Research Article
PDF BibTex RIS Cite

İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 26 - 40, 15.09.2021

Abstract

Bu araştırmada; bilgi gizleme, psikolojik güvenlik ve işe angaje olma arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Çalışmada ilk olarak kavramlar incelenmiş ve geniş literatür taraması yapılmıştır. Literatür taramasının ardından araştırma modeli ve hipotezler geliştirilmiştir. Sonraki aşamada kavramlar arasındaki ilişkiler nicel yöntemler kullanılarak ampirik bir araştırma yapılmıştır. Bu bağlamda sosyal bilimlerde sıklıkla kullanılan anket tekniğinden faydalanılmıştır. Araştırmada literatürde var olan ölçekler kullanılmıştır. İlgili anket çalışması çeşitli yaş ve meslek gruplarından 500’den fazla kişiye ulaştırılmıştır. Ankete 324 kişiden geri dönüş sağlanmıştır. Ölçeklerin geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri gerçekleştirildikten sonra kavramsal model test edilmiştir.
Çalışmanın sonuçları bilgi gizleme ve psikolojik güvenlik ile bilgi gizleme ve işe angaje olma değişkenlerinin negatif ilişkili olduğunu, psikolojik güvenlik ve işe angaje olmanın pozitif ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca psikolojik güvenlik iki değişken arasında aracı etkisi görmektedir.

References

  • Alavi M. & Leidner D.E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge managament systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25 (1), 107-136.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
  • Burmeister A., Fasbender U. & Gerpott F.H. (2019). Consequences of knowledge hiding: The differential compensatory effects of guilt and shame. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92, 281–304.
  • Connelly C.E. & Kelloway E.K. (2001). Predictors of Employees’ Perceptions of Knowledge Sharing Cultures. Working Paper, 01-06.
  • Connelly C.E., Zweig D., Webster J. & Trougakos J.P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 64–88.
  • Černe M., Nerstad C.G.L., Dysvık A. & Škerlavaj M. (2014). What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 1-52.
  • Chen C.Y., Yen C.H. & Tsai F.C. (2014). Job crafting and job engagement: The mediating role of person-job fit. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37, 21-28.
  • Connelly C.E., Černe M., Dysvik A. & Škerlavaj M. (2019). Understanding Knowledge Hiding in Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 40, 779-782.
  • Davenport T. H. & Prusak L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Emerson R.M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.
  • Edmondson A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (2), 350-383.
  • Edmondson A.C. (2002). Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams. International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork, London: Blackwell.
  • Edmondson A.C. & Mogelof J.P. (2004). Explaining psychological safety in innovation teams: Organizational culture, team dynamics, or personality?. In Thompson L.L. and Choi H.S. (Eds.) Creativity and innovation in organizational teams, 109-136, Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Edmondson A. C. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. In Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches. Kramer RM, Cook KS (eds). Russell Sage Foundation. New York: 239-272.
  • Inceoglu I. & Warr P. (2012a). Personality and job engagement. Journal of Personnel Psychology, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10 (4), 177-181.
  • Inceoglu I. & Warr P. (2012b). Job engagement, job satisfaction, and contrasting associations with person-job fit. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17 (2), 129-138.
  • Jiang Z., Hu X., Wang Z. & Jiang X. (2019). Knowledge hiding as a barrier to thriving: The mediating role of psychological safety and moderating role of organizational cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40, 800–818.
  • Kahn W.A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), 692-724.
  • Kelloway E. K. & Barling J. (2000). Knowledge Work as Organizational Behavior, International Journal of Management Reviews, 287-304.
  • Maslow A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Originally Published in Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
  • Maslach C., Schaufeli W.B. & Leiter M.P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.
  • May D.R., Gilson R.L. & Harter L.M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37.
  • Macey W.H. & Schneider B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30.
  • Nunnally J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. 2nd Edition, McGraw‐Hill.
  • Offergelt F., Spörrle M., Moser K. & Shaw J.D. (2018). Leader‐signaled knowledge hiding: Effects on employees' job attitudes and empowerment. Journal Organizational Behaviour, 40, 819–833.
  • Peng H. (2013). Why and when do people hide knowledge?. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17 (3), 398-415.
  • Rich B.L., Lepine J.A. & Crawford E.R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (3), 617–635.
  • Schein E.H. (1992). How can organiations learn faster? The problem of entering the green room. Working paper, 3409-92.
  • Saks A.M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (7), 600-619.
  • Schoorman F.D., Mayer R.C. & Davis J.H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Review, 32 (2), 344-354.
  • Schaufeli W. (2013). What is engagement?. Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice, London: Routledge, 3-37.
  • Skerlavaj M., Connelly C.E., Cerne M. & Dysvik A. (2018). Tell me if you can: Time pressure, prosocial motivation, perspective taking, and knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22 (7), 1489-1509.
  • Webster J., Brown G., Zweig D., Connelly C.E., Brodt S. & Sitkin S. (2008). Beyond knowledge sharing: Withholding knowledge at work. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 27.

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 26 - 40, 15.09.2021

Abstract

References

  • Alavi M. & Leidner D.E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge managament systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25 (1), 107-136.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
  • Burmeister A., Fasbender U. & Gerpott F.H. (2019). Consequences of knowledge hiding: The differential compensatory effects of guilt and shame. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92, 281–304.
  • Connelly C.E. & Kelloway E.K. (2001). Predictors of Employees’ Perceptions of Knowledge Sharing Cultures. Working Paper, 01-06.
  • Connelly C.E., Zweig D., Webster J. & Trougakos J.P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 64–88.
  • Černe M., Nerstad C.G.L., Dysvık A. & Škerlavaj M. (2014). What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 1-52.
  • Chen C.Y., Yen C.H. & Tsai F.C. (2014). Job crafting and job engagement: The mediating role of person-job fit. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37, 21-28.
  • Connelly C.E., Černe M., Dysvik A. & Škerlavaj M. (2019). Understanding Knowledge Hiding in Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 40, 779-782.
  • Davenport T. H. & Prusak L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Emerson R.M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.
  • Edmondson A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (2), 350-383.
  • Edmondson A.C. (2002). Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams. International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork, London: Blackwell.
  • Edmondson A.C. & Mogelof J.P. (2004). Explaining psychological safety in innovation teams: Organizational culture, team dynamics, or personality?. In Thompson L.L. and Choi H.S. (Eds.) Creativity and innovation in organizational teams, 109-136, Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Edmondson A. C. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. In Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches. Kramer RM, Cook KS (eds). Russell Sage Foundation. New York: 239-272.
  • Inceoglu I. & Warr P. (2012a). Personality and job engagement. Journal of Personnel Psychology, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10 (4), 177-181.
  • Inceoglu I. & Warr P. (2012b). Job engagement, job satisfaction, and contrasting associations with person-job fit. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17 (2), 129-138.
  • Jiang Z., Hu X., Wang Z. & Jiang X. (2019). Knowledge hiding as a barrier to thriving: The mediating role of psychological safety and moderating role of organizational cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40, 800–818.
  • Kahn W.A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), 692-724.
  • Kelloway E. K. & Barling J. (2000). Knowledge Work as Organizational Behavior, International Journal of Management Reviews, 287-304.
  • Maslow A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Originally Published in Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
  • Maslach C., Schaufeli W.B. & Leiter M.P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.
  • May D.R., Gilson R.L. & Harter L.M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37.
  • Macey W.H. & Schneider B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30.
  • Nunnally J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. 2nd Edition, McGraw‐Hill.
  • Offergelt F., Spörrle M., Moser K. & Shaw J.D. (2018). Leader‐signaled knowledge hiding: Effects on employees' job attitudes and empowerment. Journal Organizational Behaviour, 40, 819–833.
  • Peng H. (2013). Why and when do people hide knowledge?. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17 (3), 398-415.
  • Rich B.L., Lepine J.A. & Crawford E.R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (3), 617–635.
  • Schein E.H. (1992). How can organiations learn faster? The problem of entering the green room. Working paper, 3409-92.
  • Saks A.M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (7), 600-619.
  • Schoorman F.D., Mayer R.C. & Davis J.H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Review, 32 (2), 344-354.
  • Schaufeli W. (2013). What is engagement?. Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice, London: Routledge, 3-37.
  • Skerlavaj M., Connelly C.E., Cerne M. & Dysvik A. (2018). Tell me if you can: Time pressure, prosocial motivation, perspective taking, and knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22 (7), 1489-1509.
  • Webster J., Brown G., Zweig D., Connelly C.E., Brodt S. & Sitkin S. (2008). Beyond knowledge sharing: Withholding knowledge at work. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 27.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Gözde ÖZER
GEBZE TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0002-4374-0063
Türkiye


Büşra MÜCELDİLİ
YILDIZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0003-2770-6137
Türkiye


Prof. Dr. Oya ERDİL
GEBZE TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0003-3793-001X
Türkiye

Publication Date September 15, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

Bibtex @research article { ysbed893306, journal = {Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi}, eissn = {2587-2036}, address = {Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yıldız Kampüsü Barbaros Bulvarı 34349 Yıldız - İstanbul}, publisher = {Yildiz Technical University}, year = {2021}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, pages = {26 - 40}, title = {İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi}, key = {cite}, author = {Özer, Gözde and Müceldili, Büşra and Erdil, Prof. Dr. Oya} }
APA Özer, G. , Müceldili, B. & Erdil, P. D. O. (2021). İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi . Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi , 5 (1) , 26-40 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ysbed/issue/65290/893306
MLA Özer, G. , Müceldili, B. , Erdil, P. D. O. "İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi" . Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5 (2021 ): 26-40 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ysbed/issue/65290/893306>
Chicago Özer, G. , Müceldili, B. , Erdil, P. D. O. "İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi". Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5 (2021 ): 26-40
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi AU - GözdeÖzer, BüşraMüceldili, Prof. Dr. OyaErdil Y1 - 2021 PY - 2021 N1 - DO - T2 - Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 26 EP - 40 VL - 5 IS - 1 SN - -2587-2036 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2021 ER -
EndNote %0 Yıldız Social Sciences Institute Journal İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi %A Gözde Özer , Büşra Müceldili , Prof. Dr. Oya Erdil %T İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi %D 2021 %J Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi %P -2587-2036 %V 5 %N 1 %R %U
ISNAD Özer, Gözde , Müceldili, Büşra , Erdil, Prof. Dr. Oya . "İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi". Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5 / 1 (September 2021): 26-40 .
AMA Özer G. , Müceldili B. , Erdil P. D. O. İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi. Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2021; 5(1): 26-40.
Vancouver Özer G. , Müceldili B. , Erdil P. D. O. İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi. Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2021; 5(1): 26-40.
IEEE G. Özer , B. Müceldili and P. D. O. Erdil , "İşletmelerde Çalışanların Psikolojik Güvenliği ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Örgütsel Çıktı Olan İşe Angaje Olmaya Etkisi", Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 26-40, Sep. 2021