THE ECJ CASE LAW CONCERNING ARTICLES 17 AND 18 OF THE EC TREATY AND THE SUBSEQUENT EFFECT ON THE RIGHT TO MOVE FREELY

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 147 - 164, 01.05.2010

Bahadır Yakut

https://doi.org/10.1501/Avraras_0000000141

Öz

The European Court of Justice ECJ has played a major role in the expansion of the boundaries of right to free movement by interpreting the EU citizenship provisions of the Treaty. The paper analyses the case law of the ECJ, highlighting the most important decisions in this field and their enormous effects on the way citizenship is construed. Although, the Court was initially reluctant, it has moved from market interpretation that is economic citizenship to political citizenship and then it extended right of citizenship to non nationals. As of the new Citizenship Directive, it is more than a consolidation and summarise the innovation of jurisprudence of the Court whilst recasting the contents of the abolished directives in the wording of residence entitlements

Anahtar Kelimeler

European Court of Justice, Right to Move Freely, Citizenship, European Union, Jurisprudence of the ECJ

THE ECJ CASE LAW CONCERNING ARTICLES 17 AND 18 OF THE EC TREATY AND THE SUBSEQUENT EFFECT ON THE RIGHT TO MOVE FREELY

Öz

Avrupa Adalet Divanı ATAD , AT Antlaşmasının vatandaşlığa ilişkin hükümlerini yorumlarken serbest dolaşım hakkının sınırlarının önemli ölçüde genişlemesinde çok önemli rol oynamıştır. Bu makalede ATAD’ın vatandaşlığa ilişkin hükümlerin yorumlanması konusundaki en önemli içtihatları analiz edilerek getirdiği yorumların altı çizilecektir. Başlangıçta ATAD isteksiz olmasına rağmen, daha sonraki içtihatlarında iç pazar anlamında yani ekonomik vatandaşlık yorumundan politik vatandaşlığa doğru evrilmiştir ve vatandaşlığa ilişkin hakları vatandaş olmayanlara da teşmil etmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

ATAD, Serbest Dolaşım Hakkı, Vatandaşlık, Avrupa Birliği, ATAD içtihatları

Kaynakça

• Antony ARNULL, The European Union and its Court of Justice, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999
• Paul CRAIG, and de Burca GRAINNE, EU Law Text, Cases and Materials, 3rd ed., Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
• Jo SHAW and Gilliam MORE (eds), New Legal Dynamics of European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
• David O’ KEEFFE and Patrick TWOMEY (eds.) Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty Chancery/Wiley, London, 1994.
• Penelope KENT, Law of the European Union, London, Pearson Longman Fourth Edition, 2008
• Stephen HALL, Nationality, Migration Rights and Citizenship of the Union, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995 Articles
• Carlos CLOSA, “The concept of Citizenship in the Treaty on European Union”, 29 Common Market Law Review 1137, 1992
• Carlos CLOSA, “Citizenship of the Union and Nationality of Member States”, 32 Common Market Law Review 487, 1995
• David O’ KEEFFE “Union Citizenship”, in David O’ Keeffe and Patrick Twomey (eds.) Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty, London, Chancery/Wiley, 1994
• David O’ KEEFFE, “Reflections on European Union Citizenship”, 49 Current Legal Problems 347, 1996
• Dora KOSTAKOPOLOU, “Ideas, Norms and European Citizenship: Explaining Institutional Change”, 68 Modern Law Review, 2005.
• Hans Ulrich Jessurun D'OLİVİERA, “Nationality and the EU after Amsterdam”, David O'Keeffe and Patrick Twoney, Legal Issues of the Amsterdam Treaty, Oxford University Press, 1999
• Hans Ulrich Jessurun D'OLIVEIRA, “Union Citizenship: Pie in the Sky?” in A. Rosas and E. Antola (eds), A Citizens' Europe: In Search of a New Order, London: Sage, 1995.
• Hüseyin GÖÇMEN, “Does the Concept of European Citizenship Lack Content?”, 2(4) GAU J. Social Sciences, 2008
• Izolda BULVİNAİTE, “Union Citizenship and its Role in the Free Movement Regimes”, at. http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2003/issue5/bulvinaite5.html (5.6.2006).
• James D. MATHER, “The Court of Justice and Union Citizen”, 11 European Law Journal 724, 2005
• Jo SHAW, “The Interpretation of the European Union Citizenship”, 61 The Modern Law Review Limited, 1998
• Jo SHAW, “Citizenship of the Union: Towards Post-National Membership?” in Vi(1) Collected Courses Of The Academy Of European Law 237, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999.
• Martina DOPPELHAMMER, “Expulsion: a Test Case for European Union Citizenship?”, 24 European Law Review 621, 1999
• Michael DOUGAN, “Fees, Grants, Loans and Dole Cheques: Who Covers the Costs of Migrant Education in EU”, 42 Common Market Law Review, 2005
• Michelle EVERSON, “The Legacy of the Market Citizen” in Jo Shaw and Gillian More (eds), New Legal Dynamics of European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
• Norbert REİCH, “Union Citizenship – Metaphor or Source of Rights?” 7 European Law Journal 4, 2001.
• Norbert REİCH, “The European Constitution and New Member Countries: The Constitutional Relevance of Free Movement and Citizenship”, Annual Lecture at CECIL, University of Sheffield, 2004
• Niamh Nic SHUİBHNE, “Free Movement of Persons and the Wholly Internal Rule: Time to Move on?”, 39 Common Market Law Review 731, 2002
• Robin WHİTE, “Free Movement, Equal Treatment, Citizenship of the Union”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2005
• Robin WHİTE, “The Citizenship Directive: Consolidation, Codification or Re-conceptualisation”, (Leicester University Distance Learning Week Hand out 2006)
• Síofra O’ LEARY, “Putting Flesh on the Bones of European Union Citizenship”, 24 European Law Review 68, 1999
• Sybilla FRIES and Jo SHAW, “Citizenship of the Union: First steps in the European Court of Justice”, 4 European Public Law 533, 1998