Research Article

Determination and prevalence of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) and Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) in pepper production areas in Demre district of Antalya

Volume: 58 Number: 3 September 5, 2021
EN TR

Determination and prevalence of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) and Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) in pepper production areas in Demre district of Antalya

Abstract

Objective: In this study, it was aimed to serological determination of the presence of TSWV and CMV on pepper plants grown in the greenhouses in Kumluca district where Antalya pepper production is carried out intensely and compare the accuracy of the criteria determining that positive applied in by DAS-ELISA with RT-PCR method. Material and Methods: Samples were collected from virus-like symptoms showing plants by conducting surveys in greenhouse pepper production areas in the Demre district of Antalya province. Samples were subjected to DAS-ELISA test using monoclonal and /or polyclonal antibodies specific for CMV and TSWV. RT-PCR tests were applied to some positive samples which have different absorbance values in the ELISA reader by using specific primers. Results: According to the results of the DAS-ELISA method, 65 of the 82 samples (79%) were found to have at least one virus. The number of samples infected only with CMV was 10 (12%) and the number of samples infected only with TSWV was 47 (57%). In 8 samples (10%) were found to have both TSWV and CMV mixed infections. The presence of the factors in the samples which have positive absorbance values in the ELISA reader were compared by RT-PCR method and the presence of the factors was confirmed. Conclusion: It was determined that TSWV factor was found more in pepper samples and CMV factor did not show much prevalence.

Keywords

Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) , DAS-ELISA , RT-PCR , Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV)

References

  1. Adkins, S. 2000. Tomato spotted wilt virus-positive steps towards negative success, Molecular Plant Pathology, 1(3):151-157 pp.
  2. Arli-Sokmen, M.A., Mennan, H., Sevik, M.A. and Ecevit, O. 2005. Occurrence of viruses in field-grown pepper crops and some of their reservoir weed hosts in Samsun, Turkey, Phytoparasitica, 33(4):347-358pp.
  3. Bozokalfa, M ve Eşiyok, D. 2010.Biber (Capsicum annuum L.) aksesyonlarında genetik çeşitliliğin agronomik özellikler ile belirlenmesi, Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(2):123-134 s.
  4. Burgmans, J.L., Fry, P.R. and Sunde, R. G. 1986. Peppers: survey of virus diseases of Capsicum annuum in Hawke’s Bay and Poverty Bay, New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 14:459-463 pp.
  5. Clark, M.F. and Adams, A.N. 1977. Characteristic of microplate method of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology, 34:475-483 pp.
  6. Deligoz, I., Sokmen, M.A. and Sari, S. 2014. First report of resistance breaking strain of Tomato spotted wilt virus (Tospovirus; Bunyaviridae) on resistant sweet pepper cultivars in Turkey, New Disease Reports, 30:26 p.
  7. Espín, A., Alcázar, M.D., Egea, C. and Candela, M.E. 1994. Defensive response of two Capsicum annuum cultivars of different sensitivity to an isolate of Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Fitopatología, 29(3):178-187 pp.
  8. Faggioli, F., Ferretti, L., Albanese, G., Sciarroni, R., Pasquini, G., Lumia, V. and Barba, M. 2005. Distribution of olive tree viruses in Italy as revealed by one-step RT-PCR. Journal of Plant Pathology, 49-55 pp.
  9. Fanigliulo, A., Comes, S., Pacella, R., Crescenzi, A., Momol, M. T., Olson, S. M. and Reitz, S. 2007. Integrated management of viral diseases in field-grown tomatoes in southern Italy. In II International Symposium on Tomato Diseases 808:387-392 pp.
  10. FAO, 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E (Erişim Tarihi: 26.Ocak 2019)
APA
Beşkeçili, M., Güneş, N., & Gümüş, M. (2021). Antalya ili Demre ilçesi biber yetiştiriciliğinde Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) ve Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) etmenlerinin yaygınlığının belirlenmesi. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 58(3), 399-405. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.799432