Beyazlatıcı Ağız Gargaralarının Farklı Yüzey İşlemi Uygulanmış Hibrit Seramik Materyalin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğüne Etkisi

Yıl 2023, , 112 - 118, 18.01.2023

Merve Özarslan , Dilber Bilgili Can

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1170280

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, üç farklı yüzey işlemi uygulanmış hibrit seramik materyalin yüzey pürüzlülüğüne farklı içerikteki üç beyazlatıcı gargaranın etkisini değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Hibrit seramik bloklardan (Vita Enamic-VE) 7x5x1 mm boyutlarında örnekler hazırlandı. Numunelerin yüzeyleri silisyum karbür kağıtlar ile standardize edildi. Örnekler rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı (n=24). Grup C: ekstra işlem yapılmadı, Grup L: VE teknik kit ve Grup G: glaze uygulandı. Örneklerin başlangıç yüzey pürüzlülük değerleri (Ra) profilometre ile ölçülüp kaydedildi. Tüm gruplar farklı içerikteki gargaralarda (hidrojen peroksit, hidrojen peroksit içermeyen ve aktif karbon içeren) bekletilmek üzere 3 alt gruba ayrıldı (n=8). 24 saat solüsyonda bekletilmesini takiben örneklerin Ra değerleri tekrar ölçüldü. Örneklerin başlangıç yüzey pürüzlülük değerleri Kruskal Wallis Testi ile incelendi. 24 saat bekletme sonrası son ölçüm değerlerinin karşılaştırılmasında İki Yönlü Varyans Analizi kullanıldı ve çoklu karşılaştırmalar Tukey HSD Testi ile yapıldı (p<0,05).
Bulgular: Başlangıç pürüzlülük değerlerinde diğer gruplara göre grup G istatistiksel olarak düşük değer göstermiştir (p<0,05). Pürüzlülük fark değerleri için grup G de hidrojen peroksit içerikli gargara grubunda diğerlerine göre anlamlı fark görülmüştür (p<0,05).
Sonuç: Hibrit seramik materyalin pürüzlülük değerleri yüzey bitirme işleminden etkilendi ve en düşük yüzey pürüzlülük değerleri glaze uygulanan grupta görüldü. Glaze uygulanan yüzeyler için alkol bazlı beyazlatıcı gargara tercih edilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hibrit Seramik, yüzey işlemi, yüzey pürüzlülüğü, beyazlatıcı gargara

Effect of Whitening Mouthwashes on the Surface Roughness of Different Surface Treated Hybrid Ceramic Material

Öz

Aim: Evaluate the effect of three whitening mouthwashes with different contents on the surface roughness of hybrid ceramic materials with three different surface treatments.
Material and Methods: The surfaces of the samples (7x5x1 mm) obtained from hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic-VE) were standardized with silicon carbide papers and randomly divided into 3 groups (n=24). Group C: no-extra process, Group L: VE technique kit, Group G: glaze was applied. The baseline surface roughness values (Ra) of the samples were measured with a profilometer. All groups were divided into 3 subgroups to be kept in mouthwashes with different contents (hydrogen peroxide (HP), hydrogen peroxide-free and activated carbon-containing) (n=8). After immersed in solutions for 24 hours, the samples' Ra were measured again. Recorded values were evaluated with Kruskal Wallis Test, Two-Way Analysis of Variance and Tukey HSD Test (p<0.05).
Results: Group G showed a statistically lower value in baseline values (p<0.05). For roughness difference values, significant difference was observed in the HP-containing mouthwash group in Group G compared to others (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The roughness values of the hybrid ceramic were affected by the surface finishing process. The lowest Ra were observed in the glazed group. An alcohol-based whitening mouthwash may be preferred for glazed surfaces.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Surface treatment, Surface roughness, Whitening mouthwash, Hybrid Ceramic

Kaynakça

• 1. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44-56.
• 2. Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Güth J-F. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;55:1-11.
• 3. Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent J. 2013;7:118.
• 4. Özarslan MM, Büyükkaplan UŞ, Barutcigil Ç, Arslan M, Türker N, Barutcigil K. Effects of different surface finishing procedures on the change in surface roughness and color of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network material. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(1):16-20.
• 5. Ruse N, Sadoun M. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014;93(12):1232-4.
• 6. Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, Gunal SK, Avunduk MC, Ozkan S. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(4):221-7.
• 7. Sagsoz O, Demirci T, Demirci G, Sagsoz NP, Yildiz M. The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(6):417-22.
• 8. Greenwall L. Bleaching techniques in restorative dentistry: An illustrated guide: CRC Press; 2001.
• 9. Brooks JK, Bashirelahi N, Hsia R-c, Reynolds MA. Charcoal-based mouthwashes: a literature review. Br Dent J. 2020;228(4):290-4.
• 10. SUBAŞI MG, DEMİR N, KARCI M, BOZKURT MG. Farkli geçici materyallerin farkli sivilarda kisa dönem bekletme sonrasi renk ve yüzey pürüzlülük değişiminin incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;29(3):448-54.
• 11. Lee JH, Kim SH, Yoon HI, Yeo ISL, Han JS. Colour stability and surface properties of high‐translucency restorative materials for digital dentistry after simulated oral rinsing. Eur J Oral Sci. 2020;128(2):170-80.
• 12. Hamza TA, Alameldin AA, Elkouedi AY, Wee AG. Effect of artificial accelerated aging on surface roughness and color stability of different ceramic restorations. Stomatological Disease and Science. 2017;1:8-13.
• 13. Volpato CÂM, Garbelotto L, Fredel MC, Bondioli F. Application of zirconia in dentistry: biological, mechanical and optical considerations. Advances in ceramics-electric and magnetic ceramics, bioceramics, ceramics and environment. 2011;25.
• 14. Haywood VB, Heymann H, Kusy R, Whitley J, Andreaus S. Polishing porcelain veneers: an SEM and specular reflectance analysis. Dent Mater. 1988;4(3):116-21.
• 15. Al-Wahadni A, Muir Martin D. Glazing and finishing dental porcelain: a literature review. J Can Dent Assoc. 1998;64:580-3.
• 16. Al Ben Ali A, Kang K, Finkelman MD, Zandparsa R, Hirayama H. The effect of variations in translucency and background on color differences in CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass ceramics. J Prosthodont. 2014;23(3):213-20.
• 17. ÇÖKÜK DN. TAM SERAMİK SİSTEMLERİNE UYGULANAN FARKLI POLİSAJ METOTLARININ YÜZEY PÜRÜZLÜLÜĞÜNE ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2009(2):98-104.
• 18. Sulik WD, Plekavich EJ. Surface finishing of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;46(2):217-21.
• 19. Harorlı OT, Barutcigil Ç. Color recovery effect of commercial mouth rinses on a discolored composite. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(4):256-63.
• 20. Tredwin C, Naik S, Lewis N, Scully C. Hydrogen peroxide tooth-whitening (bleaching) products: review of adverse effects and safety issues. Br Dent J. 2006;200(7):371-6.
• 21. Ntovas P, Masouras K, Lagouvardos P. Efficacy of non‐hydrogen peroxide mouthrinses on tooth whitening: An in vitro study. J Esthet Restor Dent.2021;33(7):1059-65.
• 22. Lima FG, Rotta TA, Penso S, Meireles SS, Demarco FF. In vitro evaluation of the whitening effect of mouth rinses containing hydrogen peroxide. Braz Oral Res. 2012;26:269-74.
• 23. Ghajari MF, Shamsaei M, Basandeh K, Galouyak MS. Abrasiveness and whitening effect of charcoal-containing whitening toothpastes in permanent teeth. Dent Res J. 2021;18.
• 24. El-Sherif NM, Fathelbab E. Effect of bleaching agents on color and surface roughness of hybrid resin ceramics. Dent J. 2018;64(945):951.
• 25. Yanikoglu N, Duymus ZY, Aydiner SF. Comparison of the Effects of Sugar-free Solutions, Cola, Mouthwash on the Surface Hardness and Roughness of Temporary Crown Materials. Materiale Plastice. 2021;58(4):197-209.
• 26. Zakir T, Dandekeri S, Suhaim KS, Shetty NH, Ragher M, Shetty SK. Influence of aerated drink, mouthwash, and simulated gastric acid on the surface roughness of dental ceramics: a comparative in vitro study. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences. 2020;12(Suppl 1):S480.
• 27. Gürgan S, Önen A, Köprülü H. In vitro effects of alcohol‐containing and alcohol‐free mouthrinses on microhardness of some restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24(3):244-6.
• 28. Polydorou O, Mönting JS, Hellwig E, Auschill TM. Effect of in-office tooth bleaching on the microhardness of six dental esthetic restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2007;23(2):153-8.
• 29. Gürdal P, Akdeniz BG, Hakan Sen B. The effects of mouthrinses on microhardness and colour stability of aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(9):895-901.
• 30. Bollenl CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13(4):258-69.