Türkiye’s Approach to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Incident Management: A Comprehensive Analysis

Öz

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) incidents pose significant threats to global and national security, necessitating an integrated, multidisciplinary response framework. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of Türkiye’s approach to CBRN incident management under the coordination of the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD). It offers an overview of evolving CBRN threats and hazards, including emerging risks such as synthetic chemicals, artificial intelligence-enabled weaponization, and cyberattacks. The study outlines the objectives and variables of incident management, Türkiye’s integrated management system, and the national legislation governing this domain. By synthesizing national policies with international best practices, the article highlights Türkiye’s strengths and identifies areas for improvement. This analysis aims to elucidate Türkiye’s strategic approaches to building resilience against CBRN incidents, contributing to global security discussions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• CBRN
• incident management
• AFAD
• disaster response
• emerging threats

Kimyasal, Biyolojik, Radyolojik, Nükleer (KBRN) Olay Yönetimine Türkiye’nin Yaklaşımı: Kapsamlı Bir Analiz

Öz

Kimyasal, Biyolojik, Radyolojik ve Nükleer (KBRN) olaylar, küresel ve ulusal güvenliğe yönelik önemli tehditler oluşturur ve entegre, çok disiplinli bir müdahale yapılanmasını gerekli kılar. Bu makale, Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı (AFAD) koordinasyonunda, Türkiye'nin KBRN olay yönetimine yaklaşımının kapsamlı bir analizini sunmaktadır. Sentetik kimyasallar, yapay zeka destekli silahlanma ve siber saldırılar gibi ortaya çıkan yeni riskler de dahil olmak üzere gelişen KBRN tehdit ve tehlikelerine bir bakış sunulmaktadır. Çalışma, olay yönetiminin hedeflerini ve değişkenlerini, Türkiye'nin entegre yönetim sistemini ve bu alandaki ulusal mevzuatı ana hatlarıyla açıklamaktadır. Bu makale, ulusal politikaları uluslararası en iyi uygulamalarla sentezleyerek Türkiye'nin güçlü yönlerini vurgulamakta ve geliştirilecek alanları belirlemektedir. Bu analiz, Türkiye'nin KBRN olaylarına karşı dayanıklılık oluşturma konusundaki stratejik yaklaşımlarını açıklayarak küresel güvenlik tartışmalarına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• KBRN
• olay yönetimi
• AFAD
• afet müdahalesi
• yeni tehditler

Kaynakça

1. AFAD. (2024). 2024 disaster and emergency statistics report. Disaster and Emergency Management Authority.
2. Alsaleh, O. I., Elsafti Elsaeidy, A. M., Saeed, S., Alhallak, A. A., Altelawi, M. A., Van Berlaer, G., & Hubloue, I. (2022). Acute health effects and outcome following sarin gas attacks in Khan Shaykhun, Syria. Cureus, 14(2) , e22188. https://doi.org/10.7759/ cureus.22188
3. Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Zeitzoff, T., Filar, B., Anderson, H. S., Roff, H., Allen, G. C., Steinhardt, J., Flynn, C., Ó hÉigeartaigh, S., Beard, S., Belfield, H., Farquhar, S., Lyle, C., Crootof, R., Evans, O., Page, M., Bryson, J., Yampolskiy, R., & Amodei, D. (2018, February). The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.07228
4. Bunn, M., & Sagan, S. D. (2014). A worst practices guide to insider threats: Lessons from past mistakes. American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Emerging infectious diseases: Preparedness and response. CDC.
6. Ciccarone, D. (2019). The triple wave epidemic: Supply and demand drivers of the US opioid overdose crisis. International Journal of Drug Policy, 71, 183–188. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.010
7. Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/15406237.8402002
8. Department of Homeland Security. (2025, August 8). Radiological dispersal device (RDD) immediate response guidance (2nd ed.). U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/st-frg-rdd-response-guidance-planning-first-100minutes

9. Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD). (2021). CBRN glossary. AFAD
10. Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD). (2020). Türkiye disaster response plan. AFAD.
11. Drabek, T. E., & McEntire, D. A. (2003). Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: Lessons, trends, and opportunities from the research literature. Disaster Prevention and Management, 12(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560310463814
12. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2022). ENISA Threat Landscape 2022. ENISA.
13. Gostin, L. O., Mundaca-Shah, C. C., & Kelley, P. W. (2014). Neglected dimensions of global security: The global health risk framework commission. JAMA, 315(14) , 1451– 1452 . https://doi.org/10.1001/jama. 2016.1964
14. ICRC (2025, August 5). Hiroshima 80 years on: The humanitarian imperative to eliminate nuclear weapons. Retrieved from International Committee of the Red Cross website: https://www.icrc.org/en/article/hiroshima-80-years-humanitarian-imperativeeliminate-nuclear-weapons
15. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2015). The Fukushima Daiichi accident: Report by the Director General. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. https://www.iaea.org/publications/10962/the-fukushima-daiichi-accident
16. Jernigan, J. A., Stephens, D. S., Ashford, D. A., Omenaca, C., Topiel, M. S., Galbraith, M., ... & Perkins, B. A. (2001). Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: The first 10 cases reported in the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 7(6), 933–944. https:// doi.org/10.3201/eid0706.010604
17. Koblentz, G. D. (2011). Predicting peril or the peril of prediction? Assessing the risk of CBRN terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 23(4), 501–520. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09546553.2011.575487
18. Labaška, M., Gál, M., Nemčeková, K., Svitková, V., Krivjanská, A., Ryba, J., Híveš, J., & Mackuľak, T. (2024). Navigating the Landscape of CBRN-Contaminated Forensic Processes. Forensic Chemistry, 40(3), Article 100600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forc.2024.100600
19. Leaning, J., & Guha-Sapir, D. (2013). Natural disasters, armed conflict, and public health. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(19), 1836–1842. https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMra1109877
20. Marrs, T. C., Maynard, R. L., & Sidell, F. R. (2007). Chemical warfare agents: Toxicology and treatment (2nd ed.). Wiley.
21. National Academy of Sciences. (2018). Biodefense in the age of synthetic biology. National Academies Press.
22. Nepovimova, E., & Kuca, K. (2018). Chemical warfare agent NOVICHOK – minireview of available data. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 121, 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.09.015
23. Norris, F. H., Friedman, M. J., Watson, P. J., Byrne, C. M., Diaz, E., & Kaniasty, K. (2002). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part I. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981–2001. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 65(3), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.65.3.207.20173
24. Nuclear Regulatory Authority. (n.d.). Radiation Monitoring and Early Warning System Network (RADİSA). Retrieved September 5, 2025, from https://www.ndk.gov.tr/en-US/radiation-monitoring-and-warning-system-network-radisa
25. Okumura, T., Takasu, N., Ishimatsu, S., Miyanoki, S., Mitsuhashi, A., Kumada, K., ... & Hinohara, S. (1996). Report on 640 victims of the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 28(2) , 129–135. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70052-5
26. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. (2023). Annual report 2023. OPCW.
27. Perry, R. W., & Lindell, M. K. (2003). Preparedness for emergency response: Guidelines for the emergency planning process. Disasters, 27(4) , 336–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.0361-3666.2003.00237.x
28. Porzi, J., Porzi, M., Patonnier, M., Macri, F., Widmer, N., Desmettre, T., Platon, A., Poletti, P.-A., & Gartner, B. A. (2024). Diagnosis and emergency management of radiological incidents. Revue Médicale Suisse, 20(883), 1418-1421. https://doi.org/10.53738/ REVMED.2024.20.883.1418
29. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2014, October 28). No: 328, Press release regarding the suspicious powder sent to consulates general in İstanbul. Retrieved from Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs website: https://www.mfa.gov.tr/ no_-328_-28-october-2014_-press-release-regarding-the-suspicious-powder-sent-toconsulate-generals-in-%C4%B0stanbul.en.mfa
30. Rotz, L. D., Khan, A. S., Lillibridge, S. R., Ostroff, S. M., & Hughes, J. M. (2002). Public health assessment of potential biological terrorism agents. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 8(2) , 225–230. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid 0802.010164
31. Sezigen, S., & Kenar, L. (2019). Recent sulfur mustard attacks in Middle East and experience of health professionals. Toxicology Letters, 320, 52–57. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.12.001
32. Stone, F. P. (2020, May 6). Are Drone Swarms Weapons of Mass Destruction? Future Warfare Series No. 60. U.S. Air Force Center for Strategic Deterrence Studies. (Report).
33. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2024). World drug report 2024. UNODC.
34. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. (2000). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR.
35. World Health Organization. (2009). WHO Manual for the Public Health Management of Chemical Incidents. WHO. ISBN: 978 92 4 159814 9.