Araştırma Makalesi

Assessing Patients' Awareness and Knowledge of Suggested Cleaning Procedures for Implant Prosthetic Restorations

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 30 Ağustos 2024
PDF İndir
EN TR

Assessing Patients' Awareness and Knowledge of Suggested Cleaning Procedures for Implant Prosthetic Restorations

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the attitudes and knowledge of patients attending Ataturk University Faculty of Dentistry Prosthodontics Clinic regarding their preferences for providing professional implant care and awareness of implant-specific oral hygiene methods. Material and Methods: A questionnaire was administered to 130 randomly selected patients with fixed or removable prosthetic restorations on implants attending the Prosthodontics Clinic of Ataturk University Faculty of Dentistry. Results: It was found that patients answered yes to the questions of flossing (27.7%), use of interface brush (21.5%), use of mouth shower (7.7%), and use of mouthwash (80.8%) among the preferred methods for cleaning implant prosthetic restorations. When the rates of mouth shower use were analyzed in terms of the relationship between education and the use of mouth shower, a statistically significant relationship was found (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Dentists play a major role in explaining and raising awareness of their patients about the cleaning of implant prostheses and home care recommendations. The general awareness tendency of patients at this point is low. This study proved that patients need to know how to take care of and clean their dentures. Our study's hypothesis, which was founded on our clinical findings prior to the investigation, suggested that there might be variations in how implant-retained prosthetic restorations are cleaned depending on the age and educational level of the patient.

Keywords

Teşekkür

We hope you find our manuscript suitable for publication and look forward to hearing from you.

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Günday M, Şener ID, Yamaner G. The study of the age of becoming edentulous in the last 20 years in Turkey. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;49:172-5.
  2. 2. Thomsonn WM, Ma S. An ageing population poses dental challenges. Singapore Dent J. 2014;35:3-8.
  3. 3. Moraschini V, Poubel LADC, Ferreira VF, Barboza EDSP. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:377-88.
  4. 4. Gulati M, Govila V, Anand V, Anand B. Implant maintenance: a clinical update. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;9:908534.
  5. 5. Bidra AS, Daubert DM, Garcia LT, Gauthier MF, Kosinski TF, Nenn CA, Olsen JA, Platt JA, Wingrove SS, Chandler ND, Curtis DA. A systematic review of recall regimen and maintenance regimen of patients with dental restorations. Part 2: implant-borne restorations. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:16-31.
  6. 6. Schmage P, Kahili F, Nergiz I, Scorziello TM, Platzer U, Pfeiffer P. Cleaning effectiveness of implant prophylaxis instruments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:331-7.
  7. 7. Monique C, Matthew S, Ivan B. Dental implant hygiene and maintenance protocols: a survey of oral health practitioners in Australia. Am Dent Hyg. 2021;95:25-35.
  8. 8. Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42:158-71.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Protez

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Ağustos 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Temmuz 2024

Kabul Tarihi

22 Temmuz 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver
1.Tuba Şenocak, Zeynep Çintosun, Funda Bayindir. Assessing Patients’ Awareness and Knowledge of Suggested Cleaning Procedures for Implant Prosthetic Restorations. Akd Dent J. 01 Ağustos 2024;3(2):47-53. doi:10.62268/add.1514694

Başlangıç: 2022

Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 sayı

Yayıncı: Akdeniz Üniversitesi