Çift yönlü katı-faz ekstraksiyonu ve sıvı kromatografi-ardışık kütle spektrometresi ile kan örneklerinde sentetik kannabinoidlerin tayini

Öz

AMAÇ: Son yıllarda kullanımı hızla artan sentetik kannabinoidlerin kan örneklerinde tayini için hassas ve güvenilir bir sıvı-kromatografisi ardışık kütle spektrometrik LC-MS/MS metot sunulması amaçlanmıştır.YÖNTEM: Kan örnekleri çift-yönlü katı faz ekstraksiyonu BDSPE ile ekstrakte edildikten sonra LC-MS/MS’e enjekte edilmiştir. Toplam olarak 57 adet sentetik kannabinoid ve metabolitleri Poroshell 2,7μm 150×4.6mm analitik kolonu ile gradiyent akış programı uygulanarak kantitatif olarak tayin edilmiştir. Metot validasyonu uluslararası rehberlere göre yapılmıştır. BULGULAR: Sadece 0,5mL kan örneği kullanılarak, tespit LOD ve tayin LOQ sınırları 0,3 ve 0,5ng/mL veya daha düşük olarak belirlenmiştir. Metot 0,5-100ng/mL arasında en düşük 0,990 belirleme katsayısı ile lineerdir. Geri kazanım oranları %54- %115 arasında ve ortalama %87’dir. Matriks etkisi analiz hassasiyetini negatif olarak etkilememekte, kesinlik ve doğruluk kabul edilebilir seviyelerdedir.SONUÇ: Her bir analitin düşük konsantrasyonlarda olsa bile tayinine imkân sağlayan metot adli ve klinik toksikoloji laboratuarlarının rutin uygulamalarında kullanılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sentetik kannabinoid, adli toksikoloji, LC-MS/MS, metot validasyonu

An LC-MS/MS method for determination of synthetic cannabinoids in human blood using bidirectional solid-phase extractiont

Öz

OBJECTIVE: To present a sensitive and reliable liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry LC–MS/MS method for determination of synthetic cannabinoids in blood samples is aimed in this study. METHODS: The samples were prepared using a bidirectional solid phase extraction BD-SPE followed by injected to LC-MS/MS. A total of 57 synthetic cannabinoids and metabolites were separated on an Agilent Poroshell 2.7μm 150 × 4.6 mm column with gradient program and determined quantitatively. The method validation was done according to international guidelines.RESULTS: Limits of detection for all target analytes are 0.3 ng/mL or better, with only 0.5 mL of specimen used for analysis. The method is linear from 0.5 to 100 ng/mL with a correlation coefficient R2 greater than 0.990. Recovery values were in the ranges of 54.0% and 115.0% with a mean of 87%. Matrix effects did not negatively affect analytical sensitivity and precision and accuracy were acceptable at any quality control level.CONCLUSION: The method allowing the determination of each analyte, even at low concentrations, can be used in the routine applications of forensic and clinical toxicology laboratories.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Synthetic cannabinoid, forensic toxicology, LC-MS/MS, validation

Kaynakça

1. UNODC, World Drug Report 2015. New York, 2015 Available at: https://www.unodc.org/documents/wdr2015/World_Drug_ Report_2015.pdf. cited: 4 March 2018 .
2. The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction; c2009. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, EMCDDA, Understanding the ‘Spice’ phenomenon. 2009. Available at: http://www.emcdda.europa. eu/publications/thematic-papers/spice. cited: 4 March 2018 .
3. UNODC, Synthetic cannabinoids in herbal products. 2011. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/documents/scientific/ Synthetic_Cannabinoids.pdf. cited: 4 March 2018 .
4. Hudson S, Ramsey J. The emergence and analysis of synthetic cannabinoids. Drug Test Anal 2011;3 7-8 :466-78.
5. Auwärter V, Dresen S, Weinmann W, Müller M, Pütz M, Ferreirós N. ‘Spice’ and other herbal blends: harmless incense or cannabinoid designer drugs? J Mass Spectrom 2009;44 5 :832-7.
6. The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction; c2009. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, EMCDDA, European Drug Report, 2016. Available at: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/2637/TDAT16001TRN.pdf. cited: 4 March 2018 .
7. Rockville, MD. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. December 4, 2012 . Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits Involving Synthetic Cannabinoids. Available at: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/SR-1378/ SR-1378.pdf. cited: December 2017 .
8. Law R, Schier J, Martin C, Chang A, Wolkin A. CDC , C.f.D.C., 2015. Notes from the Field: Increase in Reported Adverse Health Effects Related to Synthetic Cannabinoid Use − United States, January-May 2015. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/ preview/mmwrhtml/mm6422a5.htm. cited: December 2017 .

9. Uchiyama N, Kikura-Hanajiri R, Ogata J, Goda Y. Chemical analysis of synthetic cannabinoids as designer drugs in herbal products. Forensic Sci Int 2010;198:31-8.
10. Logan BK, Reinhold LE, Xu A, Diamond FX. Identification of synthetic cannabinoids in herbal incense blends in the United States. J Forensic Sci 2012;57:1168-80.
11. Uchiyama N, Kawamura M, Kikura-Hanajiri R, Goda Y. URB754: a new class of designer drug and 12 synthetic cannabinoids detected in illegal products. Forensic Sci Int 2012;227:21-32.
12. Hudson S, Ramsey J, King L, Timbers S, Maynard S, Dargan PI, Wood DM. Use of high-resolution accurate mass spectrometry to detect reported and previously unreported cannabinomimetics in ‘herbal high’ products. J Anal Toxicol 2010;34:252-60.
13. Dresen S, Ferreiros N, Pütz M, Westphal F, Zimmermann R, Auwarter V. Monitoring of herbal mixtures potentially containing synthetic cannabinoids as psychoactive compounds. J Mass Spectrom 2010;45 10 :1186-94.
14. Moosmann B, Kneisel S, Girreser U, Brecht V, Westphal F, Auwarter V. Separation and structural characterization of the synthetic cannabinoids JWH-412 and 1-[ 5-fluoropentyl -1Hindol-3yl]- 4-methylnaphthalen-1-yl methanone using GC–MS, NMR analysis and a flash chromatography system. Forensic Sci Int 2012;220;e17-22. Sobolevsky T, Prasolov I, Rodchenkov G. Study on the phase I metabolism of novel synthetic cannabinoids, APICA and its fluorinated analogue. Drug Test Anal 2015;7 2 :131-42.
15. Park Y, Lee C, Lee H, Pyo J, Jo J, Lee J, Choi H, Kim S, Hong RS, Park Y, Hwang BY, Choe S, Jung JH. Identification of a new synthetic cannabinoid in a herbal mixture: 1-butyl-3- 2- methoxybenzoyl indole. Forensic Toxicol 2013;31 2 :187-96.
16. Angerer V, Bisel P, Moosmann B, Auwarter V. Separation and structural characterization of the new synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018 cyclohexyl methyl derivative ‘‘NE-CHMIMO’’ using flash chromatography, GC-MS, IR and NMR spectroscopy. Forensic Sci Int 2016;266:e93-98.
17. Lee JH, Park HN, Leem TS, Jeon J, Cho S, Lee J, Baek SY. Identification of new synthetic cannabinoid analogue APINAC adamantan-1-yl 1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxylate with other synthetic cannabinoid MDMB N -Bz-F in illegal products. Forensic Toxicol;2017:35 1 :45-55.
18. Uchiyama N, Asakawa K, Hanajiri RK, Tsutsumi T, Hakamatsuka T. A new pyrazole-carboxamide type synthetic cannabinoid AB-CHFUPYCA [N- 1-amino-3- methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl -1- cyclohexylmethyl -3- 4- fluorophenyl -1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide] identified in illegal products. Forensic Toxicol 2015;33 2 :367-73.
19. Schaefer N, Kettner M, Laschke MW, Schlote J, Peters B, Bregel D, Menger MD, Maurer HH, Ewald AH, Schmidt PH. Simultaneous LC-MS/MS determination of JWH-210, RCS-4, Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol, and their main metabolites in pig and human serum, whole blood, and urine for comparing pharmacokinetic data. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015;407 13 :3775-86.
20. Ozturk S, Ozturk YE, Yeter O, Alpertunga B. Application of a validated LC–MS/MS method for JWH-073 and its metabolites in blood and urine in real forensic cases. Forensic Sci Int 2015;257:165-71.
21. Ozturk YE, Yeter O, Alpertunga B. Validation of JWH-018 and its metabolites in blood and urine by UPLC–MS/MS: Monitoring in forensic cases. Forensic Sci Int 2015;248:88-93.
22. Yeakel JK, Logan BK. Blood synthetic cannabinoid concentrations in cases of suspected impaired driving. J Anal Toxicol 2013;37 8 :547-51.
23. Kneisel S, Auwärter V. Analysis of 30 synthetic cannabinoids in serum by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry after liquid–liquid extraction. J Mass Spectrom 2012;47:825-35.
24. Hutter M, Kneisel S, Auwärter V, Neukamm MA. Determination of 22 synthetic cannabinoids in human hair by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 2012;903:95-101.
25. Salomone A, Gerace E, D’Urso F, Corcia DD, Vincenti M. Simultaneous analysis of several synthetic cannabinoids, THC, CBD and CBN, in hair by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Method validation and application to real samples. J Mass Spectrom 2012;47 5 :604-10.
26. Kima J, Park Y, Park M, Kim E, Yang W, Baeck S, Lee S, Han S. Simultaneous determination of five naphthoylindole-based synthetic cannabinoids and metabolites and their deposition in human and rat hair. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2015;102 5 :162-75.
27. Meejung P, Seonghoon Y, Jaesin L. Determination of XLR-11 and its metabolites in hair by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2015;114 1 :184-9.
28. Montesano C, Simeoni MC, Curini R, Sergi M, Lo Sterzo C, Compagnone D. Determination of illicit drugs and metabolites in oral fluid by microextraction on packed sorbent coupled with LC-MS/MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015;407 13 :3647-58.
29. Kneisel S, Auwärter V, Kempf J. Analysis of 30 synthetic cannabinoids in oral fluid using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal 2013;5 8 :657-69.
30. Strano-Rossi S, Anzillotti L, Castrignanò E, Romolo FS, Chiarotti M. Ultra high performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry screening method for direct analysis of designer drugs, “spice” and stimulants in oral fluid. J Chromatogr A 2012;1258:37-42.
31. de Castro A, Piñeiro B, Lendoiro E, Cruz A, López-Rivadulla M. Quantification of selected synthetic cannabinoids and Δ9- tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid by liquid chromatography– tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2013;1295:99- 106.
32. Wohlfarth A, Scheidweiler KB, Chen XH, Liu HF, Huestis MA. Qualitative confirmation of 9 synthetic cannabinoids and 20 metabolites in human urine using LC-MS/MS and library search. Anal Chem 2013;85 7 :3730-8.
33. Wohlfarth A, Scheidweiler KB, Castaneto M, Gandhi AS, Desrosiers NA, Klette KL, Martin TM, Huestis MA. Urinary prevalence, metabolite detection rates, temporal patterns and evaluation of suitable LC-MS/MS targets to document synthetic cannabinoid intake in US military urine specimens. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53 3 :423-34.
34. Scheidweiler KB, Jarvis MJ, Huestis MA. Nontargeted SWATH acquisition for identifying 47 synthetic cannabinoid metabolites in human urine by liquid chromatography-highresolution tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015;407 3 :883-97.
35. Jang M, Shin I, Kim J. Simultaneous quantification of 37 synthetic cannabinoid metabolites in human urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Forensic Toxicol 2015 2 ;33:221-34.
36. de Jager AD, Warner JV, Henman M, Ferguson W, Hall A. LC–MS/MS method for the quantitation of metabolites of eight commonly-used synthetic cannabinoids in human urine–An Australian perspective. J Chromatogr B 2012;897:22-31.
37. Scheidweiler KB, Huestis MA. Simultaneous quantification of 20 synthetic cannabinoids and 21 metabolites, and semi-quantification of 12 alkyl hydroxy metabolites in human urine by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2014;1327:105-17.
38. Gambaro V, Arnoldi S, Bellucci S, Casagni E, Dell’Acqua L, Fumagalli L, Pallavicini M, Roda G, Rusconi C, Valoti E V. Characterization of in vitro metabolites of JWH-018, JWH-073 and their 4-methyl derivatives, markers of the abuse of these synthetic cannabinoids. J Chromatogr B 2014;957:68-76.
39. Grigoryev A, Melnik A, Savchuk S, Simonov A, Rozhanets V. Gas and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry studies on the metabolism of the synthetic phenylacetylindole cannabimimetic JWH-250, the psychoactive component of smoking mixtures. J Chromatogr B 2011; 879:2519-26.
40. Lovett DP, Yanes EG, Herbelin TW, Knoerzer TA, Levisky JA. Structure elucidation and identification of a common metabolite fornaphthoylindole-based synthetic cannabinoids using LC-TOF and comparison to a synthetic reference Standard. Forensic Sci Int 2013;226:81-7.
41. Shevyrin V, Melkozerov V, Nevero A, Eltsov O, Shafran Y. Analytical characterization of some synthetic cannabinoids, derivatives of indole-3-carboxylic acid. Forensic Sci Int 2013;232:1-10.
42. Choi H, Heo S, Kim E, Hwang B.Y, Lee C, Lee J. Identification of 1-pentylindol-3-yl - 2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl methanone and its 5-pentyl fluorinatedanalog in herbal incense seized for drug trafficking. Forensic Toxicol 2013;31 1 :86-92.
43. Shevyrin V, Melkozerov V, Nevero A, Eltsov O, Morzherin Y, Shafran Y. 3-Naphthoylindazoles and 2-naphthoylbenzoimidazoles as novel chemical groups of synthetic cannabinoids: Chemical structure elucidation, analytical characteristics and identification of the first representatives in smoke mixtures. Forensic Sci Int 2014;242:72-80.
44. Shevyrin V, Melkozerov V, Nevero A, Eltsov O, Shafran Y, Morzherin Y, Lebedev AT. Identification and analytical characteristics of synthetic cannabinoids with an indazole-3- carboxamide structure bearing a N-1-methoxycarbonylalkyl group. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015;407 21 :6301-15.
45. Shevyrin V, Melkozerov V, Nevero A, Eltsov O, Shafran Y, Morzherin Y. Synthetic cannabinoid 3-benzyl-5-[1- 2- pyrrolidin-1-ylethyl -1H-indol-3-yl]-1,2,4-oxadiazole. The first detection in illicit market of new psychoactive substances. Forensic Sci Int 2016;259:95-100.
46. Blakey K, Boyd S, Atkinson S, Wolf J, Slottje PM, Goodchild K, McGowan J. Identification of the novel synthetic cannabimimetic 8-quinolinyl 4-methyl-3- 1-piperidinylsulfonyl benzoate QMPSB and other designer drugs in herbal incense. Forensic Sci Int 2016;260:40-53.
47. Yeter O. Identification of the synthetic cannabinoid 1- 4-cyanobutyl -N- 2-phenylpropan-2-yl -1H-indazole-3- carboxamide CUMYL-4CN-BINACA in plant material and quantification in post-mortem blood samples. J Anal Toxicol 2017;41 9 :720-8.
48. Diao X, Carlier J, Zhu M. Pang S, Kronstrand R, Scheidweiler KB, Huestis MA. In vitro and in vivo human metabolism of a new synthetic cannabinoid NM-2201 CBL-2201 . Forensic Toxicol 2017;35 1 :20-32.
49. Diao X, Scheidweiler KB, Wohlfarth A, Zhu M, Pang S, Huestis MA.Strategies to distinguish new synthetic cannabinoid FUBIMINA BIM-2201 intake from its isomer THJ-2201: Metabolism of FUBIMINA in human hepatocytes Forensic Toxicol 2016;34 2 :256-67.
50. Kim JH, Kim HS, Kong TY, Lee JY, Kim JY, In MK, Lee HS. In vitro metabolism of a novel synthetic cannabinoid, EAM-2201, in human liver microsomes and human recombinant cytochrome P450s. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2016;119:50-8.
51. Sobolevsky T, Prasolov I, Rodchenkov G. Study on the phase I metabolism of novel synthetic cannabinoids, APICA and its fluorinated analogue. Drug Test Anal 2015;7 2 :131-42.
52. Fietzke, M, Thomas, A, Beike J, Rothschild MA, Thevis M, Bender K. In vitro elucidation of the metabolic profile of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists JWH-175 and JWH176. Forensic Toxicol 2016;34 2 :353-62.
53. De Brabanter N, Esposito S, Tudela E, Lootens L, Meuleman P, Leroux-Roels G, Deventer K, Van Eenoo P. In vivo and in vitro metabolism of the synthetic cannabinoid JWH-200. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2013;27 18 :2115-26.
54. Ozturk YE, Yeter O, Ozturk S, Karakus G, Ates I, Buyuk Y, Yurdun T. Detection of metabolites of the new synthetic cannabinoid CUMYL-4CN-BINACA in authentic urine samples and human liver microsomes using high-resolution mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal 2017;1-11.
55. FDA Bioanalytical Method Validation Guide 2011. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM368107.pdf cited: 4 March 2018 .
56. Peters FT, Maurer HH. Bioanalytical method validation and its implications for forensic and clinical toxicology - A review. Accred Qual Assur 2002;7 11 :441-9.
57. Eurachem the fitness for purpose of analytical methods a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics. Available at: https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories /Guides/ pdf/MV_guide_2nd_ed_EN.pdf cited: 4 March 2018 .
58. Matuszewski BK, Constanzer ML, Chavez-Eng CM. Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC–MS/MS. Anal Chem 2003;75 13 :3019-30.
59. Banister SD, Longworth M, Kevin R, Sachdev S, Santiago M, Stuart J, Mack J.B.C, Glass M, McGregor IS, Connor M, Kassiou M. Pharmacology of valinate and tert-leucinate synthetic cannabinoids 5F-AMBICA, 5F-AMB, 5F-ADB, AMB-FUBINACA, MDMB-FUBINACA, MDMB-CHMICA, and their analogues. ACS Chem Neurosci 2016;7 9 :1241−54.
60. Angerer V, Jacobi S, Franz F, Auwärter VV, Pietsch J. Three fatalities associated with the synthetic cannabinoids 5F-ADB, 5F-PB-22, and AB-CHMINACA. Forensic Sci Int 2017;281:e9-15.
61. Rojek S, Kłys M, Maciów-Głąb M, Kula K. A new challenge in forensic toxicology exemplified by a case of murder under the influence of a synthetic cannabinoid–AM-2201. Leg Med 2017;27:25-31.
62. Adamowicz P, Gieroń J, Gil D, Lechowicz W, Skulska A, Tokarczyk B. The effects of synthetic cannabinoid UR-144 on the human body—A review of 39 cases. Forensic Sci Int 2017;273:e18-21.