Energy and Natural Resources Policy of the Russian Federation: An International Relations Perspective

Öz

The Russian Federation's energy policy exemplifies a complex interplay of economic, geopolitical, and ideational objectives. Russia, a major global supplier of oil and natural gas, leverages its energy resources as strategic tools to influence energy-dependent states, particularly in Europe. This approach aligns with a Neorealist perspective, emphasizing Russia's strategy of entrenching energy dependencies to respond to a balance of threat, especially in response to Western sanctions following its annexation of Crimea and the conflict in Ukraine. Meanwhile, Neoliberal theories underscore cooperative aspects, highlighting Russia's partnerships with OPEC and alignment with China as stabilizing forces in an interconnected energy market. These partnerships mitigate the impact of sanctions and support Russia's sustained global influence, illustrating the stabilizing effects of economic interdependence. Constructivist interpretations further reveal Russia's identity as a resource-rich country, viewing energy policy as not only a geopolitical tool but a symbol of sovereignty and resilience within the international system. This paper thus aims to present a multidimensional analysis of Russia’s energy strategy, detailing how these intertwined theoretical frameworks would help to explain Russia's enduring role in global energy markets amidst shifting dynamics toward renewable energy and sustainability. The implications for countries, such as Türkiye, are significant, as the global order increasingly intertwines energy, economic resilience, and security concerns.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• International Relations
• Russian Federation
• Energy
• Geopolitics
• Türkiye

Rusya Federasyonu'nun Enerji ve Doğal Kaynaklar Politikası: Uluslararası İlişkiler Perspektifi

Öz

Rusya Federasyonu'nun enerji politikası, ekonomik, jeopolitik ve fikirsel hedeflerin karmaşık bir etkileşimini örneklemektedir. Petrol ve doğal gazın önemli bir küresel tedarikçisi olan Rusya, enerji kaynaklarını, özellikle Avrupa'daki enerjiye bağımlı devletleri etkilemek için stratejik araçlar olarak kullanmaktadır. Bu yaklaşım, özellikle Kırım'ın ilhakı ve Ukrayna'daki çatışmanın ardından Batı yaptırımlarına yanıt olarak, Rusya'nın tehdit dengesine cevaben enerji bağımlılıklarını sağlamlaştırma stratejisini vurgulayan bir Neorealist bakış açısıyla uyumludur. Bu arada, Neoliberal teoriler, Rusya'nın OPEC ile ortaklıklarını ve Çin ile uyumunu, birbirine bağlı bir enerji pazarında istikrar sağlayıcı güçler olarak vurgulayarak işbirlikçi yönleri vurgulamaktadırlar. Bu ortaklıklar, yaptırımların etkisini hafifletmekte ve Rusya'nın süregelen küresel etkisini destekleyerek ekonomik bağımlılığın istikrar sağlayıcı etkilerini göstermektedir. Yapılandırmacı yorumlar, Rusya'nın kaynak zengini bir ülke olarak kimliğini daha da ortaya koymakta ve enerji politikasını yalnızca jeopolitik bir araç olarak değil, aynı zamanda uluslararası sistem içinde egemenliğin ve dayanıklılığın bir sembolü olarak görmektedir. Bu makale, Rusya'nın enerji stratejisinin çok boyutlu bir analizini sunmayı ve bu iç içe geçmiş teorik çerçevelerin, yenilenebilir enerji ve sürdürülebilirliğe doğru değişen dinamikler ortasında Rusya'nın küresel enerji piyasalarındaki kalıcı rolünü açıklamaya nasıl yardımcı olacağını ayrıntılı olarak açıklamayı amaçlamaktadır. Türkiye gibi ülkeler üzerindeki etkiler önemlidir, çünkü küresel düzen enerji, ekonomik dayanıklılık ve güvenlik endişelerini giderek daha fazla iç içe geçirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uluslararası İlişkiler
• Rusya Federasyonu
• Enerji
• Jeopolitik
• Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Abbas, M., & Locatelli, C. (2019). National Institutional Systems’ Hybridisation through Interdependence. The Case of EU-Russia Gas Relations. Post-Communist Economies, 32(4), 429–446.
2. AFP (6 January 2023). International nuclear fusion project may be delayed by years, its head admits. Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/jan/06/french-nuclear-fusion-project-may-be-delayed-by-years-its-head-admits [11.01.2023].
3. Air1; (31 March 2022). Invasion backfires on Putin: 70,000 computer specialists have fled Russia since Ukraine attack. Air1: https://www.Air1.com/news/tech-science/invasion-backfires-on-putin-70-000-computer-specialists-have-fled-russia-since-ukraine-attack-31291 [30.11.2022].
4. Angus, I. (2016). Facing the Anthropocene: Fossil capitalism and the crisis of the earth system. NYU Press.
5. Aslund, A. (2019). Russia's Crony Capitalism: The Path from Market Economy to Kleptocracy. Yale University Press.
6. Aydın, C. I. (2020). Nuclear energy debate in Turkey: Stakeholders, policy alternatives, and governance issues. Energy Policy, 136, 111041.
7. Aydın, M. (2020). Grand strategizing in and for Turkish foreign policy: Lessons learned from history, geography and practice. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 25(2), 203-226.
8. Bağcı, H., & Gaudino, U. (2020). Involving Turkey in EU Common Foreign, Security and Defence Policies. Eurasian Research Journal, 2(1), 7-27.

9. Balta, E. (2019). From geopolitical competition to strategic partnership: Turkey and Russia after the cold war. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 16(63), 69-86.
10. Benyaminova, A. Et al. (2019). The Impact of Changes in Stakeholder Salience on Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Russian Energy Firms: A Contribution to the Divergence/Convergence Debate. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1222-1234.
11. Black, B. C. (2020). Crude Reality: Petroleum in World History. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
12. Bruusgaard, K. (2020). Russian nuclear strategy and conventional inferiority. Journal of Strategic Studies, 44, 3 - 35.
13. Casey, T. (24 March 2022). China's Green Hydrogen Message Spells Bad News For Russia. CleanTechnica: https://cleantechnica.com/2022/03/24/chinas-green-hydrogen-message-spells-bad-news-for-russia/ [22.03.2023].
14. Casier, T. (2016). Great Game or Great Confusion: The Geopolitical Understanding of EU-Russia Energy Relations. Geopolitics, 21, 763 - 778; https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1185607.
15. Ćetković, S., & Buzogány, A. (2020). Between markets, politics and path-dependence: Explaining the growth of solar and wind power in six Central and Eastern European countries. Energy Policy, 139, 111325.
16. Chaudhury, Dipanjan Roy. (29 August 2023). India-Russia trade could touch $100-125 billion over next three years, says Russian industrialist. The Economic Times Website: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/foreign-trade/india-russia-trade-could-touch-100-125-billion-over-next-three-years-says-russian-industrialist/articleshow/103153838.cms?from=mdr [10.10.2023].
17. Churashev, V., et al (2022). Ugol'nyye Proyekty Aziatskoy Rossii Kak Drayver Razvitiya İnfrastruktury [Coal Projects as a Possible Driver of Infrastructure Development in Asian Russia]. Economy of Region, 18(4), 1153-1164.
18. Climate Change Post. (20 March 2023). Fresh water resources. Climate Change Post: https://www.climatechangepost.com/russia/fresh-water-resources/ [30.03.2023].
19. Cohen, Patricia. (9 December 2022). Turkey Is Strengthening Its Energy Ties With Russia. New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/09/business/turkey-erdogan-energy-russia.html [25.12.2022].
20. Connoly, R., et al. (2020). It's Deja Vu All Over Again: COVID-19, The Global Energy Market, and The Russian Economy. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 61(4-5), 511-531.
21. Corwin, J. (27 March 2006). U.S. Academics Charge Putin With Plagiarizing Thesis. Retrieved from https://www.rferl.org/a/1067113.html [25.12.2022].
22. Czerny, M. (2023). Power-Supply Geopolitics. The Dependence of European Economies on Imports of Fuels from Russia. Miscellanea Geographica, 27, 52 - 65; https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2023-0014.
23. Dannreuther, R. (2016). EU-Russia Energy Relations in Context. Geopolitics, 21, 913 - 921; https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1222521.
24. David-Barrett, E. (2023). State capture and development: a conceptual framework. Journal of International Relations and Development, 26, 224–244.
25. Davies, Rob. (10 March 2022). Oleg Deripaska: Putin ‘favourite’ with strong ties to UK politics.The Guardian Website: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/10/oleg-deripaska-profile-putin-britain [10.10.2023].
26. Debardeleben, J. (2020). Crisis Response, Path Dependence, and the Joint Decision Trap: The EU's Eastern and Russia Policies after the Ukraine Crisis. East European Politics, 36(4), 564-585.
27. Dolchinkov & Dolchinkova, B. (2019). State And Prospects Of The Russıan Uranıum Mınıng And Uranıum Processıng Industry In The Context Of World Development. Knowledge - International Journal , 30(3), 563–574.
28. Dubsky, Z., & Tichy, L. (2022). The European Union as a Recognised Energy Actor in Relations with the Russian Federation, 2014-2019; Europe-Asia Studies, 74(10), 1-25.
29. Ediger, V. Ş., Bowlus, J. V., & Aydın, M. (2020). Geopolitics and gas-transit security through pipelines. Regulations in the Energy Industry: Financial, Economic and Legal Implications, 85-106.
30. Erşen, E., & Çelikpala, M. (2019). Turkey and the changing energy geopolitics of Eurasia. Energy Policy, 128, 584-592.
31. EUObserver. (7 October 2022). Russia's €200m Nuclear Exports Untouched by EU Sanctions. EUObserver: https://EUObserver.com/world/156226 [22.03.2023].
32. Euronews. (8 April 2022). EU countries agree on new Russia sanctions, including coal embargo. Euronews: https://www.Euronews.com/my-europe/2022/04/07/eu-countries-agree-on-new-russia-sanctions-including-coal-embargo [22.03.2023].
33. Faucon, B. & Summer Said. (30 December 2022). Russia's Oil Ban Accelerates Shift in Global Energy Flows. The Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/articles/russias-oil-ban-accelerates-shift-in-global-energy-flows-11672402199 [10.01.2023].
34. Faulconbridge, Guy. (26 September 2023). Russian oligarch Deripaska says Western sanctions won't stop Ukraine war. Financial Times Website: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-oligarch-deripaska-says-western-sanctions-wont-stop-ukraine-war-ft-2023-09-26/ [13.10.2023].
35. Filimonova, I., et al. (2020). Impact of the Global Green Factor on the Capitalization of Oil Companies in Russia. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(2), 309-324.
36. Forbes Russia (Non-Dated) (a). Новатэк [Novatek]. Forbes Russia: https://www.Forbes.ru/profile/244806-Novatek [14.11.2023].
37. Forbes Russia (Non-Dated) (b). Леонид Михельсон. Forbes Russia Website: https://www.Forbes.ru/profile/leonid-mihelson [14.10.2023].
38. Frye, T. (2021). Weak Strongman: The Limits of Power in Putin's Russia. Princeton University Press.
39. Gagarinskiy, A. Y., et al. (2022). New Stage in Russia’s Nuclear Energy Strategy. Atomic Energy, 131(6), 307-311.
40. Giddens, A. (2009). Politics of Climate Change. Polity.
41. Goble, P. (13 September 2022). Forget about Lake Baikal as Source of Water for Export. Eurasia Review: https://www.eurasiareview.com/13092022-forget-about-lake-baikal-as-source-of-water-for-export-oped/ [30.11.2022].
42. Goble, P. (18 August 2022). Russia's Demographic Collapse is Accelerating. Jamestown Foundation: https://jamestown.org/program/russias-demographic-collapse-is-accelerating/ [30.11.2022].
43. Goldthau, A. and Sitter, N. (2015). Soft power with a hard edge: eu policy tools and energy security. Review of International Political Economy, 22(5), 941-965; https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1008547.
44. Groce, M. S. (2020). Uncovering the Domestic Factor in the Sino-Russian Energy Partnership. Geopolitics, 25(4), 989-1014.
45. Herdegen, M. (2016). Principles of International Economic Law. Oxford University Press.
46. Hudson, V. M. & Day, B. S. (2019). Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Rowman & Littlefield.
47. Ibekwe, K. (2024). Energy security in the global context: a comprehensive review of geopolitical dynamics and policies. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(1), 152-168; https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i1.741.
48. IntelliNews. (8 December 2022). Russian Coal Exports Hit Fresh Highs After EU Shipping Sanctions were Softened. IntelliNews: https://www.IntelliNews.com/RUSSIAN-COAL-EXPORTS-HIT-FRESH-HIGHS-AFTER-EU-SHIPPING-SANCTIONS-WERE-SOFTENED-264679// [30.12.2022].
49. Jack, Victor (21 December 2022). Nuclear fusion: The one relationship Russia and the West just can’t break. Politico: https://www.politico.eu/article/the-one-relationship-russia-and-eu-just-cant-break-iter-fusion-ukraine-war/.
50. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown.
51. Kroenig, M. (2020). The Return of Great Power Rivalry: Democracy versus Autocracy from the Ancient World to the US and China. Oxford University Press.
52. Krutikhin, M., & Overland, I. (2017). OPEC and Russia: A happy pro forma marriage. In Harald Claes & Giuliano Garavini (Eds.). Handbook of OPEC and the Global Energy Order (pp. 248-256). Taylor & Francis.
53. Kryukov, V. A., Kryukov YA. V. (2022). TEK Kitaya i Rossii v Epokhu Perekhoda k Trayektorii Nizkouglerodnogo Razvitiya [Fuel and energy complex of China and Russia in the context of the transition to a low-carbon development trajectory]. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika [Spatial economics], 18(3), 141-167.
54. Kucukgocmen, Ali (21 September 2023). Ship with Ukraine grain back in Turkey under "humanitarian corridor". Reuters Website: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ship-with-ukraine-grain-back-turkey-under-humanitarian-corridor-2023-09-21/ [15.09.2023].
55. Kuzemko, C., et al. (2022). Russia’s War on Ukraine, European Energy Policy Responses and Implications for Sustainable Transformations. Energy Research & Social Science, 93, 1-8.
56. Lander, C., & Kuns, B. (2021). The Sinking of the Armada: Problems for the Three ‘Flagship’ Foreign Investment Agroholdings in Russia and Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies, 74, 449 - 480.
57. Li, W. D., et al. (2022). An Impact Path Analysis of the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict on the World and Policy Response Based on the Input-Output Network. Sustainability, 14(14), 2-17.
58. Loe, J. S. P. (2019). But it is Our Duty! Exploring Gazprom's Reluctance to Russian Gas Sector Reform. Post-Soviet Affairs, 35(1), 63-76.
59. Magnus, G. (2018). Red Flags: Why Xi's China is in Jeopardy. Yale University Press.
60. Marusyk, Y. (2019). Securing a spot under the sun? gas and renewables in the eu-russian energy transition discourse. East European Politics, 35(2), 182-200; https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2019.1612371.
61. Mcgrath, P. (2016). Energy Security and Cooperation in Eurasia: Power, Profits and Politics. International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs, 25, 89.
62. Meissner, K. (2023). Caught up by geopolitics: sanctions and the eu’s response to russia’s war against ukraine. The Economists Voice, 20(2), 275-283; https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2023-0051.
63. Melchiorre, T. (2022). The Akademik Lomonosov and the Arctic legal regime: geopolitics versus international law?. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 30, 738 - 749; https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2031130.
64. Meredith, S. (14 October 2022). Europe is Still Quietly Importing Russian Nuclear Energy. CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/14/ukraine-war-europe-is-still-quietly-importing-russian-nuclear-energy.html [30.11.2022].
65. Meynkhard, A. (2020). Priorities of Russian energy policy in Russian-Chinese relations. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2020, 10(1), 65-71.
66. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Relations between Türkiye and the Russian Federation. Ministry of Foreign Affairs: https://www.mfa.gov.tr/relations-between-turkey-and-the-russian-federation.en.mfa [20.03.2023].
67. Mitrova, T. and Melnikov, Y. (2019). Energy transition in russia. Energy Transitions, 3(1-2), 73-80; https://doi.org/10.1007/s41825-019-00016-8.
68. Nilsen, T. (14 January 2020). Arctic shipping boycott gains support among big businesses, but not all are happy. The Barents Observer. https://www.thebarentsobserver.com/arctic/arctic-shipping-boycott-gains-support-among-big-businesses-but-not-all-are-happy/116290 [20.03.2023].
69. Novatek (Non-Dated). History. Novatek Website: https://www.Novatek.ru/en/about/company/history/ [13.10.2023].
70. Novikau, A. (2021). What Does Energy Security Mean for Energy-Exporting Countries? A Closer Look At The Russian Energy Security Strategy. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 39(1), 105-123.
71. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs. Olah, G. A. Et al. (2018). Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy. John Wiley & Sons.
72. Olier, E. (2023). Geopolitics and Energy. ICE, Revista de Economía. https://doi.org/10.32796/ice.2023.932.7655.
73. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - OECD (4 August 2022). The Supply of Critical Raw Materials Endangered by Russia's War on Ukraine. OECD: https://www.OECD.org/ukraine-hub/policy-responses/the-supply-of-critical-raw-materials-endangered-by-russia-s-war-on-ukraine-e01ac7be/ [30.11.2022].
74. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - OECD (5 August 2022). The Impacts and Policy Implications of Russia's Aggression Against Ukraine on Agricultural Markets. OECD: https://www.OECD.org/ukraine-hub/policy-responses/the-impacts-and-policy-implications-of-russia-s-aggression-against-ukraine-on-agricultural-markets-0030a4cd/ [30.11.2022].
75. Ott, H. (21 October 2022). Amid Global Energy Crisis, U.S. And Russia Still Working Together in Quest for Unlimited, Clean Power from Nuclear Fusion. CBS News: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-us-nuclear-fusion-iter-cooperation-amid-energy-crisis-ukraine-war/ [30.11.2022].
76. Patonia, A. (24 October 2022). How Its War on Ukraine Killed Russia's Hydrogen Ambitions. The German Marshall Fund of the United States: https://www.gmfus.org/news/how-its-war-ukraine-killed-russias-hydrogen-ambitions [30.11.2022].
77. Peña‐Ramos, J., Bagus, P., & Amirov-Belova, D. (2020). The north caucasus region as a blind spot in the “european green deal”: energy supply security and energy superpower russia. Energies, 14(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010017.
78. Petrikov, A. (2022). Prioritety Strukturnoy Politiki V Sel'skom Khozyaystve Rossii [Structural policy priorities in agriculture of Russia]. Problems of AgriMarket, 1, 13-23.
79. Polityuk, Pavel (22 September 2023). First big grain ship leaves Ukraine's Black Sea port. Reuters Website: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/second-vessel-leaves-ukraines-Black-sea-port-after-loading-grain-source-2023-09-22/ [20 October 2023].
80. Prontera, A. (2021). Italy, Russia and the Great Reconfiguration in East-West Energy Relations. Europe-Asia Studies, 73(4), 647-672.
81. Putin, V.V. (1997). Strategic planning for the reproduction of the mineral and raw base of the region in the conditions of the formation of market relations (St. Petersburg and Leningrad. Reg.). PhD Dissertation. Saint Petersburg Mining University. Russian Federation.
82. Rahman, Maizar (29 April 2004) Oil and the challenges of the 21st century. .The 5th International Oil Summit Paris, France, 29 April 2004: https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/906.htm.
83. Rosatom (Non-Dated a). Are there different types of nuclear reactor?. Rosatom Website: https://www.world-nuclear.org/nuclear-essentials/are-there-different-types-of-reactor.aspx.
84. Rosatom (Non-Dated b). Short history of the russian nuclear industry. Rosatom Website: https://www.Rosatom.ru/en/press-centre/short-history-of-the-russian-nuclear-industry/.
85. Røseth, T. (2017). Russia’s energy relations with China: passing the strategic threshold?. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58(1), 23-55.
86. Rosneft (Non-Dated). История Компании [History of the Company]. Rosneft Website: https://www.Rosneft.ru/about/history/ [12.10.2023].
87. Rousan, S., et al (2018). A dynamic network analysis of the world oil market: Analysis of OPEC and non-OPEC members. Energy Economics, 75, 28-41.
88. Saul, Jonathan (27 September 2023). Ukraine grain corridor should not replace broader deal, UN trade chief says. Reuters Website: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-grain-corridor-should-not-replace-broader-deal-un-trade-chief-2023-09-27/ [13.10.2023].
89. Schmidt-Felzmann, A. (2020). Gazprom's Nord Stream 2 and Diffuse Authority in the EU: Managing Authority Challenges Regarding Russian Gas Supplies Through the Baltic Sea. Journal of European Integration, 42(1), 129-145.
90. Siddi, M. (2023). Governing the eu’s energy crisis: the european commission’s geopolitical turn and its pitfalls. Politics and Governance, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7315.
91. Sotiriou, S. (2022). From Monopsony to Monopoly: Russia’s Opening to China as a Stabilising Factor in the Eurasian Energy Trade. Europe-Asia Studies, 75, 28 - 46.
92. Statista. (12 January 2023). Demographics of Russia - Statistics & Facts. Statista: https://www.Statista.com/topics/5937/demographics-of-russia/#topicHeader__wrapper [20.01.2023].
93. Statista. (23 November 2022). Climate Change in Russia. Statista: https://www.Statista.com/topics/5613/climate-change-Russia/#dossierkeyfigures [20.01.2023].
94. Suzdaleva, A. (2020). Russia and Global Water Crisis. World Economy and International Relations, 64, 53-59.
95. Tanrısever, O. F. (2019). Turkey and the Russian Federation: towards a mutual understanding?. Turkey’s Foreign Policy in the 21st Century (121-138). Routledge.
96. Taylor, B. D. (2018). The Code of Putinism. Oxford University Press.
97. Thompson, H. (2022). Disorder: Hard times in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press.
98. United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund - UNİCEF. (15 April 2022). 1.4 Million People Without Running Water Across War-Affected Eastern Ukraine. UNİCEF: https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/14-million-people-without-running-water-across-war-affected-eastern-ukraine-uom/russia/fresh-water-resources/ [22.03.2023].
99. Wall Street Journal (Non-Dated). Key People Rosneft Oil Co. Wall Street Journal Website: https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/RU/ROSN/company-people [14.10.2023].
100. Walt, S. M. (1987). The origins of alliances. Cornell University Press.
101. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill.
102. Wigell, M., & Vihma, A. (2016). Geopolitics versus geoeconomics: the case of Russia's geostrategy and its effects on the EU. International Affairs, 92, 605-627; https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12600.
103. Wilson, J. (2019). A securitisation approach to international energy politics. Energy Research & Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2018.10.024.
104. World Nuclear Association (December 2021) Nuclear Power in Russia. World Nuclear Association Website: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-o-s/russia-nuclear-power.aspx.
105. Xu, B., & Reisinger, W. M. (2019). Russia's Energy Diplomacy with China: Personalism and Institutionalism in its Policy-Making Process. Pacific Review, 32(1), 1-19.
106. Yergin, D. (2020). The New Map: Energy, Climate, and the Clash of Nations. Penguin UK.
107. Zhiznin, S. (2010). Russian energy diplomacy and international energy security (geopolitics and Economics). Baltic region, 2, 7-17; https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2010-1-2.
108. Zimmermann, A. (25 May 2022). Russia's War on Water in Ukraine. Politico Europe: https://www.politico.eu/article/Russias-war-on-water-in-ukraine/ [30.11.2022].