Gastronomik Estetiğin Yeni Dili: Tabak Tasarımında ChatGPT'nin Pratik Bir Uygulaması

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, tabak tasarım sürecinde sosların estetik kullanımı için yaratıcı bir yapay zeka aracı olan ChatGPT’yi kullanarak görsel rehber hazırlamak ve uygulanabilirliğini ortaya koymaktır. Aynı zamanda görselliğin yemek deneyimini önemli ölçüde etkilediği gerçeğinden hareketle, tasarım unsurlarının sistematik bir şekilde kullanımı üzerinde durulmuştur. Çalışma, nokta, çizgi, şekil, doku, renk, form, ton/ışık/gölge ve alan gibi temel tasarım öğelerini inceleyerek, sosların tabak tasarımında nasıl yaratıcı bir biçimde uygulanabileceğini analiz etmektedir. Bu süreçte, yapay zeka destekli bir yaklaşım benimsenmiş ve ChatGPT’nin sunduğu öneriler değerlendirilerek görsel bir rehber oluşturulmuştur. Yapay zekanın yaratıcı karar alma süreçlerine nasıl katkı sağlayabileceği, tasarım öğelerinin çeşitliliğini artırma ve uygulanabilirlik açısından uzman değerlendirmeleriyle incelenmiştir. Bulgular, ChatGPT’nin sunduğu tasarım önerilerinin gastronomik sunumlarda inovatif kullanım alanları oluşturduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, çalışma hem teorik hem de pratik anlamda gastronomi ve mutfak sanatları alanında yenilikçi bir perspektif sunmaktadır. Gastronomi eğitiminde yaratıcı düşünmeyi teşvik edici bir kaynak olarak da değerlendirilebilir. Bu bağlamda, yapay zekanın mutfak sanatlarıyla etkileşimi yeni araştırmalara zemin hazırlayabilir niteliktedir.

Keywords

• Tabak Tasarımı
• Gastronomi
• Yapay Zeka Araçları
• ChatGPT
• Mutfakta Görsel Estetik
• Uygulanabilirlik

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmanın, özgün bir çalışma olduğunu; çalışmanın hazırlık, veri toplama, analiz ve bilgilerin sunumu olmak üzere tüm aşamalarından bilimsel etik ilke ve kurallarına uygun davrandığımı; bu çalışma kapsamında elde edilmeyen tüm veri ve bilgiler için kaynak gösterdiğimi ve bu kaynaklara kaynakçada yer verdiğimi; kullanılan verilerde herhangi bir değişiklik yapmadığımı, çalışmanın Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)' in tüm şartlarını ve koşullarını kabul ederek etik görev ve sorumluluklara riayet ettiğimi beyan ederim.

The New Language of Gastronomic Aesthetics: A Practical Application of ChatGPT in Plate Design

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to prepare a visual guide for the aesthetic use of sauces in plate design by utilizing ChatGPT as a creative artificial intelligence tool and to demonstrate its applicability. Based on the fact that visual appeal significantly impacts the dining experience, the study emphasizes the systematic use of design elements. It examines fundamental design components such as points, lines, shapes, texture, color, form, tone/light/shadow, and space, analyzing how sauces can be creatively applied in plate design. In this process, an AI-assisted approach has been adopted, and ChatGPT's recommendations have been evaluated to create a visual guide. The study also investigates how artificial intelligence contributes to creative decision-making, enhances the diversity of design elements, and evaluates its feasibility through expert assessments. The findings indicate that ChatGPT’s design recommendations provide innovative applications for gastronomic presentations. Ultimately, this study offers a novel perspective in both theoretical and practical aspects of gastronomy and culinary arts. It can also be considered as a resource that encourages creative thinking in gastronomy education. In this context, the interaction of artificial intelligence with culinary arts can pave the way for new research.

Keywords

• Plate Design
• Gastronomy
• AI Tools
• ChatGPT
• Visual Aesthetics in Cuisine
• Applicability

References

1. Aftab, O., Khan, H., VanderBeek, B. L., Scoles, D., Kim, B. J., & Tsui, J. C. (2025). Evaluation of ChatGPT-4 in Detecting Referable Diabetic Retinopathy Using Single Fundus Images. AJO International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100111.
2. Al-Mamary, Y. H., & Abubakar, A. A. (2025). Empowering ChatGPT adoption in higher education: A comprehensive analysis of university students' intention to adopt artificial intelligence using self-determination and technology-to-performance chain theories. The Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101015.
3. Ambrose, G., & Harris, P. (2008). Yaratıcı Tasarımın Temel Prensipleri. İstanbul: Bilge Adam Yayınları. Apicius. (1936). Cooking and dining in imperial Rome (J. D. Vehling, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Orijinal eser 1. yüzyılda yayınlanmıştır)
4. Becer, E. (2002). İletişim ve Grafik Tasarım (3. Baskı). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi.
5. Bekiroğlu, N., & Özgür, E. G. (2025). Can Chatgpt Be Used As An Education Assistant İn the field of health sciences? Examining with the integration of meta-analysis and co-citation analysis. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41925.
6. Bell, R., Meiselman, H. L., Pierson, B. J., & Reeve, W. G. (1994). Effects of adding an Italian theme to a restaurant on the perceived ethnicity, acceptability, and selection of foods. Appetite. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1994.1002. Bingol, M. P., & Ozkaya, F. (2020). Gastronomi ve Mutfak Sanatları Alanında Temel Sanat Eğitimi Uygulamaları. İnönü Üniversitesi Kültür ve Sanat Dergisi, 6(1), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.22252/ijca.733449.
7. Biswas, S. S. (2023). Role of chat gpt in public health. Annals of biomedical engineering, 51(5), 868-869. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03172-7.
8. Boduroğlu, E., Koç, O., & Yiğiter, M. S. (2023). Madde Güçlüklerinin Tahmin Edilmesinde Uzman Görüşleri ve ChatGPT Performansının Karşılaştırılması. Disiplinlerarası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(15), 202-210. https://doi.org/10.57135/jier.1296255.

9. Bohn, C., Hand, C., Tannir, S., Ulrich, M., Saniei, S., Girod-Hoffman, M., ... & Forsythe, B. (2025). American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery OrthoInfo provides more readable information regarding meniscus injury than ChatGPT-4 while information accuracy is comparable. Journal of ISAKOS. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100843.
10. Brown, J. N. (2005). Integrating Eisner’s arts education philosophy into culinary arts education. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 4(1), s. 89-90. https://doi.org/10.1300/J385v04n01_10.
11. Butler, Y. G., & Jiang, S. (2025). How do pre-service language teachers perceive generative AIs’ affordance?: A case of ChatGPT. System, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103606.
12. Califano, G., & Spence, C. (2024). Assessing the visual appeal of real/AI-generated food images. Food Quality and Preference, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105149.
13. Califano, G., Zhang, T., & Spence, C. (2024). Would you trust an AI chef? Examining what people think when AI becomes creative with food. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100973.
14. Chen, A., Xiang, M., Zhou, J., Jia, J., Shang, J., Li, X., ... & Fan, Y. (2025). Unpacking help-seeking process through multimodal learning analytics: A comparative study of ChatGPT vs Human expert. Computers & Education, 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105198.
15. Çağlayan, E. (2019). Temel sanat eğitimi dersinin gastronomi ve mutfak sanatları eğitimindeki yeri ve önemi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), 3084-3095. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.629732. de Vries, P. L. M., Baud, D., Baggio, S., Ceulemans, M., Favre, G., Gerbier, E., ... & Panchaud, A. (2025). Enhancing perinatal health patient information through ChatGPT–An accuracy study. PEC Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100381.
16. Değerli, A. H., & Tatlisu, N. B. (2023). Cooking With Chatgpt And Bard: A Study On Competencies Of Aı Tools On Recipe Correction, Adaption, Time Management And Presentation. Journal Of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 11(4), 2658-2673. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2023.1312.
17. Delwiche, J. F. (2012). You eat with your eyes first. Physiology & behavior, 107(4), 502-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.07.007.
18. Deng, J., & Lin, Y. (2023). The benefits and challenges of ChatGPT: An overview. Benefits, 2(2), 2022. DOI: 10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465.
19. Deng, J., Li, L., Oosterhof, J. J., Malliaras, P., Silbernagel, K. G., Breda, S. J., ... & de Vos, R. J. (2025). ChatGPT is a comprehensive education tool for patients with patellar tendinopathy, but it currently lacks accuracy and readability. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103275.
20. Deroy, O., Michel, C., Piqueras-Fiszman, B., & Spence, C. (2014). The plating manifesto (I): From decoration to creation. Flavour, 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-3-6.
21. Deveci, M. (2022). Yapay Zekâ Uygulamalarının Sanat ve Tasarım Alanlarına Yansıması. Vankulu Sosyal Araștırmalar Dergisi, 9, 119-140. https://doi.org/10.55089/yyuvasad.1115961.
22. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.
23. Edman, I. (1977). Sanat ve İnsan Estetiğe Giriş (2. Baskı). (Çev: T. Oğuzkan). İstanbul: İnkılap ve Aka Kitabevleri. Gezer, Ü. (2019). Çağdaş Sanat ve Tasarim Eğitiminde Görsel Tasarim Ögeleri ve İlkeleri. Ulakbilge Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(40), 595-614.
24. González, R., Poenaru, D., Woo, R., Trappey III, A. F., Carter, S., Darcy, D., ... & Pediatric Surgery ChatGPT Collaborative Group. (2024). ChatGPT: What every pediatric surgeon should know about its potential uses and pitfalls. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 59(5), 941-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.01.007.
25. Göktaş, L. S. (2023). The Role Of Chatgpt İn Vegetarian Menus. Tourism and Recreation, 5(2), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.53601/tourismandrecreation.1343598.
26. Hahn, A. K., Connors, G. M., Megalla, M., Grace, Z. T., Croen, B. J., Mancini, M. R., ... & Coyner, K. J. (2025). Use of ChatGPT vs. Google web search in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: from a patient’s perspective. In Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2024.11.005.
27. Harrar, V., & Spence, C. (2013). The taste of cutlery: how the taste of food is affected by the weight, size, shape, and colour of the cutlery used to eat it. Flavour, 2, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-2-21.
28. Hou, Y., Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2017). Do pictures help? The effects of pictures and food names on menu evaluations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.008.
29. Huang, Y., Wang, W., Zhou, J., Zhang, L., Lin, J., Liu, H., ... & Dong, W. (2025). Integrative modeling enables ChatGPT to achieve average level of human counselors performance in mental health Q&A. Information Processing & Management, 62(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104152.
30. İbiş, S. (2025). Yapay Zekâ Teknolojilerinin Gastronomi Turizminde Kullanımı: Chatgpt Örneği. Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 109-131. https://doi.org/10.32572/guntad.1518594.
31. Jackson, S. (2023). Is AI a good alternative for photography?, Erişim Linki: https://www.slerp.com/blog/2023/05/16/is-ai-a-good-alternative-for-photography/ , Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2025.
32. Jacob, T. P., Bizotto, B. L. S., & Sathiyanarayanan, M. (2024, April). Constructing the ChatGPT for PDF files with langchain–AI. In 2024 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT) (pp. 835-839). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICICT60155.2024.10544643.
33. Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2025). Rhetorical distinctions: Comparing metadiscourse in essays by ChatGPT and students. English for Specific Purposes, 79, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2025.03.001.
34. Kansaksiri, P., Panomkhet, P., & Tantisuwichwong, N. (2023). Smart cuisine: Generative recipe & chatgpt powered nutrition assistance for sustainable cooking. Procedia Computer Science, 225, 2028-2036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.193.
35. Khizar, H. M. U., Ashraf, A., Yuan, J., & Al-Waqfi, M. (2025). Insights into ChatGPT adoption (or resistance) in research practices: The behavioral reasoning perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124047.
36. Kıvrak, O., Çelik, C., Hatipoğlu, S., & Koç, K. (2024). Yapay Zeka Destekli Gastronomi Turizmi: Turistlerin Damak Tadına Göre Kişisel Restoran Öneri Sistemleri. UGTAK, 8. Uluslararası Gastronomi Turizmi Araştırmaları Kongresi, ss. 47-49.
37. Kim, J., Lee, S. Y., Kim, J. H., Shin, D. H., Oh, E. H., Kim, J. A., & Cho, J. W. (2024). ChatGPT vs. sleep disorder specialist responses to common sleep queries: Ratings by experts and laypeople. Sleep Health, 10(6), 665-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2024.08.011.
38. Kocaman, Ş. (2021). Grafik tasarım endüstrisinde yapay zekâ. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 8(77), 3000-3016. http://dx.doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.2843.
39. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. Relc Journal, 54(2), 537-550. DOI: 10.1177/00336882231162868.
40. Krettek, C. (2023). ChatGPT. Die Unfallchirurgie, 126(3), 252-254.
41. Lee, J. S., Kim, S. A., Kim, T., Lee, S., Kim, T. H., & Kang, J. W. (2024). Exploring Korean Medicine professions' perspectives on the applicability of ChatGPT in facial palsy practice: A web-based survey. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102422.
42. Lewandowski, M., Łukowicz, P., Świetlik, D., & Barańska-Rybak, W. (2024). ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 dermatological knowledge level based on the Specialty Certificate Examination in Dermatology. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 49(7), 686-691. DOI: 10.1093/ced/llad255.
43. Manierre, M., Propst, L., Cohen, A., & Rogers, J. (2025). Coexisting with ChatGPT: Evaluating a tool for AI-based paper revision. Computers and Composition, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102923.
44. Masruroh, B., Wibawa, A. P., Harianti, L. R., Djoumoi, A., Maysa, F., Ningrum, V. S., ... & Anugrah, P. (2023). Unveiling The Most Delicious Foods İn The World By Artificial Intelligence And Google Trends. Bulletin Of Culinary Art And Hospitality, 3(2), 3. DOI: 10.17977/um069v3i22023p52-58.
45. Mei, P., Brewis, D. N., Nwaiwu, F., Sumanathilaka, D., Alva-Manchego, F., & Demaree-Cotton, J. (2025). ‘‘If ChatGPT can do it, where is my creativity?’’Generative AI boosts performance but diminishes experience in a creative writing task. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100140.
46. Michel, C., Velasco, C., Fraemohs, P., & Spence, C. (2015). Studying the impact of plating on ratings of the food served in a naturalistic dining context. Appetite, 90, 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.030.
47. Michel, C., Velasco, C., Gatti, E., & Spence, C. (2014). A taste of Kandinsky: Assessing the influence of the artistic visual presentation of food on the dining experience. Flavour, 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-3-7.
48. Miller, E. J., Steward, B. A., Witkower, Z., Sutherland, C. A., Krumhuber, E. G., & Dawel, A. (2023). AI hyperrealism: Why AI faces are perceived as more real than human ones. Psychological Science, 34(12), 1390-1403. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231207095.
49. O’Hara, C., Kent, G., Flynn, A. C., Gibney, E. R., & Timon, C. M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence to estimate the nutritional content of meal photos: an evaluation of ChatGPT-4. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 83(OCE4), E336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665124005743.
50. O’Hara, C., Kent, G., Flynn, A. C., Gibney, E. R., & Timon, C. M. (2025). An Evaluation of ChatGPT for Nutrient Content Estimation from Meal Photographs. Nutrients, 17(4), 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17040607.
51. Ogrinc, M., Koroušić Seljak, B., & Eftimov, T. (2024). Zero-shot evaluation of ChatGPT for food named-entity recognition and linking. Frontiers in nutrition, 11. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1429259.
52. Öngen, A. G. (2011). Görsel tasarım öğeleri bağlamında Selçuklu halıları (Tİ EM’Ndeki örnekler üzerine Bir araştırma) (Master's thesis, Marmara Universitesi (Turkey)).
53. Özsoy, V., & Mamur, N. (2019). Görsel Sanatlar Öğrenme ve Öğretim Yaklaşımları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
54. Park, A., & Kim, T. (2025). Code suggestions and explanations in programming learning: Use of ChatGPT and performance. The International Journal of Management Education, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101119.
55. Pedersan, L, B. (2012). Creativity in gastronomy. (Yayınlanmamış lisansüstü tezi). Copenhagen Business School, Kophenhag.
56. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Alcaide, J., Roura, E., & Spence, C. (2012). Is it the plate or is it the food? Assessing the influence of the color (black or white) and shape of the plate on the perception of the food placed on it. Food quality and preference, 24(1), 205-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.011.
57. Prazeres, F. (2025). ChatGPT’s Performance on Portuguese Medical Examination Questions: Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT-3.5 Turbo and ChatGPT-4o Mini. JMIR Medical Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/65108.
58. Sarrion, E. (2023). What Is ChatGPT?. In Exploring the power of ChatGPT: Applications, techniques, and implications (pp. 3-8). Berkeley, CA: Apress.
59. Shamburg, C., Zieger, L., Mason, D., Amerman, T., & Zieger, H. (2025). Teachers and ChatGPT: The first wave on TikTok. Teaching and Teacher Education, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.104993.
60. Sipahi, S., Ekincek, S., & Yılmaz, H. (2017). Gastronominin sanatsal kimliğinin estetik üzerinden incelenmesi. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 5(3), s. 381-396. DOI: 10.21325/jotags.2017.100.
61. Spence, C., & Piqueras-Fiszman, B. (2014). The perfect meal: the multisensory science of food and dining. John Wiley & Sons.
62. Spence, C., Harrar, V., & Piqueras-Fiszman, B. (2012). Assessing the impact of the tableware and other contextual variables on multisensory flavour perception. Flavour, 1, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-1-7.
63. Spence, C., Levitan, C. A., Shankar, M. Ü. ve Zampini, M. (2010). Does food color influence taste and flavor perception in humans?. Chemosensory perception, 3, 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-010-9067-z.
64. Stewart, P. C., & Goss, E. (2013). Plate shape and colour interact to influence taste and quality judgments. Flavour, 2, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-2-27.
65. Şen, E. & Atiker, B. (2020). Grafik tasarım uygulamalarında yeni bir aktör: Yapay zekâ. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 7(63), 3946-3957. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.2250.
66. Şener, E., & Ulu, E. K. (2024). Culinary Innovation: Will The Future Of Chefs' Creativity Be Shaped By Aı Technologies?. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 72(3), 340-352. https://doi.org/10.37741/t.72.3.4.
67. Tabanli, A., & Demirkiran, N. D. (2025). Comparing ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 in Low Back Pain Patient Education: Addressing Strengths, Limitations, and Psychosocial Challenges. World Neurosurgery, 196, 123755. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123755.
68. Teo, Y.S. (2022, 29 Eylül). Görsel Tasarımın Temel Öğeleri ve İlkeleri. Etkileşim Tasarımı Vakfı-IxDF. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/the-building-blocks-of-visual-design.
69. Thelwall, M., Jiang, X., & Bath, P. A. (2025). Estimating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT. Information Processing & Management, 62(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104123.
70. Torrico, D. D. (2025). The Potential Use of ChatGPT as a Sensory Evaluator of Chocolate Brownies: A Brief Case Study. Foods, 14(3), 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030464.
71. Uçar, M. (2023). Modernden Postmoderne, Sanatta Estetik Deneyimin Dönüşümü. Akademik Sanat, (20), 141-153. DOİ: 10.34189/asd.2023.20.010.
72. Uçuk, C. (2017). Gastronomide tabak tasarım teknikleri ve yenilikçi sunum anlayışları. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Gazintep.
73. Vehling, J. D. (1977). Cookery and dining in imperial Rome. Courier Corporation.
74. Wansink, B., & Van Ittersum, K. (2012). Fast food restaurant lighting and music can reduce calorie intake and increase satisfaction. Psychological reports, 111(1), 228-232. doi: 10.2466/01.PR0.111.4.228-232.
75. Welsby, P., & Cheung, B. M. (2023). ChatGPT. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 99(1176), 1047-1048.
76. Wong, W. (1991). Principles of two-dimensional design. John Wiley ve Sons.
77. Wu, D. C., Li, W., Wu, J., Hu, M., & Shen, S. (2025). How well can ChatGPT forecast tourism demand?. Tourism Management, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105119.
78. Xu, J., & Liu, Q. (2025). Uncurtaining windows of motivation, enjoyment, critical thinking, and autonomy in AI-integrated education: Duolingo Vs. ChatGPT. Learning and Motivation, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102100.
79. Yıldız, Ş., & Turunç, Y. (2019). Moda tasarımcısı Issey Mıyake’nin koleksiyonlarının tasarım ögeleri bakımından incelenmesi. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 560-577. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.618732.
80. Yiğit, S. (2023). Yapay Zekâ Gastronomi Eğitimine Katkı Sunabilir Mi? Chatgpt Örneği (Yapay Zeka Gastronomi Eğitimine Katkı Sağlayabilir Mi? Chatgpt Örneği). Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 11 (3), 1970-1982. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2023.1276.
81. Yolcu, E. (2004). Sanat eğitimi kuramları ve yöntemleri. (1. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım
82. Zelený, J., Kalabisová, J., Stupková, L. C., Melas, D., & Turnerová, L. (2024, May). Bibliometric Analysis On Chatgpt İn Tourism, Hospitality, And Gastronomy: Papers Published İn 2023. In International Conference On Management, Tourism And Technologies (Pp. 336-346). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
83. Zhang, C., Wang, L. H., & Rice, R. E. (2025). US College Students’ Acceptability and Educational Benefits of ChatGPT from a Digital Divide Perspective (CAEAI-D-24-00352R2). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100385.
84. Zhu, J. J., Jiang, J., Yang, M., & Ren, Z. J. (2023). ChatGPT and environmental research. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(46), 17667-17670. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01818.