THE ANALYSIS OF THE HUNGARIAN GOVERNMENT’S DISCOURSE TOWARDS THE MIGRANT CRISIS: A COMBINATION OF SECURITIZATION AND EUROSCEPTICISM
Öz
Since the Syrian crisis, migration has emerged as a rising and permanent discussion of European politics that has both created diversity and caused obstacles in the attitudes and policy orientations across the member states. In addition, the migrant crisis opened a space for Eurosceptic actors to exploit it as an issue for politicization and securitization. Eurosceptic discourse has framed the migrant crisis as a threat to national, economic, cultural and internal security, bringing its securitization aspect into question. In this respect, new security measures, such as border controls and detention, and a discourse that employs anti-migration themes have become visible in many member states. The focus of this study is to analyse Hungary’s overall position and policy orientations towards the crisis in order to deconstruct its main messages, identify the interlocutors and the reasons behind particular perspectives. In this descriptive content analysis, more than 160 official documents have been thoroughly examined. It was observed that in opposition to the European migration governance, Hungary has gone through a securitizing discourse as the first theme. The second theme is that due to Brussels’ policy preferences, which are characterized to be anti-democratic and unlawful, and believed to have created a civilization disaster, Budapest has exhibited a Eurosceptic stance. Hungary’s overall position and policy orientations towards the migrant crisis are concluded to be the combination of securitization and Euroscepticism. Accordingly in the last theme, Hungary’s proposed solution to the migrant crisis, which was framed as a threat, is “stopping” it by initiating new security measures.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Balzacq, T. (2005). The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171-201. Doi: 10.1177/1354066105052960
- Banulescu-Bogdan, N. & Fratzke, S. (2015, 24 September). Europe’s Migration crisis in context: why now and what next?. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/europe-migration-crisis-context- why-now-and-what-next
- Baysal, B. & Lüleci, Ç. (2015). Kopenhag Okulu ve Güvenlikleştirme Teorisi. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 11(22), 61-95. http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/guvenlikstrtj/article/view/5000148022
- BBC. (2005, 19 August). Migrant crisis: Slovakia ‘will only accept Christians’. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-33986738
- BBC. (2016, 3 March). Why is EU struggling with migrants and asylum?. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-24583286
- Bigo, D. (2002). Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives, 27(1), 63-92. Doi:10.1177/03043754020270S105
- Buzan B., Wæver, O. & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: a new framework for analysis. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
- Chadwick, V. (2016, 19 June). Viktor Orbán to lobby against Brexit. http://www.politico.eu/article/viktor-Orbán-news-uk-brexit-newspaper-ads/
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
Konferans Bildirisi
Yazarlar
Önder Canveren
DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ, AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ (DR)
Türkiye
Fulya Akgül Durakçay
DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ, AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ (DR)
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
27 Aralık 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
20 Nisan 2017
Kabul Tarihi
25 Aralık 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3
Cited By
Macaristan’da Popülist Söylem: Türk Göçmenlerin Deneyimleri
Alternatif Politika
https://doi.org/10.53376/ap.2023.04Güvenlikleştirme Kuramında ‘Söz Edim’ ve ‘Pratikler’: Türkçe Güvenlikleştirme Yazınında ‘Yöntem’ Arayışı
Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.905758THE EUROPEAN UNION’S POLICIES TO PROTECT THE RULE OF LAW IN THE CASE OF DEMOCRATIC BACKSLIDING IN HUNGARY
Akademik Hassasiyetler
https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1295652Crisis management experience in Hungary
Global Public Policy and Governance
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-023-00077-y