Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Question of Derogations in European Integration Studies

Yıl 2020, , 437 - 468, 17.01.2020

Didem Buhari Gülmez Diğdem Soyaltın Colella

https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.676537
Cited By: 1

Öz

This essay aims to investigate the role of derogations in European integration studies. Accordingly, the following questions will be discussed: how is a derogation defined within the EU context? Who attributes the derogatory rights to whom and under what conditions? What are the implications of derogations on the ongoing integration process? The question of derogations has been partially covered by studies in law, organizational sociology and political science. This study puts forward conceptual and theoretical criticisms against the issue of derogations and demonstrates the limitations of the rationalist accounts of European integration through an investigation of various cases of EU derogations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

European Union integration derogation rationalism

Kaynakça

  • Alter, Karen ve Sophie Meunier-Aitsahalia. “Judicial Politics in the European Community: European Integration and the Pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon Decision.” Comparative Political Studies 26, no 1 (1994): 535-61.
  • Arda, Atilla. “Member States’ Right to Derogate from the European Treaties: A Commentary on Article 297 TEC.” İçinde C. Campbell, P.Herzog ve Gudrun Zagel (der.), Smit & Herzog on the Law of the European Union. New York: Matthew Bender, 2005. https://ssrn.com/abstract=925570
  • Aspinwall, Mark ve Gerard Schneider. “Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and the Study of European Integration.” European Journal of Political Research 38, no 1(2000): 1–36.
  • Bauer, Michael W., Christoph Knill ve Diana Pitschel. “Differential Europeanization in Eastern Europe: The Impact of Diverse EU Regulatory Governance Patterns.” Journal of European Integration 29, no 4(2007): 405–23.
  • Balkır, Canan ve Diğdem Soyaltın. Avrupalılaşma: Tarihçe, Kuram, Kavram ve Türkiye Uygulaması. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2018. Bergström, CF., Farrell, H. & Héritier, A. “Legislate or delegate? Bargaining over implementation and legislative authority in the EU.” West European Politics 30, no 2(2007): 338-66.
  • Börzel, Tanja A. “Mind the Gap! European Integration between Level and Scope.” Journal of European Public Policy 12, (2005): 21-20.
  • Börzel, Tanja ve Thomas Risse. “Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe.” İçinde The Politics of Europeanization, editörler Kevin Featherstone ve Claudio Radaelli, 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • Herzog, Peter, Christian Campbell ve Gudrun Zagel. (der.) Smit & Herzog on the Law of the European Union. New York: LexisNexis / Matthew Bender, 2005.
  • Checkel, Jeffery. “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change.” International Organization 55, no 3(2001): 553–88.
  • Checkel, Jeffery. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization 59, no 1(2005): 801–26.
  • Cohen, Albert K. “Deviance and Social Problems.” İçinde Stability and Social Change, editörler Bernard Barber ve Alex Inkeles. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1971.
  • Cowles, Maria G., James Caporaso e Thomas Risse, T. (der.) Transforming Europe. Ithaca ve London: Cornell University Press, 2001.
  • Cremona, Marise ve Nikos Skoutaris. “Speaking of the derogations: accommodating a solution of the Cyprus issue within the Union legal order.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 11, no 4 (2009): 381-95.
  • Demiray, Volkan. “Avrupa Birliği’nde İşçilerin Serbest Dolaşım Hakkı ve Türk işçilerin Durumu, Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı.” Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara, 2014.
  • Etzioni, Amitai. “The Community Deficit.” Journal of Common Market Studies 45, no 1(2007): 23-42.
  • Follesdal, Andreas ve Simon Hix. “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no 3(2006): 533-62.
  • Garrett, Geoffrey. “International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market.” International Organization 46, no 1(1992): 533-60.
  • Gitter, Donna M. “Led Astray by the Moral Compass: Incorporating Morality into European Union Biotechnology Patent Law.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 19, no 1(2001): 1-43.
  • Haas, Peter M. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46, no 1(1992): 1-35.
  • Hall, Peter A. ve Rosemary Taylor. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44, no 1(1996): 936-57.
  • Héritier, Adrienne, Kerwer, Dieter, Knill, Christoph, Lehmkuhl, Dirk, Teutsch, Michael ve Anne-Ccile Douillet. (der.) Differential Europe: The European Union Impact on National Policymaking. NY: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.
  • Hilson, Chris J. “The Unpatriotism of the Economic Constitution? Rights to Free Movement and their Impact on National and European Identity.” European Law Journal 14, no 2(2008): 186–202.
  • Hoffmann, Stanley. “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe.” Daedelus 95, (1966): 862-915.
  • Hooghe, Liesbeth ve Gary Marks. “A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39, no 1(2008): 1-23.
  • Jachtenfuchs, Markus ve Beata Kohler-Koch. Governance and Institutional Development, European Integration Theory. Oxford ve New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. JRS (2016) “The EU-Turkey Deal Analysis and Considerations.” Europe Policy Discussion Paper, https://jrseurope.org/assets/Publications/File/JRS_Europe_ EU_Turkey_Deal_policy_analysis_2016-04-30.pdf
  • Kahler, Miles. “Rationality in International Relations.” International Organization 52, no 1(1998): 919-41.
  • Kassim, Hussein ve Anand Menon. “The Principal-Agent Approach and the Study of the European Union: Promise Unfulfilled?.” Journal of European Public Policy 10, no 1(2003): 121-39.
  • Keohane, Robert O. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
  • Kocian, Mari-Anne. “German Beer Purity Law”, TED Case Studies 4, no 2 (1995). http://mandalaprojects.com/giant-project/germbeer.htm (Erişim tarihi 11 Mart 2018).
  • Koutrakos, Panos. “Is Article 297 EC a ‘reserve of sovereignty’?.” Common Market Law Review 37, no 6(2000): 1339-62.
  • Kramer, Roderick M. ve Tom R. Tyler. (der.) Trust in organizations : frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1996.
  • Leach, Rodney. (der.) Europe: A Concise Encyclopedia of the European Union from Aachen to Zollverein, 3. baskı, Londra, 2000.
  • March, James G. ve Johan Olsen. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press, 1989.
  • Majone, Giandomenico. “Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance.” European Union Politics 2, no 1 (2001): 103-21.
  • Majone, Giandomenico. Dilemmas of European integration: the ambiguities and pitfalls of integration by stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • Manners, Ian. “The normative ethics of the EU.” International Affairs 84, no 1 (2008): 45-60.
  • Mastenbroek, Ellen. “EU Compliance: Still a 'Black Hole'?.” Journal of European Public Policy 12, no 6 (2005): 1103 – 20.
  • McGowan, Lee. “Theorising European Integration: Revisiting Neo-Functionalism and Testing its Suitability for Explaining the Development of EC Competition Policy?.” European Integration Online Papers 11, no 3 (2007), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=989925
  • MacLaren, Malcolm. “Patently Unsatisfactory?: Community Legislative Competence and the ECJ Biotech Decision.” German Law Journal 2, no 18 (2001). http://www.germanlawjournal.com/volume-02-no-18/
  • Mény, Yves, Pierre Muller ve Jean-Louis Quermonne. (der.) Adjusting to Europe: The Impact of the European Union on National Institutions and Policies. Londra: Routledge, 1996.
  • Metin, Yüksel ve Yakup Altan. “Lizbon Antlaşması Sonrasında Subsidiarite İlkesi”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 16, no 3 (2011): 131-47.
  • Meyer, John W. ve Ronald Jepperson. “The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological Theory 18, no 1 (2000): 100-20.
  • Moravcsik, Andrew. “Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31, no 4 (1993): 473-523.
  • Moravcsik, Andrew. “Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no 4 (2002): 603-24.
  • Nicolaides, Phedon. “Negotiating Effectively for Accession to the European Union: Realistic Expectations, Feasible Targets, Credible Arguments.” EIPASCOPE 1998, no 1(1998): 1-6.
  • O'Donnell, Daniel. “Commentary by the Rapporteur on Derogation.” Human Rights Quarterly 7, no 1 (1985): 23-34.
  • Olsen, Johan. P. “Coping with conflict at constitutional moments.” Industrial and Corporate Change 12, no 4(1985): 812-842.
  • Pollack, Mark. “International Relations Theory and European Integration.” Journal of Common Market Studies 39, no 2 (2001): 221-244.
  • Rasmussen, Anne. “Challenging the Commission's right of initiative? Conditions for institutional change and stability.” West European Politics 30, no 2 (2007): 244 - 64.
  • Risse, Thomas. “Social Contructivism and European Integration.” İçinde European Integration Theory, editörler Antje Wiener ve Thomas Diez, 144-162. (NY: Oxford University Press, 2004).
  • Rock, Paul. E. Deviant Behavior. Londra: Hutchinson, 1973.
  • Rosenau, James N. Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization. Princeton ve Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003.
  • Scharpf, Fritz W. “The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no 4 (2006): 845–64.
  • Scharpf, Fritz W. Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic?. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • Schmidt, Susanne K. “Only an Agenda Setter?: The European Commission's Power over the Council of Ministers.” European Union Politics 1, no 1(2000): 37-61.
  • Sedelmeier, Ulrich. “Europeanisation in new member and candidate states.” Living Reviews in European Governance 6, no 1 (2011). http://www.europeangovernancelivingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2006-3/
  • Stefanou, Constantin ve Helen Xanthaki. Legal and Political Interpretation of Articles 224 and 225 of the Treaty of Rome: the FYROM Cases. Dartmouth: Ashgate, 1997.
  • Swenden, Wilfried. “Is the European Union in Need of a Competence Catalogue? Insights from Comparative Federalism.” Journal of Common Market Studies 42, no 2 (2004): 371–92.
  • Swinnen, Johan F.M. ve Liesbet Vranken (2009), “Review of the Transitional Restrictions Maintained by New Member States on the Acquisition of Agricultural Real Estate—Final Report”, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS). http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/capital/docs/study_en.pdf
  • Tesser, Lynn M. “East-Central Europe's New Security Concern: Foreign Land Ownership.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 37, no 2 (2004): 213–39.
  • Tokarski, Slawomir ve Alan Mayhew. “Impact Assessment And European Integration Policy”, Sussex European Institute, Working Paper No. 38 (2009).
  • Tsebelis, George ve Geoffrey Garrett. “The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union.” International Organization 55, no 2(2001): 357-90.
  • Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
  • Wendt , Alexander. “Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46, no 2(1992): 391-425.
  • Wernicke, Stephan. “Au Nom De Qui? The European Court of Justice between Member States, Civil Society and Union Citizens.” European Law Journal 13, no 3(2007): 380-407.
  • Wood, Steve. “A Common European Space? National Identity, Foreign Land Ownership and EU Enlargement: The Polish and Czech Cases.” Geopolitics 9, no 3(2004): 588-607.
  • Zaun, Natascha. EU Asylum Policies: The Power of Strong Regulating States. New York: Palgrave, 2017.
  • - Biyoteknolojik icatların yasal olarak korunmasına ilişkin 6 Temmuz 1998 tarihli ve 98/44 sayılı Avrupa Parlamentosu ve Konsey Direktifi, OJ L (1998) No L213.
  • - Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanının C-377/98 no’lu kararı, Hollanda Krallığı v. Avrupa Parlamentosu ve AB Konseyi.
  • -AB Adalet Divanının “Slovakya ve Macaristan Konseye karşı” C-643/15 ve C-647/15 no’lu davalarına ilişkin ortak kararı, No 91/17, Lüksemburg, 6 Eylül 2017, https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2017-09/cp170091en.pdf
  • Avrupa Komisyonu (2011) Information on the Results of the EU Accession Negotiations with Croatia, https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhoodenlargement/ sites/near/files/pdf/hp/results_of_th_eu_accession_negotiations_with_croatia.pdf
  • Avrupa Komisyonu (2018) Fact Sheet: March infringements package: key decisions, 8 Mart, Brüksel, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-18-1444_en.htm
  • Avrupa Birliği Konseyi (2005) Müzakere Çerçeve Belgesi, ELARG 64, Brüksel, http://www.mfa.gov.tr/data/AB/mcb_tr.pdf
  • - Monti 2004 (AB Rekabetten sorumlu eski komiseri Mario Monti’nin konuşması), “Competition For Consumers’ Benefit”, Amsterdam, 22 Ekim 2004, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/speeches/text/sp2004_016_en.pdf
  • - Kroes 2008 (AB Rekabetten sorumlu eski komiseri Neelie Kroes’in Avrupa Parlamentosu Ekonomik ve Mali İşler Komitesine hitaben yaptığı konuşma), “Competition policy objectives”, Brüksel, 26 Mart 2008,http://europa.eu/rapid/ pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/08/152&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
  • - 11 Temmuz 2007 tarihli Avrupa Parlamentosunun Hükümetlerarası Konferansın toplanmasına ilişkin ilke kararı: Avrupa Parlamentosu görüşü (AT Anlaşmasının 48. maddesi) (11222/2007 – C6-0206/2007 – 2007/0808(CNS), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/file.jsp?id=5497232
  • -20 Şubat 1979 tarihli ATAD 120/78 no’lu kararı: Rewe-Zentral AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/ EN/TXT/HTML/?isOldUri=true&uri=CELEX:61978CJ0120
  • -ATAD 305/87 no’lu kararı, Avrupa Komisyonu v Yunanistan, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:61987CJ0305
  • -11 Mart 1986 tarihli ATAD (4. Daire) kararı, Conegate Limited v HM Customs & Excise, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61985CJ0121

AVRUPA BÜTÜNLEŞMESİ ÇALIŞMALARINDA DEROGASYONLAR MESELESİ

Yıl 2020, , 437 - 468, 17.01.2020

Didem Buhari Gülmez Diğdem Soyaltın Colella

https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.676537
Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Avrupa bütünleşmesi çalışmalarında derogasyonların rolünü incelemektir. Bu kapsamda şu sorulara yanıt aranmaktadır: Derogasyon Avrupa bütünleşmesi bağlamında nasıl tanımlanmaktadır? Derogasyon hakkı kim tarafından hangi kriterlere göre devletlere verilebilir? Bütünleşme sürecine derogasyonların etkisi nasıl olmuştur? Yer yer Hukuk, örgüt sosyolojisi ve siyaset bilimi literatürlerinde konu edilen derogasyon meselesine kavramsal ve kuramsal açıdan eleştiriler getiren bu çalışma, çeşitli AB derogasyonlarının vaka analizleri yoluyla Avrupa bütünleşmesine ilişkin rasyonalist açıklamaların yetersiz kaldığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Avrupa Birliği bütünleşme derogasyon rasyonalizm

Kaynakça

  • Alter, Karen ve Sophie Meunier-Aitsahalia. “Judicial Politics in the European Community: European Integration and the Pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon Decision.” Comparative Political Studies 26, no 1 (1994): 535-61.
  • Arda, Atilla. “Member States’ Right to Derogate from the European Treaties: A Commentary on Article 297 TEC.” İçinde C. Campbell, P.Herzog ve Gudrun Zagel (der.), Smit & Herzog on the Law of the European Union. New York: Matthew Bender, 2005. https://ssrn.com/abstract=925570
  • Aspinwall, Mark ve Gerard Schneider. “Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and the Study of European Integration.” European Journal of Political Research 38, no 1(2000): 1–36.
  • Bauer, Michael W., Christoph Knill ve Diana Pitschel. “Differential Europeanization in Eastern Europe: The Impact of Diverse EU Regulatory Governance Patterns.” Journal of European Integration 29, no 4(2007): 405–23.
  • Balkır, Canan ve Diğdem Soyaltın. Avrupalılaşma: Tarihçe, Kuram, Kavram ve Türkiye Uygulaması. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2018. Bergström, CF., Farrell, H. & Héritier, A. “Legislate or delegate? Bargaining over implementation and legislative authority in the EU.” West European Politics 30, no 2(2007): 338-66.
  • Börzel, Tanja A. “Mind the Gap! European Integration between Level and Scope.” Journal of European Public Policy 12, (2005): 21-20.
  • Börzel, Tanja ve Thomas Risse. “Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe.” İçinde The Politics of Europeanization, editörler Kevin Featherstone ve Claudio Radaelli, 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • Herzog, Peter, Christian Campbell ve Gudrun Zagel. (der.) Smit & Herzog on the Law of the European Union. New York: LexisNexis / Matthew Bender, 2005.
  • Checkel, Jeffery. “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change.” International Organization 55, no 3(2001): 553–88.
  • Checkel, Jeffery. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization 59, no 1(2005): 801–26.
  • Cohen, Albert K. “Deviance and Social Problems.” İçinde Stability and Social Change, editörler Bernard Barber ve Alex Inkeles. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1971.
  • Cowles, Maria G., James Caporaso e Thomas Risse, T. (der.) Transforming Europe. Ithaca ve London: Cornell University Press, 2001.
  • Cremona, Marise ve Nikos Skoutaris. “Speaking of the derogations: accommodating a solution of the Cyprus issue within the Union legal order.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 11, no 4 (2009): 381-95.
  • Demiray, Volkan. “Avrupa Birliği’nde İşçilerin Serbest Dolaşım Hakkı ve Türk işçilerin Durumu, Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı.” Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara, 2014.
  • Etzioni, Amitai. “The Community Deficit.” Journal of Common Market Studies 45, no 1(2007): 23-42.
  • Follesdal, Andreas ve Simon Hix. “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no 3(2006): 533-62.
  • Garrett, Geoffrey. “International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market.” International Organization 46, no 1(1992): 533-60.
  • Gitter, Donna M. “Led Astray by the Moral Compass: Incorporating Morality into European Union Biotechnology Patent Law.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 19, no 1(2001): 1-43.
  • Haas, Peter M. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46, no 1(1992): 1-35.
  • Hall, Peter A. ve Rosemary Taylor. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44, no 1(1996): 936-57.
  • Héritier, Adrienne, Kerwer, Dieter, Knill, Christoph, Lehmkuhl, Dirk, Teutsch, Michael ve Anne-Ccile Douillet. (der.) Differential Europe: The European Union Impact on National Policymaking. NY: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.
  • Hilson, Chris J. “The Unpatriotism of the Economic Constitution? Rights to Free Movement and their Impact on National and European Identity.” European Law Journal 14, no 2(2008): 186–202.
  • Hoffmann, Stanley. “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe.” Daedelus 95, (1966): 862-915.
  • Hooghe, Liesbeth ve Gary Marks. “A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39, no 1(2008): 1-23.
  • Jachtenfuchs, Markus ve Beata Kohler-Koch. Governance and Institutional Development, European Integration Theory. Oxford ve New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. JRS (2016) “The EU-Turkey Deal Analysis and Considerations.” Europe Policy Discussion Paper, https://jrseurope.org/assets/Publications/File/JRS_Europe_ EU_Turkey_Deal_policy_analysis_2016-04-30.pdf
  • Kahler, Miles. “Rationality in International Relations.” International Organization 52, no 1(1998): 919-41.
  • Kassim, Hussein ve Anand Menon. “The Principal-Agent Approach and the Study of the European Union: Promise Unfulfilled?.” Journal of European Public Policy 10, no 1(2003): 121-39.
  • Keohane, Robert O. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
  • Kocian, Mari-Anne. “German Beer Purity Law”, TED Case Studies 4, no 2 (1995). http://mandalaprojects.com/giant-project/germbeer.htm (Erişim tarihi 11 Mart 2018).
  • Koutrakos, Panos. “Is Article 297 EC a ‘reserve of sovereignty’?.” Common Market Law Review 37, no 6(2000): 1339-62.
  • Kramer, Roderick M. ve Tom R. Tyler. (der.) Trust in organizations : frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1996.
  • Leach, Rodney. (der.) Europe: A Concise Encyclopedia of the European Union from Aachen to Zollverein, 3. baskı, Londra, 2000.
  • March, James G. ve Johan Olsen. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press, 1989.
  • Majone, Giandomenico. “Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance.” European Union Politics 2, no 1 (2001): 103-21.
  • Majone, Giandomenico. Dilemmas of European integration: the ambiguities and pitfalls of integration by stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • Manners, Ian. “The normative ethics of the EU.” International Affairs 84, no 1 (2008): 45-60.
  • Mastenbroek, Ellen. “EU Compliance: Still a 'Black Hole'?.” Journal of European Public Policy 12, no 6 (2005): 1103 – 20.
  • McGowan, Lee. “Theorising European Integration: Revisiting Neo-Functionalism and Testing its Suitability for Explaining the Development of EC Competition Policy?.” European Integration Online Papers 11, no 3 (2007), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=989925
  • MacLaren, Malcolm. “Patently Unsatisfactory?: Community Legislative Competence and the ECJ Biotech Decision.” German Law Journal 2, no 18 (2001). http://www.germanlawjournal.com/volume-02-no-18/
  • Mény, Yves, Pierre Muller ve Jean-Louis Quermonne. (der.) Adjusting to Europe: The Impact of the European Union on National Institutions and Policies. Londra: Routledge, 1996.
  • Metin, Yüksel ve Yakup Altan. “Lizbon Antlaşması Sonrasında Subsidiarite İlkesi”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 16, no 3 (2011): 131-47.
  • Meyer, John W. ve Ronald Jepperson. “The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological Theory 18, no 1 (2000): 100-20.
  • Moravcsik, Andrew. “Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31, no 4 (1993): 473-523.
  • Moravcsik, Andrew. “Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no 4 (2002): 603-24.
  • Nicolaides, Phedon. “Negotiating Effectively for Accession to the European Union: Realistic Expectations, Feasible Targets, Credible Arguments.” EIPASCOPE 1998, no 1(1998): 1-6.
  • O'Donnell, Daniel. “Commentary by the Rapporteur on Derogation.” Human Rights Quarterly 7, no 1 (1985): 23-34.
  • Olsen, Johan. P. “Coping with conflict at constitutional moments.” Industrial and Corporate Change 12, no 4(1985): 812-842.
  • Pollack, Mark. “International Relations Theory and European Integration.” Journal of Common Market Studies 39, no 2 (2001): 221-244.
  • Rasmussen, Anne. “Challenging the Commission's right of initiative? Conditions for institutional change and stability.” West European Politics 30, no 2 (2007): 244 - 64.
  • Risse, Thomas. “Social Contructivism and European Integration.” İçinde European Integration Theory, editörler Antje Wiener ve Thomas Diez, 144-162. (NY: Oxford University Press, 2004).
  • Rock, Paul. E. Deviant Behavior. Londra: Hutchinson, 1973.
  • Rosenau, James N. Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization. Princeton ve Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003.
  • Scharpf, Fritz W. “The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no 4 (2006): 845–64.
  • Scharpf, Fritz W. Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic?. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • Schmidt, Susanne K. “Only an Agenda Setter?: The European Commission's Power over the Council of Ministers.” European Union Politics 1, no 1(2000): 37-61.
  • Sedelmeier, Ulrich. “Europeanisation in new member and candidate states.” Living Reviews in European Governance 6, no 1 (2011). http://www.europeangovernancelivingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2006-3/
  • Stefanou, Constantin ve Helen Xanthaki. Legal and Political Interpretation of Articles 224 and 225 of the Treaty of Rome: the FYROM Cases. Dartmouth: Ashgate, 1997.
  • Swenden, Wilfried. “Is the European Union in Need of a Competence Catalogue? Insights from Comparative Federalism.” Journal of Common Market Studies 42, no 2 (2004): 371–92.
  • Swinnen, Johan F.M. ve Liesbet Vranken (2009), “Review of the Transitional Restrictions Maintained by New Member States on the Acquisition of Agricultural Real Estate—Final Report”, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS). http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/capital/docs/study_en.pdf
  • Tesser, Lynn M. “East-Central Europe's New Security Concern: Foreign Land Ownership.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 37, no 2 (2004): 213–39.
  • Tokarski, Slawomir ve Alan Mayhew. “Impact Assessment And European Integration Policy”, Sussex European Institute, Working Paper No. 38 (2009).
  • Tsebelis, George ve Geoffrey Garrett. “The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union.” International Organization 55, no 2(2001): 357-90.
  • Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
  • Wendt , Alexander. “Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46, no 2(1992): 391-425.
  • Wernicke, Stephan. “Au Nom De Qui? The European Court of Justice between Member States, Civil Society and Union Citizens.” European Law Journal 13, no 3(2007): 380-407.
  • Wood, Steve. “A Common European Space? National Identity, Foreign Land Ownership and EU Enlargement: The Polish and Czech Cases.” Geopolitics 9, no 3(2004): 588-607.
  • Zaun, Natascha. EU Asylum Policies: The Power of Strong Regulating States. New York: Palgrave, 2017.
  • - Biyoteknolojik icatların yasal olarak korunmasına ilişkin 6 Temmuz 1998 tarihli ve 98/44 sayılı Avrupa Parlamentosu ve Konsey Direktifi, OJ L (1998) No L213.
  • - Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanının C-377/98 no’lu kararı, Hollanda Krallığı v. Avrupa Parlamentosu ve AB Konseyi.
  • -AB Adalet Divanının “Slovakya ve Macaristan Konseye karşı” C-643/15 ve C-647/15 no’lu davalarına ilişkin ortak kararı, No 91/17, Lüksemburg, 6 Eylül 2017, https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2017-09/cp170091en.pdf
  • Avrupa Komisyonu (2011) Information on the Results of the EU Accession Negotiations with Croatia, https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhoodenlargement/ sites/near/files/pdf/hp/results_of_th_eu_accession_negotiations_with_croatia.pdf
  • Avrupa Komisyonu (2018) Fact Sheet: March infringements package: key decisions, 8 Mart, Brüksel, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-18-1444_en.htm
  • Avrupa Birliği Konseyi (2005) Müzakere Çerçeve Belgesi, ELARG 64, Brüksel, http://www.mfa.gov.tr/data/AB/mcb_tr.pdf
  • - Monti 2004 (AB Rekabetten sorumlu eski komiseri Mario Monti’nin konuşması), “Competition For Consumers’ Benefit”, Amsterdam, 22 Ekim 2004, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/speeches/text/sp2004_016_en.pdf
  • - Kroes 2008 (AB Rekabetten sorumlu eski komiseri Neelie Kroes’in Avrupa Parlamentosu Ekonomik ve Mali İşler Komitesine hitaben yaptığı konuşma), “Competition policy objectives”, Brüksel, 26 Mart 2008,http://europa.eu/rapid/ pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/08/152&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
  • - 11 Temmuz 2007 tarihli Avrupa Parlamentosunun Hükümetlerarası Konferansın toplanmasına ilişkin ilke kararı: Avrupa Parlamentosu görüşü (AT Anlaşmasının 48. maddesi) (11222/2007 – C6-0206/2007 – 2007/0808(CNS), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/file.jsp?id=5497232
  • -20 Şubat 1979 tarihli ATAD 120/78 no’lu kararı: Rewe-Zentral AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/ EN/TXT/HTML/?isOldUri=true&uri=CELEX:61978CJ0120
  • -ATAD 305/87 no’lu kararı, Avrupa Komisyonu v Yunanistan, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:61987CJ0305
  • -11 Mart 1986 tarihli ATAD (4. Daire) kararı, Conegate Limited v HM Customs & Excise, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61985CJ0121
Toplam 79 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Siyaset Bilimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Didem Buhari Gülmez Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-9199-7835

Diğdem Soyaltın Colella 0000-0002-7221-517X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 17 Ocak 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 2 Temmuz 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020

Kaynak Göster

Chicago Buhari Gülmez, Didem, ve Diğdem Soyaltın Colella. “AVRUPA BÜTÜNLEŞMESİ ÇALIŞMALARINDA DEROGASYONLAR MESELESİ”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 18, sy. 2 (Ocak 2020): 437-68. https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.676537.

Cited By

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ DÜZEYİNDE YÖNETİŞİM VE SİYASAL TERİTORYALİTE
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.743946