Fiber Destekli Kompozit Rezin Köprü Hakkında Bilgi Kaynağı Olarak YouTube: Doğruluk ve Güvenilirlik Değerlendirmesi

Öz

Amaç Mevcut çalışmanın amacı, fiber destekli kompozit köprüler ile ilgili YouTube videolarının doğruluğunu ve güvenilirliğini incelemekti. Gereç ve Yöntemler YouTube'da 'fiber destekli kompozit rezin köprü' anahtar kelimesi İngilizce olarak arandı ve çalışmaya 100 video dahil edildi. Videolar video demografisi açısından değerlendirildi. Video içerikleri 2 farklı kategoride, video kaynakları ise 5 farklı kategoride incelendi. Videolar, JAMA (Amerikan Tıp Derneği Dergisi) ve m-DISCERN (Modifiye DISCERN) ölçeklerini kullanan iki araştırmacı tarafından değerlendirildi. Bulgular Kaynak açısından değerlendirildiğinde, hem m-DISCERN hem de JAMA kriterlerinde anlamlı bir fark vardı (sırasıyla, p = 0.032; p = 0.037). İçerik açısından hem video süresinde hem de m-DISCERN puanında anlamlı bir fark vardı (sırasıyla, p = 0.003; p = 0.004). m-DISCERN ile video süresi arasında anlamlı bir fark vardı (p = 0.04). Şirket ile diş hekimi arasında m-DISCERN açısından anlamlı bir fark bulundu (p = 0.01). JAMA' ya göre, diş hekimliği şirketi-diş hekimi ile diş hekimliği şirketi-uzmanı arasında anlamlı bir fark bulundu (p = 0.014). Sonuç Fiberle güçlendirilmiş kompozit rezin köprüler hakkındaki YouTube videoları hem halk sağlığı bilinci hem de diş hekimliği eğitimi için değerli araçlardan birisi olma potansiyeline sahiptir. Ancak, diş hekimliği profesyonellerinin bu konuda paylaşılan içeriğin kalitesini ve doğruluğunu artırmaları gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fiber destekli kompozit rezin köprü
• JAMA
• m-DISCERN
• YouTube

Youtube As Sources of Information About Fiber-Reinforcement Composite Resin Bridge: Accuracy and Reliability Assessment

Abstract

Objectives The aim of current study was to examine the accuracy and reliability of YouTube videos regarding fiber-reinforced composite resin bridges. Material and Methods The keyword 'fiber-reinforced composite resin bridge' was searched in English on YouTube and 100 videos were included in the study. The videos were evaluated in terms of video demographics. Video contents were examined in 2 different categories and video sources were examined in 5 different categories. The videos were assessed by two researchers utilizing the JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) and m-DISCERN (modified DISCERN) scales. Results When evaluated in terms of source, there was a significant difference in both m-DISCERN and JAMA criteria (respectively, p = 0.032; p = 0.037). In terms of content, there was a significant difference in both video duration and m-DISCERN score (respectively, p = 0.003; p = 0.004). There was a significant difference between m-DISCERN and video duration (p = 0.04). A significant difference was found between the company and the dentist in terms of m-DISCERN (p = 0.01). According to JAMA, a significant difference was found between the dental company-dentist and the dental company-specialist (p = 0.014). Conclusion YouTube videos about fiber-reinforced composite resin bridges have the potential to serve as valuable tools for both public health awareness and dental education. However, there is a need for dental professionals to enhance the quality and accuracy of the content being shared on this topic.

Keywords

• Fiber-reinforced composite resin bridge
• Journal of American Medical Association
• modified-DISCERN
• YouTube

Kaynakça

1. 1. Smith ED, Howe LC. Planning and making crowns and bridges: CRC Press; 2013.
2. 2. Chafaie A, Portier R. Anterior fiber-reinforced composite resin bridge: a case report. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26(6):530-4.
3. 3. Bagis B, Satiroglu I, Korkmaz FM, Ates SM. Rehabilitation of an extracted anterior tooth space using fiber‐reinforced composite and the natural tooth. Dent Traumatol. 2010;26(2):191-4.
4. 4. Escobedo Martínez MF, Rodríguez López S, Valdés Fontela J, Olay García S, Mauvezín Quevedo M. A New Technique for Direct Fabrication of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Bridge: A Long-Term Clinical Observation. Dent J. 2020;8(2):48.
5. 5. Isola G, Matarese G, Ramaglia L, Pedullà E, Rapisarda E, Iorio-Siciliano V. Association between periodontitis and glycosylated haemoglobin before diabetes onset: A cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:2799-808.
6. 6. Perea-Lowery L, Vallittu PK. Framework design and pontics of fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses—An overview. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62(3):281-6.
7. 7. Aydın MY, Kargül B. Glass-fiber reinforced composite in management of avulsed central incisor: a case report. J Dent Child. 2004;71(1):66-8.
8. 8. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-94.

9. 9. Leong AY, Sanghera R, Jhajj J, Desai N, Jammu BS, Makowsky MJ. Is YouTube useful as a source of health information for adults with type 2 diabetes? A South Asian perspective. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42(4):395-403. e4.
10. 10. Farsi D. Social media and health care, part I: literature review of social media use by health care providers. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(4):e23205.
11. 11. Shoufan A, Mohamed F. YouTube and education: A scoping review. IEEE Access. 2022;10:125576-99.
12. 12. Dias da Silva MA, Pereira AC, Vital S, Mariño R, Ghanim A, Skelton‐Macedo MC, et al. Online videos: The hidden curriculum. Eur J Dent Educ. 2022;26(4):830-7.
13. 13. Tonsaker T, Bartlett G, Trpkov C. Health information on the Internet: gold mine or minefield? Can Fam Physician. 2014;60(5):407-8.
14. 14. Díaz‐Rodríguez A, Limeres‐Posse J, Albuquerque R, Brailo V, Cook R, Fricain JC, et al. Assessment of the quality of oral biopsy procedure videos shared on YouTube. Oral Dis. 2024;30(5):3081-93.
15. 15. Loureiro JM, Chaves VCV, Risso PA, Magno MB, Maia LC, Pithon MdM. YouTube™ as a source of tooth avulsion information: a video analysis study. Dent Traumatol. 2023;39(6):616-24.
16. 16. Incerti-Parenti S, Bartolucci ML, Biondi E, Fiordelli A, Paganelli C, Alessandri-Bonetti G. Online audio-visual information on the treatment of OSA with mandibular advancement devices: analysis of quality, reliability and contents. Appl Sci. 2023;13(9):5727.
17. 17. Nour MM, Nour MH, Tsatalou O-M, Barrera A. Schizophrenia on youtube. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(1):70-4.
18. 18. Li HO-Y, Bailey A, Huynh D, Chan J. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(5):e002604.
19. 19. Farag M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. Use of YouTube as a resource for surgical education—clarity or confusion. Eur Uro Focus. 2020;6(3):445-9.
20. 20. Javidan A, Nelms MW, Li A, Lee Y, Zhou F, Kayssi A, et al. Evaluating YouTube as a source of education for patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surgery. 2023;278(4):e712-e8.
21. 21. Özbay Y, Çırakoğlu NY. YouTube as an information source for instrument separation in root canal treatment. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(1).
22. 22. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan H. YouTube as a patient‐information source for root canal treatment. Int Endo J. 2016;49(12):1194-200.
23. 23. Foster BK, Malarkey WM, Maurer TC, Rocha DFB, Udoeyo IF, Grandizio LC. Distal biceps tendon rupture videos on YouTube: an analysis of video content and quality. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2022;4(1):3-7.
24. 24. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren's syndrome? Oral Dis. 2016;22(3):196-201.
25. 25. Rachmawati YL, Naibaho LVC, Aulia NR. Quality of tooth-whitening videos available on youtube. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clín Integr. 2023;23:e210232.
26. 26. Garip R, Sakallioğlu AK. Evaluation of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos addressing eyelid ptosis surgery. Orbit. 2022;41(5):598-604.
27. 27. Besmens IS, Uyulmaz S, Knipper S, Giovanoli P, Lindenblatt N. ‘Viewer discretion advised when preparing for surgery’–why YouTube cannot teach you how to do an upper blepharoplasty. An evaluation of the educational potential of surgical videos on blepharoplasty on YouTube. J PlasT Surg Hand Surg. 2021;55(3):181-4.
28. 28. Erdem H, Sisik A. The reliability of bariatric surgery videos in YouTube platform. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):712-6.
29. 29. Barlas T, Avci DE, Cinici B, Ozkilicaslan H, Yalcin MM, Altinova AE. The quality and reliability analysis of YouTube videos about insulin resistance. Int J Med Inform. 2023;170:104960.
30. 30. Li Z, Yan C, Lyu X, Li F, Zeng R. Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):2620.
31. 31. Turhan B. Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos about Insulin Injection in Children. Duzce Med J. 2024(Early Access).
32. 32. Nagpal SJS, Karimianpour A, Mukhija D, Mohan D, Brateanu A. YouTube videos as a source of medical information during the Ebola hemorrhagic fever epidemic. Springerplus. 2015;4:1-5.