AUTHORS' ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES

• The submitted study should not be published in another journal or submitted for publication. Work published in another journal cannot be sent. Submitting the same article to more than one journal means unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

• Each application can be started following the completion of the previous application.

• Author (s) are required to make use of and / or quote in a complete and accurate way in order to benefit from other studies or to use other studies. In writing citation and bibliography, the APA editorial guidelines should be considered.

• If all work submitted for publication is to constitute a conflict of interest, and if relevant, this should be indicated.

• The author (s) may be request raw data on their framing of evaluation processes; in such a case the author (s) should be ready to submit the expected data and information to the editorial board.
• If there is a need to do so, the author (s) must have evidence that they have the necessary permissions for the rights of the data used, research / measurement tools / analyses.
• The author (s) has an obligation to cooperate with the editor in informing, correcting or withdrawing the journal editor or publisher if he / she finds a mistake or error related to his / her early published or evaluation work.
• The author (s) must present only original works and cite the works of other researchers in accordance with scientific ethics.

REFEREES' ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES

• Referees shoul only accept evaluating the work related to the field of expertise.
• They should evaluate submitted studies with impartiality and confidentiality.
• If they think that they are confronted with a conflict of interest during the evaluation process, they should refuse to examine the work and inform the editor of the journal.
• As per the principle of confidentiality and the privacy policy, they should delete the work that has been reviewed after reviewing. Only the final versions of the studies can be used after publication.
• Reviewing should be done objectively only with respect to the content of the work. Nationality, gender, religious beliefs, political beliefs and commercial concerns should not allow affect the process of reviewing.
• Referees should adopt a polite language when reviewing the studies and they should avoid humiliating personal interpretations of hostility, slander and insults.
• The evaluation should be carried out on time and with respect to the above ethical responsibilities.

EDITORS' ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES

• All publications are to be judged on the basis of their intellectual content, regardless of the author's gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenship and political values.
• Personal information about the articles should be kept confidential.
• The conflict of interest observed regarding the article must be explained.
• The Editorial Board assumes the responsibility to make publishing decisions for the submitted articles, based on the evaluation of the candidate's articles, the editorial board policies of the journal, and the legally prohibited items against plagiarism and copyright infringement.