Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Birleşmiş Milletler ve Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2023, , 197 - 236, 28.11.2023

İrem Şevval Akbaş

https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.1243555
Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Birleşmiş Milletler ve özellikle de barış ve güvenlik konusunda oynadığı önemli rolden dolayı Birleşmiş Milletler organlarından biri olan Güvenlik Konseyi ile Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi arasındaki ilişkinin hukuki niteliğinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi kurucu antlaşması olan Roma Statüsü’nde yer alan birtakım düzenlemeler incelenmiştir. Söz konusu düzenlemelerin Güvenlik Konseyi’nin aldığı bazı kararlar ile nasıl uygulandığı karşılaştırılarak, iki kurumun aslında iş birliği ilişkisi halinde hareket ettiği ancak pratikte alınan bazı kararlar ile bu iş birliği ilişkisinin zedelenebildiği değerlendirmesi yapılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi İş birliği Roma Statüsü BM Şartı

Kaynakça

  • Abass, Ademola. “The Competence of the Security Council to Terminate the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.” Texas International Law Journal 40. no. 2 (Winter 2005): 263-298.
  • Alibaba, Arzu. “Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesinin Kuruluşu.” Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 49. no. 1 (2000): 181-207.
  • Arbour, Louise. “The Relationship Between the ICC and UN Security Council.” Global Governance 20 (2004): 195-201.
  • Bassiouni, M. Cherif. International Criminal Law III. International Enforcement. 3. Edition. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2008.
  • Bohlander, Michael. “Darfur, The Security Council, And The International Criminal Court.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55. no.1 (January 2006): 226-236.
  • Condorelli, Luigi ve Annalisa Ciampi. “Comments on the Security Council Referral of the Situation in Darfur to the ICC.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 3 (2005): 590-599.
  • Çakmak, Cenap. “Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’nin Darfur Krizi’ne Müdahil Olması ve ABD’nin Süper Güç Olarak Limitleri.” Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika 3. no.10 (2007): 43-74.
  • Değirmenci, Olgun ve Ali Mavuş. Uluslararası Ceza Hukukunda Saldırı Suçu. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları, 2016.
  • Elias, Olufemi ve Anneliese Quast. “The Relationship between the Security Council and the International Criminal Court in the Light of Resolution 1422.” Non-State Actors and International Law 3. no. Issues 2-3 (2003): 165-186.
  • Ely II, Robert B. “A Proposal for an International Criminal Court; A Critique and an Alternative.” Dickinson Law Review 57. no. 1 (1952): 46-60.
  • Emir, Nergiz. “Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’nin Yargı Yetkisi Bakımından Saldırı Suçu.” Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 1. no. 2 (2015): 118- 143.
  • Fletcher, George P. ve Jens David Ohlin. “The ICC: Two Courts in One?.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 4 (2006):428-433.
  • Galand, Alexandre Skander. “The Nature of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (and its Amended Jurisdictional Scheme).” Journal of International Criminal Justice 17. no.5 (2019): 933-956.
  • Gallarotti, Giulio M. ve Arik Y. Preis. “Politics, International Justice, and the United States: Toward a Permanent International Criminal Court.” UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 4. no. 1 (Spring/Summer 1999): 1-54.
  • Greenawalt, Alexander K. A. “Introductory Note to the International Criminal Court: Decisions Pursuant to Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Failure by the Republic of Malawi and the Republic of Chad to Comply with the Cooperation Requests Issued by the Court with Respect to the Arrest and Surrender of Omar Hassan Ahmad al Bashir & African Union Response”, International Legal Materials 51. no. 2 (2012): 393-417.
  • Hall, Christopher Keith. “The Powers and Role of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in the Global Fight against Impunity.” Leiden Journal of International Law 17. no. 1 (March 2004): 121-140.
  • İşyar, Ömer Göksel. “Günümüzde Uluslararası Güvenlik Stratejileri: Kavramsal Çerçeve ve Uygulama.” Gazi Akademik Bakış 2. no. 3 (2008): 1-42.
  • Jain, Neha. “A Separate Law for Peacekeepers: The Clash between the Security Council and the International Criminal Court.” The European Journal of International Law 16. no. 2 (2005): 239-254.
  • Jamison, Sandra L. “A Permanent International Criminal Court: A Proposal That Overcomes Past Objections.” Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 23. no. 2 (Spring 1995): 419-458.
  • Kacker, Devyani. “Coming Full Circle: The Rome Statute and the Crime of Aggression.” Suffolk Transnational Law Review 33. no. 2 (Summer 2010): 257-288.
  • Keppler, Elise. “The United States and the International Criminal Court: The Bush Administration’s Approach and a Way Forward Under the Obama Administration.” Publicist 2. no. 1 (2009): 12-23.
  • Knottnerus, Abel S. “The Security Council And The International Criminal Court: The Unsolved Puzzle Of Article 16.” Netherlands International Law Review l. (2014): 195-224.
  • Koskenniemi, Martti. “The Police in the Temple Order, Justice and the UN: A Dialectical View.” European Journal of International Law 6. no. 3 (1995): 325-348.
  • Kurşun, Günal. 101 Soruda UCM. 1. Baskı. Ankara: İnsan Hakları Gündemi Derneği. 2011. https://rightsagenda.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/821_101SorudaUCM.pdf.
  • Kyle, Jess. “The New Legal Reality: Peace, Punishment, and Security Council Referrals to the ICC.” Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 25. no. 1 (Winter 2015): 109-152.
  • Lavers, Troy. “(Pre)Determining the Crime of Aggression: Has the Time Come to Allow the International Criminal Court Its Freedom.” Albany Law Review 71. no. 1 (2008): 299-320.
  • Mégret, Frédéric. “International Criminal Justice as a Peace Project.” The European Journal of International Law 29. no. 3 (2018): 835-858.
  • Önok, Murat. Tarihi Perspektifiyle Uluslararası Ceza Divanı. Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi Yayınları. 2003.
  • Roach, Steven C. “Humanitarian Emergencies and the International Criminal Court (ICC): Toward a Cooperative Arrangement between the ICC and UN Security Council.” International Studies Perspectives 6. no. 4 (2005): s. 431-446.
  • Rukooko, Archangel ve Byaruhanga Jon Silverman. “The International Criminal Court and Africa: A Fractious Relationship Assessed.” African Human Rights Law Journal 19. no. 1 (2019): 85-104.
  • Sarıgüzel, Hacı. “Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi.” Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi. no. 3 (2013): 230-273.
  • Scheffer, David. “A Pragmatic Approach to Jurisdictional and Definitional Requirements for the Crime of Aggression in the Rome Statute.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 41. no. 2-3 (2009): 397-412.
  • Shamsi, Nadia. “The ICC a Political Tool? How The Rome Statute Is Susceptible to The Pressures of More Power States.” Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution 24. no. 1 (2016): 85-104.
  • Sur, Melda. “Birleşmiş Milletler Örgütünün Gelişimi ve Geleceği The Development and The Future of the United Nations.” Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 8 (2013): 2535-2550.
  • Tabanlı, Figen. “Uluslararası Ceza Yargılamalarına Başlanabilmesinde Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyinin Rolü ve Sudan Örneği.” Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi. no. 1 (2017): 79-104.
  • Talmon, Stefan. “The Security Council As World Legislature.” American Journal of International Law 99. no.1 (2005): 175-193.
  • Tezcan, Durmuş, Mustafa Ruhan Erdem ve Murat Önok. Uluslararası Ceza Hukuku. 6. baskı, İstanbul: Seçkin Yayınları. 2021.
  • Trahan, Jennifer. “Revisiting the Role of the Security Council Concerning the International Criminal Court’s Crime of Aggression.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 17 (2019): 471-483.
  • Uzun, Elif. “Milletlerarası Ceza Mahkemesi Düşüncesinin Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Roma Statüsü.” Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 3. no. 2 (2003): 25-48.
  • Weller, Marc. “Undoing the Global Constitution: UN Security Council Action on the International Criminal Court.” International Affairs 78. no. 4 (2002): 693-712.
  • Zappalà, Salvatore. “The Reaction of the US to the Entry in to Force of the ICC Statute: Comments on UN SC Resolution 1422 (2002) and Article 98 Agreements.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 1 (2003): 114–134.
  • Zimmermann, Andreas. “The Creation of a Permanent International Criminal Court.” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 2 (1998): 169-238.
  • Fanton, Jonathan F. “US Obstructs Global Justice.” Los Angeles Times. 29 Mart 2005. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-mar-29-oe-fanton29-story.html.
  • Müller, Lukas Emanuel. “Referrals, Deferrals and Many Double Standards: Recapitulating the History of the SC-ICC Relationship.” Völkerrechtsblog. 12.07.2022. https://voelkerrec htsblog.org/referrals-deferrals-and-many-double-standards/.
  • “Open Debate in the Security Council on Peace and justice, with a special focus on the role of the International Criminal Court.” 17 October 2012. S/2012/731. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3CF6E 4FF96FF9%7D/s_2012_731.pdf.
  • “The Relationship Between the ICC and the Security Council: Challenges and Opportunities.” The International Peace Institute (IPI). 777 United Nations Plaza. New York. 10017-3521. (March 2013). https://www.ipinst.org/wpcontent/uploads/publications/ipi_e_pub_relationship_bet__icc_and_sc__2_.pdf.
  • “United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court.” Rome. 15 June -17 July 1998 Official Records A/CONF.183/13(Vol.II).https://legal.un.org/icc/rome/proceedings/E/Rome%20Proceedings_v2_e.pdf.
  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/darfur/abd-al-rahman.
  • https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/whatsinblue/2022/06/arria-formula-meeting%20reflections-on-the- relationship-between-the-international-criminal-court-and-the-security-council.php.
  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/situations/ukraine.
  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-ukraine-icc-judges-issue-arrest-warrants-against-vladimir-vladimirovich-putin-and.
  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/icc-prosecutor-karim-khan-kc-concludes-fourth-visit-ukraine-amidst-darkness-light-justice.
  • https://archive.globalpolicy.org/international-justice/the-international-criminal-court/icc-in-the-security-council-6-4.html.
  • https://crimeofaggression.info/resourcessearch/situation-in-ukraine/.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNITED NATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

Yıl 2023, , 197 - 236, 28.11.2023

İrem Şevval Akbaş

https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.1243555
Cited By: 1

Öz

In this study, it is aimed to determine the legal nature of the relationship between the United Nations and Security Council, which is one of the United Nations organs and it plays important role in upholding peace and security, and the International Criminal Court. In this context, some articles in the Rome Statute which is the founding treaty of the International Criminal Court are examined. It is evaluated that two institutions actually act in a cooperative relationship when compared to the implementation of these articles with some of the decisions taken by the Security Council, but this cooperation relationship could be damaged by some decisions taken in practice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

United Nations Security Council International Criminal Court Cooperation Rome Statute UN Charter

Kaynakça

  • Abass, Ademola. “The Competence of the Security Council to Terminate the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.” Texas International Law Journal 40. no. 2 (Winter 2005): 263-298.
  • Alibaba, Arzu. “Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesinin Kuruluşu.” Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 49. no. 1 (2000): 181-207.
  • Arbour, Louise. “The Relationship Between the ICC and UN Security Council.” Global Governance 20 (2004): 195-201.
  • Bassiouni, M. Cherif. International Criminal Law III. International Enforcement. 3. Edition. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2008.
  • Bohlander, Michael. “Darfur, The Security Council, And The International Criminal Court.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55. no.1 (January 2006): 226-236.
  • Condorelli, Luigi ve Annalisa Ciampi. “Comments on the Security Council Referral of the Situation in Darfur to the ICC.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 3 (2005): 590-599.
  • Çakmak, Cenap. “Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’nin Darfur Krizi’ne Müdahil Olması ve ABD’nin Süper Güç Olarak Limitleri.” Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika 3. no.10 (2007): 43-74.
  • Değirmenci, Olgun ve Ali Mavuş. Uluslararası Ceza Hukukunda Saldırı Suçu. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları, 2016.
  • Elias, Olufemi ve Anneliese Quast. “The Relationship between the Security Council and the International Criminal Court in the Light of Resolution 1422.” Non-State Actors and International Law 3. no. Issues 2-3 (2003): 165-186.
  • Ely II, Robert B. “A Proposal for an International Criminal Court; A Critique and an Alternative.” Dickinson Law Review 57. no. 1 (1952): 46-60.
  • Emir, Nergiz. “Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’nin Yargı Yetkisi Bakımından Saldırı Suçu.” Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 1. no. 2 (2015): 118- 143.
  • Fletcher, George P. ve Jens David Ohlin. “The ICC: Two Courts in One?.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 4 (2006):428-433.
  • Galand, Alexandre Skander. “The Nature of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (and its Amended Jurisdictional Scheme).” Journal of International Criminal Justice 17. no.5 (2019): 933-956.
  • Gallarotti, Giulio M. ve Arik Y. Preis. “Politics, International Justice, and the United States: Toward a Permanent International Criminal Court.” UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 4. no. 1 (Spring/Summer 1999): 1-54.
  • Greenawalt, Alexander K. A. “Introductory Note to the International Criminal Court: Decisions Pursuant to Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Failure by the Republic of Malawi and the Republic of Chad to Comply with the Cooperation Requests Issued by the Court with Respect to the Arrest and Surrender of Omar Hassan Ahmad al Bashir & African Union Response”, International Legal Materials 51. no. 2 (2012): 393-417.
  • Hall, Christopher Keith. “The Powers and Role of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in the Global Fight against Impunity.” Leiden Journal of International Law 17. no. 1 (March 2004): 121-140.
  • İşyar, Ömer Göksel. “Günümüzde Uluslararası Güvenlik Stratejileri: Kavramsal Çerçeve ve Uygulama.” Gazi Akademik Bakış 2. no. 3 (2008): 1-42.
  • Jain, Neha. “A Separate Law for Peacekeepers: The Clash between the Security Council and the International Criminal Court.” The European Journal of International Law 16. no. 2 (2005): 239-254.
  • Jamison, Sandra L. “A Permanent International Criminal Court: A Proposal That Overcomes Past Objections.” Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 23. no. 2 (Spring 1995): 419-458.
  • Kacker, Devyani. “Coming Full Circle: The Rome Statute and the Crime of Aggression.” Suffolk Transnational Law Review 33. no. 2 (Summer 2010): 257-288.
  • Keppler, Elise. “The United States and the International Criminal Court: The Bush Administration’s Approach and a Way Forward Under the Obama Administration.” Publicist 2. no. 1 (2009): 12-23.
  • Knottnerus, Abel S. “The Security Council And The International Criminal Court: The Unsolved Puzzle Of Article 16.” Netherlands International Law Review l. (2014): 195-224.
  • Koskenniemi, Martti. “The Police in the Temple Order, Justice and the UN: A Dialectical View.” European Journal of International Law 6. no. 3 (1995): 325-348.
  • Kurşun, Günal. 101 Soruda UCM. 1. Baskı. Ankara: İnsan Hakları Gündemi Derneği. 2011. https://rightsagenda.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/821_101SorudaUCM.pdf.
  • Kyle, Jess. “The New Legal Reality: Peace, Punishment, and Security Council Referrals to the ICC.” Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 25. no. 1 (Winter 2015): 109-152.
  • Lavers, Troy. “(Pre)Determining the Crime of Aggression: Has the Time Come to Allow the International Criminal Court Its Freedom.” Albany Law Review 71. no. 1 (2008): 299-320.
  • Mégret, Frédéric. “International Criminal Justice as a Peace Project.” The European Journal of International Law 29. no. 3 (2018): 835-858.
  • Önok, Murat. Tarihi Perspektifiyle Uluslararası Ceza Divanı. Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi Yayınları. 2003.
  • Roach, Steven C. “Humanitarian Emergencies and the International Criminal Court (ICC): Toward a Cooperative Arrangement between the ICC and UN Security Council.” International Studies Perspectives 6. no. 4 (2005): s. 431-446.
  • Rukooko, Archangel ve Byaruhanga Jon Silverman. “The International Criminal Court and Africa: A Fractious Relationship Assessed.” African Human Rights Law Journal 19. no. 1 (2019): 85-104.
  • Sarıgüzel, Hacı. “Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi.” Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi. no. 3 (2013): 230-273.
  • Scheffer, David. “A Pragmatic Approach to Jurisdictional and Definitional Requirements for the Crime of Aggression in the Rome Statute.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 41. no. 2-3 (2009): 397-412.
  • Shamsi, Nadia. “The ICC a Political Tool? How The Rome Statute Is Susceptible to The Pressures of More Power States.” Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution 24. no. 1 (2016): 85-104.
  • Sur, Melda. “Birleşmiş Milletler Örgütünün Gelişimi ve Geleceği The Development and The Future of the United Nations.” Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 8 (2013): 2535-2550.
  • Tabanlı, Figen. “Uluslararası Ceza Yargılamalarına Başlanabilmesinde Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyinin Rolü ve Sudan Örneği.” Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi. no. 1 (2017): 79-104.
  • Talmon, Stefan. “The Security Council As World Legislature.” American Journal of International Law 99. no.1 (2005): 175-193.
  • Tezcan, Durmuş, Mustafa Ruhan Erdem ve Murat Önok. Uluslararası Ceza Hukuku. 6. baskı, İstanbul: Seçkin Yayınları. 2021.
  • Trahan, Jennifer. “Revisiting the Role of the Security Council Concerning the International Criminal Court’s Crime of Aggression.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 17 (2019): 471-483.
  • Uzun, Elif. “Milletlerarası Ceza Mahkemesi Düşüncesinin Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Roma Statüsü.” Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 3. no. 2 (2003): 25-48.
  • Weller, Marc. “Undoing the Global Constitution: UN Security Council Action on the International Criminal Court.” International Affairs 78. no. 4 (2002): 693-712.
  • Zappalà, Salvatore. “The Reaction of the US to the Entry in to Force of the ICC Statute: Comments on UN SC Resolution 1422 (2002) and Article 98 Agreements.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 1 (2003): 114–134.
  • Zimmermann, Andreas. “The Creation of a Permanent International Criminal Court.” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 2 (1998): 169-238.
  • Fanton, Jonathan F. “US Obstructs Global Justice.” Los Angeles Times. 29 Mart 2005. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-mar-29-oe-fanton29-story.html.
  • Müller, Lukas Emanuel. “Referrals, Deferrals and Many Double Standards: Recapitulating the History of the SC-ICC Relationship.” Völkerrechtsblog. 12.07.2022. https://voelkerrec htsblog.org/referrals-deferrals-and-many-double-standards/.
  • “Open Debate in the Security Council on Peace and justice, with a special focus on the role of the International Criminal Court.” 17 October 2012. S/2012/731. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3CF6E 4FF96FF9%7D/s_2012_731.pdf.
  • “The Relationship Between the ICC and the Security Council: Challenges and Opportunities.” The International Peace Institute (IPI). 777 United Nations Plaza. New York. 10017-3521. (March 2013). https://www.ipinst.org/wpcontent/uploads/publications/ipi_e_pub_relationship_bet__icc_and_sc__2_.pdf.
  • “United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court.” Rome. 15 June -17 July 1998 Official Records A/CONF.183/13(Vol.II).https://legal.un.org/icc/rome/proceedings/E/Rome%20Proceedings_v2_e.pdf.
  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/darfur/abd-al-rahman.
  • https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/whatsinblue/2022/06/arria-formula-meeting%20reflections-on-the- relationship-between-the-international-criminal-court-and-the-security-council.php.
  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/situations/ukraine.
  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-ukraine-icc-judges-issue-arrest-warrants-against-vladimir-vladimirovich-putin-and.
  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/icc-prosecutor-karim-khan-kc-concludes-fourth-visit-ukraine-amidst-darkness-light-justice.
  • https://archive.globalpolicy.org/international-justice/the-international-criminal-court/icc-in-the-security-council-6-4.html.
  • https://crimeofaggression.info/resourcessearch/situation-in-ukraine/.
Toplam 54 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Hukuk
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

İrem Şevval Akbaş 0000-0003-4624-963X

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 2 Kasım 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Kasım 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023

Kaynak Göster

APA Akbaş, İ. Ş. (2023). Birleşmiş Milletler ve Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Arasındaki İlişki. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 81(CUMHURİYET 100. YIL ÖZEL SAYISI), 197-236. https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.1243555
AMA Akbaş İŞ. Birleşmiş Milletler ve Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Arasındaki İlişki. ABD. Kasım 2023;81(CUMHURİYET 100. YIL ÖZEL SAYISI):197-236. doi:10.30915/abd.1243555
Chicago Akbaş, İrem Şevval. “Birleşmiş Milletler Ve Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Arasındaki İlişki”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi 81, sy. CUMHURİYET 100. YIL ÖZEL SAYISI (Kasım 2023): 197-236. https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.1243555.
EndNote Akbaş İŞ (01 Kasım 2023) Birleşmiş Milletler ve Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Arasındaki İlişki. Ankara Barosu Dergisi 81 CUMHURİYET 100. YIL ÖZEL SAYISI 197–236.
IEEE İ. Ş. Akbaş, “Birleşmiş Milletler ve Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Arasındaki İlişki”, ABD, c. 81, sy. CUMHURİYET 100. YIL ÖZEL SAYISI, ss. 197–236, 2023, doi: 10.30915/abd.1243555.
ISNAD Akbaş, İrem Şevval. “Birleşmiş Milletler Ve Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Arasındaki İlişki”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi 81/CUMHURİYET 100. YIL ÖZEL SAYISI (Kasım 2023), 197-236. https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.1243555.
JAMA Akbaş İŞ. Birleşmiş Milletler ve Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Arasındaki İlişki. ABD. 2023;81:197–236.
MLA Akbaş, İrem Şevval. “Birleşmiş Milletler Ve Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Arasındaki İlişki”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, c. 81, sy. CUMHURİYET 100. YIL ÖZEL SAYISI, 2023, ss. 197-36, doi:10.30915/abd.1243555.
Vancouver Akbaş İŞ. Birleşmiş Milletler ve Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Arasındaki İlişki. ABD. 2023;81(CUMHURİYET 100. YIL ÖZEL SAYISI):197-236.

Cited By

Türk ve Alman Ceza Hukuku Mevzuatının Roma Statüsü'ne Uyumu
Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.60002/ebyuhfd.1475363

Ankara Barosu Dergisi TÜHAS atıf sistemini benimsemektedir.