Current Approaches in Gingival Retraction

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 1252 - 1258, 01.10.2012

Özlem Acar Selim Erkut

Öz

Gingival displacement is still one of the big challenges in clinical practice. Although conventional displacement cord method conserves its popularity, high percentages of gingival recession, recurrent bleeding, and patient discomfort cannot be ignored. Alternatively, the newly introduced cordless displacement system may offer advantages on periodontal health, bleeding after displacement system removal, patient comfort and time spent. This article aims to inform the reader about selecting the appropriate retraction method with respect to the clinical conditions, and also aims to emphasize that the patient comfort and periodontal health are as important as gingival displacement success

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gingival displacement technique, gingival recession, patient comfort

Dişeti Retraksiyonunda Güncel Yaklaşımlar

Öz

Dişeti retraksiyonu klinik uygulamada karşılaşılan güçlüklerden biri olmaya devam etmektedir. Geleneksel tekniklerle retraksiyon, sıklıkla tercih edilen bir yöntem olsa da, uygulamayı takiben gözlenen dişeti çekilmesi, kanama ve hasta rahatsızlığı göz ardı edilemeyen olumsuzluklardır. Alternatif olarak, yeni geliştirilen kordsuz retraksiyon yöntemleri periodontal sağlık, kanama, hasta konforu ve klinik zaman değerlendirildiğinde avantajlar getirebilmektedir. Bu derleme klinik koşullar doğrultusunda uygun retraksiyon yöntemi seçimi ile ilgili okuyucuya bilgi vermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bunun yanı sıra dişetini uzaklaştırmada sağlanan başarı kadar periodontal sağlığın korunmasının ve hasta konforunun sağlanmasının önemini de vurgulamaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dişeti retraksiyon teknikleri, dişeti çekilmesi, hasta rahatlığı

Kaynakça

• Shillinburg HT. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, 1997, 281.
• Nemetz H., Donovan T., Landesman H. Exposing the gingival margin: a systematic approach for the control of hemorrhage. J. Prosthet. Dent. 51: 647-651, 1984.
• Donovan TE., Chee WW. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent. Clin. North Am. 48: 445-470, 2004.
• Baharav H., Kupershmidt I., Laufer BZ., Cardash HS. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut. Int. J. Prosthodont. 17: 585-589, 2004. DB.
• Mechano-chemical gingival 5. Gilboe
• displacement. A review of the literature. J. Can.
• Dent. Assoc. 46: 513-517, 1980.
• Nemetz EH., Seibly W. The use of chemical agents in gingival retraction. Gen. Dent. 38: 104-108, 1990.
• Rosenstiel SF., Land MF., Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. St. Louis Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2004, 434-438.
• Thomas MS., Joseph RM., Parolia A. Nonsurgical gingival displacement in restorative dentistry. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 32: 26-34, 2011.
• Donovan TE., Chee WW. Current concepts in gingival displacement. Dent. Clin. North Am. 48: 433-444, 2004.
• Donovan TE., Gandara BK., Nemetz H. Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords. J. Prosthet. Dent. 53: 525-531, 1985.
• Feng J., Aboyoussef H., Weiner S., Singh S., Jandinski J. The effect of gingival retraction procedures on periodontal indices and crevicular fluid cytokine levels: A pilot study. J. Prosthodont. 15: 108-112, 2006.
• Ferrari M., Cagidiaco MC., Ercoli C. Tissue management with a new gingival retraction material: A preliminary clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent. 75: 242-247, 1996.
• Beier US., Kranewitter R., Dumfahrt H. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system-a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth. Int. J. Prosthodont. 22: 143-147, 2009.
• Al Hamad KQ., Azar WZ., Alwaeli HA., Said KN. A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health. J. Clin. Periodontol. 35: 1053-1058, 2008.
• Poss S. An innovative tissue-retraction material. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 23: 13-17, 2002.
• Bennani V., Aarts JM., He LH. A comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement techniques. J. Prosthet. Dent. 107: 388-392, 2012.
• Yang J-C., Tsai C-M., Chen M-S., Wei J-Y., Lee S-Y., Lin C-T. Clinical study of a newly developed injection-type gingival retraction material. Chin. Dent. J. 24: 147-151, 2005.
• Weir DJ., Williams BH. Clinical effectiveness of mechanical-chemical tissue displacement methods. J. Prosthet. Dent. 51: 326-329, 1984.
• Jokstad A. Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords. J. Prosthet. Dent. 81: 258-261, 1999.
• Kumbuloglu O., User A., Toksavul S., Boyacioglu H. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords. Quintessence Int. 38: 92-98, 2007.
• Johnson GH., Lepe X., Aw TC. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions. J. Prosthet. Dent. 90: 354-364, 2003.
• Shivasakthy M., Asharaf AS. Comparative study on the efficacy of gingival retraction using polyvinyl acetate strips and conventional retraction cord - an in vivo study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 7: 2368-2371, 2013.
• Beier US., Grunert I., Kulmer S., Dumfahrt H. Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients. Int. J. Prosthodont. 20: 270-274, 2007.
• O’Mahony A., Spencer P., Williams K., Corcoran J. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions. Quintessence Int. 31: 201-206, 2000.
• Bennani V., Schwass D., Chandler N. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 139: 1354- 1363, 2008.
• Lang NP., Corbet EF. Periodontal diagnosis in daily practice. Int. Dent. J. 45: 3-15, 1995.
• Ferrari M., Nathanson D. Tissue management and retraction technique combined with all- ceramic crowns: Case reports. Pract. Periodontics Aesthet. Dent. 7: 87-94, 1995.
• Phatale S., Marawar PP., Byakod G., Lagdive SB., Kalburge JV. Effect of retraction materials on gingival health: A histopathological study. J. Indian. Soc. Periodontol. 14: 35-39, 2010.