THE IMPACT OF POPULAR SUPPORT ON TERRORIST GROUP SURVIVAL: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PKK AND THE SHINING PATH
Abstract
Why do some terrorist groups survive for decades while others collapse despite sharing similar contexts? This study argues that variation in popular support plays a crucial but often overlooked role as a causal explanation for the longevity of terrorist group. Drawing on a comparative, process-tracing analysis of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and Sendero Luminoso (Shining Path), the article shows that the longevity of terrorist groups depends on the maintenance of popular support which activates the mechanisms of resource mobilization and post-shock adaptation (organizational and ideological). While both groups emerged from marginalized rural bases and faced harsh counterterrorism campaigns, their survival trajectories sharply diverged. The PKK survived intense counterterrorism and leadership decapitation through continued popular support, whereas the Shining Path’s violence against civilians rapidly eroded its social base, making it vulnerable to collapse after Guzman’s arrest. The findings in this study contribute to terrorism literature by theorizing popular support as a dynamic causal mechanism and offer policy implications for counterterrorism strategies by emphasizing legitimacy and civilian engagement.
Keywords
References
- • Akçınaroğlu, Seden and Tokdemir, Efe (2018), “To instill fear or love: Terrorist groups and the strategy of building reputation”, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 35 (4), pp. 355-377.
- • Akkaya, Ahmet Hamdi and Jongerden, Joost (2012), “Reassembling the Political: The PKK and the Project of Radical Democracy”, European Journal of Turkish Studies, 14, pp. 1-19.
- • Akkaya, Ahmet Hamdi and Jongerden, Joost (2013), “Confederalism and autonomy in Turkey: The Kurdistan Workers’ Party and the reinvention of democracy”, in (eds. by Cengiz Güneş and Welat Zeydanlıoğlu) The Kurdish Question in Turkey: New Perspectives on Violence, Representation, and Reconciliation, London: Routledge, pp. 186-204.
- • Asal, Victor and Rethemeyer, R. Karl (2008), “The Nature of the Beast: Organizational Structures and the Lethality of Terrorist Attacks”, The Journal of Politics, 70 (2), pp. 437-449.
- • Berman, Eli (2009), Radical, Religious, and Violent: The New Economics of Terrorism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- • Bhattacharya, Srobana (2017), “Comparing Civilian Support for Terrorism”, Journal of Strategic Security, 10 (2), pp. 1-32.
- • Blomberg, S. Brock, Engel, Rozlyn C. & Sawyer, Reid (2009), “On the Duration and Sustainability of Transnational Terrorist Organizations”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54 (2), pp. 303-330.
- • Blomberg, S. Brock, Gaibulloev, Khusrav & Sandler, Todd (2011), “Terrorist Group Survival: Ideology, Tactics, and Base of Operations”, Public Choice, 149 (3-4), pp. 441-463.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
International Security, Terrorism in International Relations
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
March 2, 2026
Submission Date
February 14, 2026
Acceptance Date
February 23, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 7 Number: 1