Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

GİRİŞİMCİLİK EKOSİSTEMLERİNİ MEYDANA GETİREN FAKTÖRLERE AİT KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVENİN BİBLİYOMETRiK ANALİZ İLE TESPİTİ

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 1, 33 - 57, 31.03.2020

Hakan Duman Serkan Künü

https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.526039
Cited By: 1

Öz

İstihdamdaki artışlar, başta politika yapıcılar olmak üzere, toplumun her kesimi tarafından memnuniyetle karşılanmakta ve işsizliğe bir çare olarak girişimciliğin desteklenmesi amacıyla çeşitli çabalar içerisine girilmektedirler. Bir bölgede girişimciliğin desteklenmesi ile ilgili yeni yaklaşımlardan bir tanesi de “girişimcilik ekosistemi” yaklaşımıdır. Bu çalışmada Web of Science temel koleksiyonunda bulunan, İngilizce yayınlanmış 154 dergi makalesi, bibliyometrik yöntemle incelenmiş ve en etkili bulunan makaleler üzerinden girişimcilik ekosistemi ve bileşenleri üzerinde sentez bir kavramsal çerçeve oluşturulmuştur. Bu çalışmada incelenen literatür kaynakları, bir girişimcilik ekosistemi yaratmak ve geliştirmek için öncelikle KOBI ve serbest meslek sahipleri ile inovatif ve hırslı girişimcilerin birbirlerinden ayrılması gerektiğine, politikalarda elitist bir ayrımcılık uygulanarak hırslı ve yenilikçi girişimcilere ağırlık verilmesine işaret etmektedir.


Anahtar Kelimeler

Girişimcilik girişimcilik ekosistemi inovasyon bölgesel ekonomi

Kaynakça

  • Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., Szerb, L. (2014), “National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications”, Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494.
  • Al, U., Tonta, Y. (2004), “Atıf analizi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphanecilik Bölümü tezlerinde atıf yapılan kaynaklar”, Bilgi Dünyası, 5(1), 19-47.
  • Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C. (2017), “Bibliometrix: An r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis”, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
  • Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M. (2017), “Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030-1051.
  • Aulet, B., Murray, F. (2013), A tale of two entrepreneurs: Understanding differences in the types of entrepreneurship in the economy (Report), Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
  • Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., Wright, M. (2014), “Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context”, Research Policy, 43(7), 1097-1108.
  • Bahrami, H., Evans: (1995), “Flexible re-cycling and high-technology entrepreneurship”, California Management Review, 37(3), 62-89.
  • Bischoff, K., Volkmann, C. K., Audretsch, D. B. (2018), “Stakeholder collaboration in entrepreneurship education: An analysis of the entrepreneurial ecosystems of european higher educational institutions”, Journal Of Technology Transfer, 43(1), 20-46.
  • Boutillier, S., Carré, D., Levratto, N. (2016), Entrepreneurial ecosystems, e-book: Wiley-ISTE.  http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsebk&AN=1202063&lang=tr&site=eds-live&authtype=ip,uid (15/10/2017)
  • Carayannis, E. G., Provance, M., Grigoroudis, E. (2016), “Entrepreneurship ecosystems: an agent-based simulation approach”, JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 41(3), 631-653.
  • Cohen, B. (2006), “Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1-14.
  • Feld, B. (2012), Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Feldman, M., Lowe, N. (2015), “Triangulating regional economies: Realizing the promise of digital data”, Research Policy, 44(9, SI), 1785-1793
  • Feldman, M. P. (2014), “The character of innovative places: Entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity”, Small Business Economics, 43(1), 9-20.
  • Foster, G., Shimizu, C., Ciesinski, S., Davila, A., Hassan: Z., Jia, N., Morris, R. (2013), Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics: Report summary for the annual meeting of the new champions 2013 (Report), (D. Lee, Ed.), World Economic Forum.
  • Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., Barker, K. (2012), “Tracing thought through time and space: A selective review of bibliometrics in social work”, G. Holden, G. Rosenberg, K. Barker (Ed.), Bibliometrics in social work (1-34), London: Routledge.
  • Isenberg, D. J. (2010), “How to start an entrepreneurial revolution”, Harvard business review, 88(6), 40-50.
  • Isenberg, D. J. (2011), “The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship”, The Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/The-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-for-economic-growth-policy-20110620183915.pdf (25/05/2018)
  • KOSGEB. (2014), Girişimcilik Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı (GİSEP) 2015-2018, https://www.kosgeb.gov.tr/Content/Upload/Dosya/Mali%20Tablolar/Gisep_2015-2018_TR.pdf, (15/12/2018)
  • KOSGEB. (2015), KOSGEB 2016-2020 Stratejik Planı,  https://www.kosgeb.gov.tr/Content/Upload/Dosya/Mali%20Tablolar/KOSGEBN%20Stratejik%20Plan/KOSGEB_Stratejik_Plani_(2016-2020).pdf (15/12/2018)
  • Kshetri, N. (2014), “Developing successful entrepreneurial ecosystems Lessons from a comparison of an Asian tiger and a Baltic tiger”, Baltic Journal Of Management, 9(3), 330-356.
  • Li, J. F., Garnsey, E. (2014), “Policy-driven ecosystems for new vaccine development”, Technovation, 34(12, SI), 762-772.
  • Mack, E., Mayer, H. (2016), “The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems”, Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118-2133.
  • Marshall, A. (1920), Principles of economics (8th ed.), London: Macmillan.
  • Mason, C. (2006), “Informal sources of venture finance”, in C. Parker (Ed.), The life cycle of entrepreneurial ventures, New York (USA): Springer,  259-299)
  • Mason, C., Brown, R. (2014), Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship (Final Report), The Hague: OECD LEED Programme; the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs.
  • Motoyama, Y., Knowlton, K. (2017), “Examining the Connections within the Startup Ecosystem: A Case Study of St. Louis”, Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(1)Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., Corbett, A. C. (2004), “An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation”, Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190-208.
  • Nicotra, M., Romano, M., Del Giudice, M., Schillaci, C. E. (2018), “The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: A measurement framework”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3, SI), 640-673.
  • Osareh, F. (1996), “Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of literature”, Libri, 46(3), 149-158.
  • Pitelis, C. (2012), “Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: A conceptual framework”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(6), 1359-1388.
  • R Core Team. (2018), R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (24/03/2018)
  • Roemer, R. C., Borchardt, R. (2015), Meaningful metrics: A 21st-century librarian’s guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics, and research impact. Chicago: Association of College; Research Libraries.
  • Roundy, P. T. (2016), “Start-up community narratives: The discursive construction of entrepreneurial ecosystems”, The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(2), 232-248.
  • Roundy, P. T. (2017), “Hybrid organizations and the logics of entrepreneurial ecosystems”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(4), 1221-1237Saxenian, A. (2000), Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Sengupta, I. N. (1992), “Bibliometrics, informetrics, scientometrics and librametrics: An overview”, Libri, 42(2), 75-98.
  • Small, H. (1973), “Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents”, Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
  • Spigel, B. (2017), “The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72.
  • Spigel, B., Harrison, R. (2018), “Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151-168.
  • Spilling, O. R. (1996), “The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event", Journal of Business research, 36(1), 91-103.
  • Stam, E. (2014), The dutch entrepreneurial ecosystem. Birch Research. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2473475 (17/11/2018)
  • Stam, E. (2015), “Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique”, European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769.
  • Stam, E., Spigel, B. (2016), Entrepreneurial ecosystems (Discussion Paper Series 16-13), Utrecht School of Economics.
  • Subotzky, G. (1999). “Beyond the entrepreneurial university: The potential role of South Africa's historically disadvantaged institutions in reconstruction and development.”, International review of education, 45(5-6), 507-527.
  • Thompson, T. A., Purdy, J. M., Ventresca, M. J. (2018), “How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in seattle”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96-116.
  • Vogel, P. (2013), “The employment outlook for youth: Building entrepreneurial ecosystems as a way forward”, G20 youth forum: Social dimension (443-449), Saint-Petersburg, Russia: G8 & G20 Alumni Asociation.
  • Zupic, I., Čater, T. (2015), “Bibliometric methods in management and organization”, Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.

DETERMINING THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF THE FACTORS CONSTITUTING ENTREPRENEURSHIP ECOSYSTEMS BY BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 1, 33 - 57, 31.03.2020

Hakan Duman Serkan Künü

https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.526039
Cited By: 1

Öz

Increases in employment are welcomed by all segments of society, especially policy-makers, and are engaged in various efforts to support entrepreneurship as a remedy for unemployment. One of the new approaches to promoting entrepreneurship in a region is the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. In this study, 154 journal articles published in English in the basic collection of Web of Science were examined with bibliometric methods and a conceptual framework was formed on the entrepreneurial ecosystem and its components through the most effective articles. The literature sources examined in this study point to the fact that SMEs and self-employed and innovative and ambitious entrepreneurs need to be separated from each other in order to create and develop an entrepreneurship ecosystem.


Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneurship entrepreneurial ecosystem innovation regional economics

Kaynakça

  • Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., Szerb, L. (2014), “National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications”, Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494.
  • Al, U., Tonta, Y. (2004), “Atıf analizi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphanecilik Bölümü tezlerinde atıf yapılan kaynaklar”, Bilgi Dünyası, 5(1), 19-47.
  • Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C. (2017), “Bibliometrix: An r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis”, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
  • Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M. (2017), “Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030-1051.
  • Aulet, B., Murray, F. (2013), A tale of two entrepreneurs: Understanding differences in the types of entrepreneurship in the economy (Report), Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
  • Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., Wright, M. (2014), “Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context”, Research Policy, 43(7), 1097-1108.
  • Bahrami, H., Evans: (1995), “Flexible re-cycling and high-technology entrepreneurship”, California Management Review, 37(3), 62-89.
  • Bischoff, K., Volkmann, C. K., Audretsch, D. B. (2018), “Stakeholder collaboration in entrepreneurship education: An analysis of the entrepreneurial ecosystems of european higher educational institutions”, Journal Of Technology Transfer, 43(1), 20-46.
  • Boutillier, S., Carré, D., Levratto, N. (2016), Entrepreneurial ecosystems, e-book: Wiley-ISTE.  http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsebk&AN=1202063&lang=tr&site=eds-live&authtype=ip,uid (15/10/2017)
  • Carayannis, E. G., Provance, M., Grigoroudis, E. (2016), “Entrepreneurship ecosystems: an agent-based simulation approach”, JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 41(3), 631-653.
  • Cohen, B. (2006), “Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1-14.
  • Feld, B. (2012), Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Feldman, M., Lowe, N. (2015), “Triangulating regional economies: Realizing the promise of digital data”, Research Policy, 44(9, SI), 1785-1793
  • Feldman, M. P. (2014), “The character of innovative places: Entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity”, Small Business Economics, 43(1), 9-20.
  • Foster, G., Shimizu, C., Ciesinski, S., Davila, A., Hassan: Z., Jia, N., Morris, R. (2013), Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics: Report summary for the annual meeting of the new champions 2013 (Report), (D. Lee, Ed.), World Economic Forum.
  • Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., Barker, K. (2012), “Tracing thought through time and space: A selective review of bibliometrics in social work”, G. Holden, G. Rosenberg, K. Barker (Ed.), Bibliometrics in social work (1-34), London: Routledge.
  • Isenberg, D. J. (2010), “How to start an entrepreneurial revolution”, Harvard business review, 88(6), 40-50.
  • Isenberg, D. J. (2011), “The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship”, The Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/The-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-for-economic-growth-policy-20110620183915.pdf (25/05/2018)
  • KOSGEB. (2014), Girişimcilik Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı (GİSEP) 2015-2018, https://www.kosgeb.gov.tr/Content/Upload/Dosya/Mali%20Tablolar/Gisep_2015-2018_TR.pdf, (15/12/2018)
  • KOSGEB. (2015), KOSGEB 2016-2020 Stratejik Planı,  https://www.kosgeb.gov.tr/Content/Upload/Dosya/Mali%20Tablolar/KOSGEBN%20Stratejik%20Plan/KOSGEB_Stratejik_Plani_(2016-2020).pdf (15/12/2018)
  • Kshetri, N. (2014), “Developing successful entrepreneurial ecosystems Lessons from a comparison of an Asian tiger and a Baltic tiger”, Baltic Journal Of Management, 9(3), 330-356.
  • Li, J. F., Garnsey, E. (2014), “Policy-driven ecosystems for new vaccine development”, Technovation, 34(12, SI), 762-772.
  • Mack, E., Mayer, H. (2016), “The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems”, Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118-2133.
  • Marshall, A. (1920), Principles of economics (8th ed.), London: Macmillan.
  • Mason, C. (2006), “Informal sources of venture finance”, in C. Parker (Ed.), The life cycle of entrepreneurial ventures, New York (USA): Springer,  259-299)
  • Mason, C., Brown, R. (2014), Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship (Final Report), The Hague: OECD LEED Programme; the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs.
  • Motoyama, Y., Knowlton, K. (2017), “Examining the Connections within the Startup Ecosystem: A Case Study of St. Louis”, Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(1)Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., Corbett, A. C. (2004), “An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation”, Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190-208.
  • Nicotra, M., Romano, M., Del Giudice, M., Schillaci, C. E. (2018), “The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: A measurement framework”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3, SI), 640-673.
  • Osareh, F. (1996), “Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of literature”, Libri, 46(3), 149-158.
  • Pitelis, C. (2012), “Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: A conceptual framework”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(6), 1359-1388.
  • R Core Team. (2018), R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (24/03/2018)
  • Roemer, R. C., Borchardt, R. (2015), Meaningful metrics: A 21st-century librarian’s guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics, and research impact. Chicago: Association of College; Research Libraries.
  • Roundy, P. T. (2016), “Start-up community narratives: The discursive construction of entrepreneurial ecosystems”, The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(2), 232-248.
  • Roundy, P. T. (2017), “Hybrid organizations and the logics of entrepreneurial ecosystems”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(4), 1221-1237Saxenian, A. (2000), Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Sengupta, I. N. (1992), “Bibliometrics, informetrics, scientometrics and librametrics: An overview”, Libri, 42(2), 75-98.
  • Small, H. (1973), “Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents”, Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
  • Spigel, B. (2017), “The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72.
  • Spigel, B., Harrison, R. (2018), “Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151-168.
  • Spilling, O. R. (1996), “The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event", Journal of Business research, 36(1), 91-103.
  • Stam, E. (2014), The dutch entrepreneurial ecosystem. Birch Research. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2473475 (17/11/2018)
  • Stam, E. (2015), “Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique”, European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769.
  • Stam, E., Spigel, B. (2016), Entrepreneurial ecosystems (Discussion Paper Series 16-13), Utrecht School of Economics.
  • Subotzky, G. (1999). “Beyond the entrepreneurial university: The potential role of South Africa's historically disadvantaged institutions in reconstruction and development.”, International review of education, 45(5-6), 507-527.
  • Thompson, T. A., Purdy, J. M., Ventresca, M. J. (2018), “How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in seattle”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96-116.
  • Vogel, P. (2013), “The employment outlook for youth: Building entrepreneurial ecosystems as a way forward”, G20 youth forum: Social dimension (443-449), Saint-Petersburg, Russia: G8 & G20 Alumni Asociation.
  • Zupic, I., Čater, T. (2015), “Bibliometric methods in management and organization”, Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.
Toplam 46 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Yazarlar

Hakan Duman 0000-0001-6166-5776

Serkan Künü Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-6166-5776

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Mart 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 12 Şubat 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 38 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Duman, H., & Künü, S. (2020). GİRİŞİMCİLİK EKOSİSTEMLERİNİ MEYDANA GETİREN FAKTÖRLERE AİT KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVENİN BİBLİYOMETRiK ANALİZ İLE TESPİTİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.526039
AMA Duman H, Künü S. GİRİŞİMCİLİK EKOSİSTEMLERİNİ MEYDANA GETİREN FAKTÖRLERE AİT KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVENİN BİBLİYOMETRiK ANALİZ İLE TESPİTİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Mart 2020;38(1):33-57. doi:10.17065/huniibf.526039
Chicago Duman, Hakan, ve Serkan Künü. “GİRİŞİMCİLİK EKOSİSTEMLERİNİ MEYDANA GETİREN FAKTÖRLERE AİT KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVENİN BİBLİYOMETRiK ANALİZ İLE TESPİTİ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 38, sy. 1 (Mart 2020): 33-57. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.526039.
EndNote Duman H, Künü S (01 Mart 2020) GİRİŞİMCİLİK EKOSİSTEMLERİNİ MEYDANA GETİREN FAKTÖRLERE AİT KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVENİN BİBLİYOMETRiK ANALİZ İLE TESPİTİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 38 1 33–57.
IEEE H. Duman ve S. Künü, “GİRİŞİMCİLİK EKOSİSTEMLERİNİ MEYDANA GETİREN FAKTÖRLERE AİT KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVENİN BİBLİYOMETRiK ANALİZ İLE TESPİTİ”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 38, sy. 1, ss. 33–57, 2020, doi: 10.17065/huniibf.526039.
ISNAD Duman, Hakan - Künü, Serkan. “GİRİŞİMCİLİK EKOSİSTEMLERİNİ MEYDANA GETİREN FAKTÖRLERE AİT KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVENİN BİBLİYOMETRiK ANALİZ İLE TESPİTİ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 38/1 (Mart 2020), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.526039.
JAMA Duman H, Künü S. GİRİŞİMCİLİK EKOSİSTEMLERİNİ MEYDANA GETİREN FAKTÖRLERE AİT KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVENİN BİBLİYOMETRiK ANALİZ İLE TESPİTİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;38:33–57.
MLA Duman, Hakan ve Serkan Künü. “GİRİŞİMCİLİK EKOSİSTEMLERİNİ MEYDANA GETİREN FAKTÖRLERE AİT KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVENİN BİBLİYOMETRiK ANALİZ İLE TESPİTİ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 38, sy. 1, 2020, ss. 33-57, doi:10.17065/huniibf.526039.
Vancouver Duman H, Künü S. GİRİŞİMCİLİK EKOSİSTEMLERİNİ MEYDANA GETİREN FAKTÖRLERE AİT KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVENİN BİBLİYOMETRiK ANALİZ İLE TESPİTİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;38(1):33-57.

Cited By

Türkiye’de Bölgesel Kalkınmanın Girişimcilik, İnovasyon ve Ar-Ge Çalışmalarıyla İlişkisinin Bibliyometrik Analizi ve LDA Mallet Uygulaması
Erzincan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.46790/erzisosbil.968808

Dergiye yayımlanmak üzere gönderilecek yazılar Dergi'nin son sayfasında ve Dergi web sistesinde yer alan Yazar Rehberi'ndeki kurallara uygun olmalıdır.


Gizlilik Beyanı

Bu dergi sitesindeki isimler ve e-posta adresleri sadece bu derginin belirtilen amaçları doğrultusunda kullanılacaktır; farklı herhangi bir amaç için veya diğer kişilerin kullanımına açılmayacaktır.