SİLİKAT ESASLI REÇİNE KATKILI KUM TİPİ ZEMİN ÖRNEKLERİNİN KESME MUKAVEMETİ PARAMETRELERİ VE DEFORMABİLİTE ÖZELLİKLERİ

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 142 - 153, 31.12.2024

Eren Kömürlü

https://doi.org/10.62301/usmtd.1544512

Abstract

Bu çalışmada farklı oranlarda silikat bazlı polimer reçine eklenmiş siltli kum türü bir zeminin makaslama dayanımı, tek eksenli sıkışma dayanımı (UCS) değerleri ve deformabilite özellikleri bir dizi deneysel çalışma ile incelenmiştir. Reçine oranı arttıkça UCS ve makaslama dayanımı degerleri artmasına rağmen içsel sürtünme açısının azaldığı belirlenmiştir. Reçine içeriği artışına bağlı dayanım değerini iyileştiren ana etkenin kohezyon artışı olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Kohezyon ve içsel sürtünme açısı değerleri ile Mohr&Coulomb yenilme ölçütüne gore hesaplanan UCS (UCSc) değerlerinin direk UCS deneyinden elde edilen değerlerden 2.6-3.0 kat düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu bulguya göre, Mohr&Coulomb yenilme ölçütünün reçineli kumları iyi temsil edemediği sonucuna varılmıştır. UCS/UCSc arasındaki arasındaki oranın reçine oranı artışı ile biraz azaldığı bulunmuştur. Bir diğer ifade ile bağlayıcı içeriği düşük olan numunelerde Mohr&Coulomb yenilme ölçütünün daha hatalı sonuçlar verdiği belirlenmiştir. Reçine oranının artışı ile numunelerin hem elastisite modülü hem de süneklik özelliklerinde anlamlı artışlar görülmüştür. Silikat bazlı polimer reçine bağlayıcının önemli bir avantajı olarak zeminlerin tokluk ve enerji emme kapasitesi özelliklerinde önemli artışlar sağlayabildiği değerlendirilmiştir.

Keywords

Reçine katkılı kumlar, Zemin iyileştirme, Silikat esaslı reçine, Zemin makaslama kutusu deneyi, Bağlayıcılı zeminlerin sıkışma dayanımları

SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS AND DEFORMABILITY PROPERTIES OF SILICATE-BASED RESIN ADDED SAND-TYPE SOIL SPECIMENS

Abstract

In this study, the shear strength, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) values and deformability properties of silicate-based polymer resin added silty sand type soil specimens were examined through a series of experimental studies. Although the UCS and shear strength values increased, minor decreases in the internal friction angle values were measured as the resin ratio increased. It was determined that the main reason for the improvement in strength values due to the increase in resin content is the increase in cohesion values. It was found that the UCS values calculated according to the cohesion and internal friction angle parameters of the Mohr & Coulomb failure criterion (UCSc) were 2.6-3.0 times lower than the values obtained from the direct UCS experiment. According to this finding, it was concluded that the Mohr & Coulomb failure criterion is not properly usable to represent the mechanical behaviors of resin added sands. As another outcome, the ratio between UCS/UCSc slightly decreased with an increase in the resin amount. In other words, it has been determined that the Mohr&Coulomb failure criterion gives a bit more inaccurate results for the specimens with low binder contents. With the increase in the resin content ratio, significant increases were obtained in both elastic modulus and ductility properties of the samples. It has been evaluated that the silicate-based polymer resin binder is advantageous to provide significant increases in the toughness and energy absorption capacity of soils.

Keywords

Resin stabilized sands, Soil improvement, Silicate based resins, Shear box test, Compressive strengths of binder added sands

References

• D. Guner, H. Ozturk, Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Effects of Curing Time on Tensile Mechanical Properties of Thin Spray-on Liners, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 49 (2016) 3205–3222.
• K.G. Holter, Performance of EVA-Based Membranes for SCL in Hard Rock, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 49 (2016) 1329–1358.
• E. Komurlu, A resin type additive use to improve load bearing capacities of grouted rock bolts exposed to thermal cycles, Journal of Engineering Sciences and Designs, 11(2) (2023) 743-754.
• M.M.S. Sabri, N.I. Vatin, K.A.M. Alsaffar, Soil Injection Technology Using an Expandable Polyurethane Resin: A Review, Polymers, 13 (2021) 3666.
• P. Kolapo, M. Onifade, K.O. Said, M. Amwaama, A.E. Aladejare, A.I. Lawal, P.O. Akinseye, On the Application of the Novel Thin Spray-on Liner (TSL): A Progress Report in Mining Operations. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 39 (2021) 5445–5477.
• E. Komurlu, High-density polyurethane rigid foam usability as liner support material in rock engineering. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,13 (2020) 422.
• E. Komurlu, A. Kesimal, U. Colak, Polyurea type Thin Spray-on Liner Coating to Prevent Rock Bolt Corrosion. 8th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, 2014, pp. 1389-1397, Sapporo, Japan.
• P.K. Kolay, B. Dhakal, Geotechnical Properties and Microstructure of Liquid Polymer Amended Fine-Grained Soils, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38 (2020) 2479–2491.
• E. Komurlu, Use of Polymeric Energy Absorption Liners to Improve the Concrete Rock Fall Barriers, Geoscience Engineering, 67(4) (2021) 168-175.
• E. Komurlu, A. Kesimal, C.O. Aksoy, Use of Polyamide-6 type Engineering Polymer as Grouted Rock Bolt Material. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 3 (2017) 37.
• A. Luciani, D. Peila, Tunnel Waterproofing: Available Technologies and Evaluation through Risk Analysis, International Journal of Civil Engineering, 17 (2019) 45–59.
• E. Komurlu, Investigation of Uniaxial Compressive Strength values of a Polyvinyl resin reinforced Silt: An Experimental Study on resin amount and curing temperature, International Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 2(2) (2020) 82-87.
• B. Lakkimsetti, M.L. Gali, Grain Shape Effects on the Liquefaction Response of Geotextile-Reinforced Sands, International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 9 (2023) 15.
• B. Lakkimsetti, G.M. Latha, Effectiveness of Different Reinforcement Alternatives for Mitigating Liquefaction in Sands, International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 9 (2023) 37.
• G.M. Latha, B. Lakkimsetti, Morphological Perspectives to Quantify and Mitigate Liquefaction in Sands, Indian Geotechnical Journal, 52 (2022) 1244–1252.
• ASTM International, ASTM D2487-17 coded Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2017)
• ASTM International, ASTM D4318-10: Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. In: 2010 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2010)
• FMY Kimya, Silikat Enjeksiyon Kimyasalı İnsilex TS – Teknik Veri Broşürü (2024) İstanbul
• ASTM International, ASTM D2166-06 coded Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength Of Cohesive Soil, West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2006)
• ASTM International, ASTM D3080-04 Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2012)
• B.A. Uzuner, Çözümlü Problemlerle Temel Zemin Mekaniği, Derya Kitabevi, Trabzon (2007)
• A. Anburuvel, The Engineering Behind Soil Stabilization with Additives: A State-of-the-Art Review, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 42 (2024) 1–42.
• M.S. Eisa, M.E. Basiouny, A. Mohamady, M. Mira, Improving Weak Subgrade Soil Using Different Additives, Materials, 15 (2022) 4462.
• C.A. Anagnostopoulos, V. Aggelidis, Factors Affecting Properties of Polymer Grouted Sands, CivilEng, 5 (2024) 65-88.
• E. Komurlu, A. Kesimal, Sulfide-rich mine tailings usage for short-term support purposes: An experimental study on paste backfill barricades, Geomechanics and Engineering, 9 (2) (2015) 195-205.
• G. Spagnoli, A review of soil improvement with non-conventional grouts. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 15(3) (2018) 273–287.
• P. Pratter, C. Boley, Y. Forouzandeh, Innovative Ground Improvement with Chemical Grouts: Potential and Limits of Partial Saturation with Polymers, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 41 (2023) 477–489.
• C.A. Anagnostopoulos, M. Dimitriadi, D. Konstantinidis, Static and cyclic behaviour of epoxy resin and bentonite-grouted sands, Transportation Geotechnics, 33 (2022) 100725.
• E. Komurlu, F. Cihangir, A. Turan, A. Kesimal, B. Erçıkdı, An Experimental Study on Shear Strength of Cemented Paste Backfill Materials, Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 22 (2018) 45-52.
• Z.Y. Yin, P.Y. Hicher, Y.F. Jin, Elastoplastic Modeling of Soils: From Mohr-Coulomb to SIMSAND. In: Practice of Constitutive Modelling for Saturated Soils. Springer, Singapore (2020)
• X. Xiang, D. Zi-Hang, Numerical implementation of a modified Mohr–Coulomb model and its application in slope stability analysis, Journal of Modern Transport, 25 (2017) 40–51.
• R. Lepakshi, B.V. Venkatarama Reddy, Shear strength parameters and Mohr-Coulomb failure envelopes for cement stabilised rammed earth, Construction and Building Materials, 249 (2020) 118708.
• Y.X. Li, X.L. Yang, Soil-Slope Stability considering Effect of Soil-Strength Nonlinearity, International Journal of Geomechanics, 19(3) (2019) 04018201.
• E. Komurlu, Investigation of Failure of Soils in the Shear Box Test, National Symposium on Engineering Geology and Geotechnics, 2019 (MühJeo 2019), Denizli, Turkey, pp. 97-104.
• E. Komurlu, A.G. Celik, V. Karakaya, An experimental study on uniaxial compressive strength values of silicate based resin added sand samples with different types of fiber reinforcements, Yerbilimleri, 45(1) (2024) 79-92.
• M. Mariri, R.Z. Moayed, A. Kordnaeij, Stress–Strain Behavior of Loess Soil Stabilized with Cement, Zeolite, and Recycled Polyester Fiber, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 31(12) (2019) 04019291.
• M. Wu, F. Liu, J. Yang, Stress–strain–strength behavior of geosynthetic reinforced rubber–sand mixtures, Acta Geotechnica, 18 (2023) 4835–4846.
• H. Jin, L. Guo, H. Sun, T. Wu, L. Shi, Y. Cai, Energy-based evaluation of undrained cyclic behavior of marine soft clay under multidirectional simple shear stress paths, Acta Geotechnica, 18 (2023) 2883–2898.
• E. Komurlu, An Experimental Study on Determination of Crack Propagation Energy of Rock Materials under Dynamic (Impact) and Static Loading Conditions, Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, 6 (2019) 1-6.
• E. Botero, A. Ossa, G. Sherwell, E. Ovando-Shelley, Stress–strain behavior of a silty soil reinforced with polyethylene terephthalate (PET), Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 43(4) (2015) 363-369.
• L. Li, C.S. Tang, J.J. Xu, Y. Wei, Z.H. Dong, B. Liu, X.Y. Zhang, B. Shi, Exploring an eco-friendly approach to improve soil tensile behavior and cracking resistance, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 16 (10) (2024) 4272-4284.
• E. Komurlu, A. Kesimal, Rock Bolting from Past to Present in 20 Inventions, MT Bilimsel, 9 (2016) 69-85.
• M. Omidvar, M. Iskander, S. Bless, Stress-strain behavior of sand at high strain rates, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 49 (2012) 192-213.
• E. Komurlu, S. Demir, Length Effect on Load Bearing Capacities of Friction Rock Bolts, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 63(3) (2019) 718-725.
• G.O.M. Pedroso, R.D. dos Santos Junior, J. Lins da Silva, M.F.B. Motta, E.F. Félix, Flexural Strength Characteristics of Fiber-Reinforced Cemented Soil, Materials 16 (2023) 4185.