EU Maritime Security Strategy: A Theoretical Analysis

Abstract

How can we explain the integration of EU maritime foreign and security policy? In other words, how can we explain the addition of the 'maritime' as a new dimension to the EU's foreign and security policy? What are the main mechanisms that ensure integration in the maritime domain? What were the driving forces behind member states' adoption of the EU Maritime Security Strategy (EUMSS), which they initially opposed, after a short period of time? This article aims to clarify these questions by conducting an in-depth and theoretical study of the adoption of the EUMSS.

Keywords

• EU Maritime Foreign and Security Policy
• EU Maritime Security Strategy
• Neo-Realism
• Constructivism
• Rational Choice Institutionalism

AB DENİZ GÜVENLİĞİ STRATEJİSİ: TEORİK BİR İNCELEME

Öz

AB deniz dış ve güvenlik politikası entegrasyonunu nasıl açıklayabiliriz? Yani AB’nin dış ve güvenlik politikasına yeni bir boyut olarak ‘deniz’in eklenmesini nasıl açıklayabiliriz? Denizcilik alanında entegrasyonu sağlayan temel mekanizmalar nelerdir? Üye devletlerin başlangıçta karşı çıktıkları AB Deniz Güvenliği Stratejisi’ni (ABDGS) (EU Maritime Security Strategy-EUMSS) kısa bir süre sonra kabul etmesinde hangi itici güçler etkili olmuştur? Bu makale, ABDGS’nin benimsenmesine ilişkin teorik bir çalışma yürüterek bu soruları açıklığa kavuşturmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• AB Deniz Dış ve Güvenlik Politikası
• AB Deniz Güvenliği Stratejisi
• Neo-Realizm
• İnşacılık
• Rasyonel Seçim Kurumsalcılığı

Kaynakça

1. Aggestam, Lisbeth. “Role theory and European foreign policy: A framework of analysis.” İçinde The European Union’s Roles in International Politics, editörler Ole Elgström ve Michael Smith, 11-29. London: Routledge, 2006.
2. Allen, David. “Who Speaks for Europe? The Search for an Effective and Coherent External Policy.” İçinde A Common Foreign Policy for Europe? Competing Visions of the CFSP, editörler John Peterson ve Helene Sjursen, 41-58. New York: Routledge, 1998.
3. Baird, Theodore. “Where is civil society in the EU’s new Maritime Security Strategy?”, Open Democracy, 7 Kasım 2014, Erişim Tarihi: Ekim 31, 2022, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/where-is-civil society-in-eus new-maritime-security-strategy/.
4. Barnett, Michael ve Martha Finnemore. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. 1. Baskı. London: Cornell University Press, 2004.
5. Busch Per-Olof ve Andrea Liese, “The Authority of International Public Administrations.” İçinde International Bureaucracy: Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research, editörler Michael W. Bauer, Christoph Knill ve Steffen Eckhard, 97-122. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. Carlsnaes, Walter. “Foreign Policy.” İçinde Handbook of International Relations, editörler Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse ve Beth A. Simmons, 298-325. London: Sage Publications, 2013.
6. Checkel, Jeffrey T. “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change.” International Organization 55, no 3 (2001): 553-588.
7. Chou, Meng-Hsuan ve Marianne Riddervold. “Beyond Delegation: How the European Commission Affects Intergovernmental Policies Through Expertise.” ARENA Working Paper 12, Kasım 2014, 1-21.
8. Chou, Meng-Hsuan ve Marianne Riddervold. “The Unexpected Negotiator at the Table: How the European Commission’s Expertise Informs Intergovernmental EU Policies.” Politics and Governance 3, no 1 (2015): 61-72.

9. Copeland, Paul ve Scott James, “Policy windows, ambiguity and Commission entrepreneurship: explaining the relaunch of the European Union's economic reform agenda.” Journal of European Public Policy 21, no 1 (2014): 1-19.
10. Council of the European Union. “Council conclusions on developing a European Union Policy towards the Arctic Region.” Foreign Affairs Council Meeting, Brussels, 12 Mayıs 2014, Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 2, 2022. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/28342/142554.pdf.
11. AB DENİZ GÜVENLİĞİ STRATEJİSİ: TEORİK BİR İNCELEME 335 Council of the European Union. “European Union Maritime Security Strategy.” 11205/14, Brussels, 24 Haziran 2014, Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 1, 2022. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-11205-2014-INIT/en. Council of the European Union.
12. “European Union Maritime Security Strategy (EUMSS)- Action Plan.” 17002/14, Brussels, 16 Aralık 2014, Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 2, 2022. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST 17002-2014-INIT/en/pdf.
13. Cram, Laura. “The European commission as a multi‐organization: Social policy and IT policy in the EU.” Journal of European Public Policy 1, no 2 (1994): 195- 217.
14. Davis Cross, Mai’a K. “Cooperation by Committee: The EU Military Committee and the Committee for Civilian Crisis Management.” Occasional Paper, no 82 (2010): 1-42.
15. European Union Institute for Security Studies (ISS). Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 1, 2022. https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/op82_0.pdf.
16. Deitelhoff, Nicole. “The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case.” International Organization 63, no 1 (2009): 33-65.
17. Deutsche Welle. “Italy phases out sea rescue mission for migrants.” 31 Ekim 2014, Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://www.dw.com/en/italy-phases-out sea-rescue-mission for-migrants/a-18033647.
18. Directorate General for External Policies. “Pooling and Sharing: Member States Engagement and the Support by the EU.” 6 Mayıs 2015, Brussels, Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 16, 2022. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/534994/EXP O_IDA(20 5)534994_EN.pdf, 1-18.
19. EEAS. “About EUCAP Somalia.” 12 Mayıs 2022, Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eucap-somalia/about-eucap-somalia_en?s=332.
20. Egeberg, Morten. Multilevel Union Administration: The Trasformation of Executive Politics in Europe. 1. Baskı. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
21. Elgström, Ole ve Michael Smith. The European Union’s Roles in International Politics. 1. Baskı. London: Routledge, 2006.
22. Elster, Jon. “A Plea for Mechanisms.” İçinde Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, editörler Peter Hedström ve Richard Swedberg, 45-73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
23. EMSA. “Vessel traffic monitoring in EU waters (SafeSeaNet).” Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://www.emsa.europa.eu/ssn-main.html.
24. Eriksen, Erik Oddvar ve John Erik Fossum. Democracy in the European Union: Integration Through Deliberation? 1. Baskı. New York: Routledge, 2000.
25. Eriksen, Erik Oddvar. “Reflexive Integration in Europe.” İçinde Making The European Polity: Reflexive Integration in the EU, editör Erik Oddvar Eriksen, 9-29. London: Routledge, 2005.
26. Euractiv. “The Spanish EU Presidency.” Son Güncelleme: Temmuz 2, 2010, Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 15, 2022. https://www.euractiv.com/section/regional policy/linksdossier/the spanish-eu-presidency/.
27. EUR-Lex, “Satellite-based Vessel Monitoring System (VMS).” Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/satellite based-vessel- monitoring-system-vms.html.
28. European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. “Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council-For an open and secure global maritime domain: elements for a European Union maritime security strategy.” JOIN (2014) 9 final, Brussels, 6 Mart 2014, Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 2, 2022. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2d06a85d a57e-11e3-8438-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
29. European Commission. “Common information sharing environment (CISE).” Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://oceans-and fisheries.ec.europa.eu/ocean/blue-economy/other- sectors/common information-sharing-environment-cise_en.
30. European Commission. “Eurosur.” Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://home affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/schengen-borders-and-visa/border crossing/eurosur_en.
31. European Defence Agency (EDA). “Maritime Surveillance (MARSUR).” Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://eda.europa.eu/what-we-do/all activities/activities- search/maritime-surveillance-(marsur).
32. Frontex. “Joint Operation Triton (Italy).” 10 Ekim 2016, Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://frontex.europa.eu/media-centre/news/focus/joint-operation triton-italy--ekKaes.
33. Frontex. “Operations in the Western Balkans.” Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://frontex.europa.eu/we-support/main-operations/operations-in-the western- balkans/.
34. Frontex. “Operations Minerva, Indalo (Spain).” Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://frontex.europa.eu/we-support/main-operations/operations-minerva indalo- spain-/. Frontex. “Operation Poseidon (Greece).” Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://frontex.europa.eu/we-support/main-operations/operation-poseidon greece-/.
35. Frontex. “Operation Themis (Italy).” Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 12, 2022. https://frontex.europa.eu/we-support/main-operations/operation-themis italy-/.
36. Frontini, Andrea. “The European Union Maritime Security Strategy: sailing uncharted waters?” European Policy Center (EPC), 26 Haziran 2014, Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 1, 2022. http://aei.pitt.edu/56472/1/pub_4569_the_eu_maritime_security_strategy.pdf.
37. Germond, Basil ve Michael E. Smith. “Re-Thinking European Security Interests and the ESDP: Explaining the EU's Anti-Piracy Operation.” Contemporary Security Policy 30, no 3 (2009): 573-593.
38. Germond, Basil. The Maritime Dimension of European Security: Seapower and the European Union. 1. Baskı. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
39. Gornitzka, Åse. “Networking Administration in Areas of National Sensitivity: The Commission and European Higher Education.” İçinde European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research, editörler Alberto Amaral, Guy Neave, Christine Musselin ve Peter Maassen, 109-131. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.
40. Hooghe, Liesbet. The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance. 1. Baskı. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
41. Hyde-Price, Adrian. “‘Normative’ power Europe: a realist critique.” Journal of European Public Policy 13, no 2 (2006): 217-234.
42. Hyde-Price, Adrian. “A ‘Tragic Actor’? A Realist Perspective on ‘Ethical Power Europe’.” International Affairs 84, no 1 (2008): 29-44.
43. Hyde-Price, Adrian. “Neorealism: A Structural Approach to CSDP.” İçinde Explaining the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy: Theory in Action, editörler Xymena Kurowska ve Fabian Breuer, 16-40. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
44. Hynek, Nik. “EU crisis management after the Lisbon Treaty: civil–military coordination and the future of the EU OHQ.” European Security 20, no 1 (2011): 81-102.
45. Kleine, Mareike ve Thomas Risse, “Deliberation in Negotiations.” Journal of European Public Policy 17, no 5 (2010): 708-726.
46. Kluth, Michael Friederich ve Jess Pilegaard. “Balancing beyond the horizon? Explaining aggregate EU naval military capability changes in a neo-realist perspective.” European Security 20, no 1 (2011): 45-64.
47. Kurowska, Xymena ve Fabian Breuer. Explaining the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy: Theory in Action. 1. Baskı. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
48. Landman, Lennart. “The EU Maritime Security Strategy: Promoting or Absorbing European Defence Cooperation?”, Clingendael Institute, April 2015, 1-12.
49. Lewis, Jeffrey. “Informal integration and the supranational construction of the Council.” Journal of European Public Policy 10, no 6 (2003): 996-1019.
50. March, James G. ve Johan P. Olsen. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52, no 4 (1998): 943-969.
51. March, James G. ve Johan P. Olsen. “The Logic of Appropriateness.” İçinde The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, editörler Robert Goodin, Michael Moran ve Martin Rein, 689-708. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
52. Marsh, Steve ve Wyn Rees. The European Union in the Security of Europe: From Cold War to Terror War. 1. Baskı. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
53. Martens, Maria. “Administrative Integration through the Back Door? The Role and Influence of the European Commission in Transgovernmental Networks within the Environmental Policy Field.” Journal of European Integration 30, no 5 (2008): 635- 651.
54. Mearsheimer, John J. “E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On.” International Relations 19, no 2 (2005): 139-152.
55. Mearsheimer, John J. “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin.” Foreign Affairs, Eylül/Ekim 2014. Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 1, 2022. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2014-08-18/why-ukraine crisis- west-s-fault.
56. Offerdal, Kristine. “The EU in the Arctic: In pursuit of legitimacy and influence.” International Journal 66, no 4 (2011): 861-877.
57. Pollack, Mark A. “Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the European Community.” International Organization 51, no 1 (1997): 99-134. Posen, Barry R. “European Union Security and Defence Policy: Response to Unipolarity.” Security Studies 15, no 2 (2006): 149-186.
58. Riddervold, Marianne. “Finally flexing its muscles? Atalanta – The European Union's naval military operation against piracy.” European Security 20, no 3 (2011): 385-404. Riddervold, Marianne. “From reason-giving to collective action: Argument-based learning and European integration.” Cooperation and Conflict 46, no 4 (2011): 563-580.
59. Riddervold, Marianne. “(Not) in the Hands of the Member States: How the European Commission Influences EU Security and Defence Policies.” Journal of Common Market Studies 54, no 2 (2016): 353-369.
60. Riddervold, Marianne. “A Maritime Global Commons Power in the Making? On the Characteristics of EU Policies Towards the High Seas: The Arctic and the Maritime Security Strategy.” İçinde The Maritime Turn in EU Foreign and Security Policies: Aims, Actors and Mechanisms of Integration, editör Marianne Riddervold, 77-96. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
61. Riddervold, Marianne. “Expertise and Circumvention: How the Commission Influences the EU’s Maritime Foreign and Security Policies.” İçinde The Maritime Turn in EU Foreign and Security Policies: Aims, Actors and Mechanisms of Integration, editör Marianne Riddervold, 177-194. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
62. Riddervold, Marianne. “Why Not Fight Piracy Through NATO? Explaining the EU’s First Naval Mission: EU NAVFOR Atalanta.” İçinde The Maritime Turn in EU Foreign and Security Policies: Aims, Actors and Mechanisms of Integration, editör Marianne Riddervold, 195-217. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
63. Riddervold, Marianne. “EU Maritime Foreign and Security Policy Integration: Explaining the EU Maritime Security Strategy.” İçinde The Maritime Turn in EU Foreign and Security Policies: Aims, Actors and Mechanisms of Integration, editör Marianne Riddervold, 143-164. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
64. Riddervold, Marianne. “Introduction: A Maritime Foreign and Security Power in the Making?” İçinde The Maritime Turn in EU Foreign and Security Policies: Aims, Actors and Mechanisms of Integration, editör Marianne Riddervold, 1-27. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. Riddervold, Marianne. “Beyond the Pillar Divide: The Administrative Functioning of EU Maritime Foreign and Security Policies.” İçinde The Maritime Turn in EU Foreign and Security Policies: Aims, Actors and Mechanisms of Integration, editör Marianne Riddervold, 125-136. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
65. Riddervold, Marianne. “An Actor with Agency: The Influence of the Commission on EU Maritime Foreign and Security Policies.” İçinde The Maritime Turn in EU Foreign and Security Policies: Aims, Actors and Mechanisms of Integration, editör Marianne Riddervold, 103-123. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
66. Riddervold, Marianne. “The EU’s Naval Mission Sophia: A Humanitarian Operation to Help Refugees in Distress at Sea?” İçinde The Maritime Turn in EU Foreign and Security Policies: Aims, Actors and Mechanisms of Integration, editör Marianne Riddervold, 57- 76. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
67. Risse, Thomas. ““Let's Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics.” International Organization 54, no 1 (2000): 1-39.
68. Rittberger, Berthold. “Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament.” Journal of Common Market Studies 50, no 1 (2012): 18-37.
69. Rosén, Guri. “EU Confidential: The European Parliament's Involvement in EU Security and Defence Policy.” Journal of Common Market Studies 53, no 2 (2015): 383-398.
70. Rosén, Guri. “The impact of norms on political decision-making: how to account for the European Parliament’s empowerment in EU external trade policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 24, no 10 (2016): 1450-1470.
71. Sending, Ole Jacob. “Constitution, Choice and Change: Problems with the ‘Logic of Appropriateness’ and its Use in Constructivist Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 8, no 4 (2002): 443-470.
72. Sjursen, Helene. “Understanding the Common Foreign and Security Policy: Analytical Building Blocs.” İçinde Understanding the European Union’s External Relations, editörler Michele Knodt ve Sebastiaan Princen, 35-53. London: Routledge, 2003.
73. Sjursen, Helene. “Changes to European Security in a Communicative Perspective.” Cooperation and Conflict 39, no 2 (2004): 107-128.
74. Sjursen, Helene. “Values or rights? Alternative conceptions of the EU’s ‘normative’ role.” İçinde The European Union’s Roles in International Politics, editörler Ole Elgström ve Michael Smith, 85-100. London: Routledge, 2006.
75. Sjursen, Helene. “Not so intergovernmental after all? On democracy and integration in European Foreign and Security Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 18, no 8 (2011): 1078-1095.
76. Stang, Gerald. “Global Commons: Between Cooperation and Competition.” European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), Nisan 8, 2013. Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 4, 2022. https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/global-commons between-cooperation-and- competition, 1-4.
77. Tallberg, Jonas. European Governance and Supranational Institutions: Making States Comply. 1. Baskı. London/New York: Routledge, 2003.
78. Thomas, Daniel C. Making EU Foreign Policy: National Preferences, European Norms and Common Policies. 1. Baskı. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
79. Thompson, Dennis F. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11, (2008): 497-520.
80. Trondal, Jarle. An Emergent European Executive Order. 1. Baskı. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Ulbert, Cornelia ve Thomas Risse. “Deliberately Changing the Discourse: What Does Make Arguing Effective?” Acta Politica 40, no 3 (2005): 351-367.
81. Vai, Lorenzo. “The European Union’s Maritime Security Strategy: Cogito Ergo Sum?”, İçinde Italy and Security in the Mediterranean, editörler Alessandro Marrone ve Michele Nones, 93-108. Istituto Affari Internazionali, 2016.
82. von Ondarza, Nicolai ve Ronja Scheler. “The High Representative’s ‘double hat’: How Mogherini and Ashton have differed in their links with the Commission”, LSE Europp Blog, Mart 16, 2017. Erişim Tarihi: Ekim 29, 2022. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/03/16/high-representative mogherini-ashton/.
83. Walt, Stephen M. “Would You Die for That Country: Why the United States needs to think twice before calling Ukraine an ally.” Foreign Policy, Mart 24, 2014. Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 1, 2022. https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/03/24/would-you-die-for-that- country/.
84. Warntjen, Andreas. “Between Bargaining and Deliberation: Decision-Making in the Council of the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 17, no 5 (2010): 665-679.
85. Weber, Steffen ve Iulian Romanyshyn. “Breaking the ice: The European Union and the Arctic.” International Journal 66, no 4 (2011): 849-860