Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The effects of water stress on evapotranspiration, water use efficiency, yield and quality parameters in watermelon irrigated by drip irrigations

Year 2010, Volume: 47 Issue: 2, 135 - 144, 01.06.2010
https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.69607

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of water stress on evapotranspiration (ET), water use efficiency, yield and quality parameters of watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris) irrigated by drip irrigation in Canakkale region during 2007 and 2008. For this purpose, six different irrigation treatments (100 % (control), 80%, 60%, 40%, 20% and 0% replenishment of soil water depleted) were experimented. Mean seasonal ET values and mean total irrigation water volumes were determined as 475 mm and 403 mm respectively at control treatment, in which the lack moisture of soil was corresponded completely. With regard to treatments, the yield was found between 7.04 t ha-1and 56.34 t ha-1 in the first year and between 13.66 t ha-1 and 64.82 t ha-1 in the second year. According to treatments average water use efficiency, average irrigation water use efficiency and average the percentages of irrigation water applied to meet ET were determined between 6.58-12.94 kg m-3, 7.92-12.51 kg m-3 (except S0 treatment), and 30-85%, respectively. Mean yield response factor was obtained as 1.328. While quality parameters such as fruit weight, fruit diameter, fruit height and flesh thickness were difference statistically with regard to treatments, pH and the amount of water soluble substances were not difference statistically. B T

References

  • Anonim, 2008. Çanakkale ilinde sebze üretimi. http://www.canakkaleili.com/sebze_uretimi.htm, Erişim, 2009.
  • Benami, A., M.H., Diskin, 1965. Design of sprinkling irrigation. Lowdermilk Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Publication 23, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, p.143.
  • Blake, G.R., 1965. Bulk density methods of soil analysis. Am. Soc. Agronomy. No:9, Madison, US, p.374-377.
  • Doğan, E., H., Kirnak, K., Berekatoglu, L., Bilgel, A., Surucu, 2008. Water stress imposed on muskmelon (Cucumis Melo L.) with subsurface and surface drip irrigation systems under semi-arid climatic conditions. Irrig Sci., 26, p.131-138.
  • Doorenbos, J., A.H., Kassam, 1979. Yield response to water, FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper no.33.
  • Erdem, Y., Yüksel, A.N., 2003. Yield response of watermelon to irrigation shortage. Scientia Horticulturae, 98, p.365- 383.
  • Güngör, Y., A. Z. Erözel ve O. Yıldırım. 1996. Sulama. Ankara Üniv. Ziraat. Fak. Ders Kitabı: 424, Yayın No:1443, s.227.
  • Howell, T.A., R.H., Cuenca, K.H., Solomon, 1990 Crop yield response management of farm irrigation systems.In: Hofman, G:J., et al. (Eds.), Management of Farm Irrigation Systems. ASAE, St. Joseph, Ml, p.311–312
  • James, L. G., 1988. Principles of farm irrigation systems design. John wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Kanber, R., 1999. Sulama. Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fak. Genel Yayın No: 174, Ders Kitapları Yayın No: A-52, 459s., Adana.
  • Kara, M., 2005. Sulama ve sulama tesisleri, S.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı, 268s., Konya.
  • Kırnak, H., E., Doğan, 2009. Effect of seasonal water stres imposed on drip irrigated second crop watermelon grown in semi-arid climatic conditions. Irrig.Sci 27, p.155-164.
  • Kırnak, H., E., Doğan, Bilgel, L and Berakatoğlu, K., 2009. Effect of preharvest deficit irrigation on second crop watermelon grown in an extremely hot climate. J.Irrig. and Drain. Eng. 135:2, p.141-148.
  • McCann, L., E., Kee, J., Adkins, E., Ernest, J., Ernest, 2007. Effect of irrigation rate on yield of drip-irrigated seedless watermelon in a humid region. Scientia Horticulturae 113, p.155–161.
  • Orta, A.H., Erdem, Y. and Erdem T., 2003. Crop water stres index for watermelon. Scientia Horticulturae, 98, p.121- 130.
  • Proietti, S., Y., G., Rouphael, Colla, M., Cardarelli, M.D., Agazio, M., Zacchini, E., Rea, Moscatello, S and Battistelli, A., 2008. Fruit quality of mini-watermelon as affected by grafting and irrigation regimes. J. Sci Food Agric 88: p.1107-1114.
  • Soil Survey Staff, 1951. Soil survey manual. U.S. Dep. Agr. Handbook No:18, U.S. Government Print. Office, Washington.
  • SPSS, 2004. Brief Guide. SPSS Inc.,Version 13.0, Chicago, USA.
  • Stewart, J.I., R.H., Cuenca, W.O., Pruitt, R.M., Hagan, J., Tosso, 1977. Determination and utilization of water production functions for principal California crops. W-67 CA Contributing Project Report. University of California, Davis, USA.
  • Sezgin, F., T., Baş, T., Yoltaş, S., Baş, 2000. “Farklı sulama aralığı ve ekim zamanı uygulamasının karpuzun su-verim ilişkileri üzerine etkisi”, 3. Sebze Tarımı Sempozyumu, 11-13 Eylül, s.443-447, Isparta.
  • Şimşek, M., Kaçıra, M. And Tonkaz, T., 2004. The effects of different drip irrigation regimes on watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)] yield and yield components under semi-arid climatic conditions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55, p.1149-1157.
  • Taskaya, B., and Keskin, G., 2004. Kavun-karpuz. Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü, Sayı 6, Ankara.
  • Wilbur, A. G. 1983. Tomato production processing and quality evaluation Avi. Publishing Company, Inc. Westport, Connecticut.
  • Vural, H., D., Esiyok, I., Duman, 2000. Kültür Sebzeleri (Sebze Yetistirme). E.Ü.Ziraat Fakültesi, Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü, İzmir.

Damla Sulama ile Sulanan Karpuzda Su Stresinin Bitki Su Tüketimine, Su Kullanım Randımanına, Verime ve Kalite Parametrelerine Etkisi

Year 2010, Volume: 47 Issue: 2, 135 - 144, 01.06.2010
https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.69607

Abstract

B u çalışmada, 2007 ve 2008 yıllarında Çanakkale yöresinde damla sulama ile sulanan karpuz bitkisinde (Citrullus vulgaris) su stresinin bitki su tüketimine, su kullanım randımanına, verime ve kalite parametrelerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla altı farklı sulama konusu (tüketilen suyun %100’ü (kontrol), %80’i, %60’ı, %40’ı, %20’si ve susuz) oluşturulmuştur. Topraktaki eksik nemin tam olarak karşılandığı kontrol konusunda (%100), ortalama mevsimlik bitki su tüketimi 475 mm ve uygulanan ortalama toplam sulama suyu miktarı ise 403 mm olarak bulunmuştur. Verim, denemenin ilk yılında konulara göre 7.04-56.34 tha-1, ikinci yılında ise 13.66-64.82 tha-1 arasında gerçekleşmiştir. Konulara göre ortalama su kullanım randımanları, sulama suyu kullanım randımanları ve uygulanan sulama suyunun bitki su tüketimini karşılama yüzdeleri sırasıyla 6.5812.94 kg m-3, 7.92-12.51 kg m-3 (susuz konusu hariç), % 30-85 arasında olmuştur. Ortalama verim tepki etmeni 1.328 bulunmuştur. Kalite parametrelerinden tek meyve ağırlığı, meyve çapı, meyve boyu ve meyve eti kalınlığı konulara göre farklılık gösterirken, pH ve suda çözünür kuru madde miktarı herhangi bir farklılık göstermemiştir

References

  • Anonim, 2008. Çanakkale ilinde sebze üretimi. http://www.canakkaleili.com/sebze_uretimi.htm, Erişim, 2009.
  • Benami, A., M.H., Diskin, 1965. Design of sprinkling irrigation. Lowdermilk Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Publication 23, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, p.143.
  • Blake, G.R., 1965. Bulk density methods of soil analysis. Am. Soc. Agronomy. No:9, Madison, US, p.374-377.
  • Doğan, E., H., Kirnak, K., Berekatoglu, L., Bilgel, A., Surucu, 2008. Water stress imposed on muskmelon (Cucumis Melo L.) with subsurface and surface drip irrigation systems under semi-arid climatic conditions. Irrig Sci., 26, p.131-138.
  • Doorenbos, J., A.H., Kassam, 1979. Yield response to water, FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper no.33.
  • Erdem, Y., Yüksel, A.N., 2003. Yield response of watermelon to irrigation shortage. Scientia Horticulturae, 98, p.365- 383.
  • Güngör, Y., A. Z. Erözel ve O. Yıldırım. 1996. Sulama. Ankara Üniv. Ziraat. Fak. Ders Kitabı: 424, Yayın No:1443, s.227.
  • Howell, T.A., R.H., Cuenca, K.H., Solomon, 1990 Crop yield response management of farm irrigation systems.In: Hofman, G:J., et al. (Eds.), Management of Farm Irrigation Systems. ASAE, St. Joseph, Ml, p.311–312
  • James, L. G., 1988. Principles of farm irrigation systems design. John wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Kanber, R., 1999. Sulama. Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fak. Genel Yayın No: 174, Ders Kitapları Yayın No: A-52, 459s., Adana.
  • Kara, M., 2005. Sulama ve sulama tesisleri, S.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı, 268s., Konya.
  • Kırnak, H., E., Doğan, 2009. Effect of seasonal water stres imposed on drip irrigated second crop watermelon grown in semi-arid climatic conditions. Irrig.Sci 27, p.155-164.
  • Kırnak, H., E., Doğan, Bilgel, L and Berakatoğlu, K., 2009. Effect of preharvest deficit irrigation on second crop watermelon grown in an extremely hot climate. J.Irrig. and Drain. Eng. 135:2, p.141-148.
  • McCann, L., E., Kee, J., Adkins, E., Ernest, J., Ernest, 2007. Effect of irrigation rate on yield of drip-irrigated seedless watermelon in a humid region. Scientia Horticulturae 113, p.155–161.
  • Orta, A.H., Erdem, Y. and Erdem T., 2003. Crop water stres index for watermelon. Scientia Horticulturae, 98, p.121- 130.
  • Proietti, S., Y., G., Rouphael, Colla, M., Cardarelli, M.D., Agazio, M., Zacchini, E., Rea, Moscatello, S and Battistelli, A., 2008. Fruit quality of mini-watermelon as affected by grafting and irrigation regimes. J. Sci Food Agric 88: p.1107-1114.
  • Soil Survey Staff, 1951. Soil survey manual. U.S. Dep. Agr. Handbook No:18, U.S. Government Print. Office, Washington.
  • SPSS, 2004. Brief Guide. SPSS Inc.,Version 13.0, Chicago, USA.
  • Stewart, J.I., R.H., Cuenca, W.O., Pruitt, R.M., Hagan, J., Tosso, 1977. Determination and utilization of water production functions for principal California crops. W-67 CA Contributing Project Report. University of California, Davis, USA.
  • Sezgin, F., T., Baş, T., Yoltaş, S., Baş, 2000. “Farklı sulama aralığı ve ekim zamanı uygulamasının karpuzun su-verim ilişkileri üzerine etkisi”, 3. Sebze Tarımı Sempozyumu, 11-13 Eylül, s.443-447, Isparta.
  • Şimşek, M., Kaçıra, M. And Tonkaz, T., 2004. The effects of different drip irrigation regimes on watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)] yield and yield components under semi-arid climatic conditions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55, p.1149-1157.
  • Taskaya, B., and Keskin, G., 2004. Kavun-karpuz. Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü, Sayı 6, Ankara.
  • Wilbur, A. G. 1983. Tomato production processing and quality evaluation Avi. Publishing Company, Inc. Westport, Connecticut.
  • Vural, H., D., Esiyok, I., Duman, 2000. Kültür Sebzeleri (Sebze Yetistirme). E.Ü.Ziraat Fakültesi, Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü, İzmir.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Gökhan Çamoğlu This is me

Şerafettin Aşık This is me

Levent Genç This is me

Kürşad Demirel This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2010
Submission Date November 25, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 47 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Çamoğlu, G., Aşık, Ş., Genç, L., Demirel, K. (2010). Damla Sulama ile Sulanan Karpuzda Su Stresinin Bitki Su Tüketimine, Su Kullanım Randımanına, Verime ve Kalite Parametrelerine Etkisi. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 47(2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.69607

      27559           trdizin ile ilgili görsel sonucu                 27560                    Clarivate Analysis ile ilgili görsel sonucu            CABI logo                      NAL Catalog (AGRICOLA), ile ilgili görsel sonucu             EBSCO Information Services 

                                                       Creative Commons Lisansı This website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.