Intentional Replantation for the Management of Type I Dens Invaginatus with External Inflammatory Root Resorption after Dental Trauma: A Case Report with an 18-Month Follow-Up

Abstract

Dens invaginatus (DI) represents a rare developmental anomaly that may predispose affected teeth to pulpal and periapical pathologies. When complicated by external inflammatory root resorption (EIRR), treatment becomes considerably more challenging and prognosis may be compromised. Intentional replantation (IR) has reemerged as a conservative alternative in cases where conventional nonsurgical endodontic retreatment or periapical surgery is not feasible. A 20-year-old systemically healthy male presented with intraoral swelling in the maxillary lateral incisor region. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) revealed a periapical lesion approximately 12 mm in diameter associated with a maxillary lateral incisor exhibiting Oehlers Type I DI and severe EIRR. The tooth was atraumatically extracted, and granulation tissue on the root surface was removed using ultrasonic tips under continuous saline irrigation, followed by apical resection. A 3-mm retrograde filling using mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was placed. All extraoral procedures were completed within 14.5 min. The patient was followed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated complete periapical healing and cortical bone regeneration at the 18-month follow-up. This case demonstrates that IR can be a reliable and conservative option for the management of complex endodontic cases involving dens invaginatus and extensive inflammatory root resorption.

Keywords

• Dens invaginatus
• external inflammatory root resorption
• intentional replantation
• mineral trioxide agregat

Diş Travması Sonrası Gelişen Tip I Dens İnvajinatus ve Eksternal Inflamatuvar Kök Rezorpsiyonunun Kasıtlı Replantasyon ile Tedavisi: 18 Aylık Olgu Sunumu

Öz

Dens invaginatus etkilenen dişlerin pulpal ve periapikal patolojilere yatkınlığını artırabilen nadir görülen gelişimsel dental anomalidir. Eksternal inflamatuvar kök rezorpsiyonu ile komplike olduğunda tedavi süreci belirgin şekilde zorlaşmakta ve prognoz olumsuz yönde etkilenebilmektedir. Kasıtlı replantasyon, cerrahi olmayan endodontik yeniden tedavi veya periapikal cerrahinin uygulanamadığı olgularda konservatif bir tedavi alternatifi olarak gündeme gelmektedir. Bu olgu sunumunda, maksiller lateral kesi ci diş bölgesinde intraoral şişlik şikâyeti bulunan sistemik olarak sağlıklı 20 yaşında erkek hasta değerlendirilmiştir. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi incelemesinde, Oehlers Tip I dens invaginatus ve şiddetli eksternal inflamatuvar kök rezorpsiyonu bulunan maksiller lateral kesici dişle ilişkili yaklaşık 12 mm çapında bir periapikal lezyon saptanmıştır. İlgili diş atravmatik olarak çekilmiş; kök yüzeyindeki granülasyon dokusu, sürekli serum fiz- yolojik irrigasyonu altında ultrasonik uçlar kullanılarak uzak laştırılmış ve apikal rezeksiyon yapılmıştır. Ardından mineral trioksit agregat (MTA) kullanılarak 3 mm derinliğinde retrograd dolgu yapılmıştır ve tüm ekstraoral işlemler 14.5 dakika içerisinde tamamlanmıştır. Hasta 1., 3., 6., 12. ve 18. aylarda klinik ve radyografik olarak takip edilmiştir. 18. ay kontrolünde, radyografik değerlendirmede tam periapikal iyileşme ve kortikal kemik dokusu miktarında artış gözlenmiştir. Bu olgu, dens invaginatus ve yaygın inflamatuar kök rezorpsiyonu ile seyreden kompleks endodontik vakaların tedavisinde, dikkatli klinik uygulama ile kasıtlı replantasyonun güvenilir ve konservatif bir tedavi seçeneği olabileceğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dens invaginatus
• eksternal inflamatuvar kök rezorpsiyonu
• kasıtlı replantasyon
• mineral trioksit agregat

Kaynakça

1. 1. Alkadi M, Almohareb R, Mansour S, et al. Assessment of dens invaginatus and its characteristics in maxillary anterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 19727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99258-0
2. 2. Vier‐Pelisser FV, Pelisser A, Recuero LC, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in the diagnosis, planning and follow up of a type III dens invaginatus case. Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 198-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01956.x
3. 3. Oehlers F. Dens invaginatus (dilated composite odontome): I. Variations of the invagination process and associated anterior crown forms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1957; 10(: 1204-18.
4. 4. Krastl G, Weiger R, Filippi A, et al. European Society of Endodontology position statement: endodontic management of traumatized permanent teeth. Int Endod J. 2021; 54: 1473-81. doi: 10.1111/iej.13543
5. 5. Laux M, Abbott P, Pajarola G, et al. Apical inflammatory root resorption: a correlative radiographic and histological assessment. Int Endod J. 2000; 33: 483-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00338.x
6. 6. Grossman LI. Intentional replantation of teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1966; 72: 1111-8.
7. 7. Becker BD. Intentional replantation techniques: a critical review. J Endod. 2018; 44: 14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.002
8. 8. Bender I, Rossman LE. Intentional replantation of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993; 76: 623-30. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(93)90073-d

9. 9. Mainkar A. A systematic review of the survival of teeth intentionally replanted with a modern technique and cost-effectiveness compared with single-tooth implants. J Endod. 2017; 43: 1963-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.019
10. 10. Choi Y, Bae J, Kim Y, et al. Clinical outcome of intentional replantation with preoperative orthodontic extrusion: a retrospective study. Int Endod J. 2014; 47: 1168-76. doi: 10.1111/iej.12268
11. 11. Pisano M, Di Spirito F, Martina S, et al. Intentional replantation of single-rooted and multi-rooted teeth: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 11: 11. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010011
12. 12. Plotino G, Abella Sans F, Bastos JV, et al. Effectiveness of intentional replantation in managing teeth with apical periodontitis: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2023; 56: 499-509. doi: 10.1111/iej.13727
13. 13. Grahnen H. Dens invaginatus. I. A clinical, roentgenological and genetical study of permanent upper lateral incisors. Odontol Revy. 1959; 10: 115-37.
14. 14. Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN, Hernández SR, et al. Dens invaginatus: clinical implications and antimicrobial endodontic treatment considerations. J Endod. 2022; 48: 161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.11.014
15. 15. Fernandes M, De Ataide I. Nonsurgical management of a large periapical lesion associated with an immature tooth displaying external inflammatory resorption. J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18: 349-53. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.159758
16. 16. Vizgirda PJ, Liewehr FR, Patton WR, et al. A comparison of laterally condensed gutta-percha, thermoplasticized gutta-percha, and mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal filling materials. J Endod. 2004;30(2):103-106.
17. 17. Torabinejad M, Hong C-U, Lee S-J, et al. Investigation of mineral trioxide aggregate for root-end filling in dogs. J Endod. 1995;21(12):603-608.
18. 18. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review - Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010; 36: 16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.006
19. 19. Camilleri J. Characterization of hydration products of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 408-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01370.x
20. 20. Ceylan A, Keskin M, Keskin C. Intentional replantation of a mandibular first molar with post-treatment apical periodontitis: a case report with 12-month follow-up. Int Arch Dent Sci. 2025; 46: 65-9. doi: 10.5505/iads.2025.59489
21. 21. Wu SY, Chen G. A long-term treatment outcome of intentional replantation in Taiwanese population. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021; 120: 346-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.05.01
22. 22. Jang Y, Lee SJ, Yoon TC, et al. Survival rate of teeth with a C-shaped canal after intentional replantation: a study of 41 cases for up to 11 years. J Endod. 2016; 42: 1320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.05.010
23. 23. Torabinejad M, Dinsbach NA, Turman M, et al. Survival of intentionally replanted teeth and implant-supported single crowns: a systematic review. J Endod. 2015;41(7):992-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.004
24. 24. Cho SY, Lee Y, Shin SJ, et al. Retention and healing outcomes after intentional replantation. J Endod. 2016; 42: 909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.006
25. 25. Setzer FC, Shah SB, Kohli MR, et al. Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature - Part 1: comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery. J Endod. 2010; 36: 1757-65. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.007
26. 26. Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R, et al. Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review. J Endod. 2009; 35: 930-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.023
27. 27. Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, et al. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J. 2007; 40: 818-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01299.x