Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

KUŞAK ÇALIŞMALARINDAKİ TARTIŞMALI KONULARA İLİŞKİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Year 2020, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 17 - 34, 30.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.707744

Abstract

Kuşak kavramı ve kuşaklar arası farklılıklar, akademisyenler, uygulayıcılar ve popüler medya gibi birçok tarafın ilgisini çekmekte ve konuyla ilgili araştırma sayısı her geçen gün artmaktadır. Bununla birlikte kuşak kavramının çok boyutlu yapısına odaklanan ve kuşak çalışmalarındaki sorunlara değinen sınırlı sayıda araştırma vardır. Bu doğrultuda, kuşakları daha iyi kavrayabilmek için kavramla ilgili varsayımların eleştirel bir biçimde sorgulanması önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kuşak kavramını analiz ederek ve kavramın bağlamından kopuk olarak ele alınmasının yarattığı sorunları sistematik bir şekilde ortaya koyarak kapsamlı bir çerçeve sunmaktır. Ayrıca pazarlama alanındaki kuşak literatürüne eleştirel bir bakış açısı ile katkı sağlanması hedeflenmiştir. Bunun için kavramın tarihsel gelişimi, tanımları ve kullanımındaki sorunlar tartışılmış ve pazarlama alanında kuşak farklılıklarına odaklanan çalışmalar literatür analizi yöntemi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Kuşaklar arası farklılıklarla ilgili literatürde karşılaşılan genel sorunlar, pazarlama alanındaki çalışmalar üzerinden betimlenmiştir. Bu noktadan hareketle kuşak kavramına dair bilgiye ilişkin kavrayış ve kuşaklarla ilgili araştırma tasarımları için önerilerde bulunulmuştur. Çalışmada sunulan çerçevenin hem araştırmacılar hem de uygulayıcıların kuşaklarla ilgili araştırma süreçlerine ve değerlendirmelerine katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.

References

  • American Marketing Association/AMA, (2017). Definitions of Marketing, https://www.ama.org/the-definition-of-marketing-what-is-marketing/ (Erişim Tarihi: 12.03.2020).
  • Arsenault, P. M. (2004). Validating generational differences. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25 (2), 124-141.
  • Bengtson, V. L., Furlong, M. J., & Laufer, R. S. (1983). Time, aging, and the continuity of social structure: Themes and issues in generational analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 30 (2), 1-30.
  • Benson, J. & Brown, M. (2011). Generations at work: are there differences and do they matter?. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22 (9), 1843-1865
  • Burnett, J. (2010). Generations: The Time Machine in Theory and Practice. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Press. Cennamo, L. & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person‐organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23 (8), 891-906.
  • Costa, C., Gilliland, G., & McWatt, J. (2019). ‘I want to keep up with the younger generation’-older adults and the web: a generational divide or generational collide?. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 38 (5), 566-578.
  • Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B., & Gade, P. A. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 375-394.
  • Costanza, D. P., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2015). Generationally based differences in the workplace: Is there a there there?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(3), 308-323
  • Edmunds, J., & Turner, B. S. (2005). Global generations: social change in the twentieth century. The British Journal of Sociology, 56 (4), 559-577.
  • Erdoğan, B. Z. & Çifci, S. D. (2015). Uygulamalı sentez bir sosyal bilim olarak pazarlama. Pazarlama Teorisi ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 1 (1), 1-21.
  • France, A. & Roberts, S. (2015). The problem of social generations: a critique of the new emerging orthodoxy in youth studies, Journal of Youth Studies, 18 (2), 215-230.
  • Giancola, F. (2006). The generation gap: More myth than reality. Human Resource Planning, 29 (4), 32–37. Glenn, N. D. (1976). Cohort analysts' futile quest: Statistical attempts to separate age, period and cohort effects. American Sociological Review, 41 (5), 900-904.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2015). Kuşak farklılıkları: Mit mi, gerçek mi. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 2 (1), 39-57.
  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. Vintage.
  • Jaeger, H. (1985). Generations in history: Reflections on a controversial concept. History and Theory, 24 (3), 273-292.
  • Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., & Franz, G. (2011). Generations in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 177-205.
  • Kowske, B. J., Rasch, R., & Wiley, J. (2010). Millennials’ (lack of) attitude problem: An empirical examination of generational effects on work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25 (2), 265-279.
  • Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19 (1), 65-76.
  • Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In Kecskemeti P. (Ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge: Collected Works, New York: Routledge
  • Marias, J. (1968). Generations: The concept. International encyclopedia of social sciences. New York: Free Press.
  • Nash, L. (1978). Greek Origins of Generational Thought. Daedalus, 107, 1-22.
  • Noble, S. M., & Schewe, C. D. (2003). Cohort segmentation: An exploration of its validity. Journal of Business Research, 56 (12), 979-987.
  • Palmore, E. (1978). When can age, period, and cohort be separated?. Social Forces, 57 (1), 282-295.
  • Parry, E. & Urvin, P. (2010). Generational Differences in Work Values: A Review of Theory and Evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13 (1), p.79-96.
  • Pilcher, J. (1994). Mannheim's sociology of generations: an undervalued legacy. British Journal of Sociology, 45 (3), 481-495.
  • Reeves, T., ve Oh, E. (2007). Generational Differences. in J.M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M.P. Driscoll (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Springer.
  • Rhodes, S. R. (1983). Age-related differences in work attitudes and behavior: A review and conceptual analysis. Psychological bulletin, 93 (2), 328.
  • Schewe, C.D. & Noble, S.M. (2000). Market segmentation by cohorts: the value and validity of cohorts in American and abroad, Journal of Marketing Management, 16, 129-42.
  • Schewe, C. D., & Meredith, G. (2004). Segmenting global markets by generational cohorts: determining motivations by age. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4 (1), 51-63.
  • Schuman, H. & Scott, J. (1989), Generations and collective memories, American Sociological Review, 54, 359-81.
  • Smola, W. K., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23 (4), 363-382.
  • Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America's future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow & Co.
  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14 (3), 207-222.
  • Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36 (5), 1117-1142.
  • Wyn, J. & Woodman, D. (2006). Generation, youth and social change in Australia. Journal of Youth Studies, 9 (5), 495-514.
  • Yang, S. & Guy, E. M. (2006). Genxers versus Boomers: Work motivators and management implications, Public Performance & Management Review, 29 (3), 267-284.
  • Yüksekbilgili, Z. (2015). Türkiye’de Y Kuşağının Yaş Aralığı. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14 (53), 259-267.
  • Zemke, R., Raines, C. & Filipczak, B. (2000), Generations at Work: Managing the Clash of Veterans. Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in Your Workplace, AMACOM, New York, NY.
  • https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/
  • https://scholar.google.com
Year 2020, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 17 - 34, 30.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.707744

Abstract

References

  • American Marketing Association/AMA, (2017). Definitions of Marketing, https://www.ama.org/the-definition-of-marketing-what-is-marketing/ (Erişim Tarihi: 12.03.2020).
  • Arsenault, P. M. (2004). Validating generational differences. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25 (2), 124-141.
  • Bengtson, V. L., Furlong, M. J., & Laufer, R. S. (1983). Time, aging, and the continuity of social structure: Themes and issues in generational analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 30 (2), 1-30.
  • Benson, J. & Brown, M. (2011). Generations at work: are there differences and do they matter?. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22 (9), 1843-1865
  • Burnett, J. (2010). Generations: The Time Machine in Theory and Practice. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Press. Cennamo, L. & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person‐organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23 (8), 891-906.
  • Costa, C., Gilliland, G., & McWatt, J. (2019). ‘I want to keep up with the younger generation’-older adults and the web: a generational divide or generational collide?. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 38 (5), 566-578.
  • Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B., & Gade, P. A. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 375-394.
  • Costanza, D. P., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2015). Generationally based differences in the workplace: Is there a there there?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(3), 308-323
  • Edmunds, J., & Turner, B. S. (2005). Global generations: social change in the twentieth century. The British Journal of Sociology, 56 (4), 559-577.
  • Erdoğan, B. Z. & Çifci, S. D. (2015). Uygulamalı sentez bir sosyal bilim olarak pazarlama. Pazarlama Teorisi ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 1 (1), 1-21.
  • France, A. & Roberts, S. (2015). The problem of social generations: a critique of the new emerging orthodoxy in youth studies, Journal of Youth Studies, 18 (2), 215-230.
  • Giancola, F. (2006). The generation gap: More myth than reality. Human Resource Planning, 29 (4), 32–37. Glenn, N. D. (1976). Cohort analysts' futile quest: Statistical attempts to separate age, period and cohort effects. American Sociological Review, 41 (5), 900-904.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2015). Kuşak farklılıkları: Mit mi, gerçek mi. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 2 (1), 39-57.
  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. Vintage.
  • Jaeger, H. (1985). Generations in history: Reflections on a controversial concept. History and Theory, 24 (3), 273-292.
  • Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., & Franz, G. (2011). Generations in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 177-205.
  • Kowske, B. J., Rasch, R., & Wiley, J. (2010). Millennials’ (lack of) attitude problem: An empirical examination of generational effects on work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25 (2), 265-279.
  • Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19 (1), 65-76.
  • Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In Kecskemeti P. (Ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge: Collected Works, New York: Routledge
  • Marias, J. (1968). Generations: The concept. International encyclopedia of social sciences. New York: Free Press.
  • Nash, L. (1978). Greek Origins of Generational Thought. Daedalus, 107, 1-22.
  • Noble, S. M., & Schewe, C. D. (2003). Cohort segmentation: An exploration of its validity. Journal of Business Research, 56 (12), 979-987.
  • Palmore, E. (1978). When can age, period, and cohort be separated?. Social Forces, 57 (1), 282-295.
  • Parry, E. & Urvin, P. (2010). Generational Differences in Work Values: A Review of Theory and Evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13 (1), p.79-96.
  • Pilcher, J. (1994). Mannheim's sociology of generations: an undervalued legacy. British Journal of Sociology, 45 (3), 481-495.
  • Reeves, T., ve Oh, E. (2007). Generational Differences. in J.M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M.P. Driscoll (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Springer.
  • Rhodes, S. R. (1983). Age-related differences in work attitudes and behavior: A review and conceptual analysis. Psychological bulletin, 93 (2), 328.
  • Schewe, C.D. & Noble, S.M. (2000). Market segmentation by cohorts: the value and validity of cohorts in American and abroad, Journal of Marketing Management, 16, 129-42.
  • Schewe, C. D., & Meredith, G. (2004). Segmenting global markets by generational cohorts: determining motivations by age. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4 (1), 51-63.
  • Schuman, H. & Scott, J. (1989), Generations and collective memories, American Sociological Review, 54, 359-81.
  • Smola, W. K., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23 (4), 363-382.
  • Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America's future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow & Co.
  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14 (3), 207-222.
  • Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36 (5), 1117-1142.
  • Wyn, J. & Woodman, D. (2006). Generation, youth and social change in Australia. Journal of Youth Studies, 9 (5), 495-514.
  • Yang, S. & Guy, E. M. (2006). Genxers versus Boomers: Work motivators and management implications, Public Performance & Management Review, 29 (3), 267-284.
  • Yüksekbilgili, Z. (2015). Türkiye’de Y Kuşağının Yaş Aralığı. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14 (53), 259-267.
  • Zemke, R., Raines, C. & Filipczak, B. (2000), Generations at Work: Managing the Clash of Veterans. Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in Your Workplace, AMACOM, New York, NY.
  • https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/
  • https://scholar.google.com
There are 40 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Economics
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Ali Emre Aydın 0000-0002-2340-8469

Publication Date April 30, 2020
Submission Date March 23, 2020
Acceptance Date April 16, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Aydın, A. E. (2020). KUŞAK ÇALIŞMALARINDAKİ TARTIŞMALI KONULARA İLİŞKİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi Ve Felsefe Dergisi, 8(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.707744
AMA Aydın AE. KUŞAK ÇALIŞMALARINDAKİ TARTIŞMALI KONULARA İLİŞKİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. JIMM. April 2020;8(1):17-34. doi:10.32705/yorumyonetim.707744
Chicago Aydın, Ali Emre. “KUŞAK ÇALIŞMALARINDAKİ TARTIŞMALI KONULARA İLİŞKİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi Ve Felsefe Dergisi 8, no. 1 (April 2020): 17-34. https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.707744.
EndNote Aydın AE (April 1, 2020) KUŞAK ÇALIŞMALARINDAKİ TARTIŞMALI KONULARA İLİŞKİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi 8 1 17–34.
IEEE A. E. Aydın, “KUŞAK ÇALIŞMALARINDAKİ TARTIŞMALI KONULARA İLİŞKİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”, JIMM, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 17–34, 2020, doi: 10.32705/yorumyonetim.707744.
ISNAD Aydın, Ali Emre. “KUŞAK ÇALIŞMALARINDAKİ TARTIŞMALI KONULARA İLİŞKİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi 8/1 (April 2020), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.707744.
JAMA Aydın AE. KUŞAK ÇALIŞMALARINDAKİ TARTIŞMALI KONULARA İLİŞKİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. JIMM. 2020;8:17–34.
MLA Aydın, Ali Emre. “KUŞAK ÇALIŞMALARINDAKİ TARTIŞMALI KONULARA İLİŞKİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi Ve Felsefe Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 1, 2020, pp. 17-34, doi:10.32705/yorumyonetim.707744.
Vancouver Aydın AE. KUŞAK ÇALIŞMALARINDAKİ TARTIŞMALI KONULARA İLİŞKİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. JIMM. 2020;8(1):17-34.

Dear Authors;
There should be no information about the authors on your manuscript uploaded to the journal system. Our esteemed authors are kindly requested to consider this warning.

Our journal (JIMM) adopts Open Access Policy and does not demand any charges (fee) for submitting, processing and publishing articles from authors.


88x31.png

The journal (JIMM) is licensed by Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)