Evaluation of Immediate Post-Polymerization Color Change in One-Shade and Multi-Shade Composite Resins Polymerized with Different Light-Curing Units

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different light-curing units on the immediate post-polymerization color change of one-shade and multi-shade composite resins. Material and Methods Eight composite resins, comprising 4 universal one-shade (Omnichroma, Charisma Diamond One, Essentia Universal, and Vittra APS Unique) and 4 multi-shade composite resins (Estelite Sigma Quick, Gænial Universal Injectable, Optishade Universal, and Filtek Ultimate) were evaluated. Standardized specimens were prepared using 8 mm-diameter, 2 mm-thickness Teflon molds (n = 10). Baseline color measurements were obtained with a contact-type spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade Compact) before polymerization. Then the specimens were polymerized using 4 different light-curing units (Elipar S10, VALO Cordless, Woodpecker LED.E, and Woodpecker iLed), and second color measurements were performed. Color differences were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula. Data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests, with α = 0.05. Results Statistically significant differences in color change were observed among the tested composite resins and light-curing units (P ≤ 0.05). The ΔE00 values ranged from 3.75 to 13.93. The most significant color change was detected in the Omnichroma group polymerized with the Woodpecker iLed unit (ΔE00 = 13.93). In contrast, Estelite Sigma Quick demonstrated the lowest color change when cured with the VALO Cordless (ΔE00 = 3.75). Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, both the type of composite resin and the light-curing units significantly influenced post-polymerization color change. Therefore, shade selection should be performed after polymerization, and the same light-curing unit should be used for polymerization to achieve optimal aesthetic outcomes in clinical practice.

Keywords

• Color change
• composite resin
• light-curing unit
• polymerization

Farklı Işık Cihazları ile Polimerize Edilen Tek Renkli ve Çok Renkli Kompozit Rezinlerde Polimerizasyon Sonrası Anlık Renk Değişiminin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı ışık cihazlarının tek renkli ve çok renkli kompozit rezinlerde polimerizasyon sonrası anlık renk değişimi üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler Çalışmada, dördü tek renkli universal kompozit (Omnichroma, Charisma Diamond One, Essentia Universal ve Vittra APS Unique) ve dördü çok renkli kompozit rezin (Estelite Sigma Quick, Gænial Universal Injectable, Optishade Universal, Filtek Ultimate) olmak üzere toplam 8 kompozit rezin değerlendirilmiştir. Standart örnekler, 8 mm çapında ve 2 mm derinliğinde silikon kalıplar kullanılarak hazırlanmıştır (n = 10). Polimerizasyon öncesinde, temas tipi bir spektrofotometre (Vita Easyshade Compact) ile başlangıç renk ölçümleri yapılmıştır. Daha sonra örnekler 4 farklı ışık cihazı (Elipar S10, VALO Cordless, Woodpecker LED.E ve Woodpecker iLed) kullanılarak polimerize edilmiş ve ikinci renk ölçümleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Renk farkları CIEDE2000 formülü kullanılarak hesaplanmıştır. Veriler, iki yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey post-hoc testleri kullanılarak α = 0,05 anlamlılık düzeyinde analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular Test edilen kompozit rezinler ve ışık cihazları arasında renk değişimi açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar saptanmıştır (P ≤ 0.05). ΔE00 değerleri 3.75 ile 13.93 arasında değişmiştir. En yüksek renk değişimi, Woodpecker iLed cihazı ile polimerize edilen Omnichroma grubunda (ΔE00 = 13.93) gözlenirken, en düşük renk değişimi VALO Cordless cihazı ile polimerize edilen Estelite Sigma Quick grubunda (ΔE00 = 3.75) görülmüştür. Sonuç Bu çalışmanın sınırlılıkları dahilinde, hem kompozit rezin tipi hem de kullanılan ışık cihazı polimerizasyon sonrası renk değişimini anlamlı derecede etkilemiştir. Bu nedenle, klinik uygulamada optimal estetik sonuçlar elde etmek amacıyla renk seçimi polimerizasyon sonrasında yapılmalı ve polimerizasyon için de aynı ışık cihazı kullanılmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Renk değişimi
• kompozit rezin
• ışık cihazı
• polimerizasyon

Kaynakça

1. 1. Leal CFC, Miranda SB, Alves Neto EL, et al. Color stability of single-shade resin composites in direct restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16: 2172. doi: 10.3390/polym16152172
2. 2. Korkut B, Dokumacigil G, Murat N, et al. Effect of Polymerization on the color of resin composites. Oper Dent. 2022; 47: 514-26. doi: 10.2341/20-155-L
3. 3. Dietschi D, Fahl N. Shading concepts and layering techniques to master direct anterior composite restorations: an update. Br Dent J. 2016; 221: 765-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.944
4. 4. Pereira Sanchez N, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Instrumental and visual evaluation of the color adjustment potential of resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31: 465-70. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12488
5. 5. Ahmed MA, Jouhar R, Khurshid Z. Smart monochromatic composite: a literature review. Int J Dent. 2022; 2022: 2445394. doi: 10.1155/2022/2445394
6. 6. Castro FLA, Durand LB. Influence of cavity wall thickness on the color adjustment potential of single-shade resin composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 2024; 155: 605-13. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2024.03.006
7. 7. Iyer RS, Babani VR, Yaman P, et al. Color match using instrumental and visual methods for single-, group-, and multi-shade composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33: 394-400. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12621
8. 8. Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2004; 32: 3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.013

9. 9. Sharma G, Wu W, Dalal EN. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Res Appl. 2005; 30: 21-30. doi: 10.1002/col.20070
10. 10. Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27: S1-9. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12149
11. 11. Kim IJ, Lee YK. Changes in color and color parameters of dental resin composites after polymerization. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007; 80: 541-6. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30628
12. 12. Gao F, Berzins DW. Color change in commercial resin composites with different photoinitiators. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12: 1047. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12101047
13. 13. Rueggeberg FA, Giannini M, Arrais CAG, et al. Light curing in dentistry and clinical implications: a literature review. Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31: E61. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0061
14. 14. Rencz A, Hickel R, Ilie N. Curing efficiency of modern LED units. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16: 173-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0498-3
15. 15. Çelik EU, Aladağ A, Türkün LŞ, et al. Color changes of dental resin composites before and after polymerization and storage in water. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011; 23: 179-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00421.x
16. 16. Prodan CM, Gasparik C, Ruiz-López J, et al. Color and translucency variation of a one-shaded resin-based composite after repeated heating cycles and staining. Materials (Basel). 2023; 16: 3793. doi: 10.3390/ma16103793
17. 17. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146
18. 18. The Jamovi Project. Jamovi (Version 2.6) [Computer software]. Sydney, Australia, 2025. Available from: https://www.jamovi.org
19. 19. Howard B, Wilson ND, Newman SM, et al. Relationships between conversion, temperature and optical properties during composite photopolymerization. Acta Biomater. 2010; 6: 2053-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.006
20. 20. Shim JE, Kim HJ, Oh S, et al. Optical and mechanical characteristics of one-shade composite resins. J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16: 419. doi: 10.3390/jfb16110419
21. 21. Paravina RD, Pérez MM, Ghinea R. Acceptability and perceptibility thresholds in dentistry: A comprehensive review of clinical and research applications. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31: 103-12. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12465
22. 22. Rocha MG, Maucoski C, Roulet JF, et al. Depth of cure of 10 resin-based composites light-activated using a laser diode, multi-peak, and single-peak light-emitting diode curing lights. J Dent. 2022; 122: 104141. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104141
23. 23. Hasanain FA, Nassar HM. Utilizing light cure units: a concise narrative review. Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13: 1596. doi: 10.3390/polym13101596
24. 24. Marović D, Daničić P, Bojo G, et al. Polywave light-curing units: effect on light transmission of composite without alternative photoinitiators. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024; 58: 30-8. doi: 10.15644/asc58/1/3
25. 25. AlShaafi MM. Factors affecting polymerization of resin-based composites: a literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2017; 29: 48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.01.002
26. 26. Santini A, Miletic V, Swift MD, et al. Degree of conversion and microhardness of TPO-containing resin-based composites cured by polywave and monowave LED units. J Dent. 2012; 40: 577-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.007
27. 27. Shimokawa C, Sullivan B, Turbino ML, et al. Influence of emission spectrum and irradiance on light curing of resin-based composites. Oper Dent. 2017; 42: 537-47. doi: 10.2341/16-349-L
28. 28. del Mar Pérez M, Saleh A, Pulgar R, et al. Light polymerization-dependent changes in color and translucency of resin composites. Am J Dent. 2009; 22: 97-101.
29. 29. Mondelli RFL, Tavares FC, Medina-Valdivia JR, et al. Color changes induced by light curing of resin composites. Rev Sul-Brasileira Odontol. 2016; 13: 241-7. doi:10.21726/rsbo.v13i4.345
30. 30. Kobayashi S, Nakajima M, Furusawa K, et al. Color adjustment potential of single-shade resin composite to various-shade human teeth: effect of structural color phenomenon. Dent Mater J. 2021; 40: 1033-40. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2020-364
31. 31. Ghinea R, Ugarte-Alvan L, Yebra A, et al. Influence of surface roughness on the color of dental-resin composites. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2011; 12: 552-62. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1000374
32. 32. Hatırlı H, Yaşa B, Gök A, et al. Evaluation of color change after polymerisation of esthetic restoratives with different composition. Int Arch Dent Sci. 2015; 36: 79-85. doi: 10.5505/eudfd.2015.50023