Kısa İmplantlar

Yıl 2022, , 340 - 345, 19.09.2022

Afra Nur Nazlı , Yeliz Kılınç , Sedat Çetiner

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1107007

Öz

Diş eksikliklerinin tedavisinde, implantlar 50 yıldan fazla süredir kullanılmaktadır. Geçmişten günümüze tasarım ve uygulama teknikleri açısından fazlasıyla gelişim kaydedilmiştir. Geçmişte mümkün olan en uzun implantın kullanımı tercih edilirken, günümüzde vertikal kemik yetersizliği durumlarında daha karmaşık kemik ogmentasyon yöntemleri ile birlikte uzun implant kullanımı yerine kısa implantlar tercih edilmeye başlanmıştır. Hastaların sistemik durumları her zaman ilave ogmentasyon yöntemlerine uygun olmayabilir. Bununla birlikte kısa implant uygulamalarının; düşük maliyet, uygulama kolaylığı ve tedavi süresi gibi avantajları vardır. Bu derlemede, kısa implantların endikasyonları ve kullanım alanları, güncel literatür bilgileri ışığında anlatılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

başarı oranı, implantoloji, kısa dental implant

Short Implants

Öz

In modern times, implants have been used for over 50 years as a treatment of missing teeth. From past to present, there has been a cumulative progress with regards to design and application techniques. While the use of the longest possible implant was preferred in the past; thanks to more complex bone augmentation methods, short implants have been started to be preferred in case of the vertical bone deficiency. The systemic conditions of the patients might not always be suitable for additional augmentation methods. Nevertheless, applications of short implants have several advantages such as low cost, ease of implementation and length of treatment period. In this review,the indications and usage areas of short implnats are described in the light of current literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

implantology, short dental implant, success rate

Kaynakça

• 1. Block MS. Dental implants: the last 100 years. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2018;76(1):11-26.
• 2. Küçükkurt S. İleri derecede atrofik posterior mandibulanin ekstra kısa (4 mm) implantlarla desteklenen sabit protez ile rehabilitasyonu: iki yıllık takip. Aydın Dental Journal 2018;4(1):9-16.
• 3. Atala MH, Ustaoğlu G, Çetin H. Dental implant tedavisinde başarı faktörlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi 2019;24(1):26-31.
• 4. Çakir M, Karaca İ. İmplant uygulamalari için kret koruma teknikleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2015;25(1):107-118.
• 5. Rameh S, Menhall A, Younes R. Key factors influencing short implant success. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2020;1-13.
• 6. Annibali S, Cristalli M, Dell’Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: a systematic review. Journal of Dental Research 2012;91(1):25-32.
• 7. Lorenz J, Blume M, Korzinskas T, Ghanaati S, Sader RA. Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Implant Dentistry 2019;5(1):3.
• 8. Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Vazouras K, Gholami H, Pagni S, Weber HP. Survival rates of short dental implants (≤ 6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta‐analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2018;29:8-20.
• 9. Vazouras K, de Souza AB, Gholami H, Papaspyridakos P, Pagni S, Weber HP. Effect of time in function on the predictability of short dental implants (≤ 6 mm): A meta‐analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2020;47(3):403-415.
• 10. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2006;17(S2):35-51.
• 11. Lemos CAA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonça MR, Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry 2016;47:8-17.
• 12. Thoma DS, Cha J-K, Jung U-W. Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible: short implants versus long implants in augmented bone. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 2017;47(1):2-12.
• 13. Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone volume. Periodontology 2000 2014;66(1):72-96.
• 14. Young SY, Emanuel KM, Chuang S-K. Short (5.0× 5.0 mm) implant placements and restoration with integrated abutment crowns. Implant Dentistry 2011;20(2):125-130.
• 15. Esfahrood ZR, Ahmadi L, Karami E, Asghari S. Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2017;43(2):70-76.
• 16. Rameh S, Menhall A, Younes R. Key factors influencing short implant success. Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery 2020;24(3):263-275.
• 17. Anitua E, Piñas L, Begoña L, Orive G. Long‐term retrospective evaluation of short implants in the posterior areas: clinical results after 10–12 years. Journal Of Clinical Periodontology 2014;41(4):404-411.
• 18. Anitua E, Orive G. Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow‐up. Journal of Periodontology 2010;81(6):819-826.
• 19. Thoma DS, Haas R, Tutak M, Garcia A, Schincaglia GP, Hämmerle CH. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient‐reported outcomes at 1 year of loading. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2015;42(1):72-80.
• 20. Stafford GL. Short implants had lower survival rates in posterior jaws compared to standard implants. Evidence-based Dentistry 2016;17(4):115-116.
• 21. Uehara PN, Matsubara VH, Igai F, Sesma N, Mukai MK, Araujo MG. Short dental implants (≤ 7mm) versus longer implants in augmented bone area: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The Open Dentistry Journal 2018;12:354.
• 22. Araki H, Nakano T, Ono S, Yatani H. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of extra short implants focusing on implant designs and materials. International Journal of Implant Dentistry 2020;6(1):1-10.
• 23. Cruz RS, Lemos CAdA, Batista VEdS, Olivera HFFv, Gomes JMdL, Pelizzer EP, Short implants versus longer implants with maxillary sinus lift. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brazilian Oral Research. 2018;32.
• 24. Chaware SH, Thakare V, Chaudhary R, Jankar A, Thakkar S, Borse S. The rehabilitation of posterior atrophic maxilla by using the graftless option of short implant versus conventional long implant with sinus graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trial. The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2021;21(1):28.
• 25. Wyatt C, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. International Journal of Oral and Maxilloafacial Implants 1998;13:204–211.
• 26. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Linden U, Bergström C, et al. Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 1999;14(5):639-645.
• 27. Schwartz SR. Short implants: are they a viable option in implant dentistry? Dental Clinics 2015;59(2):317-328.
• 28. Chen S, Ou Q, Wang Y, Lin X. Short implants (5‐8 mm) vs long implants (≥ 10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: A meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2019;46(12):1192-1203.
• 29. Memari Y, Fattahi P, Fattahi A, Eskandarion S, Rakhshan V. Finite element analysis of stress distribution around short and long implants in mandibular overdenture treatment. Dental Research Journal 2020;17(1):25.
• 30. Geramy A, Rokn A, Keshtkar A, Monzavi A, Hashemi HM, Bitaraf T. Comparison of short and standard implants in the posterior mandible: A 3D analysis using finite element method. Journal of Dentistry 2018;15(2):130.
• 31. Slotte C, Grønningsaeter A, Halmøy AM, Öhrnell LO, Mordenfeld A, Isaksson S, et al. Four‐millimeter implants supporting fixed partial dental prostheses in the severely resorbed posterior mandible: two‐year results. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2012;14:e46-e58.
• 32. Esposito M, Cannizarro G, Soardi E, Pellegrino G, Pistilli R, Felice P. 3-year post-loading report of a randomised controlled trial on the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic mandibles: short implants or longer implants in vertically augmented bone. Eur J Oral Implantol 2011;4(4):301-311.
• 33. Amid R, Rasoolzadeh RA, Motlagh AM, Dehnavi F, Kadkhodazadeh M. Stress and strain distribution patterns in bone around splinted standard and short implants placed at the crestal level and subcrestally using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Journal of Long-term Effects of Medical Implants 2017;27(1).
• 34. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (< 10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2011;38(7):667-676.
• 35. Misch CE, Steigenga J, Barboza E, Misch‐Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6‐year case series study. Journal of Periodontology 2006;77(8):1340-1347.
• 36. Morand M, Irinakis T. The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla: providing a rationale for the use of short implants. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2007;33(5):257-266.
• 37. Nunes M, Almeida RF, Felino AC, Malo P, Nobre MdA. The influence of crown-to-implant ratio on short implant marginal bone loss. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2016;31(5).
• 38. Meijer HJ, Boven C, Delli K, Raghoebar GM. Is there an effect of crown‐to‐implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2018;29:243-252.
• 39. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10‐year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown‐to‐implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2007;18(6):707-714.
• 40. Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown–implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant‐supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2009;20:67-72.
• 41. Anitua E, Piñas L, Orive G. Retrospective study of short and extra‐short implants placed in posterior regions: influence of crown‐to‐implant ratio on marginal bone loss. Clinical Implant Dentistry And Related Research. 2015;17(1):102-110.
• 42. Elnayef B, Monje A, Gargallo-Albiol J, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang H-L, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Vertical ridge augmentation in the atrophic mandible: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2017;32(2).