Uluslararası Üniversite Sıralama Endekslerinde Türk Üniversitelerinin Yeri

Year 2016, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 95 - 103, 01.08.2016

Gökçen Arkalı Olcay Melih Bulu

Abstract

Üniversitelerin performanslarını eğitim, araştırma, yayın, uluslararasılaşma gibi çeşitli kriterler boyutunda ölçümleyen uluslararası derecelendirme endekslerinin yükseköğretimde kaliteyi ölçmeye yarayan bir araç olup olamayacağı tartışmaları akademik camiada devam ederken kamuoyunda bu endeksler büyük oranda ciddiye alınır hale gelmiştir. Her yıl dünyanın önde gelen uluslararası üniversite derecelendirme endeksleri önceden belirledikleri kriterler, kriterleri ölçen göstergeler ve göstergelerin ilgili ağırlıkları doğrultusunda çoğunlukla tek bir skorla ifade edilen sıralamalarını paydaşları ile paylaşmaktadır. Kullanılan kriterler ve metodolojik farklılıkların fiili sıralamaları nasıl etkilediği bir sorun iken, Türk üniversitelerinin bu sıralamalardaki görünürlüğü bir başka araştırma alanı oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmada 2011 ve 2015 yılları arasında THE World, QS World, ARWU ve URAP gibi önde gelen endekslere giren Türk üniversiteleri, bu üniversitelerin benzer ve ayırt edici özellikleri ve zaman içerisinde sıralamalardaki değişimleri ele alınmaktadır. Üniversitelerin büyüklüğü, devlet ve vakıf üniversitesi farklılığı, tıp fakültelerinin varlığı ve zaman içerisinde yerleşmiş üniversite itibarı gibi faktörlerin Türk üniversitelerinin uluslararası endekslerde sıralamalara girmesinde etkili olduğu gözlemlenmiştir.

Keywords

Kalite, üniversite, üniversite derecelendirme endeksleri, Türk üniversiteleri, yükseköğretim.

Rankings of Turkish universities in international university ranking indexes

Abstract

Global ranking indexes measure university performances in terms of criteria such as education, resarch, publication and internationalization. While the dicsussion on the role of global ranking indexes in determining the quality of higher education is going on in the academia, such indexes have started to be taken into account seriously by the public opinion. The leading university ranking indexes share the rankings of world universities that are mostly ranked in terms of a single score based on predetermined criteria, indicators measuring the criteria, and the associated weights of the indicators annually with their stakeholders. While understanding how employed criteria and differences in methodologies influence the actual rankings has been an issue, Turkish universities' placements in such rankings make another avenue for research. This study explores Turkish universities that take place in the leading indexes including THE World, QS World, ARWU, and URAP during 2011 and 2015, their similar and different aspects, and the changes in the rankings over the given time period. Factors such as size of the university, being a state or foundation university, existence of the medical school, and long established reputation play a role in Turkish universities' placements in leading international indexes.

Keywords

Higher education, quality, Turkish universities, university, university ranking indexes.

References

• Benneworth, P., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., and Asheim, B. (2009). Exploring the multiple roles of Lund University in Strengthening Scania’s Regional Innovation System: Towards institutional learn- ing? European Learning Studies, 17(11), 1645–1664.
• Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University (CWTS) (2015). CWTS Leiden Ranking 2015. 19 Ocak 2016 tarihinde <http://www.leidenranking.com/> adresinden erişildi.
• Dill, D. D. (2000). Capacity building as an instrument of institutional reform: Improving the quality of higher education through academ- ic audits in the UK, New Zealand, Sweden, and Hong Kong. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice, 2(2), 211–234.
• Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. (1999). The future location of research and technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2/3), 111–123.
• Hurtado, M. E. (2012, 30 Mayıs). Latin Americans challenge international rankings, University World News, 224. 19 Ocak 2016 tarihinde <http:// www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20120530142927343> adresinden erişildi.
• Lincoln, D. (2012, 28 Şubat). Rankings: an idea whose time has come, and gone. Inside-Higher Ed. 1 Mart 2016 tarihinde <http://www.insidehighered. com/blogs/world-view/rankings-idea-whose-time-has-come-and- gone> adresinden erişildi.
• Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) (2015). QS World University Rankings 2015/2016. 19 Ocak 2016 tarihinde <http://www.topuniversities.com/> adresinden erişildi.
• Saisana, M., d’Hombres, B., and Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy 40(1), 165–177.
• Shanghai Ranking Consultancy & Center for World-Class Universities of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (ARWU) (2015). The Academic Ranking of World Universities: 2015. 19 Ocak 2016 tarihinde <http://www. shanghairanking.com/> adresinden erişildi.
• Shin, J. C., and Toutkoushian, R. K. (2011). The past, present, and future of university rankings. In Shin, J. C., R. K. Toutkoushian, and U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings: Theoretical basis, method- ology and impacts on global higher education. The changing academy: The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective (Vol. 3, pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer Science.
• Soh, K. (2013). Times Higher Education 100 under 50 ranking: Old wine in a new bottle? Quality in Higher Education, 19(1), 111–121.
• Tobolowsky, B. F. (2003). “College rankings.” Encyclopedia of education. 19 Ocak 2016 tarihinde <http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2- 3403200129.html> adresinden erişildi.
• The Times Higher Education Supplement (THE) (2015). The Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2015–2016. 19 Ocak 2016 tarihinde <https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university- rankings/> adresinden erişildi.
• University Ranking by Academic Performance Research Laboratory at Informatics Institute of Middle East Technical University (URAP) (2015). 2015–2016 world ranking. 19 Ocak 2016 tarihinde <http://www.urapcenter.org/2015/> adresinden erişildi.
• van der Wende, M. C., and Westerheijden, D. F. (2009). Rankings and classifications: The need for a multidimensional approach. In F. A. van Vught (Ed), Mapping the higher education landscape. Towards a European classification of higher education. Higher education dynamics (Vol. 28, pp. 71–86). New York, NY: Springer.