An Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Production: Case of Turkey

Volume: 49 Number: 3 September 1, 2012
M.metin Artukoğlu , F. Akın Olgun , Hakan Adanacıoğlu
EN TR

An Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Production: Case of Turkey

Abstract

u çalışmada organik ve konvansiyonel zeytin üretiminin ekonomik analizi Türkiye örneği ile incelenmiştir. Hem organik hem konvansiyonel B

Keywords

Zeytin, tarım işletmeleri, organik, konvansiyonel, maliyet, Türkiye

References

  1. Acıl, A.F., 1980. Agricultural Economics, Pub.of Ankara University, Ankara, 611p. (in Turkish).
  2. Beckingham, C. and O’Malley, K., 2007. Economics of NSW Olive Production, Prime Facts, 409 (1-6), Nowember.
  3. Cisilino, F. and Madau, F.A., 2007. Organic and Conventional Farming: a Comparison Analysis through the Italian FADN, I Mediterranean Conference of Agro-Food Social Scientists. 103rd EAAE Seminar ‘Adding Value to the Agro-Food Supply Chain in the Future Euromediterranean Space’, April 23rd - 25th, Barcelona, Spain, 22p.
  4. Engindeniz,S., 2003. A Research on Peach Production and Marketing in Kemalpaşa- Izmir, Pub. Of Union of Agricultural Chambers, Ankara, 90 p. (in Turkish).
  5. Erkuş, A., Bülbül, M., Kıral, T., Açıl, A.F., and Demirci, R., 1995. Agricultural Economics, Pub.of Ankara University, Ankara, 298 p.(in Turkish).
  6. EPC (Prime Minister of Foreign Trade Export Promotion Center), 2007. Documents of Organic Products.
  7. Inan,I.H., 2001. Agricultural Economics and Management, Hasad Publication, Tekirdag,319 p.(in Turkish).
  8. Kıral, T., Kasnakoglu,H., Tatlıdil, F.,Fidan, H and Gündogmuş, E., 1999. Database Guide and Income and Cost Calculation Methodologie for Agricultural Producs, Publications of Agricultural Research Institute, No: 37, Ankara, 133 p. (in Turkish).
  9. MARA (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), 2007. Documents of Organic Products.
  10. Newbold, P., 1995. Statistics for Business and Economics, Prentice- Hall, New Jersey.
APA
Artukoğlu, M., Olgun, F. A., & Adanacıoğlu, H. (2012). An Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Production: Case of Turkey. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 49(3), 243-247. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.69695
AMA
1.Artukoğlu M, Olgun FA, Adanacıoğlu H. An Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Production: Case of Turkey. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University. 2012;49(3):243-247. doi:10.20289/zfdergi.69695
Chicago
Artukoğlu, M.metin, F. Akın Olgun, and Hakan Adanacıoğlu. 2012. “An Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Production: Case of Turkey”. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University 49 (3): 243-47. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.69695.
EndNote
Artukoğlu M, Olgun FA, Adanacıoğlu H (September 1, 2012) An Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Production: Case of Turkey. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University 49 3 243–247.
IEEE
[1]M. Artukoğlu, F. A. Olgun, and H. Adanacıoğlu, “An Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Production: Case of Turkey”, Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 243–247, Sept. 2012, doi: 10.20289/zfdergi.69695.
ISNAD
Artukoğlu, M.metin - Olgun, F. Akın - Adanacıoğlu, Hakan. “An Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Production: Case of Turkey”. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University 49/3 (September 1, 2012): 243-247. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.69695.
JAMA
1.Artukoğlu M, Olgun FA, Adanacıoğlu H. An Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Production: Case of Turkey. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University. 2012;49:243–247.
MLA
Artukoğlu, M.metin, et al. “An Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Production: Case of Turkey”. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, vol. 49, no. 3, Sept. 2012, pp. 243-7, doi:10.20289/zfdergi.69695.
Vancouver
1.M.metin Artukoğlu, F. Akın Olgun, Hakan Adanacıoğlu. An Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Production: Case of Turkey. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University. 2012 Sep. 1;49(3):243-7. doi:10.20289/zfdergi.69695