The Democratic Deficit and the European Transparency Initiative

Öz

Supranasyonel bir kurulu olan Avrupa Birli i’nin karar organlarõnõn, büyük ölçüde temsili demokrasiye istinat etmiyor olmasõ, Birli in karar-alma mekanizmasõnõn demokratik kalitesi ve Birli in me ruiyeti konusunda kaygõlara neden olmaktadõr. Bu makale, Avrupa Birli i’nde demokrasi açõ õnõn nedenleri üzerinde dururken, Avrupa "effaflõk Giri imi’nin, demokrasi açõ õ sorununu ne ölçüde çözebilece ini analiz etmektedir

Abstract

Because the European Union as a supranational organisation is not predominantly based on representative mechanism there have been concerns about democratic quality of its decision-making process and legitimacy of its political order. This paper discusses why the European Union suffers from a democratic deficit and to what extent the European Transparency Initiative succesfully addresses the democratic deficit in the Union

Keywords

• Democratic deficit,theory of democracy,transparency,civil society

Kaynakça

1. K. A. ARMSTRONG, “Rediscovering Civil Society: The European Union and the White Paper on Governance”, European Law Journal, Vol.8, No.1, pp.102-132
2. T. AUBERGER, K. ISZKOWSKI, “Democratic Theory and the European Union: Focusing on “Interest” or “Reason”?”Journal of European Integration, Vol.29, No.3, pp. 271-284, 2007
3. G. BAKER, “Civil Society and Democracy:The Gap Between Theory and Possibility”, Politics, 18 (2), pp.81-87, 1998
4. R. BELLAMY, A. WARLEIGH (eds.), Citizenship and Governance in the European Union, Continuum, London, 2001
5. S. BORRAS, T. CONZELMANN, “Democracy, Legitimacy and Soft Modes of Governance in the EU:The Empirical Turn, Journal of European Integration, Vol.29,No.5, pp.531-543, 2007
6. H. CATT, Democracy in Practice, London, Routledge, 1999
7. D. CHALMERS et al., European Union Law, the United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2006
8. S. CHAMBERS, “Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, Volume 12, Number 4, p.389-410, 2004

9. M. CINI, “European Commission reform and the origins of the European Transparency Initiative”, Journal of European Public Policy, 15:5, p.743-760, 2008
10. C. CROMBEZ, “Legislative Procedures in the European Community”, British Journal of Political Science, Vol.26, No.2, p.199-228, 1996
11. P.J.CONGE, “Review: The Concept of Political Participation: Toward a Definition”, Comparative Politics, Vol.20, No.2, p.241-249, 1988
12. O. COSTA et.al., “Introduction: Diffuse control mechanisms in the European Union:towards a new democracy?”, Journal of European Public Policy, 10:5, p.666-676, 2003
13. R.A.DAHL, “Pluralism Revisited”, Comparative Politics, Vol.10, No.2, p.191-203, 1978
14. R.A. DAHL, Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy, Yale University Pres, 1982
15. R.A. DAHL, “A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol.109, No.1, p.23-34, 1994
16. O. DE SCHUTTER, “Europe in Search of its Civil Society”, European Law Journal, Vol.8, No.2, p.198-217, 2002
17. R. EISING, “Interest Groups and the European Union”, in European Union Politics, 2 nd. ed. Michelle Cini, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p.202-221, 2007
18. E.O. ERIKSEN, “Deliberative Supranationalism in the EU” in Democracy In The European Union: Integration Through Deliberation, ed. E. O. Eriksen and J.E. Fossum, London, Routledge, p.42-64, 2000
19. E.O. ERIKSEN, J. E. FOSSUM, “Post-national Integration”, in Democracy In The European Union: Integration Through Deliberation, ed. E. O. Eriksen and J.E. Fossum, London, Routledge, p.1-28, 2000
20. E.O. ER KSEN, J. E. FOSSUM, “Democracy through Strong Publics in the European Union?”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.40, No.3, p.401-424, 2002
21. E.O. ER KSEN, J. E. FOSSUM, “Europe in Search of Legitimacy: Strategies of Legitimation Assessed”, International Political Science Review, 25, p.435-459
22. J. ELSTER, “Introduction: Historical Background” in Deliberative Democracy ed. J. Elster, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, p.1-18, 1998
23. J.D. FEARON, “Deliberation and Discussion” in Deliberative Democracy, ed. J. Elster, United Kingdom,Cambridge University Press, p.44-68, 1998
24. J.S.FISHKIN, Democracy and Deliberation, USA, Yale University Press, 1991
25. A. FOLLESDAL, “Survey Article:The Legitimacy Deficits of the European Union”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol.14, No.4, p.441-468, 2006
26. A. FOLLESDAL, S. HIX, “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravscik”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.44, No.3, p.533-562, 2006
27. D. FRIEDRICH, Old Wine in New Bottles?:The Actual and Potential Contribution of Civil Society Organizations to Democratic Governance in Europe, Reconstituting Democracy in Europe Working Paper 2007/08, 2007, www.reconproject.eu, accessed on 04.07.2008
28. R. GARGARELLA, “Full Representation, Deliberation, and Impartiality”, in Deliberative Democracy, ed. J. Elster, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, p.260-280, 1998
29. J. GREENWOOD, Interest Representation In The European Union, 2nd ed., New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007
30. S. GREWAL, “The Paradox of Integration: Habermas and the Unfinished Project of European Union”, Politics, Vol 21(2), p.114-123, 2001
31. A. GUTMANN, D. THOMPSON, Democracy and disagreement. Why moral conflict can not be avoided in politics, and what should be done about it, Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press, 1996
32. A. GUTMANN, D. THOMPSON, Why Deliberative Democracy, Princeton, Princeton University Pres, 2004
33. J. HABERMAS, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge, MIT Pres, 1996
34. P. HIRST, From Statism to Pluralism, London, UCL Press, 1997
35. S. HIX, “Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol.35, no.1, p. 69-106, 1999
36. R. HOLZHACKER, “Democratic Legitimacy and the European Union”, Journal of European Integration, 29:3, p.257-269, 2007
37. E. HUBER et al., “The Paradoxes of Contemporary Democracy: Formal, Participatory, and Social Dimensions”, Comparative Politics, vol.29, no.3, p.323-342, 1997
38. M. JACHTENFUCHS et al., “Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Political Order”, European Journal of International Relations, vol.4, no.4, p.409-445, 1998
39. H. KASSIM, D. G. DIMITRAKOPOULOS, “The Commission and the Future of Europe”, Journal of European Public Policy, 14:8, p.1249-1270, 2007
40. R.S. KATZ, “Models of Democracy: Elite Attitudes and the Democratic Deficit in the European Union”, European Union Politics, 2; 53, p.53-79, 2001
41. J. KNIGHT, J. JOHNSON, “Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy”, Political Theory, Vol.22, No.2, p. 277-296, 1994
42. C. LORD, P. MAGNETTE, “E Pluribus Unum? Creative Disagreement about Legitimacy in the EU”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol.42, no.1, p.183-202, 2004
43. J.R. LUCAS, Democracy and Participation, England, Penquin Books, 1976
44. P. MAGNETTE, European Governance and Civic Participation: Can the European Union be politicised?, This paper is a part of contributions to the Jean Monnet Working Paper No.6/01, 2001
45. P. MAGNETTE, “European Governance and Civic Participation: Beyond Elitist Citizenship?”, Political Studies, 51, p.144-160, 2003
46. P. MAIR, Popular Democracy and the European Union Polity, European Governance Papers, No.C-05-03, 2005, http://www.connex-network.org/pdf/egp- connex-C-05-03.pdf, accessed on 07.07.2008.
47. G. MAJONE, “The European Community: An ‘Independent Fourth Branch of Government’?”, EUI Working Paper SPS No. 94/17, Florence, European University Institute, 1993
48. G. MAJONE, “Europe’s Democratic Deficit: The Questions of Standards”, European Law Journal, vol.4, no.1, p.5-28, 1998
49. G. MAJONE, “The Credibility Crisis of Community Regulation”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol.38, no.2, p.273-302, 2000
50. B. MANIN et al, “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation”, Political Theory, vol.15, no.3, p.338-368, 1987
51. J. G. MARCH, J. P. OLSEN, Democratic Governance, New York, The Free Press
52. A. MCGANN, The Logic of Democracy: Reconciling Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection, USA, The University of Michigan, 2006
53. I. MICHALOWITZ, “Analysing Structured Paths of Lobbying Behaviour: Why Discussing the Involvement of Civil Society Does not solve the EU’s Democratic Deficit”, European Integration, vol.26, no.2, p.145-170, 2004
54. J. S. MILL, Considerations on Representative Government, South Bend, Gateway
55. A. MORAVCSIK, “In Defense of the Democratic Deficit”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), p.603-624, 2002
56. D. NAURIN, “Why increasing transparency in the European Union will not make lobbyists behave any better than they already do”, European Union Studies Association EUSA, Biennial Conference, Austin, Texas, 2005
57. K. NEUNREITHER, “Political Representation in the European Union: a common whole, various wholes, or just a hole?” in European Integration after Amsterdam, ed. K. Neunreither and A. Wiener, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000
58. J. NEYER, “The Deliberative Turn In Integration Theory”, Journal of European Public Policy, 13:5, p. 779-791, 2006
59. D. I. PIETRZYK, “Democracy or Civil Society”, Politics, Vol 23(1), p.38-45, 2003
60. B. ROSAMOND, “New Theories of European Integration”, in European Union Politics 2 nd. ed. Michelle Cini, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p.117-136, 2007
61. C. F. SABEL, J. ZEITLIN, Learning from Difference:The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union, European Governance Papers network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-07-02.pdf, accessed on 07.07.2008. No. C-07-02, 2007, http://www.connex
62. F. W. SCHARPF, Governing in Europe:Effective and Democratic?, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999
63. S. K. SCHMIDT, “Only an Agenda Setter?:The European Commission’s Power over the Council of Ministers”, European Union Politics, 1:37, p.37-61, 2000
64. P. C. SCHMITTER, What Is There To Legitimize In The European Union...And How Might This Be Accomplished?, This paper is a part of contributions to the Jean Monnet Working Paper No.6/01, 2001
65. A. SLOAT, “The Preparation of the Governance White Paper”, Politics, Vol 23(2), p.128-136, 2003
66. E. VINK, “Multi-level Democracy: Deliberative or Agonistic? The Search for Appropriate Normative Standards”, Journal of European Integration, vol.29, no.3, p.303-322, 2007
67. A. WEALE, “Democratic Theory and the Constitutional Politics of the European Union”, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), p 665-669, 1997
68. A. WEALE, Democracy, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
69. A. WEALE, New Governance and Public Reasoning-Towards a Better Quality of EU Deliberation, New Government Policy Brief 19, 2008
70. J. H. H WEILER et al., European Democracy and Its Critique Five Uneasy Pieces, EUI Working Paper RSC No.95/11, 1995 Official Documents
71. Commission of the European Communities, 2001, European Governance: A White Paper, COM (2001) 428 final, Brussels.
72. Commission of the European Communities, 2002, Communication From The Commission:Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue – General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission, COM (2002) 704 final, Brussels.
73. Commission of the European Communities, 2006, Green Paper: European Transparency Initiative, COM (2006) 194 final, Brussels.
74. S. KALLAS, The Need for a European Transparency Initiative, SPEECH/05/130, Nottingham, 2005, http://ec.europa.eu, accessed on 03.07.2008.
75. S. KALLAS, European Transparency Initiative, SPEECH/07/17, Madrid, 2007a, http://ec.europa.eu, accessed on 03.07.2008.
76. S. KALLAS, The European Transparency Iniative, SPEECH/07/491, Brussels, 2007b, http://ec.europa.eu, accessed on 03.07.2008.
77. The European Transparency Initiative, http://ec.europa.eu/commission_ barroso/kallas/transparency-en.htm, accessed on 30.06.2008.