Araştırma Makalesi

Awareness and Attitudes of Dental Students Regarding Contemporary Oral Hygiene Practices

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3 31 Aralık 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

Awareness and Attitudes of Dental Students Regarding Contemporary Oral Hygiene Practices

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to explore the dental students’ contemporary oral hygiene practices, their knowledge of oral care procedures, and determine the effect of dental education on eventual changes in the oral hygiene habits of the students of two different dental faculties. Methods: This study included 377 students in two dental faculties. Habits, knowledge, and attitudes regarding dental care were obtained from the questionnaire. Statistical analysis of the data was performed by applying the Chi-Square test. Results: The students at Ankara Medipol University (52.3%) had a significantly higher knowledge of the working principle of power toothbrushes (oscillating-rotating) (p<0.05) compared to the students at Cankiri Karatekin University (45.1%). 36,6% of the students at Ankara Medipol University preferred essential oil, whereas 29% at Cankiri Karatekin University preferred chlorhexidine. Those who used essential oils among those studying at Ankara Medipol University were 36.6%, significantly higher than those at Cankiri Karatekin University 26.1%.The dental students' answers regarding the questions about types of interdental aids used and tongue cleaning methods did not differ significantly (p>0,05).Students at both universities stated that they did not know how plaque disclosing tablets work and did not use them before brushing their teeth. Conclusion: Our study shows that oral hygiene knowledge is inadequate among dental students, but dentists, who form the basis of public oral and dental health, should set an example for public health. Therefore, students’ knowledge of contemporary oral hygiene procedures needs to be improved in the preclinical education.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Costalonga M, Herzberg MC. The oral microbiome and the immunobiology of periodontal disease and caries. Immunol Lett. 2014;162:22-38.
  2. 2. Pinto TM, de Freitas GC, Dutra DA, Kantorski KZ, Moreira CH. Frequency of mechanical removal of plaque as it relates to gingival inflammation: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:948-54.
  3. 3. Van der Weijden FA, Slot DE. Efficacy of homecare regimens for mechanical plaque removal in managing gingivitis a meta review. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42:S77-91.
  4. 4. Cortes FJ, Nevot C, Ramon JM, Cuenca E. The evolution of dental health in dental students at the University of Barcelona. J Dent Edu. 2002;66:1203-8.
  5. 5. Khami MR, Virtanen JI, Jafarian M, Murtomaa H. Prevention‐oriented practice of Iranian senior dental students. Eur J Dent Edu. 2007;11:48-53.
  6. 6. Sbricoli L, Bernardi L, Ezeddine F, Bacci C, Di Fiore A. Oral hygiene in adolescence: a questionnaire-based study. Int J Environmen Res Public Health. 2022;19:7381.
  7. 7. Kawamura M. Dental behavioral science. The relationship between perceptions of oral health and oral status in adults. Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi. 1988;20:273-86.
  8. 8. Yildiz S, Dogan B. Self reported dental health attitudes and behaviour of dental students in Turkey. Eur J Dent. 2011;5:253-9.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Periodontoloji

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Ekim 2024

Kabul Tarihi

23 Aralık 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver
1.Başak Karasu, Hacer Eberliköse, Hakan Alpay Karasu. Awareness and Attitudes of Dental Students Regarding Contemporary Oral Hygiene Practices. Akd Dent J. 01 Aralık 2024;3(3):94-9. doi:10.62268/add.1575620

Başlangıç: 2022

Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 sayı

Yayıncı: Akdeniz Üniversitesi