme hızını artırmayı hedefleyen alternatif politikalara alan açılmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Acemoglu, D. Introduction To Modern Economic Growth, (Princeton University Press, 2009)
  • Arrow, K.J., Chenery, H.B., Minhas, B.S., Solow, R.M. (1961). Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 43, No. 3, 225-250
  • Azariadis, C. (1996). The economics of poverty traps - Part One: Complete markets. Journal of Economic Growth 1: 449–486.
  • Blanchard, O. J. (1997) The medium run. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2: 89–158.
  • Chirinko, R. S., Fazzari, S. M., Meyer, A. P. (1999). How responsive is business capital formation to its user cost? Journal of Public Economics 74(1): 53–80.
  • Chirinko, R. S. (2002) Corporate taxation, capital formation, and the substitution elasticity between laborand capital. National Tax Journal, 60: 339–355.
  • Chirinko, R. S. (2008). σ: The long and short of it. Journal of Macroeconomics, 30(2): 671–686.
  • Duffy, J., Papageorgiou, C. (2000). A cross-country empirical investigation of the aggregate production function specification. Journal of Economic Growth 5, 87–120.
  • Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J.E., Polya, G. Inequalities (Cambridge University Press, England, 1934)
  • De La Grandville, Olivier. In Quest of the Slutsky Diamond. The American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No. 3, (1989), 468-481
  • De La Grandville, O (1997). Curvature and the elasticity of substitution: Straightening it out. Journal of Economics 66 (1): 23-34
  • De La Grandville, O. Economic growth: a unified approach. 1th Edition. (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
  • Guo, J. T., Lansing, K. J. (2009). Capital-labour substitution and equilibrium indeterminacy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33(12): 1991–2000.
  • Jones, C. I. (2005). The shape of production functions and the direction of technical change. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2): 517–549.
  • Klump, R. (2001) Trade, money and employment in intertemporal optimizing models of growth. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development1 0(4): 411–428.
  • Klump, R., De La Grandville, O. (2000). Economic Growth and Elasticity of Substitution: Two Theorems and Some Suggestions. The American Economic Review, 90, 282-291.
  • Klump, R., McAdam, P., Willman, A. (2007). Factor substitution and factor-augmenting technical progress in the US. Review of Economics and Statistics 89(1): 183–92.
  • Klump, R., McAdam, P., Willman, A. (2012). The normalized CES production function: Theory and empirics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26: 769-799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00730.x
  • Le ́on-Ledesma, M. A., McAdam, P. and Willman, A. (2010a) Identifying the elasticity of substitution with biased technical change. American Economic Review 100(4): 1330–1357.
  • Mallick, D. (2012). The role of the elasticity of substitution in economic growth: A cross-country investigation. Labour Economics, 19, 682-694.
  • McAdam, P., Willman, A. (2013). Medium run redux. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 17(4), 695-727. doi:10.1017/S1365100511000459
  • Ozkaya, A. (2021). Inada conditions asymptotically transform production function into the Cobb–Douglas, Economics Letters, 109786.
  • Palivos, T., Karagiannis, G. (2010). The elasticity of substitution as an engine of growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 14, 617 - 628.
  • Rowthorn, R. (1999). Unemployment, wage bargaining and capital-labour substitution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23(4): 413–425.
  • Saam, M. (2008). Openness to trade as a determinant of the macroeconomic elasticity of substitution. Journal of Macroeconomics, 30: 691–702
  • Solow, Robert M. A. (1956). Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, no. 1: 65-94.
  • Ventura, J. (1997) Growth and interdependence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62: 57–84.
  • Yuhn, K. (1991). Economic Growth, Technical Change Biases, and the Elasticity of Substitution: A Test of the De La Grandville Hypothesis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 340-346.
Toplam 28 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ata Özkaya 0000-0001-7974-5600

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ağustos 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 22 Haziran 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022

Kaynak Göster

APA Özkaya, A. (2022). RECONSIDERING THE PARAMETERS OF CONSTANT ELASTICITY OF SUBSTITUTION PRODUCTION FUNCTION. Uluslararası Anadolu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(3), 1074-1090. https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.1134380

19792  21391 18309     

Our journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License