Rehabilitation of an Angled Implant with an Angled Multi-unit Abutment: A Case Report

Yıl 2023, , 287 - 292, 13.05.2023

Gözde Yalçın Çetin , Emre Tokar , Dilek Nalbant

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1186274

Öz

The aim of this case report was to describe the treatment options for angled implants for various reasons. Although implant treatment is current and successful treatment option, ideal placement may not always be possible due to anatomy. Implants are placed at an angle in cases where surgical techniques cannot be used
due to systemic disorders, economic and social reasons. In such cases; angled, custom, ti-base or multi-unit abutments are preferred for prosthetic treatment. In this case report, a diagnostic model was obtained after clinical and radiographic examination for the restoration of an inclined implant placed at mandibula. By evaluating the position of the implant and the occlusion, the restoration was completed with a 17° angled multi-unit abutment to produce a good gingival fit and a cleanable restoration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Angled abutment, aesthetic, implant, implant prosthesis, multi-unit abutment

Açılı Konumlandırılmış İmplantın Açılı Multi-unit Dayanak ile Rehabilitasyonu: Olgu Sunumu

Öz

Bu olgu sunumunun amacı çeşitli nedenlerle eğimli yerleştirilmiş implantların tedavi seçeneklerini gözden geçirmektir. İmplant tedavisi güncel ve başarılı bir tedavi seçeneği olmasına karşın anatomik engellemeler nedeniyle her zaman implantların okluzal düzleme dik yerleştirilmesi mümkün olmayabilir. Sistemik rahatsızlıklar, ekonomik veya sosyal nedenlerden dolayı ileri cerrahi tekniklerin kullanılamadığı durumlarda implantların açılı yerleştirilmesi gerekebilir. Açılı yerleştirilmiş implantların varlığında protetik tedavi için açılı, kişisel (custom), hibrit (ti-base) ya da multi-unit dayanak sistemleri tercih edilebilmektedir. Bu olgu sunumunda mandibula posterior bölgede eğimli yerleştirilmiş implantın restorasyonu için kliniğimize başvuran hastanın klinik ve radyografik muayenesi yapılmış ve tanı modeli elde edilmiştir. İmplantın arktaki konumu ve okluzyon değerlendirilerek, iyi bir diş eti uyumu ve temizlenebilir bir restorasyon üretebilmek için 17° açılı multi-unit dayanak ile restorasyon tamamlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Açılı dayanak, estetik, implant, implant üstü restorasyon, multi-unit restorasyon

Kaynakça

• Şen N, Ölçer Us Y. İmplant destekli sabit protetik restorasyonlar için dayanak seçimi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2019; 25:104-12.
• Gürpinar B, Yalçın Ülker G, Tak Ö. The Use of Angulated Screw Channel Abutment System for Anterior Single-Implant Restorations: A Clinical Report. Eur J Res Dent 2020;4:40-4.
• Misch CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. 1st ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. p. 1-8.
• Misch CE. Principles of Fixed Implant Prosthodontics: Cement-Retained Restorations. Misch CE, editor. Dental Implant Prosthetics. 2nd ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Mosby; 2015. p. 650-699.
• Bidra A, Rungruanganunt P. Clinical outcomes of implant abutments in the anterior region: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:159-76.
• Cavallaro Jr J, Greenstein G. Angled implant abutments: a practical application of available knowledge. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:150-8.
• Hirata K, Takahashi T, Tomita A, Gonda T, Maeda Y, Hirata K, et al. Influence of Abutment Angle on Implant Strain When Supporting a Distal Extension Removable Partial Dental Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:51-3.
• Janev EJ, Redzep E, Janeva N, Mindova S. Multi Unit Abutments Recommended in Prosthetic and Surgical Implantology Treatment (Case Report). J Morphol Sci 2020;3:65-72.
• Grossmann Y, Pasciuta M, Finger IM. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration. J Prost Dent 2006;95:258-61.
• Kelly JR, Rungruanganunt P. Fatigue Behavior of Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Ceramic Abutments as a Function of Design and Ceramics Processing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:601-9.
• Hirata K, Takahashi T, Tomita A, Gonda T, Maeda Y. The Influence of Loading Variables on Implant Strain When Supporting Distal-Extension Removable Prostheses: An In Vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:484-6.
• Quirynen M, Naert I, Van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and future success in the Brånemark® system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-11.
• Culp L, Wong N, Misch C. Digital Technology in Implant Dentistry, in Dental Implant Prosthetics. Misch CE, editor. 2nd edition ed: Mosby: St. Louis; 2015. p.700-23.
• Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P. The use of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: five-year clinical results of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:801-10.
• Balshi TJ, Ekfeldt A, Stenberg T, Vrielinck L. Three-year evaluation of Brånemark implants connected to angulated abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:52-8.
• Conejo J, Kobayashi T, Anadioti E, Blatz MB. Performance of CAD/CAM monolithic ceramic Implant-supported restorations bonded to titanium inserts: A systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10:139-46.
• Korkmaz IH, Kul E. Investigation of the Type of Angled Abutment for Anterior Maxillary Implants: A Finite Element Analysis. J Prosthodont 2021;126:664.e1-664.e9.
• Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prost Dent 1999;81:7-13.
• Gervais MJ, Hatzipanagiotis P, Wilson PR. Cross‐pinning: the philosophy of retrievability applied practically to fixed, implant‐supported prostheses. Aust Dent J 2008;53:74-82.
• Begg T, Geerts G, Gryzagoridis J. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:663-71.