The availability of Bicon Short Implants in Posterior Region of the Jaws: A Retrospective Evaluation

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1076 - 1081, 01.04.2012

Nihat Akbulut Şebnem Kurşun Hilal Bayram Mehmet Ünlüsoy

Öz

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the overall success of Bicon short dental implants

Anahtar Kelimeler

Short implant, posterior region, inadequate alveolar crest

Mandibula Ve Maksilla Posterior Bölgede Bicon Kısa İmplantlarının Kullanılabilirliği: Retrospektif Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Bu retrospektif çalışmanın amacı, Bicon kısa

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kısa implant, Posteriyor bölge, Rezorbe kret

Kaynakça

• Andersson B., Odman P., Carlsson GE. A study of 184 consecutive patients referred for single tooth replacement. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 6: 232–237, 1995.
• Tepper G., Haas R., Zechner W., Krach W., Watzek G. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic pos- terior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 13: 657–665, 2002.
• Krekmanov L., Kahn M., Rangert B., Lindstrom H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary imp- lants for improved prosthesis support. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 15: 405–414, 2000.
• das Neves FD., Fones D., Bernardes SR., do Prado CJ., Neto AJ. Short implants- an analysis of longitudinal studies. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 21: 86–93, 2006.
• Menchero-Cantalejo E., Barona-Dorado C., Can- tero Alvarez M., Fernandez-Caliz F., Martinez- Gonzalez JM. Meta-analysis on the survival of short implants. Medicina oral, patologı´a oral y cirugı´a bucal. 16: e546–e551, 2011.
• Draenert FG., Sagheb K., Baumgardt K., Kämmerer PW. Retrospective analysis of survival rates and marginal bone loss on short implants in the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02266.x.
• Friberg B. The posterior maxilla: clinical consi- derations and current concepts using branemark system implants. Periodontol. 47: 67–78, 2008.
• Renouard F., Nisand D. Short implants in the se- verely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin. Implant Dent. Related Res.. 7: S104–S110, 2005.
• Adell R., Eriksson B., Lekholm U. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 5: 347, 1990
• Grant BT., Pancko FX., Kraut RA. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 67: 713-7, 2009.
• Misch CE., Steignga J., Barboza E., Misch-Dietsh F., Cianciola LJ., Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter ret- rospective 6-year case series study. J. Periodon- tol. 77: 1340–1347, 2006.
• Attard NJ., Zarb GA. Implant prosthodontic ma- nagement of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: The Toronto experience. J. Prost- het. Dent. 89: 352, 2003.
• Eckert SE., Meraw SJ., Weaver AL. Early expe- rience with Wide-Platform Mk II implants. Part I: Implant survival. Part II: Evaluation of risk factors involving implant survival. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 16: 208, 2001.
• Ivanoff CJ., Grondahl K., Sennerby L. Influence of variations in implant diameters: A 3- to 5-year ret- rospective clinical report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 14: 173, 1999.
• Shin SW., Bryant SR., Zarb GA. A retrospective study on the treatment outcome of wide-bodied implants. Int. J. Prosthodont. 17: 52, 2004.
• Anner R., Better H., Chaushu G. The clinical ef- fectiveness of 6 mm diameter implants. J. Perio- dontol. 76: 1013, 2005.
• Bischof M., Nedir R., Abi-Najm S. A five-year life-table analysis on wide neck ITI implants with prosthetic evaluation and radiographic analysis: Results from a private practice. Clin. Oral Imp- lants Res. 17: 512, 2006.
• Bornstein MM., Harnisch H., Lussi A. Clinical performance of wide-body implants with a sand- blasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: Results of a 3-year follow-up study in a referral clinic. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 22: 631, 2007.
• Anitua, E. & Orive, G. Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up. J. Periodontol. 81: 819–826, 2010.
• Felice P., Pellegrino G., Checchi L., Pistilli R., Espo- sito M. Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7-mm-long implants in posterior mandibles: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 21: 1394–1403, 2010.
• Goene R., Bianchesi C., Huerzeler M., Del Lupo R., Testori T., Davarpanah M., Jalbout Z. Perfor- mance of short implants in partial restorations: 3-year follow-up of osseotite implants. Implant Dent. 14: 274–280, 2005.
• Lai HC., Si MS., Zhuang LF., Shen H., Liu YL., Wismeijer D. Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior re- gion: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years. Clin. Oral Implants Res. doi: 10.1111/j.1600- 0501.2012.02452.x.
• Renouard F., Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin. Oral Imp- lants Res. 17: 35–51, 2006.
• Nedir R., Bishof M., Briaux JM., Beyer S., Szmukler-Moncler S., Bernard JP. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI imp- lants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 15: 150–157, 2004.