Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 17 - 34, 01.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466

Öz

Bu makalenin öncelikli amacı, örgütsel analizde kurumsalcı
yaklaşımın ortaya çıkış sürecini temel nedenleriyle birlikte açıklamaktır.
İkinci önemli amacı ise kurumsalcı yaklaşım geleneği içerisinde değerlendirilen
Yeni Kurumsal Kuram’ın örgüt çalışmalarına katkılarını gösterebilmektir. Üçüncü
amacı ise yeni kurumsal kuramın öne sürdüğü varsayım ve iddialara hem kuram
içinden hem de örgütsel analizdeki diğer kuramlardan yöneltilen bazı temel eleştirileri
tartışmaktır. Çalışmada benimsenen yöntem literatür taramasıdır. Çalışma teorik
düzeyde yürütülmüş ve Türkçe literatüre teorik düzeyde katkı sunacağı
düşünülmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Arrow, K.J. (1974). The Limits of Organizations. Newyork: London. W.W. North.
  • Barley, S. R. ve P. S.Tolbert. (1997). Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links Between Action and Institution. Organization Studies, 18.1, 93-117.
  • Barley, S. R. (2010). Building an Institutional Field to Corral a Government: A Case to Set an Agenda for Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 31.6, 777-805.
  • Berger, P.L. ve T.Luckmann. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.
  • Bowring, M.A. (2000). De/Constructing Theory: A Look at the Institutional Theory That Positivism Built. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9.3, 258-270.
  • Coleman, J.S. (1986). Social Theory, Social Research and a Theory of Action. American Journal of Sociology, 91.6, 1309-1335.
  • Collins, R. (1981). On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86.5, 984-1014.
  • DiMaggio, P. J. ve W.W.Powell. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
  • DiMaggio, P.J. ve W.W.Powell. (1991-a). Introdiction. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1-38.
  • DiMaggio, P.J. ve W.W.Powell. (1991-b). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 63-82.
  • DiMaggio, P. J. (1997). Culture and Cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263-287.
  • Fligstein, N. (1997). Social Skill and Institutional Theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40.4, 397-405.
  • Friedland, R. ve R.R.Alford. (1991). Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practies and Institutional Contradictions. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 232-263.
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Autline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1969). The Characteristics of Total Institutions. A.A. Etzioni (Ed). Sociological Reader an Complex Organizations (içinde). 2nd Ed. Newyork: Hall, Rinehart and Winsten. 312-338.
  • Goffman, E. (1983). The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 48.1, 1-17.
  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure. The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91.3, 481-510.
  • Greenwood, R. ve C.R.Hinings. (1996). Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21.4, 1022-1054.
  • Greenwood, R., C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby. (2008). Introduction. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Eds). Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde), London: Sage. 1-46.
  • Haveman, H.A. ve H.Rao. (1997). Structuring a Theory Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102.6, 1606-1651.
  • Hirsch, P.M. (1997). Sociology without Social Structure: Neo-Institutional Theory Meets Brave New World. American Journal of Sociology, 102.6, 1702-1723.
  • Hirsch, P.M. ve M.Lounsbury. (1997). Ending the Family Quarrel: Toward a Reconciliation of Old and New İnstitutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40.4, 406-418.
  • Jepperson, R.L. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Effects and Institutionalism. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 143-163.
  • Jepperson, R.L. ve J.W.Meyer. (1991). The Puclic Order and the Construction of Formal Organization. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 204-231.
  • Jepperson, R.L. ve J.W.Meyer. (2011). Multiple Levels of Analysis and the Limitations of Methodological Individualisms. Sociological Theory, 29.1, 54-73.
  • Meyer, J.W. ve B. Rowan. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83.2, 340-363.
  • Meyer, J.W. ve B.Rowan. (1991). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 41-62.
  • Meyer, J.W. ve R.L.Jepperson. (2000). The Actors of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. Sociological Theory, 18.1, 101-120.
  • Meyer, J.W. (2008). Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Ed). Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde). London: Sage. 788-809. Meyer, J.W. (2010). World Society, Institutional Theories and the Actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1-20.
  • Meyer, J.W. (2017). Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Ed). Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde). 2nd Edition, London: Sage. 831-852.
  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16.1, 145-179.
  • Olsen, M. (1968). The Logic of Collective Action, Public Goods and Theory of Group. Newyork: Schocken Books. Parsons, T. (1956-a). Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations-1. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1.1, 63-85.
  • Parsons, T. (1956-b). Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations-2. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1.1, 225-239.
  • Parsons, T. (1960). Authority, Legitimation and Political Action. Structure and Process in Modern Societies (içinde). Glencae IL: Free Press. 170-198.
  • Parsons, T. (1991). The Social System. London: Routledge&Kegan Paul. Perrow, C. (1985). Overboard with Myth and Symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 91.1, 151-155.
  • Powell, W.W. (1991). Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 183-203.
  • Powell, W.W. ve J.A.Colyvas. (2008). Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Eds). Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde), London: Sage. 276-298.
  • Scott, W.R. (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.
  • Scott, W.R. (1991). Unpacking Institutional Arguments. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 164-182.
  • Scott, W.R. and J.W.Meyer. (1991-a). The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 108-140.
  • Scott, W.R. ve J.W.Meyer. (1991-b). The Rise of Training Programs in Firms and Agencies: An Institutional Perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 297-326.
  • Scott, W.R. (1995). Contemporary Institutional Theory. Institutions and Organizations (içinde). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 33-61.
  • Scott, W.R. (1998). Conceptions of Environments. Organizations Rational, Natural and Open Systems (içinde). 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. 123-148.
  • Scott, W.R. (2008). Approaching Adulthood: The Maturing of Institutional Theory. Theory Sociology. 37, 427-442.
  • Scott, W.R. (2017). Institutional Theory: Onward and Upward. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Ed). Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde). 2nd Edition, London: Sage. 853-871.
  • Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the Theory of Organization. American Sociological Review, 13.1, 25-35.
  • Selznick, P. (1990). TVA and Gross Roots. Berkeley: University of California.
  • Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism: Old and New. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270-277.
  • Sewell, W.H. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98.1, 1-29.
  • Stinchcombe, A.L. (1997). On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 1-18.
  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review, 51.2, 273-286.
  • Tolbert, P.S. (1985). Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Source of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30.1, 1-13.
  • Tolbert, P. S. ve L.G.Zucker. (1983). Institutional Source of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22-39.
  • Tolbert, P.S. ve L.G.Zucker. (1996). The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. S.Clegg, C.Hardy ve W.Nord (Ed). Handbook of Organization Studies (içinde). London: Sage. 175-190.
  • Weick, K.E. (1969). The Social Psychology of Organizations. Reading Mass, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Pub. Co.
  • Weick, K.E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38.4, 628-652.
  • Wiley, N. (1988). The Micro – Macro Problem in Social Theory. Sociological Theory, 6.2, 254-261.
  • Zucker, L.G. (1977). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence. American Sociological Review, 42.5, 726-743.
  • Zucker, L.G. (1987). Institutional Theories of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464.
  • Zucker, L.G. (1991). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. 83-107.
Toplam 61 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Ekonomi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Salih Arslan 0000-0002-4993-5611

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 6 Şubat 2019
Kabul Tarihi 1 Nisan 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Arslan, S. (2019). REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi Ve Felsefe Dergisi, 7(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466
AMA Arslan S. REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum-Yönetim-Yöntem (JIMM). Nisan 2019;7(1):17-34. doi:10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466
Chicago Arslan, Salih. “REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi Ve Felsefe Dergisi 7, sy. 1 (Nisan 2019): 17-34. https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466.
EndNote Arslan S (01 Nisan 2019) REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi 7 1 17–34.
IEEE S. Arslan, “REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”, Yorum-Yönetim-Yöntem (JIMM), c. 7, sy. 1, ss. 17–34, 2019, doi: 10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466.
ISNAD Arslan, Salih. “REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi 7/1 (Nisan 2019), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466.
JAMA Arslan S. REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum-Yönetim-Yöntem (JIMM). 2019;7:17–34.
MLA Arslan, Salih. “REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi Ve Felsefe Dergisi, c. 7, sy. 1, 2019, ss. 17-34, doi:10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466.
Vancouver Arslan S. REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum-Yönetim-Yöntem (JIMM). 2019;7(1):17-34.