Abstract

The procedure and conditions for accession to the European Union are regulated by the basic legal texts of the Union as well as the various legal documents of its institutions. Those procedure and conditions have been applied to Turkey’s accession since the declaration of its candidacy at the Helsinki Summit of 1999 as was the case for other candidate countries. This study deals with the basic principles, conditions and procedures of the current enlargement process which also includes Turkey and the implications thereof on the outcome of the accession negotiations. In that context, the main focus will be on the phrase that “long transitional periods, derogations, specific arrangements or permanent safeguard clauses, i.e. clauses which are permanently available as a basis for safeguard measures” as stipulated in the Negotiation Framework for Turkey and whether such measures could be considered as feasible, applicable or fair on the basis of the fundamental principles of the EU legal order.

Keywords

• European Union Law
• EU Enlargement
• Turkey-EU Relations
• EU Accession Negotiations
• Accession Negotiation Framework for Turkey

AB Hukukunun Temel İlkeleri Çerçevesinde AB’ye Katılım ve Türkiye’nin Müzakere Çerçeve Belgesinde Yer Alan Esaslar

Öz

Avrupa Birliği’ne katılımın usulü ve koşulları Avrupa Birliği’nin temel metinlerinde ve AB kurumlarının çeşitli belgelerinde düzenlenmektedir. Söz konusu usul ve koşullar diğer aday ülkeler gibi Türkiye’ye de 1999 yılında Helsinki Zirvesi’nde adaylık statüsünün kabulünden itibaren uygulanmaya başlanmıştır. Türkiye’nin de dahil olduğu son genişleme evresi ya da dalgası bakımından uygulanan temel esaslar, özellikle katılım müzakerelerinin tabi olduğu koşullar ile bunların Türkiye’nin katılım müzakerelerinin oluşturmaktadır. Bu çerçevede özellikle üzerinde durulacak konu ise katılım müzakerelerinin yürütülme esaslarının düzenlendiği Türkiye için Müzakere Çerçeve Belgesinde yer alan “uzun geçiş dönemleri, özel düzenlemeler, derogasyonlar ve daimi korunma önlemlerine başvuru imkanı” gibi hususların AB hukukunun temel ilke ve esasları çerçevesinde ne ölçüde mümkün, adil ve uygulanabilir olduğudur

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Avrupa Birliği Hukuku
• AB Genişlemesi
• Türkiye-AB Đlişkileri
• AB Katılım Müzakereleri
• Türkiye Müzakere Çerçeve Belgesi

Kaynakça

1. Fabien Amtenbrink, “On the European Union’s Institutional Capacity to Cope with Further Enlargement”, Steven Blockmans and Sacha Prechal (eds.), Reconciling the Deepening and Widening of the European Union, TMC Asser Instituut, The Hague, 2007. Lorand Bartels, Human Rights Conditionality in the EU’s International Agreements, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York, 2005.
2. Sanem Baykal, Tuğrul Arat, “AB’yle İlişkiler”, Baskın Oran (Ed.), Türk Dış Politikası III. Cilt, İletişim Yayınları, 2013.
3. Sanem Baykal, “1999 Helsinki’den 2004 Brüksel’e-Mukadder Üyelikten Ucu Açık Müzakerelere: Türkiye-AB İlişkileri”, Mustafa Aydın ve Çağrı Erhan (eds.), Beş Deniz Havzasında Türkiye, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara, 2006.
4. Steven Blockmans, “Consolidating the Enlargement Agenda for South Eastern Europe”, Steven Blockmans and Sacha Prechal (eds.) Reconciling the Deepening and Widening of the European Union, TMC Asser Instituut, The Hague, 2007.
5. Sergio Carrera, “What Does Free Movement Mean in Theory and Practice in an Enlarged Union?, CEPS Working Document, No. 208/October 2004.
6. Marise Cremona, Nikos Skoutaris, “Speaking of the de…rogations: accommodating a solution of the Cyprus issue within the Union legal order”, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Cilt 11, No 4, December 2009.
7. Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament-Recommendation of the European Commission on Turkey’s progress towards accession, COM (2004) 656 final, Brussels, 6.10.2004.
8. Commission of the European Communities, 2004 Regular Report on Turkey’s progress towards accession, SEC (2004) 1201, (COM (2004) 656 final), Brussels, 6.10.2004.

9. Commission Staff Working Document, Issues Arising from Turkey’s Membership Perspective, SEC (2004) 1202, (COM (2004) 656 final), Brussels, 6.10.2004.
10. Commission Decision No:2011/503/EU of 11 August 2011 Authorising Spain to Temporarily Suspend the Application of Articles 1 to 6 of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Freedom of Movement for Workers Within the Union with Regard to Romanian Workers Official Journal of the EU (OJ), L207, Aug. 12, 2011.
11. Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commision to the European Parliament and the Council-Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges-Including Annexed Special Report on the EU’s Capacity to Integrate New Members, COM (2006) 649 final, Brussels, 8.11.2006.
12. Council of the European Union, Accession Negotiations with Turkey, Brussels, 12 October 2005. (Türkçe çevirisi için bkz. www.abgs.gov.tr).
13. Lynn Dobson, “We Have the Stars, Let’s Add the Moon: EU, Turkey, and the Constitutional Values of Free Citizens”, Towards a European Constitution-from the Convention to the IGC&Beyond Conference, Goodenough College, Londra, 1-2 Temmuz 2004.
14. Michael Emerson, “Vade Mecum for the Next Enlargements of the European Union”, CEPS Policy Brief, No: 61, December 2004.
15. European Parliament 2009-2014, Plenary Sitting, Report on Enlargement: policies, criteria, and the EU’s strategic interests (2012/2025 (INI)), Committee on Foreign Affairs, Rapporteur: Maria Eleni Koppa, A7-0274/2012, 3.10.2012.
16. İlke Göçmen, “AB-Türkiye Müzakere Sürecinde Kişilerin Serbest Dolaşımına Kalıcı Koruma content/uploads/2011/04/Kalici-Koruma-Onlemleri.pdf.. Getirilmesi Sorunu”
17. http://www.eulaws.eu/wp- Helsinki European Council, Helsinki Presidency Conclusions, Bulletin of the European Communities, No. 12/1999, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2000.
18. Christophe Hillion, “The Creeping Nationalisation of the EU Enlargement Policy”, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, SIEPS 2010:6, Stockholm, November 2010. Christophe Hillion, “Negotiating Turkey’s Membership to the European Union-Can the Member States Do as They Please?”, European Constitutional Law Review, Cilt: 3, No: 02, 2007.
19. Frank Hoffmeister, “Earlier Enlargements”, Andrea Ott and Kirstyn Inglis (eds.), Handbook on European Enlargement, TMC Asser Press, The Hague, 2002.
20. House of Lords, European Union Committee, 10th Report of Session 2012-2013, The Future of EU Enlargement, HL Paper 129, 6 March 2013.
21. Kirstyn Inglis, “EU Enlargement: Membership Conditions Applied to Future and Potential Member States”, Steven Blockmans and Adam Lazowski (eds.), The European Union and Its Neighbours, TMC Asser Instituut, the Hague, 2006.
22. Kirstyn Inglis, “Annotation on Cases C-237/04, 413/04 and 414/04, Common Market Law Review, 2009.
23. Kirstyn Inglis, “Pre-Accession and Accession Treaty Legal Practice: Insights and Lessons for the Future”, Haluk Kabaalioğlu, Andrea Ott and Allan Tatham (eds.), EU and Turkey: Bridging the Differences, Economic Development Foundation (İKV), Pub. No. 250, 2011.
24. Dimitry Kochenov, “Behind the Copenhagen façade. The meaning and structure of the Copenhagen political criterion of democracy and rule of law”, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Cilt: 8, No. 10, 2004, (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004- 010a.htm).
25. Dimitry Kochenov, EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality, Kluwer Law International, The Netherlands, 2008.
26. Mattias Kumm, “The Idea of Thick Constitutional Patriotism and Its Implications for the Role and Structure of European Legal History”, German Law Journal, Special Issue-Confronting Memories, Cilt: 6, No. 2, 2005.
27. Neill Nugent, “The EU's Response to Turkey's Membership Application: Not Just a Weighing of Costs and Benefits”, Journal of European Integration, Cilt: 29, No: 4, 2007. Andrea Ott, “A flexible future for the European Union: the way forward or a way out?” Steven Blockmans and Sacha Prechal (eds.), Reconciling the Deepening and Widening of the European Union, TMC Asser Instituut, The Hague, 2007.
28. Jean Claude Piris, The Lisbon Treaty-A Legal and Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
29. Press Release, The Commission Accepts That Spain Can Temporarily Restrict the Free Movement of Romanian Workers, MEMO/11/554, Aug. 11, 2011, (EUROPA).
30. Stubb Report on the Institutional Aspects of the European Union’s Capacity to Integrate New Member States, A6-0393/2006 (16.11.2006).
31. Takis Tridimas, The General Principles of EU Law, 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York, 2006.