BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2015, Issue: 14, 125 - 133, 11.06.2015

Lerzan Aras

https://doi.org/10.17484/yedi.98571
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Postmodernism and postmodern architecture concepts, fairly discussed for many years, are now being re-examined with the statements of 21st century theorists indicating that a new turnoff is necessary; and, the discussion is on what might happen with theories after theories beyond Jencks’s postmodern architectural classification. In such a point, the general attitude in the architecture theory, distinctions, and trends should be reviewed. The aim of this study is actually to seek possible answers to the question ‘what is possible beyond postmodern architecture?’ as it appears like a reckoning with the exhibition in 2011 named ‘Postmodernism: style and Subversion 1970-1990’ and so attracting the gaze that postmodernism might be a dead ideology. In this context, the projective practice, proposed by Somol and Whiting contains possible alternative solutions. In this study three cases are discussed which are considered as suitable examples to projective practice

Keywords

Postmodern Architecture Theory After Theory Post-critical Pragmatism Projective Practice

References

  • Adamson G., Pavitt J. ( 2011). Style and Subversion,1970 –1990, Victoria and Albert Museum, South Kensington, Londra: V&A Publishing.
  • Baird, George (2004). “Criticality and its Discontents”. Harvard Design Magazine (21): 1-6.
  • Davies, Christie (2011). “Exhibition Notes”, The New Criterion (12): 54-56.
  • Groat, Linda (1992). “Rescuing Architecture from Cul-de-Sac”. Journal of Architectural Education 45(3): 138-146.
  • Jameson, Fredric (1991). “Postmodernism and Consumer Society”, Anti-Aesthetic, ed. Hal Foster, Washington: Bay Press.
  • Jarzombek, Mark (2002). “Last Words: Critical or Post-Critical?” Architectural Theory Review 7(1): 49-152.
  • Mallgrave F., Goodman D. (2011). An Introduction to Architectural Theory, 1968 to the Present, UK, Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Martin, Reinhold (2005). “Critical of What”. Harvard Design Magazine (22): 1-6.
  • Menking, William (2012). “Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970–1990”, Journal of Architectural Education 66(1): 25-27.
  • Schrijver, Lara ( 2009). “Whatever happened to Projective Architecture? Rethinking the Expertise of the Architect”, Footprint, Agency in Architecture: Reframing Criticality in Theory and Practice, Spring, 123-127.
  • Somol R., Whiting S. (2002). “Notes Around The Doppler Effect and Other Moods of Modernism”, Perspecta, The Yale Architectural Journal, (33): 72-77.
  • Sykes, Krista. (2010). “Introduction”. Constructing A New Agenda, Architectural Theory 1993-2009, ed. Krista Sykes, New York, Princeton Architectural Press, s:14-30. Internet Kaynakları
  • Barrie, Andrew (2014). “Cardboard Cathedral by Shigeru Ban in Christchurch, New Zealand”.http://www.architectural- review.com/buildings/cardboard-cathedral-by- shigeru-ban-in-christchurch-new-zealand/8654513. article# (30.12.2014).
  • Fischer, Ole (2007). “Atmospheres – Architectural Spaces between Critical Reading and Immersive Presence”. http://www.field-journal.org/uploads/file/ 2007_ Volume_ 1/o%20 fischer.pdf (25.12.2014).
  • Roth, Martin (2014). “Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970-1990 at the V&A”, http://www.dezeen. com/2011/09/26/postmodernism-style-and- subversion-1970-1990-at-the-va/ (26/11/2014).
  • Sooke, Alastair ( 2011). “Postmodernism: Style and Subversion: 1970-1990, V&A, review”. http://www.telegraph. co.uk/culture/art/art-reviews/8790569/ Postmodernism-style-and-subversion-1970-1990- VandA-review.html( 26/11/2014).
  • Schrijver, Lara (2014). “Architecture, Projective, Critical or Craft?” Projective or Critical Practice, 353-367. http:// isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1465373. files/29%20SEP%2014/Schrijver%20Architecture_ Projective_Critical_Craft.pdf (25.12.2014). Görsel Kaynaklar
  • Resim ‘Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970 – 1990’ Adlı Serginin Girişi, www.apracticeforeverydaylife. com/victoria-and-albert-museum/postmodernism- style-and-subversion-1970-1990-exhibition- graphics/ (30.12.2014)
  • Resim Yokohama Terminal Binası, (Rohaly, 2014:32).
  • Resim Karton Katedral, (Barrie, 2014).
  • Resim Bulanık Bina, ( Fischer, 2007).

Bir Serginin Ardından: Postmodern Mimarlık ve Yansıtmalı Yaklaşımlar

Year 2015, Issue: 14, 125 - 133, 11.06.2015

Lerzan Aras

https://doi.org/10.17484/yedi.98571
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Uzun yıllardır üstünde çok konuşulan postmodernizm ve postmodern mimarlık kavramları, 21. yüzyılın kuramcıları tarafından
artık yeni bir yol ayrımına gelindiğinin ifade edilmesi ile tekrar sorgulanmakta, Jencks’in postmodern mimarlık
sınıflamaları dışında teori sonrası teorilerin neler olabileceği tartışılmaktadır. Böyle bir noktada mimarlık kuramında genel
duruşun nasıl olduğunu ayrımların, eğilimlerin nasıl şekillendiğini gözden geçirmek gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı,
2011 yılında açılan, Postmodernizm: Stil ve Yıkım 1970-1990 (Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970 – 1990) adlı
sergi ile birlikte kendi kendine hesaplaşma gibi de görünebilen ve postmodernizmin artık ölü bir ideoloji olabileceği yönünde
bakışları üstüne çeken postmodern mimarlığın ötesi nedir? sorusuna olası cevaplar aramaktır. Bu bağlamda Somol
ve Whiting’in yansıtmalı yaklaşımlar (projective practice) önermesi yukarıda sorulan soruya cevap olabilecek alternatif
olasılıkları içermektedir. Bu çalışmada yansıtmalı yaklaşımlar önermesine uygun olduğu düşünülen 3 örnek tartışılacaktır.
Anahtar Sözcükler: Postmodern Mimarlık, Teori Sonrası Teoriler, Eleştiri Sonrası, Pragmatizm, Yansıtmalı Yaklaşımlar.

Keywords

-

References

  • Adamson G., Pavitt J. ( 2011). Style and Subversion,1970 –1990, Victoria and Albert Museum, South Kensington, Londra: V&A Publishing.
  • Baird, George (2004). “Criticality and its Discontents”. Harvard Design Magazine (21): 1-6.
  • Davies, Christie (2011). “Exhibition Notes”, The New Criterion (12): 54-56.
  • Groat, Linda (1992). “Rescuing Architecture from Cul-de-Sac”. Journal of Architectural Education 45(3): 138-146.
  • Jameson, Fredric (1991). “Postmodernism and Consumer Society”, Anti-Aesthetic, ed. Hal Foster, Washington: Bay Press.
  • Jarzombek, Mark (2002). “Last Words: Critical or Post-Critical?” Architectural Theory Review 7(1): 49-152.
  • Mallgrave F., Goodman D. (2011). An Introduction to Architectural Theory, 1968 to the Present, UK, Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Martin, Reinhold (2005). “Critical of What”. Harvard Design Magazine (22): 1-6.
  • Menking, William (2012). “Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970–1990”, Journal of Architectural Education 66(1): 25-27.
  • Schrijver, Lara ( 2009). “Whatever happened to Projective Architecture? Rethinking the Expertise of the Architect”, Footprint, Agency in Architecture: Reframing Criticality in Theory and Practice, Spring, 123-127.
  • Somol R., Whiting S. (2002). “Notes Around The Doppler Effect and Other Moods of Modernism”, Perspecta, The Yale Architectural Journal, (33): 72-77.
  • Sykes, Krista. (2010). “Introduction”. Constructing A New Agenda, Architectural Theory 1993-2009, ed. Krista Sykes, New York, Princeton Architectural Press, s:14-30. Internet Kaynakları
  • Barrie, Andrew (2014). “Cardboard Cathedral by Shigeru Ban in Christchurch, New Zealand”.http://www.architectural- review.com/buildings/cardboard-cathedral-by- shigeru-ban-in-christchurch-new-zealand/8654513. article# (30.12.2014).
  • Fischer, Ole (2007). “Atmospheres – Architectural Spaces between Critical Reading and Immersive Presence”. http://www.field-journal.org/uploads/file/ 2007_ Volume_ 1/o%20 fischer.pdf (25.12.2014).
  • Roth, Martin (2014). “Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970-1990 at the V&A”, http://www.dezeen. com/2011/09/26/postmodernism-style-and- subversion-1970-1990-at-the-va/ (26/11/2014).
  • Sooke, Alastair ( 2011). “Postmodernism: Style and Subversion: 1970-1990, V&A, review”. http://www.telegraph. co.uk/culture/art/art-reviews/8790569/ Postmodernism-style-and-subversion-1970-1990- VandA-review.html( 26/11/2014).
  • Schrijver, Lara (2014). “Architecture, Projective, Critical or Craft?” Projective or Critical Practice, 353-367. http:// isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1465373. files/29%20SEP%2014/Schrijver%20Architecture_ Projective_Critical_Craft.pdf (25.12.2014). Görsel Kaynaklar
  • Resim ‘Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970 – 1990’ Adlı Serginin Girişi, www.apracticeforeverydaylife. com/victoria-and-albert-museum/postmodernism- style-and-subversion-1970-1990-exhibition- graphics/ (30.12.2014)
  • Resim Yokohama Terminal Binası, (Rohaly, 2014:32).
  • Resim Karton Katedral, (Barrie, 2014).
  • Resim Bulanık Bina, ( Fischer, 2007).
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Araştırma Makaleler
Authors

Lerzan Aras

Publication Date June 11, 2015
Submission Date August 7, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Issue: 14

Cite

APA Aras, L. (2015). Bir Serginin Ardından: Postmodern Mimarlık ve Yansıtmalı Yaklaşımlar. Yedi(14), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.17484/yedi.98571

Cited By

Afetler Sonrası Mimarlıkta Yeni Normal
Kent Akademisi
https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1009252
 Download Cover Image

18409

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.