Dental Cila Sistemleri ve Restoratif Materyallerin Yüzey Kalitesi: Materyal Bilimi ve Klinik Gerçekler Üzerine Geleneksel Bir Derleme

Öz

Restoratif diş hekimliğinde yüzey pürüzlülüğü; plak birikimi, diş eti sağlığı ve renk stabilitesini etkileyen kritik bir belirleyicidir. Ra değerlerinin 0,2 µm eşik değerini aşması, bakteriyel adezyonu ve sekonder çürük riskini önemli ölçüde artırmaktadır. Bu derleme, güncel dental polisaj sistemlerini sınıflandırmayı, aşındırma mekanizmalarını aydınlatmayı ve farklı restoratif materyaller üzerindeki klinik etkinliklerini güncel literatür ışığında değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Polisaj sistemleri, aşındırıcı bileşimlerine (alüminyum oksit, elmas, silikon karbür) ve uygulama protokollerine göre değişkenlik göstermektedir. Literatür analizi sonucunda, tek aşamalı elmas emdirilmiş sistemlerin klinik zaman verimliliği sunmasına rağmen, ardışık gren boyutunu azaltma prensibini izleyen çok aşamalı protokollerin mikroskobik düzensizliklerin giderilmesinde halen "altın standart" olduğu saptanmıştır. Restorasyonun "cilalanabilirliği" (polishability), doğrudan dolgu-matriks yapısı tarafından belirlenmektedir; özellikle nanofil kompozitler, "seçici kopma" (plucking) ve yüzey çıkıntılarına yatkın mikrohibritlere kıyasla daha homojen aşınma ve üstün parlaklık koruma özellikleri sergilemektedir. Ayrıca; dönme hızı, basınç dinamikleri ve suyla soğutma gibi operatöre bağlı değişkenler, termal hasarı önlemede ve yüzey bütünlüğünü korumada hayati rol oynamaktadır. Pürüzsüz bir restorasyon yüzeyi elde etmek sadece estetik bir iyileştirme değil, aynı zamanda uzun vadeli başarı için biyolojik bir zorunluluktur. Tüm materyaller için geçerli evrensel bir polisaj sistemi bulunmamaktadır; bu nedenle klinisyenler materyale özgü protokolleri benimsemelidir. Bitirme ve polisaj işlemleri; periodontal sağlığın korunması ve estetik stabilitenin sağlanması için elzem olan, restoratif prosedürün "son imzası"nı oluşturmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dental polisaj
• Yüzey pürüzlülüğü
• Kompozit rezinler
• Bakteriyel adezyon
• Estetik diş hekimliği

Destekleyen Kurum

Yazarlar, bu çalışma için herhangi bir destek almadıklarını beyan ederler.

Proje Numarası

YOKTUR

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma literatür derlemesi niteliğinde olduğundan, herhangi bir etik kurul onayı gerektirmemektedir. Helsinki Bildirgesi prensiplerine uygun olarak hazırlanmıştır.

Teşekkür

Yazarların teşekkür edeceği herhangi bir kişi veya kurum bulunmamaktadır.

Dental Polishing Systems and Surface Quality of Restorative Materials: A Narrative Review of Material Science and Clinical Realities

Öz

Surface roughness (Ra) in restorative dentistry is a critical determinant affecting plaque accumulation, gingival health, and color stability. Ra values exceeding the 0.2 µm threshold significantly increase bacterial adhesion and secondary caries risk. This narrative review aims to classify contemporary dental polishing systems, elucidate their abrasive mechanisms, and evaluate their clinical efficacy across different restorative materials in light of current literature. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for articles published primarily between 2002 and 2024. Keywords including 'dental polishing', 'surface roughness', 'resin composites', and 'bacterial adhesion' were utilized to identify relevant in vitro and clinical studies. Following the literature analysis, it was observed that polishing systems vary by abrasive composition (aluminum oxide, diamond, silicon carbide) and application protocols. Furthermore, the review emphasizes that while one-step diamond-impregnated systems offer clinical time efficiency, multi-step protocols following sequential grit reduction remain the "gold standard" for eliminating microscopic irregularities. Achieving a smooth restoration surface is not merely an esthetic enhancement but a biological necessity for long-term success. No universal polishing system is suitable for all materials; therefore, clinicians must adopt material-specific protocols. Finishing and polishing constitute the "final signature" of the restorative procedure, essential for preserving periodontal health and ensuring esthetic stability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dental polishing
• Surface roughness
• Resin composites
• Bacterial adhesion
• Esthetic dentistry

Destekleyen Kurum

The authors declare that no support was received for this study.

Proje Numarası

YOKTUR

Etik Beyan

As this article is a literature review, ethics committee approval is not required. The study was prepared in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Teşekkür

The authors have no acknowledgements to declare.

Kaynakça

1. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003
2. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011; 27: 29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020
3. Kaizer MR, de Oliveira-Ogliari A, Cenci MS, et al. Do nanofill or submicron composites show improved smoothness and gloss? A systematic review of in vitro studies. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: E41-78. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.001
4. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997; 13: 258-69. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80038-3
5. Hauss Monteiro DD, Valentim PT, Elias DC, et al. Effect of surface treatments on staining and roughness of bleached enamel. Indian J Dent Res. 2019; 30: 393-8. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_233_16
6. Da Costa J, Ferracane J, Paravina RD, et al. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007; 19: 214-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00104.x
7. Soto-Montero JR, de Castro EF, Romano BC, et al. Color stability, surface roughness and microhardness of composites submitted to mouthrinsing action. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012; 28: E20200055. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000200013
8. de Carvalho Panzeri Pires-de-Souza F, da Fonseca Roberti Garcia L, de Moraes Rego Roselino L, et al. Color stability of silorane-based composites submitted to accelerated artificial ageing-an in situ study. J Dent. 2011; 39: E18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.03.003

9. Chourigyer Z, Kabbaj H. Finishing and polishing of direct composite restorations: a review of the latest developments. Int J Dent Oral Health. 2021; 7: 25-31.
10. Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, et al. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. Oper Dent. 2011; 36: 392-400.
11. Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51: 379-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2006.12.002
12. Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J. 2004; 196: 42-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810881
13. Barakah HM, Taher NM. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and rough surface nanocomposite resin material. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 625-31. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.007
14. Oliveira GU, Mondelli RF, Charantola Rodrigues M, et al. Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012; 20: 510-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000500003
15. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed. St. Louis, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012.
16. Scheibe KG, Almeida KG, Medeiros IS, et al. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17: 21-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000100005
17. Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2007; 32: 185-92. doi: 10.2341/06-56
18. Jung M. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat-pressed glass ceramic. Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 175-83.
19. Türkün LS, Türkün M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent. 2004; 29: 203-11.
20. Rodrigues-Junior SA, Chemin P, Piaia PP, et al. Surface roughness and gloss of actual composites as polished with different systems. Oper Dent. 2015; 40: 418-29. doi: 10.2341/14-014L
21. Nagem Filho H, D'Azevedo MT, Nagem HD, et al. Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent J. 2003; 14: 37-41. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402003000100007
22. Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface roughness of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent. 1997; 22: 260-5.
23. Endo T, Finger WJ, Kanehira M, et al. Surface texture and roughness of polished nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2010; 29: 213-23. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2009-019
24. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Ohmiti K, et al. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load. Dent Mater. 2010; 26: 306-19. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.152
25. Hachiya Y, Iwaku M, Hosoda H, et al. Relation of finish to discoloration of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52: 811-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(84)80010-4
26. Valdez-Valera AS, Ponte-Anancusi CE, Chávez-Méndez MA, et al. Effect of protein supplements on the surface roughness of three nanohybrid composite resins: in vitro study. 2026. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28277.03043
27. Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007; 19: 265-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00116.x
28. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134: 1382-90. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0054
29. Berger SB, Palialol AR, Cavalli V, et al. Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of composite resins after finishing and polishing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011; 23: 34-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00376.x
30. Alfawaz Y. Impact of polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017; 18: 647-51. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2100
31. Costa TR, Ferreira SQ, Klein-Junior CA, et al. Durability of surface treatments and intermediate agents used for repair of a polished composite. Oper Dent. 2010; 35: 231-7. doi: 10.2341/09-216-L
32. Yap AU, Ng JJ, Yap SH, et al. Surface finish of resin-modified and highly viscous glass ionomer cements produced by new one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2004; 29: 87-91.
33. Preis V, Weiser F, Handel G, et al. Wear performance of monolithic dental ceramics with different surface treatments. Quintessence Int. 2013; 44: 393-405. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a29151
34. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, et al. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study. Dent Mater. 1994; 10: 353-62. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90059-0
35. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, et al. Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 12-8. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00014-3
36. Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, et al. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 22-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60005-0
37. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, et al. In vitro characterization of two laboratory-processed resin composites. Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 393-8. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00082-9
38. Yousef M, Abo El Naga A. Color stability of different restoratives after exposure to coloring agents. J Am Sci. 2012; 8: 20-6.
39. Makkeyah F, Alhalabi F, Limpuangthip N, et al. Effect of two different intraoral polishing systems on surface roughness, color stability, and bacterial accumulation of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic. Eur J Dent. 2024; 18: 1069-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1779423
40. Benalcazar-Jalkh EB, Cunha VS, Bergamo ETP, et al. Finishing technique effect on strength of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic. Eur J Oral Sci. 2024; 132: E12964. doi: 10.1111/eos.12964
41. Khoramian Esfahani MS, Ahmadi G, Esmaeili B. Effect of polishing versus glazing of CAD-CAM ceramics on wear and surface roughness of opposing composite resin. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024: 21: 18.
42. Aktu A, Ulusoy N. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness and color stability of aged and stained bulk-fill resin composites. Materials (Basel). 2024; 17: 3576. doi: 10.3390/ma17143576