Research Article

Evaluation of the satisfaction of relatives of patients being treated in the intensive care unit

Volume: 6 Number: 5 September 30, 2024
EN

Evaluation of the satisfaction of relatives of patients being treated in the intensive care unit

Abstract

Aims: There has been no previous study on the satisfaction of relatives of patients receiving treatment in the intensive care unit of our hospital. Our study was conducted to improve quality and service in our intensive care unit. A survey was conducted to evaluate the satisfaction of the relatives of patients receiving treatment. Methods: The satisfaction of the relatives of the patients who were treated for at least 3 days in the 3rd Step general intensive care unit at Mardin Training and Research Hospital between 01. February 2023 and 01. June 2023 was evaluated in line with the surveys. A questionnaire was given to each patient’s relative by the attending physician to be filled out. Results: 114 patient relatives participated in the study. 12 patient relatives did not agree to fill out the survey. 102 patient relatives filled out the satisfaction survey. Conclusion: Waiting room in intensive care unit conditions need to be improved. In our study, we think that patient relatives have confidence in the treatments applied to their patients and are satisfied with the skills and abilities of doctors and nurses.

Keywords

References

  1. Sungono V, Hariyanto H, Soesilo TEB, et al. Cohort study of the APACHE II score and mortality for different types of intensive care unit patients. Postgraduate Med J. 2022;98:914-918. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140376
  2. Naqvi IH, Mahmood K, Ziaullaha S, Kashif SM, Sharif A. Better prognostic marker in ICU-APACHE II. SOFA or SAP II! Pakistan J Med Sci. 2016;32:1146-1151. doi:10.12669/pjms.325.10080
  3. Parpucu ÜM, Küçük O, Aydemir S. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality rates in tertiary intensive care units in Turkey: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(6):1-13. doi:10.3390/healthcare12060689
  4. Stricker KH, Kimberger O, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Mohr U. Rothen HU. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: what makes the difference?. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(12): 2051-2059. doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1611-4
  5. Schwarzkopf D, Behrend S, Skupin H, et al. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(6):1071-1079. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-2862-7
  6. Johnson D, Wilson M, Cavanaugh B, Bryden C, Gudmundson D, Moodley O. Measuring the ability to meet family needs in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:266-271. doi:10.1097/00003246-199802000-00023
  7. Hunziker S, McHugh W, Sarnoff-Lee B, et al. Predictors and correlates of dissatisfaction with intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1554-1565. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182451c70
  8. Wasser T, Pasquale MA, MatchettSC, Bryan Y, Pasquale M. Establishing reliability and validity of the critical care family satisfaction survey. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:192-196. doi:10.1097/00003246-200101000-00038

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Anaesthesiology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2024

Submission Date

June 30, 2024

Acceptance Date

September 2, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 6 Number: 5

APA
Kılınç, M., Çelik, E., & Akelma, H. (2024). Evaluation of the satisfaction of relatives of patients being treated in the intensive care unit. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, 6(5), 313-318. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1507217
AMA
1.Kılınç M, Çelik E, Akelma H. Evaluation of the satisfaction of relatives of patients being treated in the intensive care unit. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2024;6(5):313-318. doi:10.38053/acmj.1507217
Chicago
Kılınç, Metin, Enes Çelik, and Hakan Akelma. 2024. “Evaluation of the Satisfaction of Relatives of Patients Being Treated in the Intensive Care Unit”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 6 (5): 313-18. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1507217.
EndNote
Kılınç M, Çelik E, Akelma H (September 1, 2024) Evaluation of the satisfaction of relatives of patients being treated in the intensive care unit. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 6 5 313–318.
IEEE
[1]M. Kılınç, E. Çelik, and H. Akelma, “Evaluation of the satisfaction of relatives of patients being treated in the intensive care unit”, Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 313–318, Sept. 2024, doi: 10.38053/acmj.1507217.
ISNAD
Kılınç, Metin - Çelik, Enes - Akelma, Hakan. “Evaluation of the Satisfaction of Relatives of Patients Being Treated in the Intensive Care Unit”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 6/5 (September 1, 2024): 313-318. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1507217.
JAMA
1.Kılınç M, Çelik E, Akelma H. Evaluation of the satisfaction of relatives of patients being treated in the intensive care unit. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2024;6:313–318.
MLA
Kılınç, Metin, et al. “Evaluation of the Satisfaction of Relatives of Patients Being Treated in the Intensive Care Unit”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, Sept. 2024, pp. 313-8, doi:10.38053/acmj.1507217.
Vancouver
1.Metin Kılınç, Enes Çelik, Hakan Akelma. Evaluation of the satisfaction of relatives of patients being treated in the intensive care unit. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2024 Sep. 1;6(5):313-8. doi:10.38053/acmj.1507217

 

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
 

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

 

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


 

The indexes of the journal's are;


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiMDFiOS82MmZhLzA3MzMvNjlkZjNlNTdhMmI4ZjkuODYxMzMxMjQucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQxNzY3LCJub25jZSI6ImQyMTQ4MjdiNTg1ZjVmMGQwYzAzZTMxNzMwM2QwMThmIn0.RmnGvwR536HdIoKpGO-ApytZ5aRPRT_BFXE2EpGSIqc

asos-index.png
 
f9ab67f.png
 
WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png
 

 

18596download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiT3BlbkFpcmUuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjUyMWYvZjljYy8wMDk3LzY5ZGYzZDNiYmVkZGU0LjQzNDM2OTU3LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0MTQ4NCwibm9uY2UiOiIwYjgxZDE2NzRiNzhjMWQyOGVmMDM1OTA1MzI5NjdjZiJ9.xeFppR1ubA4i-dHG-u07ht9bQNogFheXQjLyEaP9GgAimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

 

84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg

 

 

 

The platforms of the journal's are;
 

COPE.jpg
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png
 
 
ncbi.png
 
ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU
 

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU
 


 


 

 


 


The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
 

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 
 


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"

 

All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)