Kalkaneus Kırıklarına İlişkin Youtube Videolarının Güvenilirlik ve Kalite Açısından Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 30 - 34, 28.02.2025

Ümit Gök , Sibel Balcı

https://doi.org/10.53446/actamednicomedia.1557781

Öz

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı kalkaneus kırıklarına ilişkin Youtube video içeriklerinin gerçekliğini, kalitesini ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmektir.
Yöntem: Youtube'da 'kalkaneus kırığı' terimi aranarak ve toplam 57 video değerlendirildi. Her video için görüntüleme sayısı, dakika ve saniye cinsinden süre, video kaynağı/yükleyici türü, içerik türü, yüklemeden bu yana geçen gün sayısı, görüntüleme oranı (görüntüleme/gün) ve beğeni sayısı değişkenleri değerlendirildi. Videoların genel özellikleri sekiz kategoride, video yükleyicileri beş kategoride ve video içerikleri üç kategoride değerlendirildi. Her videoyu değerlendirmek için Küresel Kalite Ölçeği (GQS), The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) puanı, DISCERN puanları kullanıldı.
Bulgular: median görüntüleme oranı 19.68 (aralık 9.39-37.3), median görüntüleme sayısı 28788 görüntülemeydi. median JAMA skoru 2 (aralık (IQR) 2-3), GQS skoru 3 (aralık 2-3) ve DISCERN skoru 39'du (aralık 29,5-46). En sık video yükleyenler hekimlerdi (%43,9), hastalığa özgü bilgiler grubu, en çok görüntülenen video içeriğiydi (%52,6). Akademik kaynaklar median DISCERN (46), JAMA skoru (3) ve GQS skorları (3) konusunda en iyisiydi. Ayrıca hastalığa özgü tanımlar kategorisindeki videolar en yüksek median DISCERN (46), JAMA (3) ve GQS skorlarına (3) sahipti.
sonuç: GQS ve DISCERN puanları ile ölçülen kalkaneus kırıkları hakkındaki YouTube videolarının güvenilirliği, şeffaflığı ve içerik kalitesi orta düzeydedir ancak JAMA puanları zayıftır. Video kalitelerinin artırılması, takip ve tedavisi zor olan kalkaneus kırıkları gibi hastalıklarda hastalara daha iyi rehberlik sağlayacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

hasta eğitimi, kalkaneus kırıkları, Youtube, kalite analizi

Etik Beyan

'İnsan Etiği ve Katılım Rızası' beyanı ve 'katılımcıların rızası' geçerli değildir çünkü bu makale, yazarlardan herhangi biri tarafından insan katılımcılar veya hayvanlarla gerçekleştirilen herhangi bir çalışma içermemektedir.

Evaluation of Youtube Videos on Calcaneus Fractures in Terms of Reliability and Quality

Öz

Objective: The aim of the study is evaluating the realibity and quality and the reliability of Youtube video contents concerning calcaneal factures.
Methods: We searched the terms of calcaneus fracture on Youtube and total of 57 videos evaluated. The following variables were collected for each video: number of views, duration in minutes and seconds, video source/uploader type, content type, days since upload, view ratio (views/day), and number of likes. The general features of the videos were evaluated in eight categories, video uploaders were evaluated in five categories, and video contents were evaluated in three categories. The Global Quality Scale (GQS), The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, DISCERN scores were used to assess each video.
Results: The median view ratio was 19.68 (interquartile range 9.39-37.3), median number of views were 28788 views. The median JAMA score was 2 (interquartile range (IQR) 2-3), GQS score was 3 (interquartile range 2-3) and DISCERN score was 39 (interquartile range 29,5-46). The most common video uploader were physicians (43.9%), disease specific information was the most viewed video content (52.6%). Academic sources were the best on median DISCERN (46), JAMA score (3) and GQS scores (3). Also disease specific disorders videos had the greatest median DISCERN (46), JAMA (3) and GQS scores (3).
Conclusions: The Reliability, transparency and content of YouTube videos on calcaneus fractures measured by GQS and DISCERN scores are intermediate but JAMA scores were poor. Increasing video quality will provide better guidance to patients in such diseases like calcaneus fractures that are difficult to follow and treat.

Anahtar Kelimeler

patient education, calcaneus fracture, Youtube, quality analysis

Etik Beyan

The ‘Human Ethics and Consent to Participate’ statement and ‘consents of participants’ are not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Kaynakça

• 1. Abed V, Sullivan MB, Skinner M, et al. Youtube is a poor- quality source for patient information regarding patellar dislocations. Arthroscopy. Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation. 2023;5(2):459-464. doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2023.01.014
• 2. Baker JD, Baig Y, Siyaji ZK, et al. Assessing the quality and credibility of publicly available videos on cervical fusion: Is YouTube a reliable educational tool? Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15:669-675. doi:10.14444/8088
• 3. YouTube Official Blog: Statistics for YouTube [Internet]. San Bruno, CA: YouTube. (2022) Accessed: May 2022: https://blog.youtube/press/.
• 4. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:E1334-9. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691
• 5. Kyle N. Kunze, Kevin H. Alter, Matthew R. Cohn, Amar S. Vadhera, Nikhil N. Verma, Adam B. Yanke, Jorge Chahla. YouTube videos provide low-quality educational content about rotator cuff disease. Clin Shoulder Elbow. 2022;25(3):217-223. doi:10.5397/cise.2022.00927
• 6. Davis D, Seaman TJ, Newton EJ. Calcaneus Fractures. [Updated 2023 Jul 31]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430861/
• 7. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111. doi:10.1136/jech.53.2.105
• 8. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244- 1245.
• 9. Kunze KN, Krivicich LM, Verma NN, Chahla J. Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A Youtube-Based Quality-Control Study. 2020;36(1):233-238. doi:10.1015/j.arthro.2019.07.033
• 10. Cassidy JT, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy ES, et al. YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(3):840-845. doi:10.1007/s00167-017- 4514x
• 11. Tekin SB, Bozgeyik B: Quality and Content Analysis of Hallux Valgus Videos on YouTube. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023;62(1):85-90. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2022.05.003
• 12. Staunton PF, Baker JF, Green J, Devitt A. Online curves: a quality analysis of scoliosis videos on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(23):1857-1861. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2014.06.009
• 13. MacLeod MG, Hoppe DJ, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Philippon MJ, Ayeni OR. YouTube as an information source for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of video content. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(1):136-142. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2014.06.009
• 14. Mert A, Bozgeyik B. Quality and Content Analysis of Carpal Tunnel Videos on YouTube. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2022;56:73-78. doi:10.1007/s43465-021-00430-5
• 15. Uzun M, Cingoz T, Duran ME, Varol A, Celik H. The videos on YouTube related to hallux valgus surgery have insufficient information. Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;28(4):414- 417. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.009
• 16. Uzun M, Cingoz T, Duran ME, Varol A, Celik H. The videos on YouTube related to hallux valgus surgery have insufficient information. Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;28(4):414- 417. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.009
• 17. Yüce A, İğde N, Ergün T, Mısır A. YouTube provides insufficient information on patellofemoral instability. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2022;56(5): 306-310. doi:10.5152/j.aott.2022.22005
• 18. Martinez VH, Ojo D, Gutierrez-Naranjo JM, Proffitt M, Hartzler RU. The Most Popular YouTube Videos About Shoulder Replacement Are of Poor Quality for Patient Education. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation. 2023;5(3):623-628. doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2023.03.001. ecollection 2023 Jun.
• 19. Özbek EA, Armangil M, Karaca MO, Merter A, Dursun M, Kocaoğlu H. Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of Information in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Shared on YouTube. J Wrist Surg. 2022;11:295-301. doi:10.1055/s- 0041-1735231
• 20. Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8(7):481-490. doi:10.1016/j.jash.2014.05.001
• 21. Lee JS, Seo HS, Hong TH. YouTube as a source of patient information on gallstone disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(14):4066-4070. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.4066