The Impact of European Integration Process on the Nature of Sovereignty

Öz

Bu makale, Avrupa Bütünleşme sürecinin, egemenliğin doğasını nasıl etkilediğini ve bunun sonuçlarının AB ve üye devletler için ne olduğunu sorgulamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, ilk olarak, geleneksel anlamda egemenlik ve egemen devletin ne olduğu açıklanmaktadır. İkinci olarak, Avrupa’da egemen devlet tecrübesinin ve Avrupa Bütünleşme sürecinin 1950’lerde geleneksel görüşe meydan okuma olarak ortaya çıkışını incelemektedir. Üçüncü olarak, egemenliğin, Avrupa Bütünleşme süreci içinde ortaya çıkan yeni bir kavramla, “Paylaşılan” egemenlik kavramıyla yeniden yorumlanmasını değerlendirmektedir. Dördüncü bölümde, AB ile üye ülkeler arasındaki egemenlik meselesini tartışarak, AB’yi hem ulusüstü hem devletlerarası özellikleri ile incelemektedir. Daha sonra, AB ve paylaşılan egemenlik üzerindeki incelemesini temel alarak, egemenliğin, bütünleşme sürecinin etkisi ile değişmesi üzerine genel bir analiz yapmaktadır. Son olarak, analizin ana noktalarını özetleyerek, hem ulusüstü ve hem devletlerarası unsurların birleşiminden oluşan AB içinde, artık geleneksel bir egemen devlet olarak kalmanın ve onun kesin yetkilerini yerine getirmenin mümkün olmadığının altını çizmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Egemenlik
• Egemen Devlet
• Avrupa Bütünleşme Süreci

Abstract

This article aims to question how the European integration process has affected the nature of sovereignty and what its implications are for the EU and member states. For this purpose, firstly, it clarifies what the sovereignty and sovereign state implies in the traditional understanding of sovereignty. Secondly, it examines the historical experience of the sovereign state in Europe and the emergence of European integration in 1950s as a challenge to the traditional view. Thirdly, it evaluates the reinterpretation of the sovereignty with a new concept, the concept of “Shared” sovereignty, emerged in the European integration process. In the fourth part, it scrutinizes the EU with its both supranational and intergovernmental characteristics discussing the question of sovereignty between the EU and the member states. Afterwards, based on its examination on the EU and shared sovereignty, it makes an overall analysis on the change of the sovereignty through the impact of integration process. Finally, summarizing the main points of its analysis, it underlines that, within the EU, consisting of combination of both supranational and intergovernmental elements, it is no longer possible to remain as a traditional sovereign state and to exercise its absolute powers

Keywords

• Sovereignty
• Sovereign State
• European Integration Process
• Shared Sovereignty
• EU.

Kaynakça

1. K. BLANCK-PUTZ, ‘Flexible Integration in the Common Foreign and Security Policy,’ EU Constitutionalisation: From the Convention to the Constitutional Treaty 2002–2005, Anatomy, Analysis, Assessment, in Lenka Rovná and Wolfgang Wessels (eds.), Europeum Institute for European Policy, Prague, 2006
2. G. BURCA,P.CRAIG, “The Evolution of EU Law”, Oxford University Press, Newyork., 1999
3. F. CAMERON, ‘The Future of the Common Foreign and Security Policy,’ 2003, Available at: http://www.watsoninstitute.org/bjwa/archive /9.2/EU/Cameron.pdf (accession in April 2008).
4. M. CREMONA, ‘External Relations and External Competence: The Emergence of an Integrated Policy,’ in Bӭrca, G. & Craig, P.(eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford University Press, Newyork, 1999
5. N.DAVIES, “Europe: A History”, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996
6. Desmond DINAN, “Europe Recast, A History of European Union”, Lynne Rienner Publishers, London, 2004
7. Jürgen HABERMAS, ‘The European Nation-State: On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship,’ in Linklater, Andrew (ed.), International Relations, Critical Concepts in Political Science, Vol.V, Routledge, London and Newyork, pp. 2061-2078, 2000
8. D. HELD, “Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance”, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1995

9. Eric J. HOBSBAWM, “The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century: 1914- 1991”, London, 1994
10. Robert O. KEOHANE, ‘Ironies of Sovereignty: The European Union and the United States,’ JCMS, Vol.40, No.4, pp.743-765, 2002
11. Stephen D. KRASNER, ‘Sharing Sovereignty- New Institutions for Collapsed and Failing States,’ International Security, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 85–120, 2004
12. Stephen D.KRASNER, ‘The Case For Shared Sovereignty,’ Journal of Democracy, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 69-83, 2005
13. Peter LANG, “The European Union Transformed, Community Method and Institutional Evolution from the Schuman Plan to the Constitution for Europe”, P.I.E, Bruxel, 2005
14. Paul MAGNETTE, “What is the European Union? Nature and Prospects”, Palgrave, Macmillan, New York, 2005
15. Michael MANN, “The Sources of Social Power”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989
16. Alan S. MILWARD, “The European Rescue of the Nation-State”, Routledge, London, 1992
17. Alan S. MILWARD, ‘The Springs of Integration in Gowan, P. and Anderson, P. (ed.), The Question of Europe, Verso, London, New York, 1997
18. Adrew MORAVSCIK Andrew, “The Choice for Europe, Social Purpose and State Power From Messina to Maastricht”, UCL Press, London, 1998
19. Nicholas MOUSSIS, “Guide to European Policies (11th ed.), European Study” Service, Rixensart, 2005
20. W. MULLER, V. WRIGHT, The State in Western Europe, Retreat or Redefinition(ed.), Portland, Or., Frank Cass, Ilford, Essex, 1994
21. Karl POLANYI, “The Great Transformation” (with a foreword by J.Stiglitz), Beacon Press, Boston, 2001
22. J.C. QHRGAARD, ‘International Relations or European Integration: Is the CFSP Sui Generis?,’Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy, in Tonra, B. and Christiansen, T.(eds.), Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York, 2004
23. Anthony D. SMITH, “Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era”, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1995
24. J.B.D. SIMONIS, ‘European Integration and the Erosion of the Nation-State,’ International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 50-58, 1995
25. Simon SWENEY, “Europe, the State and Globalization”, Pearson, Longman, 2005
26. Evgeni TANCHEV, ‘Sovereignty and Distribution of Authority in the Federations and in the Constitution of the European Union,’ International Seminar on The Impact of the Accession to the EU on the New Member States’ and Candidates’ Domestic Law Orders, Ankara, pp.81-94, 2004
27. Göran THERBORN, “Europe in the Twenty-first Century: The World’s Scandinavia?’ in Gowan, P. and Anderson, P. (ed.), The Question of Europe, Verso, London, New York, 1997
28. Charles TILLY, “Coercion, Capital and European States”, AD 990-1992, Blackwell Publishing, Cambridge, 1992
29. Charles TILLY, “European Revolutions (1492-1992)”, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 1993
30. TILLY, Charles, 2000, ‘Futures of European States,’ in Linklater, Andrew (ed.), International Relations, Critical Concepts in Political Science, Vol.IV, Routledge, London and Newyork, pp.1458-1466.
31. William WALLECE , ‘Rescue or Retreat? The Nation State in Western Europe, 1945- 93,’ in Gowan, P. and Anderson, P. (ed.), The Question of Europe, Verso, London, New York, 1997
32. William WALLECE, ‘The Sharing of Sovereignty: The European Paradox,’ Political Studies, Vol.47, pp.503-521, 1999