Silikon Replika Dayanak ile Ekstraoral Simantasyon Tekniği: Olgu Sunumu

Yıl 2022, , 161 - 165, 18.05.2022

Aybike Kilic , Suat Yaluğ

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1018311

Öz

Dental implantlarda implant ve protetik yapı arasındaki bağlantı vida tutuculu veya siman tutuculu olabilmektedir. Siman retansiyonlu restorasyonlarda abutment ve kuronun bağlantı bölgesindeki simanda oluşacak marjinal sorunlar kemik kaybına yol açabilecek peri-implant hastalıklara sebep olabilir. Artık siman miktarını azaltmak için implant üstü sabit protetik tedavide çeşitli simantasyon teknikleri geliştirilmiştir. Bunlardan biri de ekstraoral replika tekniğidir. Bu olgu sunumunda klinik şartlarda silikon replika dayanak yapımı ve ekstraoral simantasyon tekniği ile simantasyon anlatılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

artık siman, ekstraoral simantasyon, implant destekli siman retansiyonlu protezler

Kaynakça

• 1. Cocchetto R, Resch I, Castagna M, Vincenzi G, Celletti R.The abutment duplication technique: a novel protocol for cementable implant-supported restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Aug;30(4):415-24.
• 2. Seo CW, Seo JM. A technique for minimizing subgingival residual cement by using rubber dam for cement-retained implant crowns. J Prosthet Dent.2017 Feb;117(2):327-328.
• 3. Wang W, Chang J, Wang HM, Gu XH. Effects of precementation on minimizing residual cement around the marginal area of dental implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2019
• 4. Al Amri MD, Al-Johany SS, Al-Qarni MN, Al-Bakri AS, Al- Maflehi NS, Abualsaud HS. Influence of space size of abutment screw access channel on the amount of extruded excess cement and marginal accuracy of cement-retained single implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:263-9.
• 5.Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Maslova N, Puriene A. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:71-6.
• 6. Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:163-201.
• 7. Saleh M, Taşar-Faruk S. Comparing the marginal leakage and retention of implant-supported restorations cemented by four different dental cements. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:1181-8.
• 8. Chee WW, Duncan J, Afshar M, Moshaverinia A. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement- retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:216-21.
• 9. Jagathpal AJ, Vally ZI, Sykes LM, du Toit J. Comparison of excess cement around implant crown margins by using 3 extraoral cementation techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2020:S0022- 3913(20)30295-X. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.016.
• 10. Shadid R, Sadaqa N. A comparison between screw-and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2012;38(3):298- 307. 

• 11. Thomas G. Wilson Jr. The Positive Relationship Between Excess Cement and Peri-Implant Disease: A Prospective Clinical Endoscopic Study. J Periodontol.2009 Sep;80(9):1388-92.
• 12. Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Parker MH. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins.J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:43-7.
• 13. Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1999;14(6):865-8.
• 14. Gapski R, Neugeboren N, Pomeranz AZ, Reissner MW. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: A clinical case report. Int J Oral Max- illofac Implants 2008;23:943-946.
• 15. Ponteriero R, Tonelli MP, Carnevale G, Mombelli A, Nyman SR, Lang NP. Experimentally induced peri-implant mucositis. A clinical study in humans Clin Oral Implants Res.1994 Dec;5(4):254-9.
• 16. Lang NP, Berglundh T, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Pjetursson BE, Salvi GE, Sanz M. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding implant survival and complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im- plants 2004;19(Suppl.):150-154.
• 17. Belser UC, Buser D, Hess D, Schmid B, Bernard JP, Lang NP. Aesthetic implant restorations in partially edentulous patients--a critical appraisal. Periodontology 2000. 1998;17:132-50. 

• 18. Begum Z, Sonika R, Pratik C. Effect of Different Cementation Techniques on Retained Excess Cement and Uniaxial Retention of the Implant-Supported Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Nov-Dec 2014;29(6):1333-7.
• 19. Wadhwani C, Piñeyro A, Hess T, Zhang H, Chung K-H. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1241-6.