Research Article

Comparison of Some Phenolic Compounds of Organic and Conventional Extra-Virgin Olive Oil

Volume: 22 Number: 3 December 28, 2017
EN TR

Comparison of Some Phenolic Compounds of Organic and Conventional Extra-Virgin Olive Oil

Abstract

Olive oil is an important ingredient of the Mediterranean diet, because of its nutritional qualities and organoleptic characteristics. In addition olive oil has positive effects on human health, in particular to prevent of some types of cancer and cardiovascular diseases and as regards diabetes, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. These properties are related not only to the fatty acid composition of its lipid matrix, but especially to the presence of the phenolic compounds. The changes in the phenolic compounds of EVOO can be an important quality control parameter. The aim of this study was to determine the changes in the some phenolic compounds of organic and conventional extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO) from Turkey. Five phenolic compounds oleuropein, hydroxytyrosol, tyrosol, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid were quantified LC-DAD and justified by LC-MS. Ten extra virgin olive oils (organic and conventional extra-virgin olive oil), produced by different brands were analyzed. Oleuropein were found to be higher than other phenolic compounds. The amount decreased with the order of tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, respectively. Oleuropein concentration varied between 3.8-39 mg/kg in organic production of extra virgin olive oils. As a conclusion, phenolic content are higher in organic products compared to conventional products of EVOO.

Keywords

References

  1. Bajoub, A., Pacchiarotta, T., Hurtado-Fernández, E., Olmo-García, L., García-Villalba, R., Fernández-Gutiérrez, A., Mayboroda, O.A., Carrasco-Pancorbo, A. (2016) Comparing two metabolic profiling approaches (liquid chromatography and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry) for extra-virgin olive oil phenolic compounds analysis: A botanical classification perspective, Journal of Chromatography A, 1428, 267–279. DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2015.10.059.
  2. Crecente-Campo, J., Nunes-Damaceno, M., Romero-Rodriguez M.A., Vaızquez-Odeiriz, M.L. (2012) Color, anthocyanin pigment, ascorbic acid and total phenolic compound determination in organic versus conventional strawberries (Fragaria×ananassa Duch, cv Selva), Journal of Food Composition and Analyses, 28, 23–30. DOI:10.1016/j.jfca.2012.07.004
  3. Dagdelen, A., Tümen, G., Özcan, M., Dündar, E. (2013) Phenolics profiles of olive fruits (Olea europaea L.) and oils from Ayvalık, Domat and Gemlik varieties at different ripening stages, Food Chemistry, 136, 41–45. DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.046
  4. Franco, M.N., Galeano-Díaz, T., López, Ó., Fernández-Bolaños, J.G., Sánchez, J., De Miguel, C., Gil, M.V., Martín-Vertedor, D. (2014) Phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of virgin olive oil, Food Chemistry, 163, 289–298. DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.04.091
  5. Gaudino, S., Goia, I., Borreani, G., Tabacco, E., Sacco, D. (2014) Cropping system intensification grading using an agro-environmental indicator set in northern. Italy, Ecological Indicators, 40, 76–89. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.004
  6. Godoy-Caballero, M.P., Acedo-Valenzuela, M.I., Galeano-Diaz, T. (2012) Simple quantification of phenolic compounds present in the minor fraction of virgin olive oil by LC–DAD–FLD, Talanta, 101, 479–487. DOI:10.1016/j.talanta.2012.09.063
  7. Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D., Paletti, M.G. (2011) Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: conventional vs. organic agriculture, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30, 95–124. DOI:10.1080/07352689.2011.554355
  8. Hbaieb, R.H., Kotti, F., Valli, E., Bendini, A., Toschi, T.G., Gargouria, M. (2017) Effect of Tunisian olive ripeness on endogenous enzymes and virgin olive oil phenolic composition, Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 62, 43-50. DOI:10.1016/j.jfca.2017.04.016

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Güler Çelik This is me

Esra Doğangün This is me

Publication Date

December 28, 2017

Submission Date

December 5, 2016

Acceptance Date

December 1, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 22 Number: 3

APA
Şahan, Y., Çelik, G., & Doğangün, E. (2017). ORGANİK VE KONVANSİYONEL OLARAK ÜRETİLEN SIZMA ZEYTİNYAĞLARININ BAZI FENOLİK İÇERİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(3), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.372458
AMA
1.Şahan Y, Çelik G, Doğangün E. ORGANİK VE KONVANSİYONEL OLARAK ÜRETİLEN SIZMA ZEYTİNYAĞLARININ BAZI FENOLİK İÇERİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. UUJFE. 2017;22(3):179-186. doi:10.17482/uumfd.372458
Chicago
Şahan, Yasemin, Güler Çelik, and Esra Doğangün. 2017. “ORGANİK VE KONVANSİYONEL OLARAK ÜRETİLEN SIZMA ZEYTİNYAĞLARININ BAZI FENOLİK İÇERİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 22 (3): 179-86. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.372458.
EndNote
Şahan Y, Çelik G, Doğangün E (December 1, 2017) ORGANİK VE KONVANSİYONEL OLARAK ÜRETİLEN SIZMA ZEYTİNYAĞLARININ BAZI FENOLİK İÇERİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 22 3 179–186.
IEEE
[1]Y. Şahan, G. Çelik, and E. Doğangün, “ORGANİK VE KONVANSİYONEL OLARAK ÜRETİLEN SIZMA ZEYTİNYAĞLARININ BAZI FENOLİK İÇERİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, UUJFE, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 179–186, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.17482/uumfd.372458.
ISNAD
Şahan, Yasemin - Çelik, Güler - Doğangün, Esra. “ORGANİK VE KONVANSİYONEL OLARAK ÜRETİLEN SIZMA ZEYTİNYAĞLARININ BAZI FENOLİK İÇERİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 22/3 (December 1, 2017): 179-186. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.372458.
JAMA
1.Şahan Y, Çelik G, Doğangün E. ORGANİK VE KONVANSİYONEL OLARAK ÜRETİLEN SIZMA ZEYTİNYAĞLARININ BAZI FENOLİK İÇERİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. UUJFE. 2017;22:179–186.
MLA
Şahan, Yasemin, et al. “ORGANİK VE KONVANSİYONEL OLARAK ÜRETİLEN SIZMA ZEYTİNYAĞLARININ BAZI FENOLİK İÇERİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 3, Dec. 2017, pp. 179-86, doi:10.17482/uumfd.372458.
Vancouver
1.Yasemin Şahan, Güler Çelik, Esra Doğangün. ORGANİK VE KONVANSİYONEL OLARAK ÜRETİLEN SIZMA ZEYTİNYAĞLARININ BAZI FENOLİK İÇERİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. UUJFE. 2017 Dec. 1;22(3):179-86. doi:10.17482/uumfd.372458

Announcements:

30.03.2021-Beginning with our April 2021 (26/1) issue, in accordance with the new criteria of TR-Dizin, the Declaration of Conflict of Interest and the Declaration of Author Contribution forms fulfilled and signed by all authors are required as well as the Copyright form during the initial submission of the manuscript. Furthermore two new sections, i.e. ‘Conflict of Interest’ and ‘Author Contribution’, should be added to the manuscript. Links of those forms that should be submitted with the initial manuscript can be found in our 'Author Guidelines' and 'Submission Procedure' pages. The manuscript template is also updated. For articles reviewed and accepted for publication in our 2021 and ongoing issues and for articles currently under review process, those forms should also be fulfilled, signed and uploaded to the system by authors.