Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Effect of Different Doses of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Amount of Apical Fluid Extrusion in Root Canal Disinfection

Yıl 2024, , 67 - 71, 30.08.2024
https://doi.org/10.62268/add.1532512

Öz

Objectives:
This study aimed to compare the effects of conventional needle irrigation (CNI) and Er,Cr:YSGG laser-activated irrigation (LAI) methods used for disinfection of the root canal system on the amount of apical extrusion.
Material and Methods:
In the experiment conducted using 75 single-rooted human mandibular premolar teeth, the teeth were treated with LAI and GII at different power settings (0.25W, 0.50W, 0.75W and 1W) after root canal shaping procedures.
Results:
The findings showed that the amount of fluid exuding from the root apex was highest in the GİI group and lowest in the 0.25W laser group. The difference between the laser groups was not found to be statistically significant.
Conclusion:
It was concluded that LAI provides safer and more effective disinfection by reducing apical overflow, especially at low power settings.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58:589-99.
  • 2. Sundqvist G. Ecology of the root canal flora. J Endod. 1992;18:427-30.
  • 3. Blanken J, De Moor RJ, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: a visualization study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:514-9.
  • 4. Mancini M, Armellin E, Casaglia A, Cerroni L, Cianconi L. A comparative study of smear layer removal and erosion in apical intraradicular dentine with three irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. J Endod. 2009;35:900-3.
  • 5. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod. 2009;35:791-804.
  • 6. de Groot SD, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR, van der Sluis LW. Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: cleaning efficacy and flow visualization. Int Endod J. 2009;42:1077-83.
  • 7. Sahar-Helft S, Stabholtz A, Moshonov J, Gutkin V, Redenski I, Steinberg D. Effect of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation solution on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in an ex-vivo root canal model. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013;31:334-41.
  • 8. Bago Juric I, Plecko V, Anic I. Antimicrobial efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-activated irrigation compared with passive ultrasonic irrigation and RinsEndo against intracanal Enterococcus faecalis. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32:600-5.
  • 9. Peeters HH, Suardita K. Efficacy of smear layer removal at the root tip by using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium garnet laser. J Endod. 2011;37:1585-9.
  • 10. De Moor RJ, Meire M, Goharkhay K, Moritz A, Vanobbergen J. Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs. J Endod. 2010;36:1580-3.
  • 11. Peeters HH, Mooduto L. Radiographic examination of apical extrusion of root canal irrigants during cavitation induced by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation: an in vivo study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:2105-12.
  • 12. Hulsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation-literature review and case reports. Int Endod J. 2000;33:186-93.
  • 13. George R, Walsh LJ. Apical extrusion of root canal irrigants when using Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers with optical fibers: an in vitro dye study. J Endod. 2008;34:706-8.
  • 14. Zairi A, Lambrianidis T. Accidental extrusion of sodium hypochlorite into the maxillary sinus. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:745-8.
  • 15. Huang X, Ling J, Wei X, Gu L. Quantitative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using ProTaper Universal Tulsa rotary system in endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 2007;33:1102-5.
  • 16. Boutsioukis C, Psimma Z, Kastrinakis E. The effect of flow rate and agitation technique on irrigant extrusion ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2014;47:487-96.
  • 17. Psimma Z, Boutsioukis C, Vasiliadis L, Kastrinakis E. A new method for real-time quantification of irrigant extrusion during root canal irrigation ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2013;46:619-31.
  • 18. Altundasar E, Nagas E, Uyanik O, Serper A. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:e31-5.
  • 19. Hachmeister DR, Schindler WG, Walker WA 3rd, Thomas DD. The sealing ability and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate in a model of apexification. J Endod. 2002;28:386-90.
  • 20. Topçuoğlu HS, Aktı A, Tuncay Ö, Dinçer AN, Düzgün S, Topçuoğlu G. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files. J Endod. 2014;40:2066-9.
  • 21. Stefopoulos S, Tsatsas DV, Kerezoudis NP, Eliades G. Comparative in vitro study of the sealing efficiency of white vs grey Proroot mineral trioxide aggregate formulas as apical barriers. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24:207-13.
  • 22. Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H, Capar ID, Saygili G, Meşe M. Effect of PIPS technique at different power settings on irrigating solution extrusion. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30:1641-5.
  • 23. Mazreah SA, Shirvani A, Mazreah HA, Dianat O. Evaluation of irrigant extrusion following the use of different root canal irrigation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Endod J. 2023;49:396-417.

Kök Kanal Dezenfeksiyonunda Er,Cr:YSGG Lazerin Farklı Dozlarının Apikalden Taşan Sıvı Miktarına Etkisi

Yıl 2024, , 67 - 71, 30.08.2024
https://doi.org/10.62268/add.1532512

Öz

Bu çalışmada, kök kanal sisteminin dezenfeksiyonu için kullanılan geleneksel iğne irrigasyonu (Gİİ) ile Er,Cr:YSGG lazerle aktive irrigasyon (LAİ) yöntemlerinin apikal taşma miktarı üzerindeki etkileri karşılaştırılmıştır. 75 adet tek köklü insan alt çene premolar diş kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen deneyde, dişler kök kanal şekillendirme işlemlerinden sonra farklı güç ayarlarında (0.25W, 0.50W, 0.75W ve 1W) lazerle aktive ve geleneksel iğne irrigasyonu ile işleme tabi tutulmuştur. Sonuçlar, kök ucundan taşan sıvı miktarının en yüksek Gİİ grubunda olduğunu ve 0.25W lazer grubunda en düşük olduğunu göstermiştir. Lazer grupları arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamıştır. Lazerle aktive irrigasyonun, özellikle düşük güç ayarlarında, apikal taşmayı azaltarak daha güvenli ve etkili bir dezenfeksiyon sağladığı sonucuna varılmıştır. Lazerin oluşturduğu basınç dalgaları ve kabarcık hareketleri, irrigantların kök kanal sisteminin uzak bölgelerine ulaşmasını ve etkin bir dezenfeksiyon sağlamasını kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bu bulgular, kök kanal dezenfeksiyonunda lazer destekli irrigasyonun, geleneksel iğne irrigasyonuna göre daha güvenli bir alternatif olabileceğini göstermektedir. Ancak, yüksek güç ayarlarının klinik komplikasyonlara yol açabileceği ve optimal lazer ayarlarının belirlenmesi gerektiği vurgulanmıştır. Gelecekteki çalışmalar, farklı irrigantlar ve lazer ayarları kullanarak daha kapsamlı sonuçlar elde edebilir ve klinik uygulamalara daha fazla ışık tutabilir.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58:589-99.
  • 2. Sundqvist G. Ecology of the root canal flora. J Endod. 1992;18:427-30.
  • 3. Blanken J, De Moor RJ, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: a visualization study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:514-9.
  • 4. Mancini M, Armellin E, Casaglia A, Cerroni L, Cianconi L. A comparative study of smear layer removal and erosion in apical intraradicular dentine with three irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. J Endod. 2009;35:900-3.
  • 5. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod. 2009;35:791-804.
  • 6. de Groot SD, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR, van der Sluis LW. Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: cleaning efficacy and flow visualization. Int Endod J. 2009;42:1077-83.
  • 7. Sahar-Helft S, Stabholtz A, Moshonov J, Gutkin V, Redenski I, Steinberg D. Effect of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation solution on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in an ex-vivo root canal model. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013;31:334-41.
  • 8. Bago Juric I, Plecko V, Anic I. Antimicrobial efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-activated irrigation compared with passive ultrasonic irrigation and RinsEndo against intracanal Enterococcus faecalis. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32:600-5.
  • 9. Peeters HH, Suardita K. Efficacy of smear layer removal at the root tip by using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium garnet laser. J Endod. 2011;37:1585-9.
  • 10. De Moor RJ, Meire M, Goharkhay K, Moritz A, Vanobbergen J. Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs. J Endod. 2010;36:1580-3.
  • 11. Peeters HH, Mooduto L. Radiographic examination of apical extrusion of root canal irrigants during cavitation induced by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation: an in vivo study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:2105-12.
  • 12. Hulsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation-literature review and case reports. Int Endod J. 2000;33:186-93.
  • 13. George R, Walsh LJ. Apical extrusion of root canal irrigants when using Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers with optical fibers: an in vitro dye study. J Endod. 2008;34:706-8.
  • 14. Zairi A, Lambrianidis T. Accidental extrusion of sodium hypochlorite into the maxillary sinus. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:745-8.
  • 15. Huang X, Ling J, Wei X, Gu L. Quantitative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using ProTaper Universal Tulsa rotary system in endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 2007;33:1102-5.
  • 16. Boutsioukis C, Psimma Z, Kastrinakis E. The effect of flow rate and agitation technique on irrigant extrusion ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2014;47:487-96.
  • 17. Psimma Z, Boutsioukis C, Vasiliadis L, Kastrinakis E. A new method for real-time quantification of irrigant extrusion during root canal irrigation ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2013;46:619-31.
  • 18. Altundasar E, Nagas E, Uyanik O, Serper A. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:e31-5.
  • 19. Hachmeister DR, Schindler WG, Walker WA 3rd, Thomas DD. The sealing ability and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate in a model of apexification. J Endod. 2002;28:386-90.
  • 20. Topçuoğlu HS, Aktı A, Tuncay Ö, Dinçer AN, Düzgün S, Topçuoğlu G. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files. J Endod. 2014;40:2066-9.
  • 21. Stefopoulos S, Tsatsas DV, Kerezoudis NP, Eliades G. Comparative in vitro study of the sealing efficiency of white vs grey Proroot mineral trioxide aggregate formulas as apical barriers. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24:207-13.
  • 22. Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H, Capar ID, Saygili G, Meşe M. Effect of PIPS technique at different power settings on irrigating solution extrusion. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30:1641-5.
  • 23. Mazreah SA, Shirvani A, Mazreah HA, Dianat O. Evaluation of irrigant extrusion following the use of different root canal irrigation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Endod J. 2023;49:396-417.
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Endodonti
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Öznur Güçlüer Tuncay 0000-0001-7835-0439

Alper Kustarci 0000-0002-4942-3739

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Ağustos 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Ağustos 2024
Kabul Tarihi 22 Ağustos 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Güçlüer Tuncay Ö, Kustarci A. Kök Kanal Dezenfeksiyonunda Er,Cr:YSGG Lazerin Farklı Dozlarının Apikalden Taşan Sıvı Miktarına Etkisi. Akd Dent J. 2024;3(2):67-71.

Başlangıç: 2022

Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 sayı

Yayıncı: Akdeniz Üniversitesi