Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Weed control efficacy of some herbicides in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)

Year 2024, , 201 - 215, 01.07.2024
https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1391905

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of herbicides with different active ingredients to control weeds that cause significant yield and quality losses in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) production.
Material and Methods: The study was conducted in 2020 and three were pre-planting (Lenacil (L), Chloridazon (C), S-metolachlor+ Benoxacor (SMB)) and three were post-emergence (Haloxyfop-R- Methyl-Ester (HM), Fluazifop-p-butyl (F), Ethofumasate + Phenmedipham + Desmedipham + Lenacil (EPDL)) herbicides with 6 different active ingredients were used.
Results: A total of 9 weed species belonging to 4 families were detected in the trial area. It was observed that during the assessment periods, the effects of herbicides on the weed population generally increased over time. As a result of the study, it was found that the effects of herbicides on the weed population varied between 16.25% and 83.75%. The study revealed that the herbicide SMB yielded the most significant impact on weed dry weight, demonstrating an effectiveness of 85.71%. The L and EPDL herbicides had a phytotoxic effect on quinoa and greatly reduced the yield. C and SMB herbicides partially caused phytotoxic effects on quinoa.
Conclusion: The highest biological productivity was obtained from the weed-free control plot with 1005.60 kg/da. Although the herbicides used were effective on weeds, it was observed that some herbicides caused phytotoxic effects on quinoa and reduced the yield.

References

  • Abbaspoor, M., 2022. Herbicide screening for weed control in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Plant Production Research, 29 (3): 89-104.
  • Abbott, W.S., 1925 A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18 (2): 265-267.
  • Alptekin, H. & R. Gürbüz, 2022. The effect of organic mulch materials on weed control in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Cultivation. Journal of Agriculture, 5 (1): 68-79.
  • Alptekin, H., A. Ozkan, R. Gurbuz & M. Kulak, 2023. Management of Weeds in Maize by Sequential or Individual Applications of Pre-and Post-Emergence Herbicides. Agriculture, 13 (2): 421.
  • Alptekin, H., R. Gürbüz, A. Özkan & A. Usanmaz Bozhüyük, 2022. Mardin ili yabancı ot sorununun ve kimyasal mücadele durumunun belirlenmesi. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi 23 (1): 84-93.
  • Angeli, V., P. Miguel Silva, D. Crispim Massuela, M. W. Khan, A. Hamar, F. Khajehei, G.H. Simone & C.Piatti, 2020. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An overview of the potentials of the “Golden Grain” and socio-economic and environmental aspects of its cultivation and marketization. Foods, 9 (2): 216.
  • Bhargava, A., S. Shukla & D. Ohri, 2006. Chenopodium quinoa-an Indian perspective. Industrial crops and products, 23 (1): 73-87.
  • Doğru, A. S. & Y. E. Kitiş, 2023. The weed species in corn fields in Antalya province of Türkiye. Ege Universitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 60 (3): 429-436.
  • Eğritaş, Ö., M. Tan & K. Haliloğlu, 2020. Herbisite dayanıklı mutant Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) hatlarında bazı bitkisel özelliklerin belirlenmesi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 10 (2): 1382-1388.
  • FAO, 2023. Food and Agriculture Organization. (Web page: http://www.fao.org/home/en/) (Date accessed: August 2023).
  • González, J. A., S. S. Eisa, S. A. Hussin & F. E. Prado, 2015. Quinoa: an ıncan crop to face global changes in agriculture. Quinoa. Improvement and sustainable production, 21 (1): 1-18.
  • Güncan, A. & M. Karaca, 2018. Yabancı Otlar ve Mücadele Prensipleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi yayınları, Konya. 243 s.
  • Jacobsen, S. E., 2003. The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food reviews international, 19 (1): 167-177.
  • Jacobsen, S. E., J. L. Christiansen & J. Rasmussen, 2010. Weed harrowing and inter-row hoeing in organic grown quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Outlook on Agrıculture, 39 (3): 223-227. Jancurova, M., 2009. Quinoa-a review. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 27 (2): 71-79.
  • Kakabouki, I., A. Karkanis, I. S. Travlos, D. Hela, P. Papastylianou, H. Wu, C. Demosthenis, R. Sestrasf & D. Bilalis, 2015. Weed flora and seed yield in quinoa crop (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as affected by tillage systems and fertilization practices. International Journal of Pest Management, 61 (3): 228-234.
  • Kırgeç, Y., 2018. Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Ekim Alanlarında Sorun Olan Yabancı Ot Türlerinin ve Bunların Mücadelesinde Kullanılabilecek Herbisitlerin Fitotoksik Etkilerinin Saptanması. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, (Basılmamış) Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Samsun, 61 s.
  • Langeroodi, A. R. S., R. Mancinelli & E. Radicetti, 2020. How do ıntensification practices affect weed management and yield in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) crop?. Sustainability, 12 (15): 6103.
  • Latorre, F., 2014. Is Quinoa Cultivation on The Coastal Desert of Peru Sustainable? A Case Study From Majes. Faculty of Science and Technology, University Department of Agroecology, (Unpublished) Master’s Thesis, Denmark, 86 pp.
  • Merino, J., A. Pedreros, S. Fischer & M. D. López, 2020. Effect of post-emergence herbicides on stress indicators in quinoa. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 80 (1): 21-29.
  • Navruz-Varli, S. & N. Sanlier, 2016. Nutritional and health benefits of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Cereal Science, 69 (2016): 371-376.
  • Nurse, R. E., K. Obeid & E. R. Page, 2016. Optimal planting date, row width, and critical weed-free period for grain amaranth and quinoa grown in Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 96 (3): 360-366.
  • O’Connell, J., 2015. Quinoa Grains a Foothold in Eastern Idaho. Capital Press, (Web page: https://www.capitalpress.com/state/idaho/quinoa-gains-a-foothold-in-eastern-idaho) (Date accessed: August 2023).
  • Odum, P., 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, 574 pp.
  • Olivoto, T., M. Nardino, I. R. Carvalho, D. N. Follmann, V. J. Szareski, M. Ferrari, A. J. de Pelegrin & V. Q. de Souza, 2017. Plant secondary metabolites and its dynamical systems of induction in response to environmental factors: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 12 (2): 71-84.
  • Repo-Carrasco, R., C. Espinoza & S.E. Jacobsen 2003. Nutritional value and use of the Andean crops quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and kaniwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule). Food Reviews International, 19 (1-2): 179-189.
  • Santos, R. L. D. B., C. R. Spehar & L. Vivaldi, 2003. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) reaction to herbicide residue in a Brazilian Savannah soil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 38 (6): 771-776.
  • Sevindik, A., R. N. Gültekin & H. Uran 2021. Altın Tahıl: Kinoa. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (1): 155-165.
  • Tan, M. & S. Temel, 2019. Her Yönüyle Kinoa Önemi, Kullanılması ve Yetiştiriciliği. İksad Yayınevi, Ankara.177 s.
  • Tuusis, D., 2020. Impact of Herbicides on Quinoa Yield and Weediness. Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, (Unpublished) Doctoral Thesis, Estonian, 34 pp.
  • Üstüner, T. & A. Güncan, 2002. Niğde ve yöresi patates tarlalarında sorun olan yabancı otların yoğunluğu ve önemi ile topluluk oluşturmaları üzerine araştırmalar. Türkiye Herboloji Dergisi, 5 (2): 30-42.

Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)’da yabancı ot kontrolünde bazı herbisitlerin etkinliği

Year 2024, , 201 - 215, 01.07.2024
https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1391905

Abstract

Amaç: Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) üretiminde önemli verim ve kalite kayıplarına neden olan yabancı otların kontrolü amacıyla farklı aktif maddeli herbisitlerin etkinliği araştırılmıştır.
Materyal ve Yöntem: araştırma 2020 yılında yürütülmüş ve Çalışmada üçü ekim öncesi (Lenacil (L), Chloridazon (C), S-metolachlor + Benoxacor (SMB) ve üçü çıkış sonrası (Haloxyfop-R- Methyl-Ester (HM), Fluazifop-p-butyl (F), Ethofumasate+ Phenmedipham + Desmedipham +Lenacil (EPDL)) olmak üzere 6 farklı aktif maddeli herbisit kullanılmıştır.
Araştırma Bulguları: Deneme alanında 5 familyaya ait toplamda 9 yabancı ot türü tespit edilmiştir. Yapılan değerlendirmelerde herbisitlerin yabancı ot popülasyonu üzerine etkilerinde genel olarak değerlendirme süreleri boyunca artış gözlemlenmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda herbisitlerin yabancı ot popülasyonu üzerine etkileri %16.25 ile %83.75 oranları arasında değişiklik göstermiştir. Çalışmada en yüksek yabancı ot kuru ağırlığı üzerine yüzde etki SMB (%85.71) herbisitinde elde edilmiştir. L ve EPDL herbisitleri kinoaya fitotoksik etki gösterip verimi büyük oranda düşürmüştür. C ve SMB herbisitleri ise kısmen kinoada fitotoksik etkiye neden olmuşlardır. En yüksek biyolojik verim 1005.60 kg/da ile yabancı otsuz kontrol parselinden elde edilmiştir.
Sonuç: Kullanılan herbisitler yabancı otlar üzerinde etkili olmalarına rağmen, bazı herbisitlerin kinoada fitotoksik etkiye neden olduğu ve verimi düşürdüğü görülmüştür.

References

  • Abbaspoor, M., 2022. Herbicide screening for weed control in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Plant Production Research, 29 (3): 89-104.
  • Abbott, W.S., 1925 A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18 (2): 265-267.
  • Alptekin, H. & R. Gürbüz, 2022. The effect of organic mulch materials on weed control in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Cultivation. Journal of Agriculture, 5 (1): 68-79.
  • Alptekin, H., A. Ozkan, R. Gurbuz & M. Kulak, 2023. Management of Weeds in Maize by Sequential or Individual Applications of Pre-and Post-Emergence Herbicides. Agriculture, 13 (2): 421.
  • Alptekin, H., R. Gürbüz, A. Özkan & A. Usanmaz Bozhüyük, 2022. Mardin ili yabancı ot sorununun ve kimyasal mücadele durumunun belirlenmesi. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi 23 (1): 84-93.
  • Angeli, V., P. Miguel Silva, D. Crispim Massuela, M. W. Khan, A. Hamar, F. Khajehei, G.H. Simone & C.Piatti, 2020. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An overview of the potentials of the “Golden Grain” and socio-economic and environmental aspects of its cultivation and marketization. Foods, 9 (2): 216.
  • Bhargava, A., S. Shukla & D. Ohri, 2006. Chenopodium quinoa-an Indian perspective. Industrial crops and products, 23 (1): 73-87.
  • Doğru, A. S. & Y. E. Kitiş, 2023. The weed species in corn fields in Antalya province of Türkiye. Ege Universitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 60 (3): 429-436.
  • Eğritaş, Ö., M. Tan & K. Haliloğlu, 2020. Herbisite dayanıklı mutant Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) hatlarında bazı bitkisel özelliklerin belirlenmesi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 10 (2): 1382-1388.
  • FAO, 2023. Food and Agriculture Organization. (Web page: http://www.fao.org/home/en/) (Date accessed: August 2023).
  • González, J. A., S. S. Eisa, S. A. Hussin & F. E. Prado, 2015. Quinoa: an ıncan crop to face global changes in agriculture. Quinoa. Improvement and sustainable production, 21 (1): 1-18.
  • Güncan, A. & M. Karaca, 2018. Yabancı Otlar ve Mücadele Prensipleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi yayınları, Konya. 243 s.
  • Jacobsen, S. E., 2003. The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food reviews international, 19 (1): 167-177.
  • Jacobsen, S. E., J. L. Christiansen & J. Rasmussen, 2010. Weed harrowing and inter-row hoeing in organic grown quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Outlook on Agrıculture, 39 (3): 223-227. Jancurova, M., 2009. Quinoa-a review. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 27 (2): 71-79.
  • Kakabouki, I., A. Karkanis, I. S. Travlos, D. Hela, P. Papastylianou, H. Wu, C. Demosthenis, R. Sestrasf & D. Bilalis, 2015. Weed flora and seed yield in quinoa crop (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as affected by tillage systems and fertilization practices. International Journal of Pest Management, 61 (3): 228-234.
  • Kırgeç, Y., 2018. Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Ekim Alanlarında Sorun Olan Yabancı Ot Türlerinin ve Bunların Mücadelesinde Kullanılabilecek Herbisitlerin Fitotoksik Etkilerinin Saptanması. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, (Basılmamış) Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Samsun, 61 s.
  • Langeroodi, A. R. S., R. Mancinelli & E. Radicetti, 2020. How do ıntensification practices affect weed management and yield in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) crop?. Sustainability, 12 (15): 6103.
  • Latorre, F., 2014. Is Quinoa Cultivation on The Coastal Desert of Peru Sustainable? A Case Study From Majes. Faculty of Science and Technology, University Department of Agroecology, (Unpublished) Master’s Thesis, Denmark, 86 pp.
  • Merino, J., A. Pedreros, S. Fischer & M. D. López, 2020. Effect of post-emergence herbicides on stress indicators in quinoa. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 80 (1): 21-29.
  • Navruz-Varli, S. & N. Sanlier, 2016. Nutritional and health benefits of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Cereal Science, 69 (2016): 371-376.
  • Nurse, R. E., K. Obeid & E. R. Page, 2016. Optimal planting date, row width, and critical weed-free period for grain amaranth and quinoa grown in Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 96 (3): 360-366.
  • O’Connell, J., 2015. Quinoa Grains a Foothold in Eastern Idaho. Capital Press, (Web page: https://www.capitalpress.com/state/idaho/quinoa-gains-a-foothold-in-eastern-idaho) (Date accessed: August 2023).
  • Odum, P., 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, 574 pp.
  • Olivoto, T., M. Nardino, I. R. Carvalho, D. N. Follmann, V. J. Szareski, M. Ferrari, A. J. de Pelegrin & V. Q. de Souza, 2017. Plant secondary metabolites and its dynamical systems of induction in response to environmental factors: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 12 (2): 71-84.
  • Repo-Carrasco, R., C. Espinoza & S.E. Jacobsen 2003. Nutritional value and use of the Andean crops quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and kaniwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule). Food Reviews International, 19 (1-2): 179-189.
  • Santos, R. L. D. B., C. R. Spehar & L. Vivaldi, 2003. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) reaction to herbicide residue in a Brazilian Savannah soil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 38 (6): 771-776.
  • Sevindik, A., R. N. Gültekin & H. Uran 2021. Altın Tahıl: Kinoa. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (1): 155-165.
  • Tan, M. & S. Temel, 2019. Her Yönüyle Kinoa Önemi, Kullanılması ve Yetiştiriciliği. İksad Yayınevi, Ankara.177 s.
  • Tuusis, D., 2020. Impact of Herbicides on Quinoa Yield and Weediness. Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, (Unpublished) Doctoral Thesis, Estonian, 34 pp.
  • Üstüner, T. & A. Güncan, 2002. Niğde ve yöresi patates tarlalarında sorun olan yabancı otların yoğunluğu ve önemi ile topluluk oluşturmaları üzerine araştırmalar. Türkiye Herboloji Dergisi, 5 (2): 30-42.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Herbology
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Haşim Kaycı 0000-0002-7664-2312

Ramazan Gürbüz 0000-0003-3558-9823

Harun Alptekin 0000-0001-9319-311X

Early Pub Date July 1, 2024
Publication Date July 1, 2024
Submission Date November 16, 2023
Acceptance Date April 23, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

APA Kaycı, H., Gürbüz, R., & Alptekin, H. (2024). Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)’da yabancı ot kontrolünde bazı herbisitlerin etkinliği. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 61(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1391905

      27559           trdizin ile ilgili görsel sonucu                 27560                    Clarivate Analysis ile ilgili görsel sonucu            CABI logo                      NAL Catalog (AGRICOLA), ile ilgili görsel sonucu             EBSCO Information Services 

                                                       Creative Commons Lisansı This website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.