DATA FATIGUE AMONG INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT ACADEMICS: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND A STUDY ON ACADEMIC BURNOUT

Öz

Today, the uncontrolled surge in information volume challenges individuals rational decision-making abilities, bringing to the fore the phenomenon of cognitive overstimulation and the concomitant data fatigue. This study examines the cognitive processes experienced by academics in the field of Information and Records Management (IRM), within a framework that defines information overload as an external exposure (stressor) and data fatigue as the subjective burnout (strain) this process creates in the individual. In light of Cognitive Load Theory, it is emphasized that high and unregulated data flows deplete the limited capacity of working memory, thereby hindering learning and strategic problem-solving. Specifically, the professional practices of IRM academics—who treat data directly as a research object—create a cumulative fatigue cycle. This cycle originates with technological overload and deepens through cognitive load, FoMO (Fear of Missing Out), distraction, and decision paralysis, ultimately leading to a sense of helplessness. Drawing attention to the risk of this cycle evolving into academic burnout, the study aims to describe the data fatigue levels of IRM academics in Istanbul and the factors triggering this condition within a quantitative research design. The process is analyzed through a multidimensional scale structure encompassing technological, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors; it is discussed alongside applicable solution strategies intended to manage cognitive resources more efficiently and preserve digital well-being in academic work processes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Data Fatigue
• Information Overload
• Cognitive Load Theory
• Information and Records Management Academics
• Academic Burnout

Proje Numarası

Yoktur.

Etik Beyan

Ethical approval and written permission were obtained from the Ethics Committee of Marmara University, Institute of Turkic Studies (in accordance with the decision dated October 25, 2025, and numbered 2025/03).

BİLGİ VE BELGE YÖNETİMİ AKADEMİSYENLERİNDE VERİ YORGUNLUĞU: KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVE VE AKADEMİK TÜKENMİŞLİK ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Günümüzde bilgi hacminin kontrolsüz artışı, bireylerin rasyonel karar verme yetilerini zorlayarak bilişsel aşırı uyarılma ve beraberinde veri yorgunluğu (data fatigue) olgusunu gündeme getirmektedir. Bu çalışma, bilgi aşırı yüklenmesini dışsal bir maruziyet (stresör), veri yorgunluğunu ise bu sürecin bireyde yarattığı öznel tükenmişlik (gerilim) olarak tanımlayan bir çerçevede, Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi (BBY) akademisyenlerinin yaşadığı bilişsel süreçleri incelemektedir. Bilişsel Yük Teorisi ışığında ele alınan bu süreçte, yüksek ve düzensiz veri akışının çalışan belleğin sınırlı kapasitesini tüketerek öğrenmeyi ve stratejik problem çözmeyi zorlaştırdığı vurgulanmaktadır. Özellikle veriyi doğrudan bir araştırma nesnesi olarak ele alan BBY akademisyenlerinin mesleki pratikleri; teknolojik aşırı yüklenmeyle başlayan ve bilişsel yük, FoMO (Fear of Missing Out), dikkat dağılması ve karar felci ile derinleşen kümülatif bir yorgunluk döngüsü yaratarak, nihayetinde bir çaresizlik duygusuna yol açmaktadır. Bu döngünün akademik tükenmişliğe evrilme riskine dikkat çeken çalışma, nicel araştırma deseni kapsamında İstanbul’daki BBY akademisyenlerinin veri yorgunluğu düzeylerini ve bu durumu tetikleyen unsurları betimlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Söz konusu süreç; teknolojik, bilişsel, duygusal ve davranışsal faktörleri kapsayan çok boyutlu bir ölçek yapısıyla analiz edilerek, akademik çalışma süreçlerinde bilişsel kaynakların daha verimli yönetilmesi ve dijital refahın korunması adına uygulanabilir çözüm stratejileriyle birlikte tartışılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Veri Yorgunluğu
• Bilgi Aşırı Yüklenmesi
• Bilişsel Yük Teorisi
• Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Akademisyenleri
• Akademik Tükenmişlik

Proje Numarası

Yoktur.

Etik Beyan

Marmara Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Etik Kurulu’ndan (25.10.2025 tarih ve 2025/03 sayılı kararı gereği) etik onay ve yazılı izin alınmıştır.

Kaynakça

1. Adriatico, J. M., Cruz, A., Tiong, R. C. ve Racho-Sabugo, C. R. (2022). An analysis on the impact of choice overload to consumer decision paralysis. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies, 4(1), ss. 55-75. https://doi.org/10.32996/jefas.2022.4.1.4
2. Arnold, M., Goldschmitt, M. ve Rigotti, T. (2023). Dealing with information overload: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122200
3. Babaoğlu, A. (2025). Türkiye’de enformasyon obezitesi ile mücadele politikalarına yönelik uzman görüşleri bağlamında bir değerlendirme. Communicata, (29), ss. 25-36. https://doi.org/10.32952/communicata.1621825
4. Boymul, E. ve Yaşa Özeltürkay, E. (2017). İş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılığın tükenmişlik sendromu üzerindeki etkisi: Bir sanayii kuruluşunda uygulama. Journal of Yasar University, 12(46), ss. 93-102.
5. Cibaroğlu, M. O. ve Yalçınkaya, B. (2019). Belge ve arşiv yönetimi süreçlerinde büyük veri analitiği ve yapay zeka uygulamaları. Bilgi Yönetimi, 2(1), ss. 44-58. https://doi.org/10.33721/by.570634
6. Çubuk, Z. ve Tulunay Ateş, Ö. (2025). The relationship between burnout, fatigue, and resilience among educators. Siirt Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), ss. 205-230. https://doi.org/10.58667/sedder.1673799
7. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), ss. 475-487.
8. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F. ve Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands–resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), ss. 499-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

9. Efe, A. (2024). A multidisciplinary analysis on the pervasiveness of big data, disinformation, and misguidance. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 19(1), ss. 41–59. https://doi.org/10.54860/beyder.1319788
10. Efe Stanley, O. (2021). Information overload: Causes, symptoms, consequences and solutions. Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 11(2), ss. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2021.11.2.2887
11. Eppler, M. J. ve Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), ss. 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974
12. Stamenković, I. ve Aleksić, D. (2025). Digital overload: Fatigue and information avoidance on social media. Applied Media Studies Journal, 6(2), ss. 27–41. https://doi.org/10.46630/amsj.2.2025.02
13. Frederick, A., Desiderio, D. ve Laetitia, G. (2025). The impact of external visual attention on working memory performance in multitasking tasks. Acta Psychologia, 4(3), ss. 99–110.
14. Gobble, M. M. (2013). Big data: The next big thing in innovation. Research-Technology Management, 56(1), ss. 64–67. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5601005
15. Golub, K. ve Hansson, J. (2017). (Big) data in library and information science: A brief overview of some important problem areas. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 23(11), ss. 1098–1108.
16. González Flores, J. E. (2025). Academic fatigue of young researchers: The price of the publish or perish culture. Cureus, 17(11). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97223
17. Goulding, A. (2001). Information poverty or overload? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 33(3), ss. 109-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/096100060103300301
18. Gökaslan, M. O. (2022). Akademisyenlerin teknostres kaynaklarının ve teknostres seviyelerinin belirlenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), ss. 354-383. https://doi.org/10.31200/makuubd.1149198
19. Guraya, S. Y., Norman, R. I., Khoshhal, K. I., Guraya, S. S. ve Forgione, A. (2016). Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(6), ss. 1562-1567. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.326.10490
20. Hager, N., Stangl, F. J. ve Riedl, R. (2023). Digital detox research: An analysis of applied methods and implications for future studies. Wirtschaftsinformatik 2023 Proceedings içinde, (5). Paderborn: Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2023/5
21. Hart, S. G. ve Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. P. A. Hancock ve N. Meshkati (Ed.), Human mental workload içinde, (139-183 ss.). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
22. Iyengar, S. S. ve Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), ss. 995-1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
23. Kakırman, A. (2001). Teknolojik gelişmelerin kütüphanelere etkisi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 15(2), ss. 172-177.
24. Kanık, L. (2023). Kütüphanelerde teknostresin nedenleri, etkileri ve çözüm önerileri. Külliye, ss. 499-526. https://doi.org/10.48139/aybukulliye.1351388
25. Kashlot, S. M., Ruthven, I. ve Moshfeghi, Y. (2025). Strategies for managing information overload: A systematic review. Journal of Documentation, 82(2), ss. 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2025-0257
26. Kristensen, T. S., Borritz, M., Villadsen, E. ve Christensen, K. B. (2005). The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress, 19(3), ss. 192-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500297720
27. Kumar, R. V. (2024). Cronbach’s alpha: Genesis, issues and alternatives. IMIB Journal of Innovation and Management, 2(2), ss. 226-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/ijim.241234970
28. Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K. ve Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information & Management, 40(2), ss. 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00043-5
29. Luse, A. ve Burkman, J. (2022). Learned helplessness attributional scale (LHAS): Development and validation of an attributional style measure. Journal of Business Research, 151, ss. 623-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.001
30. Majidah, M. N. ve Masruri, A. (2025). Keterampilan sosial pustakawan dalam menghadapi masyarakat informasi di era information overload. Media Informasi, 34(1), ss. 84-102. https://doi.org/10.22146/mi.v34i1.21491
31. Maslach, C. ve Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), ss. 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311
32. Mazlum, M. M. ve Atalay, A. (2022). Developing the fear of missing out (FoMO) scale for university students: The validity and reliability study. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(4), ss. 20-34. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202215485
33. Nesbit, R. J. ve Bourne, V. J. (2018). Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale (STARS) use in psychology students: A review and analysis with an undergraduate sample. Psychology Teaching Review, 24(2), ss. 101-110. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2018.24.2.101
34. Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Martin, H. ve Cole, P. (1997). The internet: It’s early days, but there are some surprises. Aslib Proceedings içinde, (49(8), 214-216 ss.). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb051468
35. Noshad, M., Choi, J., Sun, Y., Hero, A., III. ve Dinov, I. D. (2021). A data value metric for quantifying information content and utility. Journal of Big Data, 8(82), ss. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00446-6
36. Paas, F. ve Ayres, P. (2014). Cognitive Load Theory: A broader view on the role of memory in learning and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26, ss. 191-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9263-5
37. Prasetyo, A. R., Handayaningrum, W. ve Rahayu, E. W. (2025). Digital fatigue and cognitive overload: Psychological challenges in the era of cyber education at Universitas Negeri Malang. International Proceeding (SENDIYA) içinde, (001-011 ss.). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang
38. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R. ve Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), ss. 1841-1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
39. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S. ve Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), ss. 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
40. Roetzel, P. G. (2019). Information overload in the information age: A review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework development. Business Research, 12(2), ss. 479-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0069-z
41. Sarıçoban, B. S. ve Demir, G. (2024). Bilgi toplumunda bilgi yönetimi, bilgiye erişim ve kütüphaneler: Kuramsal bir perspektif. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(2), ss. 610-631. https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.1451441
42. Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P. ve Maslach, C. (2009). Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. Career Development International, 14(3), ss. 204-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910966406
43. Scherer, K. R. (2022). Learned helplessness revisited: Biased evaluation of goals and action potential are major risk factors for emotional disturbance. Cognition and Emotion, 36(6), ss. 1021-1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2141002
44. Shahrzadi, L., Mansouri, A., Alavi, M. ve Shabani, A. (2024). Causes, consequences, and strategies to deal with information overload: A scoping review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100261
45. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), ss. 99-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
46. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, ss. 257-285. Şimşek İşliyen, F. (2020). Dijital çağda bilginin değişen niteliği ve infobezite: Z kuşağı üzerine bir odak grup çalışması. Selçuk İletişim, 13(1), ss. 246-272.
47. Tafesse, W., Aguilar, M. P., Sayed, S. ve Tariq, U. (2024). Digital overload, coping mechanisms, and student engagement: An empirical investigation based on the S-O-R framework. SAGE Open, 14(1), ss. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241236087
48. Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L. ve Stich, J. (2019). The technostress trifecta ‐ techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), ss. 6-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169
49. Taşlıyan, M., Engizek, H. ve Gül, N. (2017). Tükenmişlik, iş tatmini ve esnek çalışma saatleri: Çalışan kadınlar üzerine bir çalışma. TÜBAV Bilim, 10(2), ss. 111-125.
50. Toffler, A. (1971). Future Shock. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
51. Van Der Weijden, I., Teelken, C., De Boer, M. ve Drost, M. (2016). Career satisfaction of postdoctoral researchers in relation to their expectations for the future. Higher Education, 72(1), ss. 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9936-0
52. Vicente, P. (2024). Exploring and depicting information pathologies: A case study of information technology anxiety and information overload. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 47(2), ss. 99-107. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v47i2.17683
53. Yükseköğretim Kurulu. (2026). Yükseköğretim program atlası. 05.04.2026 tarihinde https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/ adresinden erişildi.
54. Zha, X., Wang, X., Yan, Y., Gao, Y. ve Yan, G. (2023). Exploring influencing mechanism of herd behavior in academic information use: The perspective of cognitive load. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49, 102705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102705
55. Zhang, K., Xie, Y., He, Y. ve Wang, J. (2025). Emotional influences on user continuous use intention in recommended news apps: A study of algorithm appreciation and fatigue within the cognition-affect-conation framework. Acta Psychologica, 256, 105002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105002
56. Zhang, S., Zhao, L., Lu, Y. ve Yang, J. (2016). Do you get tired of socializing? An empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services. Information & Management, 53(7), ss. 904-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.03.006
57. Zins, C. (2007). Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(4), ss. 479-493. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20508