AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NDE KAMUSAL ALANIN KİMLİK KONUSUNA ETKİSİ

Öz

Avrupa Birliği’nde (AB) kimlik konusu uzun süredir Birlik gündeminde yer almakta, Avrupa vatandaşlarının Birlik’e aidiyet hissinin nasıl yaratılabileceği ve AB’de nasıl bir kimlik oluşturulabileceği tartışılmaktadır. Makalede, kamusal alan kavramı bir müzakere alanı olarak incelenecek, AB’de demokrasi ve vatandaşlık kavramları göz önüne alınarak Avrupa kimliği yaratılmasında Avrupa kamusal alanı oluşturulmasının potansiyel rolü tartışılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Avrupa kimliği,Avrupa kamusal alanı,Avrupa vatandaşlığı

The Effect of Public Sphere on the Identity Issue in the European Union

Abstract

In the European Union (EU), identity issue has been in the Union’s agenda for a long time and it has been discussed how the sense of belonging of European citizens to the Union can be created and how an identity can be constructed in the EU. In this article, the concept of public sphere will be analysed as a deliberation sphere, it will be discussed the potential role of the construction of European public
sphere for the creation of European identity by considering democracy and citizenship concepts in the EU.

Keywords

• European identity,European public sphere,European citizenship

Kaynakça

1. Ağaoğulları, Mehmet Ali. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Halk Kendini Yaratıyor.” İçinde Sokrates’ten Jakobenlere Batı’da Siyasal Düşünceler, editör Mehmet Ali Ağaoğulları, 569-596. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2011.
2. Arendt, Hannah. İnsanlık Durumu. Çeviren Bahadır Sina Şener. 6. Baskı. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2012.
3. Bauböck, Rainer. “Expansive Citizenship: Voting beyond Territory and Membership.” Political Science and Politics 38, no 4 (2005): 683-687.
4. Brüggemann, Michael ve Hagen Schulz-Forberg. “Towards a Pan-European Public Sphere? A Typology of Transnational Media in Europe.” İçinde Transnationalization of Public Spheres, editörler Hartmut Wessler, Bernhard Peters, Michael Brüggemann, Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw ve Stefanie Sifft, 78-94. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
5. Chalmers, Adam William. “Direct Democracy for the EU: A Place for Interest Groups in the European Citizens’ Initiative.” SWP Working Paper Berlin 05 (2011): 1-6. Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 27, 2018. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/arbeitspapiere/Direct_Democracy_for_the_EU_KS.pdf.
6. Çelebi, Aykut. Avrupa: Halkların Siyasal Birliği. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 2002.
7. Dahl, Robert A. Demokrasi Üstüne. Çeviren Betül Kadıoğlu. Ankara: Phoenix, 2001.
8. “Declaration on European Identity (Copenhagen, 14 December 1973).” Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 9, 2018. http://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/1999/1/1/02798dc9-9c69-4b7d-b2c9- f03a8db7da32/publishable_en.pdf.

9. Eriksen, Oddvar Erik. “Conceptualising European public spheres: general, segmented and strong publics.” İçinde The European Union and the Public Sphere: A communicative space in the making?, editörler John Erik Fossum ve Philip Schlesinger, 23-43. London and New York: Routledge, 2007.
10. European Commission. “Final Report Summary - EUROPOLIS (EuroPolis: A deliberative polity-making project).” Erişim Tarihi: Ekim 16, 2016. http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/162495_en.pdf.
11. European Commission Eurobarometer Report. “The European Constitution: Post-referendum survey in France.” Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 27, 2018. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl171_en.pdf.
12. European Commission Eurobarometer Report. “Post referendum survey in Ireland: Preliminary Results.” Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 13, 2018. http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/flash/fl_245_en.pdf.
13. European Commission Eurobarometer Report. “The European Constitution: Post-referendum survey in the Netherlands.” Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 27, 2018. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl172_en.pdf.
14. European Council Decision. “Protocol on the concerns of the Irish people on the Treaty of Lisbon.” Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 20, 2018. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32013D0106&from=EN.
15. Fiket, Irena, Espen D.H. Olsen ve Hans-Jörg Trenz. “Deliberation under conditions of language pluralism: Insight from the Europolis Deliberative Polling Experiment.” ARENA Working Paper 9 (2011): 1-30. Erişim tarihi: Aralık 18, 2012. http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena- publications/workingpapers/working-papers2011/wp-09-11.pdf.
16. Follesdal, Andrew ve Simon Hix. “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no 3 (2006): 533-562.
17. Grimm, Dieter. “Does Europe Need a Constitution?.” İçinde The Question of Europe, editörler Peter Gowan ve Perry Anderson, 239-258. London, New York: Verso, 1997.
18. Habermas, Jürgen. “Reply to Grimm.” İçinde The Question of Europe, editörler Peter Gowan ve Perry Anderson, 259-264. London, New York: Verso, 1997.
19. Habermas, Jürgen. “Why Europe Needs A Constitution?.” New Left Review 11 (2001): 5-26. Erişim Tarihi: Nisan 3, 2018. https://newleftreview.org/II/11/jurgen-habermas-why-europe-needs-a-constitution.
20. Habermas, Jürgen. Kamusallığın Yapısal Dönüşümü. Çeviren Tanıl Bora ve Mithat Sancar. 7. Baskı. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2007.
21. Habermas, Jürgen. Europe: The Faltering Project. Çeviren Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009.
22. Herrmann, Richard ve Marilynn B. Brewer. “Identities and Institutions: Becoming European in the EU.” İçinde Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, editörler Richard K. Herrmann, Thomas Risse ve Marilynn B. Brewer, 1-22. Oxford: Rowman&Littlefield, 2004.
23. Jenkins, Richard. Bir Kavramın Anatomisi: Sosyal Kimlik. Çeviren Gül Bostancı. İstanbul: Everest Yayınları, 2016.
24. Koopmans, Ruud ve Paul Statham. “Theoretical Framework, Research Design and Methods.” İçinde The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention, editörler Ruud Koopmans ve Paul Statham, 34-59. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
25. Moravcsik, Andrew. “The Myth of Europe’s Democratic Deficit.” Intereconomics (2008): 331-340.
26. Risse, Thomas. A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2010.
27. Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoğlu. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1994.
28. The European Convention. “Organisation: Composition of Convention.” Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 22, 2018. http://european-convention.europa.eu/EN/organisation/organisation2352.html?lang=EN.
29. “Treaty of Amsterdam.” Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 12, 2018. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/treaty/pdf/amst-en.pdf.
30. “Treaty on European Union.” Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 12, 2018. https://europa.eu/european-union/sites/europaeu/files/docs/body/treaty_on_european_union_en.pdf.
31. “Treaty of Lisbon: Amending The Treaty on European Union and The Treaty Establishing The European Community.” Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 22, 2018. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:12007L/TXT&from=EN.
32. Trenz, Hans-Jörg. “In Search of the European Public Sphere: Between Normative overstretch and empirical disenchantment.” ARENA Working Paper 12 (2008): 1-24. Erişim Tarihi: Aralık 18, 2012, http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena- publications/workingpapers/working-papers2008/wp08_12.pdf.
33. Van Middelaar, Luuk. Avrupa: Bir Geçiş Süreci. Çeviren Bilal Çölgeçen. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2014.
34. Weiler, J.H.H. “Does Europe Need a Constitution? Reflections on Demos, Telos and Ethos in the German Maastricht Decision.” İçinde The Question of Europe, editörler Peter Gowan ve Perry Anderson, 265-294. London, New York: Verso, 1997.
35. Yalçınkaya, Ayhan. “Yunan Uygarlığı içinde Polis ve Siyaset.” İçinde Sokrates’ten Jakobenlere Batı’da Siyasal Düşünceler, editör Mehmet Ali Ağaoğulları, 23-90. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2011.