Kamakura Dönemine (1185-1333) Geçiş Sürecinde Değişim ve Süreklilik: Minamoto ve Fujiwara Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirme

Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 1263 - 1295, 27.03.2025

Gaye Yavuzcan

https://doi.org/10.24186/vakanuvis.1562254

Abstract

Japonya tarihinde Heian döneminden (794-1185) Kamakura dönemine (1185-1333) geçiş, köklü sosyal, ekonomik ve siyasal etkileriyle önemli bir inceleme sahası teşkil etmektedir. Bu süreci iktidar kullanımı açısından değerlendirdiğimizde, söz konusu geçiş bir yönüyle Japonya’da iktidar uygulama sistem ve anlayışının kökten değiştiği, diğer taraftan da hem uygulama hem anlayış açılarından sürekliliğin olduğu girift bir aşamaya karşılık gelir. Bu çalışmada Heian döneminden Kamakura dönemine geçişte iktidar kullanımının değişim ve sürekliliği, her iki yönü sembolize edebilecek iki klan olan Minamoto ve Fujiwara klanları odağında değerlendirilecektir. Bu sayede Japon tarihinin belirli bir döneminin yanında otorite tesisi ve iktidar ilişkilerinin doğası ile verili bir dönem ve coğrafyada iktidarın süreklilik ve kırılımı üzerine bir değerlendirme yapılabilmesi de hedeflenmektedir.

Keywords

Heian, Kamakura, Minamoto, Fujiwara, iktidar

Change and Continuity in the Transition to the Kamakura Period (1185-1333): An Evaluation through Minamoto and Fujiwara

Abstract

In the history of Japan, the transition from the Heian period (794-1185) to the Kamakura period constitutes an important field of study with its deep-rooted social, economic and political effects. When we evaluate this process in terms of the use of power, the transition in question corresponds to an intricate stage in which, on the one hand, the system and understanding of the application of power in Japan changed radically, and on the other hand, there was continuity in terms of both application and understanding. In this study, the change and continuity in the use of power in the transition from the Heian period to the Kamakura period will be evaluated with the focus on the Minamoto and Fujiwara clans, two clans that can symbolize both aspects. This study also aims to evaluate the nature of power relations in a specific period of Japanese history and the continuity and rupture of power in a given period and geography.

Keywords

Heian, Kamakura, Minamoto, Fujiwara, Power

References

• Adams, Ryon F., Outfought and Outthought: Reassessing the Mongol Invasions of Japan, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Kansas 2009.
• Andressen, Curtis, A Short History of Japan, From Samurai to Sony, Allen&Unwin, New South Wales 2002.
• Atik, Kubilay, “A Review of Feudalism in Japan,” Journal of Oriental Studies, C. 9, S. 2, 2022, ss. 84-96.
• Balandier, Georges, Siyasal Antropoloji, Çev. Devrim Çetinkasap, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul 2010
• Bauer, Mikael, “Conflanting Monastic and Imperial Lienage, The Retired Emperors’ Period Reformulated,” Monumenta Nipponica 67 (2), ss. 239-262.
• Bauer, Mikaël, The History of the Fujiwara House, A Study and Annoted Translation of the Tōshi Kaden, Renaissance Books, Kent, 2020.
• Bourdieu, Pierre, Devlet Üzerine, Collège de France Dersleri (1989-1992), Çev. Aslı Sümer, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul 2015.
• Bryant, Anthony, The Samurai, Osprey Publishing, 2000.
• Byung-Chul Han, İktidar Nedir, Çev. Mustafa Özdemir, İnsan Yayınları, İstanbul 2000.
• Cobbing, Andrew, Kyūshū: Gateway to Japan, A Coincise History, Brill, 2009.
• Deal, William E., Medieval & Early Modern Japan, Facts On File, New York 2006.
• Eberhard, W., En Eski Devirlerden Zamanımıza Kadar Uzak Doğu Tarihi, TTK, Ankara 2010
• Friday, Karl, “They Were Soldiers Once, The Early Samurai and the Imperial Court,” War and State Building in Japan, Ed. John A. Ferejohn ve Frances McCall Rosenbluth, Stanford University Press, Satanford, California, 2010.
• Gramsci, Antonio, Felsefe ve Politika Sorunları, Çev. Adnan Cemgil, İstanbul: Payel Yayınları 1975.
• Grossberg, Kenneth A., “From Feudal Chieftain to Secular Monarch. The Development of Shogunal Power in Early Muromachi Japan,” Monumenta Nipponica, C. 31, No. 1 (Bahar, 1976), ss. 29-49.
• Haley, John Owen, Authority without Power, Law and the Japanese Paradox, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford 1991.
• Hall, John W., “Epilogue,” Court and Bakufu in Japan, Essays in Kamakura History, Jeffrey P. Mass (Ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, California 1995, ss. 251-267.
• Hall, John Whitney, “Terms and Concepts in Japanese Medieval History: An Inquiry into the Problems of Translation”, The Journal of Japanese Studies, C. 9, No. 1 (Winter, 1983), ss. 1-32.
• Hall, John Whitney, Government and Local Power in Japan 500 to 1700, A Study Based on Bizen Province, Princeton University Press, New Jersey 1966.
• Hane, Mikiso, Kısa Japonya Tarihi, Çev. Şükrü Alpagut, Say Yayınları, İstanbul 2021.
• Holcombe, Charles, Doğu Asya Tarihi Çin Japonya Kore, Medeniyetin Köklerinden 21. Yüzyıla Kadar, Çev. Muhammed Murtaza Özeren, Dergâh Yayınları, 2. Baskı, İstanbul 2019.
• Hosono, Tetsuhiro (細野 哲弘), 鎌倉草創期の「真実」(“Kamakura’nın İlk Dönemlerinin Gerçeği”), Tokugikon, 2022, no. 305, ss. 110-121.
• Huffman, James L., Japan in World History, Oxford University Press, Oxford New York 2010.
• Hurst III, G. Cameron, “İnsei”, The Cambridge History of Japan, C. 2, Heian Japan, Ed. Donald H. Shively, William H. McCullough, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999, ss. 576- 643.
• Hurst III, G. Cameron, “The Kōbu Polity: Court-Bakufu Relations in Kamakura Japan,” Court and Bakufu in Japan, Essays in Kamakura History, Ed. Jeffrey P. Mass, Stanford University Press, California 1995, ss. 3-28.
• Ishizuka, Mashaide (石塚 正英), “正倉院籍帳に読まれる家父長像の歴史知的二類型” (Shosoin kayıtlarında yer alan ataerkil imajın iki tarihsel ve entelektüel türü), 頸城野郷土資料室学術研究部研究紀要 (Kubikino Enstitüsü Halk Arşivi Bülteni), C.7/No.3 2022, ss. 1-16.
• Kawakami, Tasuke, “Bushidō in its Formative Period,” The Annals of the Hitotsubashi Academy, October 1952, C. 3, No. 1 (October 1952), ss. 65-83.
• Kiley, Cornelius J., “The Imperial Court as a Legal Authority in the Kamakura Age,” Court and Bakufu in Japan, Essays in Kamakura History, Jeffrey P. Mass (Ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, California 1995, ss. 29-44.
• Kiley, Cornelius J., “Provincial Administration and Land Tenure in Early Heian”, Cambridge History of Japan, C. 2, Ed. Donald Shively, William McCullough, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999, ss. 236-340.
• Joseph M. Kitagawa, “Monarchy and Government: Traditions and Ideologies in Pre-Modern Japan,” Kingship in Asia and early America: 30. International Congress of Human Sciencesin Asia and North Africa, Ed. Arthur Llwellyn, Basham, El Colegio de Mexico 1981, 217-232.
• Kitagawa, Joseph M., “The Shadow of the Sun: A Glimpse of the Fujiwara and the Imperial Families in Japan,” On Understanding Japanese Religion, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1988, ss. 98-116.
• Kitagawa, Joseph M., “Some Reflections on Japanese Religion and Its Relationship to the Imperial System”, Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, C. 17, No 2/3, The Emperor System and Religion in Japan (1990), ss. 129-178.
• Laffin, Christina, Rewriting Medieval Japanese Women, Politics, Personality, and Literary Production in the Life of Nun Abutsu, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu 2013.
• Mass, Jeffey P., The Development of Kamakura Rule, 1180-1250: A History with Documents, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1979.
• Mass, Jeffrey P., “The Kamakura Bakufu,” Cambridge History of Japan, C. 3, Medieval Japan, Ed. Kozo Yamamura, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006, ss. 46-88.
• Mass, Jeffrey P., “The Origins of Kamakura Justice”, The Journal of Japanese Studies, Summer, 1977, Cilt. 3, No. 2 (Yaz, 1977), ss. 299-322.
• Mass, Jeffrey P., Yoritomo and the Founding of the First Bakufu, The Origins of Dual Government in Japan, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California 1999.
• Ramesh, Sangaralingam, China’s Economic Rise, Lessons from Japan’s Political Economy, Palgrave Macmillan, Oxford 2020.
• Segal, Ethan Isaac, Coins, Trade and the State, Economic Growth in Early Medieval Japan, Harvard University Press, Cambridge ve Londra 2011.
• Segal, Ethan, “Kamakura and the Challanges of Governance”, Japan Emerging, Premodern History to 1850, Ed. Karl F. Friday, Westview Press,2012, ss. 203-212.
• Shimizu, Osamu, Nihon Montoku Tenno Jitsuroku, An Annoted Translation, With a Survey of the Early Ninth Century in Japan, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Columbia Üniversitesi, New York, 1951.
• Shively, Donald H., “Preface to Volume 2”, Cambridge History of Japan, C. 2, Ed. Donald Shively, William McCullough, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999, ss. xv-xvi.
• Spafford, David, “Emperor and Shogun, Pope and King: The Development of Japan’s Warrior Aristocracy”, Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts, 2014, C. 88, No. 1/4, Japanese Art at the Time of the Samurai (2014), ss. 10-19.
• Stalker, Nancy K., “The Rise and Rule of the Warrior Class 12th–15th Centuries”, History and Culture from Classical to Cool, University of California Press, ss. 79-111.
• Totman, Conrad, A History of Japan, Blackwell Publishing, 2. Baskı, 2005.
• Yamamura, Kozo, “Introduction,” Cambridge History of Japan, C. 3, Medieval Japan, Ed. Kozo Yamamura, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006, ss.1-45.
• Yanabu, Akira, “The Tennō System as the Symbol of the Culture of Translation,” Japan Review, 1996: 7, ss. 147-157.
• Yoeda, Harumi (四重田陽美),『平家物語』「安徳入水」 について (Heike Monogatari’de Antoku’nun Boğulması Üzerine). 大阪大谷大学 STEAM Lab 紀要 (Osaka Ohtani Üniversitesi STEAM Araştırma ve Eğitim Dergisi) (2), 2022, 3-8.