Non-Price Tobacco Control Measures: Evidence from Turkey
Öz
Turkey introduced the public-place and workplace smoking regulation in 2008, which was expanded in 2009, including hotels, restaurants, bars, and teahouses. We study the predictors of smoking status, smoking intensity, and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) at home in Turkey. We then examine the relationship between the smoking bans and exposure to ETS at workplaces, home, and public places such as restaurants, teahouses, bars, and public transportation, including taxis using data from Turkey’s Health Surveys about respondents’ ETS exposure. Our multivariate reg-ression analyses indicate that age, gender, marital status, employment status, income, and education have a statistically significant relationship with smoking status and smoking intensity. T-test results indicate that there has been an increase in exposure to ETS in public places between 2010 and 2012, which indicates weak enforcement of the law in the early years. Besides, exposure to ETS at workplaces have declined between 2010 and 2012. We also find that the public smoking ban did not lead to ETS displacement to private homes. We encourage policymakers to take more severe steps to enforce the law, especially in public places.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Adda, J., & Cornaglia, F. (2006). Taxes, cigarette consumption, and smoking intensity. American Economic Review, 96(4), 1013-1028.
- Adda, J., & Cornaglia, F. (2010). The effect of bans and taxes on passive smoking. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(1), 1-32.
- Ahluwalia, I. B., Grummer-Strawn, L., & Scanlon, K. S. (1997). Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and birth outcome: increased effects on pregnant women aged 30 years or older. American journal of epidemiology, 146(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009190
- Anger, S., Kvasnicka, M., & Siedler, T. (2011). One last puff? Public smoking bans and smoking behavior. Journal of health economics, 30(3), 591-601.
- Argüder, E., Pempeci, S., Karalezli, A., & Hasanoğlu, H. C. (2019). The factors that ınfluence smoking initiation. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 6(4), 116-129.http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/addicta.2020.19099
- Aristei, D., & Pieroni, L. (2008). A double-hurdle approach to modelling tobacco consumption in Italy. Applied economics, 40(19), 2463-2476. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600970229
- Bardsley, P., & Olekalns, N. (1999). Cigarette and tobacco consumption: Have anti‐smoking policies made a difference?. Economic Record, 75(3), 225-240.
- Bilir, N., Çakır, B., Dağlı, E., Ergüder, T., & Önder, Z. (2009). Tobacco control Turkey. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Abdullah Tirgil
*
0000-0002-4491-4459
Türkiye
Burcu Üzer
0000-0001-7259-9647
Türkiye
Furkan Dalkılıç
0000-0003-1909-6199
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Haziran 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi
28 Ağustos 2020
Kabul Tarihi
19 Haziran 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1
Cited By
An Environmental Human Rights Approach to Environmental Tobacco Smoking
Muslim World Journal of Human Rights
https://doi.org/10.1515/mwjhr-2022-0024A Study on Adolescent Smoking Prevention and Cessation Policies: Based on the Propensity Score Matching–Difference-in-Differences Method
Healthcare
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13010030Sigara Sebep Olduğu Sağlık Harcamalarını Finanse Edebilir Mi? Türkiye’de Sağlık Harcamaları Finansal Kaynağına Alternatif Öneri
Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1571759