Conference Paper

THE ANALYSIS OF THE HUNGARIAN GOVERNMENT’S DISCOURSE TOWARDS THE MIGRANT CRISIS: A COMBINATION OF SECURITIZATION AND EUROSCEPTICISM

Volume: 24 Number: 3 December 27, 2017
EN TR

THE ANALYSIS OF THE HUNGARIAN GOVERNMENT’S DISCOURSE TOWARDS THE MIGRANT CRISIS: A COMBINATION OF SECURITIZATION AND EUROSCEPTICISM

Abstract

Since the Syrian crisis, migration has emerged as a rising and permanent discussion of European politics that has both created diversity and caused obstacles in the attitudes and policy orientations across the member states. In addition, the migrant crisis opened a space for Eurosceptic actors to exploit it as an issue for politicization and securitization. Eurosceptic discourse has framed the migrant crisis as a threat to national, economic, cultural and internal security, bringing its securitization aspect into question. In this respect, new security measures, such as border controls and detention, and a discourse that employs anti-migration themes have become visible in many member states. The focus of this study is to analyse Hungary’s overall position and policy orientations towards the crisis in order to deconstruct its main messages, identify the interlocutors and the reasons behind particular perspectives. In this descriptive content analysis, more than 160 official documents have been thoroughly examined. It was observed that in opposition to the European migration governance, Hungary has gone through a securitizing discourse as the first theme. The second theme is that due to Brussels’ policy preferences, which are characterized to be anti-democratic and unlawful, and believed to have created a civilization disaster, Budapest has exhibited a Eurosceptic stance. Hungary’s overall position and policy orientations towards the migrant crisis are concluded to be the combination of securitization and Euroscepticism. Accordingly in the last theme, Hungary’s proposed solution to the migrant crisis, which was framed as a threat, is “stopping” it by initiating new security measures.


Keywords

References

  1. Balzacq, T. (2005). The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171-201. Doi: 10.1177/1354066105052960
  2. Banulescu-Bogdan, N. & Fratzke, S. (2015, 24 September). Europe’s Migration crisis in context: why now and what next?. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/europe-migration-crisis-context- why-now-and-what-next
  3. Baysal, B. & Lüleci, Ç. (2015). Kopenhag Okulu ve Güvenlikleştirme Teorisi. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 11(22), 61-95. http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/guvenlikstrtj/article/view/5000148022
  4. BBC. (2005, 19 August). Migrant crisis: Slovakia ‘will only accept Christians’. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-33986738
  5. BBC. (2016, 3 March). Why is EU struggling with migrants and asylum?. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-24583286
  6. Bigo, D. (2002). Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives, 27(1), 63-92. Doi:10.1177/03043754020270S105
  7. Buzan B., Wæver, O. & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: a new framework for analysis. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
  8. Chadwick, V. (2016, 19 June). Viktor Orbán to lobby against Brexit. http://www.politico.eu/article/viktor-Orbán-news-uk-brexit-newspaper-ads/

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Conference Paper

Authors

Önder Canveren
DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ, AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ (DR)
Türkiye

Fulya Akgül Durakçay
DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ, AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ (DR)
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 27, 2017

Submission Date

April 20, 2017

Acceptance Date

December 25, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 24 Number: 3

APA
Canveren, Ö., & Akgül Durakçay, F. (2017). MACARİSTAN HÜKÜMETİNİN GÖÇMEN KRİZİNE YÖNELİK SÖYLEMLERİNİN ANALİZİ: AVRUPA ŞÜPHECİLİĞİ VE GÜVENLİKLEŞTİRMENİN BİR BİRLEŞİMİ. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 24(3), 857-876. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.307339
AMA
1.Canveren Ö, Akgül Durakçay F. MACARİSTAN HÜKÜMETİNİN GÖÇMEN KRİZİNE YÖNELİK SÖYLEMLERİNİN ANALİZİ: AVRUPA ŞÜPHECİLİĞİ VE GÜVENLİKLEŞTİRMENİN BİR BİRLEŞİMİ. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi. 2017;24(3):857-876. doi:10.18657/yonveek.307339
Chicago
Canveren, Önder, and Fulya Akgül Durakçay. 2017. “MACARİSTAN HÜKÜMETİNİN GÖÇMEN KRİZİNE YÖNELİK SÖYLEMLERİNİN ANALİZİ: AVRUPA ŞÜPHECİLİĞİ VE GÜVENLİKLEŞTİRMENİN BİR BİRLEŞİMİ”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Dergisi 24 (3): 857-76. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.307339.
EndNote
Canveren Ö, Akgül Durakçay F (December 1, 2017) MACARİSTAN HÜKÜMETİNİN GÖÇMEN KRİZİNE YÖNELİK SÖYLEMLERİNİN ANALİZİ: AVRUPA ŞÜPHECİLİĞİ VE GÜVENLİKLEŞTİRMENİN BİR BİRLEŞİMİ. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi 24 3 857–876.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Canveren and F. Akgül Durakçay, “MACARİSTAN HÜKÜMETİNİN GÖÇMEN KRİZİNE YÖNELİK SÖYLEMLERİNİN ANALİZİ: AVRUPA ŞÜPHECİLİĞİ VE GÜVENLİKLEŞTİRMENİN BİR BİRLEŞİMİ”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 857–876, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.18657/yonveek.307339.
ISNAD
Canveren, Önder - Akgül Durakçay, Fulya. “MACARİSTAN HÜKÜMETİNİN GÖÇMEN KRİZİNE YÖNELİK SÖYLEMLERİNİN ANALİZİ: AVRUPA ŞÜPHECİLİĞİ VE GÜVENLİKLEŞTİRMENİN BİR BİRLEŞİMİ”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi 24/3 (December 1, 2017): 857-876. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.307339.
JAMA
1.Canveren Ö, Akgül Durakçay F. MACARİSTAN HÜKÜMETİNİN GÖÇMEN KRİZİNE YÖNELİK SÖYLEMLERİNİN ANALİZİ: AVRUPA ŞÜPHECİLİĞİ VE GÜVENLİKLEŞTİRMENİN BİR BİRLEŞİMİ. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi. 2017;24:857–876.
MLA
Canveren, Önder, and Fulya Akgül Durakçay. “MACARİSTAN HÜKÜMETİNİN GÖÇMEN KRİZİNE YÖNELİK SÖYLEMLERİNİN ANALİZİ: AVRUPA ŞÜPHECİLİĞİ VE GÜVENLİKLEŞTİRMENİN BİR BİRLEŞİMİ”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 3, Dec. 2017, pp. 857-76, doi:10.18657/yonveek.307339.
Vancouver
1.Önder Canveren, Fulya Akgül Durakçay. MACARİSTAN HÜKÜMETİNİN GÖÇMEN KRİZİNE YÖNELİK SÖYLEMLERİNİN ANALİZİ: AVRUPA ŞÜPHECİLİĞİ VE GÜVENLİKLEŞTİRMENİN BİR BİRLEŞİMİ. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi. 2017 Dec. 1;24(3):857-76. doi:10.18657/yonveek.307339

Cited By