A Governance Model for Increasing the Positive Effects of Institutions on the Long Run Economic Growth

Öz

The main aim of this study is to critically analyze the effects of institutions on economic growth on the basis of a deeply literature review with a technological point of view. This study found that culture, traditions, tacit knowledge, openness to innovations are the outstanding points in new century and we assert that for increasing positive effects of institutions in the long term there should be a model for management and governance of business of institutions that is the whole economy in the digital macroeconomics. In the era of the upcoming industry 4.0, smart cities and e-government paradigms there should be integration of IT and business processes via a valid management and governance model. With the assumption that innovation digestion and cutting-edge IT capability of institutions have positive effect on their profitability and competency in the market, COBIT model is found to be a valid and sustainable framework for effective and efficient institutional set-ups that provide a sustainable platform for economic value creation cycle.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Institutions
• Economic Development
• E-government
• Governance Culture
• COBIT

Kurumların Uzun Dönem Ekonomik Gelişiminin Pozitif Etkilerini Arttırmak İçin Bir Yönetişim Modeli

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, kurumların ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkilerini derinlemesine bir literatür taraması temelinde eleştirel olarak analiz etmek ve teknolojik bakış açısıyla bu hususta bir çözümleme üretmeye çalışmaktır. Bu çalışma, kültür, gelenekler, zımni bilginin, yeniliklere açıklığın, yeni yüzyılda öne çıkan noktalar olduğunu ve uzun vadede kurumların olumlu etkilerini arttırmak için kurumların dijital makroekonomide bir yönetim ve yönetişim modelinin gerektiğini ortaya koymuştur. Endustri 4.0, akıllı şehirler ve e-devlet çağında bilgi teknolojileri (BT) ile iş süreçlerinin bir geçerli yönetim ve yönetişim modeli sayesinde entegre edilmesi gerekir. Yenilikçilik iştahının ve kurumların BT becerilerinin kapasitelerinin piyasadaki karlılık ve yetkinliklerini olumlu yönde etkilediği varsayımıyla, COBIT modeli, sürdürülebilir bir platform sağlayan etkin ve verimli kurumsal kurulumların ekonomik değer yaratma döngüsü için geçerli ve sürdürülebilir bir çerçeve olabildiği tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kurumlar
• ekonomik büyüme
• e-devlet
• yönetişim kültürü
• COBIT

Kaynakça

1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run Growth. Handbook of Economic Growth, Volume 1A., Edited by Philippe Aghion and Steven N. Durlauf. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://economics.mit.edu/files/4469
2. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. (2002). The rise of Europe: Atlantic trade, institutional change and economic growth. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper, 9378 Accessed on: 10.10.2020. http://www.nber.org/papers/w9378.
3. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J.. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. The American Economic Review, 1369-1401.
4. Adelman, I. (1999). The role of government in economic development, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources. University of California at Berkeley, Working Paper No: 890. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/25039/ 1/wp890.pdf
5. Alesina, A. (1994). The political economy of growth: A critical review of the recent literature. World Bank Economic Review, 8(3), 351-371. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. http://documents.worldbank.org/ curated/en/383001468764673841/The-political-economy-of-growth-a-critical-survey-of-the-recent-literature
6. Atmaca, Y. & Sağır, H. (2017). Avrupa Birliği bölgesel politikası ve Türkiye: kalkınma ajansları bağlamında bir analiz. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 67-88. DOI: 10.22466/acusbd.304471
7. Bloch, H. & Tang, S. (2004). Deep determinants of economic growth: institutions, geography and openness to trade. Progress in Development Studies 4(3). 245–255. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235737424_Deep_determinants_of_economic_growth_Institutions_geography_and_openness_to_trade
8. Chang, H. (2002). Breaking the mould: an institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 539–559.

9. Chang, H. (2011). Institutions and economic development: theory, policy and history. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4), 473–498. The JOIE Foundation, doi:10.1017/S1744137410000378
10. Corbridge, S. (1995). Urbanization and industrialization. Development Studies, 256-268.
11. David, G., & Christopher, M. (2005). Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century. Institutional Fields and Mechanisms, 16(4), 332–343. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/orsc.1050.0137
12. Dawson, J. (2007). Institutions, investment, and growth: new cross-country and panel data evidence. Economic Inquiry Vol. XXXVI, October, 603-619. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com /doi/abs/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01739.x()
13. Dodson, M. B. Paramo-Gonzales, J. M. (2001). The role of the state and consequences of alternative public revenue policies, WBI Working Paper. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. http://documents.worldbank.org/ curated/en/785541468175441775/The-role-of-the-State-and-consequences-of-alternative-forms-of-public-expenditure-financing ()
14. Dollar, D. & Kraay, A. (2003). Institutions, trade, and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 133-162. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. http://www.carnegie-rochester.rochester.edu/April02-pdfs/ITG2.pdf
15. Douglas, N. (1991). “Institutions” the Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97-112. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0895-3309%28199124%295%3A1%3C97%3AI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-W
16. Easterly, W. & Levine, R. (2002). It's not factor accumulation: stylized facts and growth models, Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 164, Central Bank of Chile. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://williameasterly.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/33_easterly_levine_itsnotfactoraccumulation_prp.pdf
17. Ekelund, R. B. & Hébert, R. F., (1990), A History of Economic Theory and Method. McGraw-Hill.
18. Fujita, M. (2011). Thünen and the new economic geography. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 11-E-074, The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, 6-8. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://www. sciencedirect.com/ science/article/abs/pii/S016604621100144X
19. Gani, A. (2011). Governance and growth in developing countries. Journal of Economic Issues, 19-39. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2753/JEI0021-3624450102
20. Gwartney, J., Holcombew, R. & Robert, L. (2006). Institutions and the Impact of Investment on Growth. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., KYKLOS, 59(2), 255–273. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com /doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00327.x
21. Haque, S. (2002). Conflict and cooperation ' japanese economic policy institution, International Conference on 'Nation, International Conference on' Nation States and Economic Policy, Tokyo, Japan, November 30 - December 2, 2002.
22. Hamilton, W.H. (1919), The institutional approach to economic theory, The American Economic Review, 9 (1), 309- 318.
23. ISACA. (2012). A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT. ISACA.
24. ISACA. (2012). Enabling Processes. ISACA.
25. Joskow, P. (2004). New institutional economics: a report card. Annual Conference of International Society of New Institutional Economics. Budapest, Hungary, September. https://economics.mit.edu/files/1171
26. Kaiser, B. A. & Roumasset, J. A. (2014) “Transitional forces in a resource-based economy: phases of economic and institutional development in Hawaii”. Review of Economics & Institutions / Economia, Societa e Istituzioni, 1-44.
27. Kazgan, G. (2002), Economic Thought or Evolution of Political Economy.Remzi Bookstore.
28. Kim, S. & Law, M. T. (2012). History, institutions, and cities: a view from the Americas. Journal of Regional Science, 10–39.
29. Klein, P. G. (1999). New institutional economics, in: B. Bouckaert & D. G. Gerrit, Encylopedia of Law and Economics, Northamptom, MA: Edward Elgar, 1, 456- 589.
30. Lahera, E. & Cabezas, M. (2000). Governance and institutional development of the Chilean economy. Journal of International Development, 1087-1109.
31. Leite, D. N., Silva, S. T. & Afonso, O. (2014). Institutions, economics and the development quest. Journal of Economic Surveys, 491-515.
32. Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption: causes, consequences, and agenda for further research. Finance and Development, March, ss. 11-14. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://www.internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/Corruption-Causes-Consequences-and-Agenda-for-Further-Research.pdf
33. McArthur, J. W. & Sachs, J. D. (2001). Institutions and geography: comment on acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2000). NBER Working Paper, 1-22.
34. Mills, C. W. (1953), Introduction to the Mentor Edition, in: T. B. Veblen, The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New American Library, vi–xix.
35. Pareja-Eastaway, M. & Miquel, Marc P. (2010). New economy, new governance approaches? Fostering creativity and knowledge in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region. Creative Industries Journal, 29-46.
36. Percoco, M. (2011). Geography, institutions and urban development: Italian cities. 1300–1861. Springer-Verlag,50(1), 135–152. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00168-011-0482-0
37. Perez, L. (1997). The Implications of Good Governance for the Reconstruction of Cuba. Cuba in Transition ASCE 1997, Book Part.Accessed on: 10.10.2020. http://lanic.utexas.edu/la/cb/cuba/asce /cuba7/perez.pdf
38. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Routledge and Keegan Paul.
39. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. & Trebbi, F. (2002). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over Geography and integration in economic development. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper series, Working Paper 9305. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. http://www.nber.org/papers/w9305
40. Roland, G. (2004). Understanding institutional change: fast-moving and slow-moving institutions. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4). 109-131. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://link.springer. com/article/10.1007/BF02686330
41. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1998). Corruption and good governance. Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1997, Boris Pleskovic ve Joseph E. Stiglitz (ed.), Washinghton, D. C.: The World Bank, 35-57. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/719821468740214930/pdf/ multi0page.pdf
42. Rutherford, M. (2000), Understanding institutional economics: 1918-1929, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22 (3), 277- 308.
43. Sachs, J. D. (2001). Tropical underdevelopment. NBER Working Paper, 1-40. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://www.nber.org/papers/w8119
44. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. CA: Sage, Thousand Oaks.
45. Stiglitz, J. (1996). The Role of government in economic development. in: Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1996. M. Bruno and B. Pleskoviç (ed.). Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 11-23.
46. Stiglitz, J. (1998). Redefining the role of the state: what should it do? How should it do? and how should these decisions be made? Japan, March 1998. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org /4b12/4f42414a569dc415bdaf034ee21e0f7e08f0.pdf?_ga=2.170655712.1995491372.1575876629-1128869485.1575876629
47. Tamanaha, B Z. (2015). The knowledge and policy limits of new institutional economics on development. Journal of Economic Issues, 89-111. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=2515875
48. Tanzi, V. (1997). The changing role of the state in the economy: a historical perspective, IMF Working Paper, No: WP/97/114. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/30/The-Changing-Role-of-the-State-in-the-Economy-A-Historical-Perspective-2329
49. Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: causes, consequences, scope and cures, IMF Working Paper, No: WP/98/63. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/30/ Corruption-Around-the-World-Causes-Consequences-Scope-and-Cures-2583
50. Tanzi, V. (2000). The role of the state and the quality of the public sector, IMF Working Paper, No: WP/00/36. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2000/wp0036.pdf
51. Thirlwall, A.P. (1994). Growth and Development. U.K.: Macmillan Press Ltd.
52. Vural, B. M. (2007). Effect of İnstitutional coordination on economic growth. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 1-29. Accessed on: 10.10.2020. http://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423876022.pdf
53. Yay, S. & Şataf, C. (2018). Yeni kurumsal iktisat perspektifinden sosyal sermaye. Bilge Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(1), 1-11. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/busad/issue/38951/430310